Skip to content

Exploratory Phase II Study of INC424 Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post Polycythaemia Myelofibrosis (PPV MF) or Post Essential Thrombocythaemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF)

A UK Open-label, Multicentre, Exploratory Phase II Study of INC424 for Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post Polycythaemia Myelofibrosis (PPV MF) or Post Essential Thrombocythaemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01558739
Acronym
MACS2030
Enrollment
48
Registered
2012-03-20
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2015-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Essential Thrombocythaemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF), Post Polycythaemia Myelofibrosis (PPV MF), Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF)

Keywords

Ruxolitinib, INC424, myelofibrosis, PMF, post polycythemia myelofibrosis, PPV MF, post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, PET-MF, Primary Myelofibrosis, Polycythemia, Thrombocythemia, Essential Thrombocytosis, myeloproliferative Disorders, Bone Marrow Diseases, Haematologic Diseases, Blood Coagulation Disorders, Blood Platelet Disorders, Haemorrhagic Disorders

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of INC424 in patients with PMF, PPV MF, or PET-MF using a composite measure of either an objective endpoint (\> 50% reduction in splenomegaly using palpitation at 48 weeks) and/or a subjective endpoint (\>50% reduction in total symptom score at 48 weeks).

Interventions

DRUGINC424

Ruxolitinib was provided in 5 mg tablets, packaged in bottles. 15 - 20 mg (dose based on Baseline platelet count) twice daily.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must not be eligible for another ongoing INC424 clinical trial. * Patients must be diagnosed with PMF, PPV MF or PET-MF, according to the 2008 revised World Health Organization criteria irrespective of JAK2 mutation status. * Patients with PMF requiring therapy must be classified as high risk (3 prognostic factors) OR intermediate risk level 2 (2 prognostic factors, no more), OR intermediate risk level 1 (1 prognostic factor, no more) with an enlarged spleen. The prognostic factors, defined by the International Working Group are: 1. Age \> 65 years; 2. Presence of constitutional symptoms (weight loss, fever, night sweats); marked anemia (Hgb \< 10g/dL)\*; 3. Leukocytosis (history of WBC \> 25 x109/L); 4. Circulating blasts \> 1%. • A hemoglobin value \< 10 g/dL must be demonstrated during the Screening Visit for patients who are not transfusion dependent. Patients receiving regular transfusions of packed red blood cells will be considered to have hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL for the purpose of evaluation of risk factors. * Patients with Intermediate-1 disease and splenomegaly must have a palpable spleen measuring 5 cm or greater from the costal margin to the point of greatest splenic protrusion. * Patients must have a peripheral blood blast count of \< 10%. * Patients with adequate liver function defined as direct bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN and ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN. * Patients with adequate renal function defined as serum creatinine ≤ 2 x ULN. * Patients with an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2 (Appendix 5).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (suitable candidate and a suitable donor is available). * Patients with history of malignancy in past 3 years except for treated, early-stage squamous or basal cell carcinoma in situ. * Patients undergoing treatment with hematopoietic growth factor receptor agonists (i.e., erythropoietin \[Epo\], granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF \[Neupogen; Neulasta\], romiplostim, eltrombopag) at any time within 2 weeks prior to Screening or 4 weeks prior to Baseline. * Impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of oral INC424 (e.g., ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, small bowel resection). * Patients with cardiac disease which in the Investigator's opinion may jeopardize the safety of the patient or the compliance with the protocol. * Patients with clinically significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic or viral infection which require therapy. Patients with acute bacterial infections requiring antibiotic use should delay screening/enrollment until the course of antibiotic therapy has been completed. * Patients with known active hepatitis A, B, C or who are HIV-positive. * Patients with inadequate bone marrow reserve as demonstrated by: 1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) that is ≤ 1000/µL. 2. Platelet count that is \< 100,000/µL without the assistance of growth factors, thrombopoietic factors or platelet transfusions. * Patients with any history of platelet counts \< 50,000/µL or ANC \< 500/µL except during treatment for a myeloproliferative disorder or treatment with cytotoxic therapy for any other reason. * Patients with coagulation parameters (PT, PTT, INR) ≥ 1.5. * Patients with known hypersensitivity to INC424 or other JAK1/2 inhibitors, or to their excipients. * Patients under ongoing treatment with another investigational medication or having been treated with an investigational medication within 30 days of screening. * Patients with any concurrent condition that, in the Investigator's opinion would jeopardize the safety of the patient or compliance with the protocol. Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success48 WeeksTreatment success was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in palpable spleen length versus baseline at 48 weeks and/or a 50% or greater improvement in total symptom score (derived from the MF symptom assessment form (MFSAF) questionnaire) versus baseline at the week 48 time point. The MFSAF assesses the following symptoms (all scored from absent (0) to worst imaginable (10)): general fatigue, abdominal pain (and discomfort), inactivity (ability to move and walk around), cough, night sweats, itching (pruritus), bone pain (diffuse not joint pain or arthritis), fever, change in appetite/unintentional weight loss (or gain) in past 6 months, overall quality of life (QoL).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptoms Assessment Form (MF-SAF)Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 48The MF-SAF consists of seven questions about key symptoms and impact of MF. Questions are scored on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. Questions 1-6, which together comprise a Total Symptom Score (TSS), investigate the following symptoms: night sweats, pruritus/itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under the ribs, early satiety and bone/muscle pain. Question 7 asks patients to report levels of inactivity. The TSS reflects the sum of the scores of these symptoms excluding inactivity, with the maximum possible score being 60 (most severe symptom experienced).
Change From Baseline in EQ5D Preference Index (5 Level EuroQol Questionnaire Determining Quality of Life) From BaselineBaseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 48The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatment. It consists of a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The EQ-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS where the endpoints are labeled 'best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ-5D health state was converted to a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches a weight to each of the levels in each dimension. The final EQ5D preference index scores range from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating better health.
Number of Hospitalizationsweek 12, week 24, week 26, week 48Medical resource utilization (MRU) was assessed according to the number of hospitalizations.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Responseweek 48Response to treatment and disease progression was assessed by physical examination, specifically assessing changes in spleen size by palpation. Disease response and progression was evaluated using the International Working Group for myelofibrosis Research and Treatment Response Criteria.
Number of Accident & Emergency Visits From Baselinebaseline to week 12, week 12 to week 24, week 24 to week 36, week 36 to week 48MRU was assessed according to the number of accidents and emergency room visits.
Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care Visitsbaseline to week 12, week 12 to, week 24, week 24 to week 36, week 36 to week 48MRU was assessed according to the number of GP, specialists', and urgent care visits.
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency Statusbaseline (BL), end of treatment (up to 28 days post last treatment) (EOT)Transfusion dependency status from baseline through the end of study was assessed. New onset of transfusion dependency was defined as the use of 2 or more units of red blood cell products during the 8 weeks prior to a study visit. New onset of transfusion independency was defined as the use of 0 or 1 unit of red blood cell products during the 8 weeks prior to a study visit.
Duration of Hospitalizationsweek 48MRU was assessed according to the mean duration of hospitalization visits.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

