Skip to content

A Study of LY2189265 in Japanese Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 3 Study of LY2189265 Monotherapy Compared to Placebo and Liraglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01558271
Enrollment
492
Registered
2012-03-20
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2015-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

GLP-1

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to examine the efficacy and safety of once-weekly LY2189265 in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not taking oral antidiabetic medication.

Detailed description

Rescue therapy (defined as alternative antihyperglycemic medication use or dose modification of oral antihyperglycemic medication \[OAM\]) may have been initiated during the planned treatment period if the participant discontinued study drug or met prespecified thresholds for severe, persistent hyperglycemia. Efficacy data, as well as data for hypoglycemic episodes from participants who permanently discontinued study treatment but switched to another diabetes medication and remained in the study, were censored from the point of initiating new treatment onwards.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo
DRUGLiraglutide

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who have had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus before screening. * Participants who have been Oral Antihyperglycemic Medication (OAM)-naïve (diet and exercise only) or been taking OAM monotherapy except for thiazolidinedione (TZD) and are willing to discontinue this medication. Participants taking OAM monotherapy must complete 8-week washout period prior to randomization. * Participants who are OAM naïve with a screening glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value of 7.0% to 10.0% and randomization HbA1c value of 7.0% to 10.0%, or who are taking OAM monotherapy with screening HbA1c value of 6.5% to 9.0% and randomization HbA1c value of 7.0% to 10.0%. * Participants who have a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m\^2) to 35.0 kg/m\^2.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who have a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. * Participants who have previously been treated with any other glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog. * Participants who have been receiving more than half of the maximum dose of sulfonylureas at screening. * Participants who have been currently taking insulin or TZD, or have had previous insulin or TZD treatment within 3 months before screening. * Participants who have obvious clinical signs or symptoms of pancreatitis, a history of chronic pancreatitis or acute pancreatitis at screening, as determined by the investigator. Participants who have a serum amylase concentration ≥3 times the upper limit of the reference range and/or a serum lipase concentration ≥2 times the upper limit of the reference range, as determined by the central laboratory at screening. * Participants who have self or family history of medullary C-cell hyperplasia, focal hyperplasia, or medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 26 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeksLeast squares (LS) means were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (oral antihyperglycemic medication \[OAM\] yes/no), baseline body mass index (BMI) group (\<25 or \>=25 kilograms per meter squared \[kg/m\^2\]) as fixed effects, baseline HbA1c as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%Up to 26 and 52 weeksThe percentage of participants achieving HbA1c level less than 7.0% and less than or equal to 6.5% at Week 26 and Week 52 was analyzed with a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no) and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2).
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksLS means were calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects, baseline FBG as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.
Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksParticipants were to test and record SMBG concentrations in their study diaries before each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), approximately 2 hours after the start of each meal, and at bedtime. LS means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline SMBG as a covariate.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksLS means were calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects, baseline body weight as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.
Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksHOMA 2 quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population was set at 100%. Change in insulin sensitivity was assessed based on change from baseline of HOMA2-%S using fasting insulin (FI) and fasting C-peptide (FCP). LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline HOMA2-%S as a covariate.
Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksHOMA 2 quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady state beta-cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population was set at 100%. Change in beta-cell function was assessed based on change from baseline of HOMA2-%B using fasting insulin (FI) and fasting C-peptide (FCP). LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline HOMA2-%B as a covariate.
Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic EpisodesBaseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeksThe percentage of participants with hypoglycemic episodes was calculated by dividing the number of participants with at least one hypoglycemic episode over the 26-week or 52-week treatment period by the total number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100%. All classifications of hypoglycemia (documented symptomatic, asymptomatic, severe, nocturnal, non-nocturnal, probable symptomatic, relative, and unspecified) were included, except for episodes of relative hypoglycemia that were not severe. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
30-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic EpisodesBaseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeksThe 30-day total hypoglycemia rate over 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment is summarized. All classifications of hypoglycemia (documented symptomatic, asymptomatic, severe, nocturnal, non-nocturnal, probable symptomatic, relative, and unspecified) were included, except for episodes of relative hypoglycemia that were not severe. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 52 WeeksBaseline, 52 weeksLS means were calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects, baseline HbA1c as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksSitting pulse rate was measured. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline pulse rate as a covariate.
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksSitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline blood pressure as a covariate.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeksEvents of pancreatitis (including suspected pancreatitis and severe or serious abdominal pain) were adjudicated by a committee of expert physicians external to the Sponsor. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
Change From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksPancreatic enzyme (lipase and total amylase) concentrations were measured.
Change From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeksA participant was considered to have treatment-emergent LY2189265 ADAs if the participant had at least 1 titer that was treatment-emergent relative to baseline, defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from the baseline measurement.
Number of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeksAdditional intervention was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. The number of participants requiring additional intervention due to hyperglycemia is summarized cumulatively at 26 and 52 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeksFridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval are summarized. The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTcF = QT/RR\^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect and the baseline ECG parameter as the covariate.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBaseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeksDeaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events were adjudicated by a committee of physicians with cardiology expertise external to the Sponsor. The nonfatal cardiovascular events subjected to adjudication included myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions (such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), and cerebrovascular events including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LY2189265
Once-weekly SC injection of 0.75 mg of LY2189265 for 26 weeks of blinded therapy, followed by once-weekly SC injection of 0.75 mg LY2189265 for an additional 26 weeks of open therapy.
280
Placebo/LY2189265
Once-weekly SC injection of placebo for 26 weeks of blinded therapy, followed by once-weekly SC injection of 0.75 mg LY2189265 for an additional 26 weeks of open therapy.
70
Liraglutide
Once-daily SC injection of 0.3 mg of Liraglutide for the first week, followed by 0.6 mg of Liraglutide for the second week, and then 0.9 mg of Liraglutide for the remaining 50 weeks of open therapy.
137
Total487

