Skip to content

Online Study of Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Making

A Comparison of the Effect of a Conjoint Analysis Based Values Clarification Exercise, Rating and Ranking Exercise, and Balance Sheet for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Making

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01558583
Acronym
CARR2
Enrollment
1831
Registered
2012-03-20
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2017-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Colon, Prostate, Cancer

Brief summary

Participants will be recruited from the United States and Australia to take an online survey about colon cancer screening or prostate cancer screening. Individuals selected for both the prostate cancer survey and the colon cancer study will be randomized to take one of three survey types - balance sheet, rating and ranking or conjoint analysis. These surveys will help participants clarify their values and opinions about screening options for colon cancer or prostate cancer. Participants' responses to the online survey are measured at one point in time - the time at which the participant takes the survey.

Detailed description

This study will compare effect of a conjoint analysis based values clarification exercise, ranking and rating, and a balance sheet on screening test preferences for colorectal cancer screening and prostate cancer screening using online surveys. Recruitment will be conducted through Survey Sampling International (SSI), an online survey research firm. Participants will be randomized to one of three arms to take online surveys. Patients will complete either a conjoint analysis task, in which they will be asked to make a series of choices between hypothetical screening testing strategies with different attributes; a rating and ranking task for these same attributes; or they will make a choice after viewing a balance sheet of attributes.

Interventions

OTHERRating and Ranking Task

Individuals who are randomized to the rating and raking arm will be asked to complete an informational task in a rating and ranking format. The task will help individuals clarify their opinions and preferences regarding colon cancer and prostate cancer screening.

OTHERDiscrete Choice Task

Individuals who are randomized to the rating and raking arm will be asked to complete an informational task in a discrete choice format. The task will help individuals clarify their opinions and preferences regarding colon cancer and prostate cancer screening.

OTHERBalance Sheet Task

Individuals who are randomized to the rating and raking arm will be asked to complete an informational task in a balance sheet format. The task will help individuals clarify their opinions and preferences regarding colon cancer and prostate cancer screening.

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Colorectal cancer * men and women, ages 50-75, who can speak and read English. * Prostate cancer screening * men, ages 50-75, who can speak and read English.

Exclusion criteria

* Colorectal Cancer * individuals with a previous personal or family history of colon cancer, personal history of polyps, or inflammatory bowel disease will be excluded. * Prostate cancer * individuals with a previous personal or family history of prostate cancer will be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant-reported most important attribute from survey1 dayThe single most important colon cancer or prostate cancer screening attribute indicated by the participant surveys. Each participant will be randomly assigned to take one of three survey versions: either (1) a conjoint analysis task wherein they will be asked to make a series of choices between hypothetical screening testing strategies with different attributes; (2) a rating and ranking task for these same attributes; or (3) they will make a choice after viewing a balance sheet of attributes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant-reported intent to undergo screening from survey1 daythe number of participants who state they plan to be screened for condition
Unlabeled screening test options1 daychoice on a single question among unlabeled screening test options

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026