54 patients were screened. 48 patients were enrolled as planned.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
INC424
Patients diagnosed with PMF, PPV MF, or PET-MF were treated with oral INC424 at a dose of 15 - 20 mg (dose based on Baseline platelet count) twice daily.
48
Total48

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event7
Overall StudyDeath3
Overall StudyDisease Progression4
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicINC424
Age, Continuous69.12 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.419
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
47 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success

Treatment success was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in palpable spleen length versus baseline at 48 weeks and/or a 50% or greater improvement in total symptom score (derived from the MF symptom assessment form (MFSAF) questionnaire) versus baseline at the week 48 time point. The MFSAF assesses the following symptoms (all scored from absent (0) to worst imaginable (10)): general fatigue, abdominal pain (and discomfort), inactivity (ability to move and walk around), cough, night sweats, itching (pruritus), bone pain (diffuse not joint pain or arthritis), fever, change in appetite/unintentional weight loss (or gain) in past 6 months, overall quality of life (QoL).

Time frame: 48 Weeks

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
INC424Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success50 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EQ5D Preference Index (5 Level EuroQol Questionnaire Determining Quality of Life) From Baseline

The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used for measuring health outcomes in a wide range of health conditions and treatment. It consists of a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The EQ-VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS where the endpoints are labeled 'best imaginable health state' and 'worst imaginable health state'. The EQ-5D health state was converted to a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches a weight to each of the levels in each dimension. The final EQ5D preference index scores range from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating better health.

Time frame: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 48

Population: Only participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had evaluable measurements at both baseline and the post-baseline week time point, was included in the analysis for that time point. The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
INC424Change From Baseline in EQ5D Preference Index (5 Level EuroQol Questionnaire Determining Quality of Life) From Baselineweek 4 (n=40)0.06 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.173
INC424Change From Baseline in EQ5D Preference Index (5 Level EuroQol Questionnaire Determining Quality of Life) From Baselineweek 12 (n=38)0.05 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.178
INC424Change From Baseline in EQ5D Preference Index (5 Level EuroQol Questionnaire Determining Quality of Life) From Baselineweek 24 (n=34)0.05 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.231
INC424Change From Baseline in EQ5D Preference Index (5 Level EuroQol Questionnaire Determining Quality of Life) From Baselineweek 48 (n=29)0.03 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.222
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptoms Assessment Form (MF-SAF)

The MF-SAF consists of seven questions about key symptoms and impact of MF. Questions are scored on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and greater inactivity. Questions 1-6, which together comprise a Total Symptom Score (TSS), investigate the following symptoms: night sweats, pruritus/itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under the ribs, early satiety and bone/muscle pain. Question 7 asks patients to report levels of inactivity. The TSS reflects the sum of the scores of these symptoms excluding inactivity, with the maximum possible score being 60 (most severe symptom experienced).