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event634
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision021
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10612

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLY2189265Placebo/LY2189265LiraglutideTotal
Age, Continuous57.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57
57.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.34
57.91 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.93
57.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.63
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
280 participants70 participants137 participants487 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
280 participants70 participants137 participants487 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants15 Participants24 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
228 Participants55 Participants113 Participants396 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
182 / 28053 / 7094 / 137
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 2805 / 707 / 137

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 26 Weeks

Least squares (LS) means were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (oral antihyperglycemic medication \[OAM\] yes/no), baseline body mass index (BMI) group (\<25 or \>=25 kilograms per meter squared \[kg/m\^2\]) as fixed effects, baseline HbA1c as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable HbA1c data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 26 Weeks-1.43 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 26 Weeks0.14 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.1
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 26 Weeks-1.33 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.07
Comparison: Approximately 490 participants were to be randomized in a 4:1:2 ratio to LY2189265, placebo, or Liraglutide, respectively. This sample size would provide greater than 99% power to demonstrate superiority of LY2189265 to placebo. This computation assumed a true mean difference in HbA1c change from baseline between LY2189265 and placebo being 0.8%, a common standard deviation of 1.1%, a 1-sided significance level of 0.025, and a 9% drop-out rate between randomization and Week 26.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.79, -1.35]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Approximately 490 participants were to be randomized in a 4:1:2 ratio to LY2189265, placebo, or Liraglutide, respectively. This sample size would provide \>90% power to confirm non-inferiority of LY2189265 to liraglutide by a margin of 0.4%. This computation assumed a true mean difference in HbA1c change from baseline between LY2189265 and Liraglutide being 0%, a common standard deviation of 1.1%, a 1-sided significance level of 0.025, and a 9% drop-out rate between randomization and Week 26.p-value: 0.24895% CI: [-0.27, 0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

30-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes

The 30-day total hypoglycemia rate over 26 weeks and 52 weeks of treatment is summarized. All classifications of hypoglycemia (documented symptomatic, asymptomatic, severe, nocturnal, non-nocturnal, probable symptomatic, relative, and unspecified) were included, except for episodes of relative hypoglycemia that were not severe. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Baseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication. One participant in the Liraglutide reporting group received study drug but discontinued from the study on the same day and, therefore, was not included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LY218926530-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes52 weeks0.00 events per participant per 30 daysStandard Deviation 0.02
LY218926530-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes26 weeks0.01 events per participant per 30 daysStandard Deviation 0.04
Placebo30-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes26 weeks0.00 events per participant per 30 daysStandard Deviation 0.02
Placebo30-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes52 weeks0.01 events per participant per 30 daysStandard Deviation 0.09
Liraglutide30-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes26 weeks0.00 events per participant per 30 daysStandard Deviation 0.02
Liraglutide30-Day Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes52 weeks0.01 events per participant per 30 daysStandard Deviation 0.04
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Participants were to test and record SMBG concentrations in their study diaries before each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), approximately 2 hours after the start of each meal, and at bedtime. LS means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline SMBG as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable SMBG data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. Missing endpoints were imputed with the LOCF method, using only postbaseline data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-morning meal, 52 weeks-66.96 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.87
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-midday meal, 52 weeks-47.03 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.86
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-evening meal, 52 weeks-55.01 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.58
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-midday meal, 52 weeks-68.21 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.74
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-morning meal, 26 weeks-39.65 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.55
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-evening meal, 52 weeks-41.04 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.08
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBedtime, 52 weeks-55.76 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.39
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-evening meal, 26 weeks-39.64 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.15
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-morning meal, 26 weeks-69.64 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.8
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBedtime, 26 weeks-53.39 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.81
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-midday meal, 26 weeks-48.47 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.05
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-evening meal-56.70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.83
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-morning meal, 52 weeks-37.46 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.58
LY2189265Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-midday meal, 26 weeks-67.57 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-evening meal0.93 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 5.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-morning meal, 26 weeks-9.29 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 5.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-midday meal, 52 weeks-45.15 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-midday meal, 26 weeks-1.50 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 5.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-morning meal, 52 weeks-65.91 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 5.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-midday meal, 52 weeks-58.52 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 5.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-midday meal, 26 weeks3.91 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-evening meal, 26 weeks9.25 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-evening meal, 52 weeks-36.13 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-evening meal, 52 weeks-55.26 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 5.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-morning meal, 26 weeks-0.15 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBedtime, 26 weeks4.26 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 5.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBedtime, 52 weeks-51.19 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-morning meal, 52 weeks-30.12 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.1
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBedtime, 52 weeks-49.10 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.35
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-midday meal, 26 weeks-66.71 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.16
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksBedtime, 26 weeks-51.07 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.94
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-evening meal, 52 weeks-32.86 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.67
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-morning meal, 26 weeks-34.93 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.19
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-morning meal, 26 weeks-61.67 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.96
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-evening meal, 26 weeks-36.62 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.05
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-evening meal-53.14 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.01
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-morning meal, 52 weeks-33.41 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.23
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-morning meal, 52 weeks-60.69 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.06
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-midday meal, 52 weeks-46.25 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.63
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-midday meal, 52 weeks-62.57 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.88
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks2 hours post-evening meal, 52 weeks-42.30 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.65
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPre-midday meal, 26 weeks-45.08 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

HOMA 2 quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady state beta-cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population was set at 100%. Change in beta-cell function was assessed based on change from baseline of HOMA2-%B using fasting insulin (FI) and fasting C-peptide (FCP). LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline HOMA2-%B as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable HOMA2-%B data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. Missing endpoints were imputed with the LOCF method, using only postbaseline data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FI, 52 weeks (n=260, 60, 120)27.81 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.39
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHHOMA2-%B based on FI, 26 weeks (n=254, 57, 115)28.42 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.54
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FCP, 26 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)27.77 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.27
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FCP, 52 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)29.59 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FCP, 52 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)NA percentage of HOMA2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FCP, 26 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)2.94 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 2.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FI, 52 weeks (n=260, 60, 120)NA percentage of HOMA2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHHOMA2-%B based on FI, 26 weeks (n=254, 57, 115)0.08 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 3.14
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FCP, 26 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)25.86 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.79
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FI, 52 weeks (n=260, 60, 120)25.89 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.99
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%B based on FCP, 52 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)28.85 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.93
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHHOMA2-%B based on FI, 26 weeks (n=254, 57, 115)25.35 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 2.23
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [21.63, 35.07]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.24295% CI: [-2.09, 8.24]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [19.25, 30.4]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.37695% CI: [-2.32, 6.13]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.41795% CI: [-2.72, 6.54]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.75395% CI: [-3.83, 5.29]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline blood pressure as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable blood pressure data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. LOCF was used to impute missing postbaseline values. If there were no data after the date of randomization, the endpoint was considered missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksDBP, 52 weeks1.41 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.41
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksDBP, 26 weeks1.09 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.39
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksSBP, 26 weeks0.62 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.62
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksSBP, 52 weeks1.32 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksDBP, 52 weeks1.16 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksSBP, 52 weeks0.37 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 1.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksDBP, 26 weeks0.29 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksSBP, 26 weeks0.53 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 1.25
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksSBP, 52 weeks-1.86 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.95
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksDBP, 26 weeks0.43 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.56
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksSBP, 26 weeks-2.10 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.89
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksDBP, 52 weeks1.17 milliliters of mercury (mmHG)Standard Error 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects, baseline body weight as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable body weight data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks-0.02 kilograms (kg)Standard Error 0.14
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks-0.17 kilograms (kg)Standard Error 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks-0.63 kilograms (kg)Standard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks-1.03 kilograms (kg)Standard Error 0.37
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks-0.36 kilograms (kg)Standard Error 0.2
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Body Weight at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks-0.13 kilograms (kg)Standard Error 0.26
p-value: 0.05795% CI: [-0.02, 1.23]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.16895% CI: [-0.14, 0.82]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.91195% CI: [-0.64, 0.57]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval are summarized. The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTcF = QT/RR\^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect and the baseline ECG parameter as the covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable ECG data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. LOCF was used to impute missing postbaseline values. If there were no data after the date of randomization, the endpoint was considered missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksQTcF, 26 weeks (n=273, 64, 128)-2.02 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 0.7
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksQTcF, 52 weeks (n=274, 64, 128)-2.76 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 0.68
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPR, 26 weeks (n=269, 65, 126)2.20 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 0.6
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPR, 52 weeks (n=270, 65, 126)2.81 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 0.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPR, 52 weeks (n=270, 65, 126)2.60 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 1.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksQTcF, 26 weeks (n=273, 64, 128)-0.96 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 1.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPR, 26 weeks (n=269, 65, 126)-0.45 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 1.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksQTcF, 52 weeks (n=274, 64, 128)-0.80 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 1.41
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPR, 52 weeks (n=270, 65, 126)3.71 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 1.03
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksQTcF, 52 weeks (n=274, 64, 128)-4.35 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 1
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksPR, 26 weeks (n=269, 65, 126)2.07 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 0.88
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Electrocardiogram Parameters at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksQTcF, 26 weeks (n=273, 64, 128)-1.89 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 1.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects, baseline FBG as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable FBG data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks-39.18 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.6
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks-38.93 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks1.03 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks-40.93 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.62
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks-37.15 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.47
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks-39.75 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.27
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-47.31, -33.11]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.83595% CI: [-4.82, 5.96]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.55395% CI: [-7.65, 4.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 52 Weeks