Time frame: Baseline, week 4, week 12, week 24, week 48

Population: Only participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had evaluable measurements at both baseline and the post-baseline week time point, was included in the analysis for that time point. The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
INC424Change From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptoms Assessment Form (MF-SAF)Week 4 (n=37)-8.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.638
INC424Change From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptoms Assessment Form (MF-SAF)Week 12 (n=35)-8.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.871
INC424Change From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptoms Assessment Form (MF-SAF)Week 24 (n=30)-9.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.95
INC424Change From Baseline in Myelofibrosis Symptoms Assessment Form (MF-SAF)Week 48 (n=18)-7.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.966
Secondary

Duration of Hospitalizations

MRU was assessed according to the mean duration of hospitalization visits.

Time frame: week 48

Population: Participants from the full analysis set, who were hospitalized between baseline and week 48, were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
INC424Duration of Hospitalizations9.00 daysStandard Deviation 5.852
Secondary

Number of Accident & Emergency Visits From Baseline

MRU was assessed according to the number of accidents and emergency room visits.

Time frame: baseline to week 12, week 12 to week 24, week 24 to week 36, week 36 to week 48

Population: Only participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had evaluable measurements at each timeframe, e.g. from baseline to week 12, were included in the analysis for that timeframe. The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
INC424Number of Accident & Emergency Visits From Baselinebaseline to week 12 (n=48)0.00 Number of visitsFull Range 0.412
INC424Number of Accident & Emergency Visits From Baselineweek 12 to week 24 (n=39)0.00 Number of visitsFull Range 0.16
INC424Number of Accident & Emergency Visits From Baselineweek 24 to week 36 (n=33)0.00 Number of visitsFull Range 0.415
INC424Number of Accident & Emergency Visits From Baselineweek 36 to week 48 (n=33)0.00 Number of visitsFull Range 0.242
Secondary

Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care Visits

MRU was assessed according to the number of GP, specialists', and urgent care visits.

Time frame: baseline to week 12, week 12 to, week 24, week 24 to week 36, week 36 to week 48

Population: Only participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had evaluable measurements at each timeframe, e.g. from baseline to week 12, were included in the analysis for that timeframe. The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsGP visits, baseline to week 12 (n=45)0.0 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsGP visits, week 12 to week 24 (n=36)0.0 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsGP visits, week 24 to week 36 (n=33)0.0 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsGP visits, week 36 to week 48 (n=33)0.0 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsSpecialists visits, baseline to week 12 (n=47)0.00 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsSpecialists visits, week 12 to week 24 (n=36)0.00 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsSpecialists visits, week 24 to week 36 (n=33)0.00 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsSpecialists visits, week 36 to week 48 (n=33)0.00 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsUrgent care visits, baseline to week 12 (n=48)0.00 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsUrgent care visits, week 12 to week 24 (n=39)0.00 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsUrgent care visits, week 24 to week 36 (n=33)0.00 number of visits
INC424Number of General Practitioner (GP), Specialists' and Urgent Care VisitsUrgent care visits, week 36 to week 48 (n=33)0.00 number of visits
Secondary

Number of Hospitalizations

Medical resource utilization (MRU) was assessed according to the number of hospitalizations.

Time frame: week 12, week 24, week 26, week 48

Population: Only participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had evaluable measurements at the post-baseline week time point, were included in the analysis for that time point. The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
INC424Number of Hospitalizationsweek 12 (n=48)0.10 number of hospitalizationsStandard Deviation 0.371
INC424Number of Hospitalizationsweek 24 (n=40)0.03 number of hospitalizationsStandard Deviation 0.158
INC424Number of Hospitalizationsweek 36 (n=37)0.05 number of hospitalizationsStandard Deviation 0.229
INC424Number of Hospitalizationsweek 48 (n=35)0.09 number of hospitalizationsStandard Deviation 0.284
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response

Response to treatment and disease progression was assessed by physical examination, specifically assessing changes in spleen size by palpation. Disease response and progression was evaluated using the International Working Group for myelofibrosis Research and Treatment Response Criteria.

Time frame: week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
INC424Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseClinical improvement6.3 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseComplete response6.3 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponsePartial response39.6 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Best Overall ResponseStable disease47.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency Status

Transfusion dependency status from baseline through the end of study was assessed. New onset of transfusion dependency was defined as the use of 2 or more units of red blood cell products during the 8 weeks prior to a study visit. New onset of transfusion independency was defined as the use of 0 or 1 unit of red blood cell products during the 8 weeks prior to a study visit.

Time frame: baseline (BL), end of treatment (up to 28 days post last treatment) (EOT)

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): The FAS included all participants who received at least one administration of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom independency at BL to independency at EOT0.0 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom dependency at BL to independency at EOT2.1 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom missing at BL to independency at EOT0.0 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom independency at BL to dependency at EOT0.0 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom dependency at BL to dependency at EOT10.4 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom missing at BL to dependency at EOT35.4 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom independency at BL to missing at EOT0.0 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom dependency at BL to missing at EOT0.0 Percentage of participants
INC424Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency StatusFrom missing at BL to missing at EOT52.1 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026