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis with treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects, baseline HbA1c as a covariate, and participant as a random effect.

Time frame: Baseline, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable HbA1c data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 52 Weeks-1.39 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 52 Weeks-1.55 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.12
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 52 Weeks-1.19 percentage of HbA1cStandard Error 0.08
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-0.39, -0.01]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

HOMA 2 quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population was set at 100%. Change in insulin sensitivity was assessed based on change from baseline of HOMA2-%S using fasting insulin (FI) and fasting C-peptide (FCP). LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline HOMA2-%S as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable HOMA2-%S data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. Missing endpoints were imputed with the LOCF method, using only postbaseline data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FI, 52 weeks (n=260, 60, 120)-7.75 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 2.34
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FI, 26 weeks (n=254, 57, 115)-4.83 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 2.34
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FCP, 26 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)-5.48 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.93
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FCP, 52 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)-11.72 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 1.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FCP, 26 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)-6.32 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 3.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FI, 52 weeks (n=260, 60, 120)NA percentage of HOMA2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FCP, 52 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)NA percentage of HOMA2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FI, 26 weeks (n=254, 57, 115)-2.97 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 4.83
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FCP, 52 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)-10.68 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 2.68
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FI, 52 weeks (n=260, 60, 120)-5.26 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 3.38
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FI, 26 weeks (n=254, 57, 115)-4.82 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 3.43
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Insulin Sensitivity Using Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA 2) at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksHOMA2-%S based on FCP, 26 weeks (n=275, 62, 131)-2.46 percentage of HOMA2Standard Error 2.75
p-value: 0.84895% CI: [-7.72, 9.38]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.72395% CI: [-12.2, 8.48]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.99895% CI: [-7.92, 7.91]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.35795% CI: [-9.48, 3.42]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.53395% CI: [-10.35, 5.36]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.74795% CI: [-7.32, 5.25]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Pancreatic enzyme (lipase and total amylase) concentrations were measured.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable pancreatic enzyme data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. LOCF was used to impute missing postbaseline values. If there were no data after the date of randomization, the endpoint was considered missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksLipase, 26 weeks7.0 units/liter
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksTotal Amylase, 26 weeks7.0 units/liter
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksLipase, 52 weeks6.0 units/liter
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksTotal Amylase, 52 weeks7.0 units/liter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksTotal Amylase, 26 weeks0.0 units/liter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksLipase, 52 weeks6.0 units/liter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksLipase, 26 weeks1.0 units/liter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksTotal Amylase, 52 weeks9.0 units/liter
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksLipase, 52 weeks9.0 units/liter
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksTotal Amylase, 26 weeks7.0 units/liter
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksTotal Amylase, 52 weeks6.0 units/liter
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Pancreatic Enzymes at 26 Weeks and 52 WeeksLipase, 26 weeks11.0 units/liter
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Sitting pulse rate was measured. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no), and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2) as fixed effects and baseline pulse rate as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable pulse rate data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. LOCF was used to impute missing postbaseline values. If there were no data after the date of randomization, the endpoint was considered missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks3.35 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.45
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks3.11 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks1.49 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks4.42 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.86
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks4.77 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.64
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Pulse Rate at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks5.13 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Error 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable serum calcitonin data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. LOCF was used to impute missing postbaseline values. If there were no data after the date of randomization, the endpoint was considered missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0.0 picograms/milliliter
LY2189265Change From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0.0 picograms/milliliter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0.0 picograms/milliliter
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0.0 picograms/milliliter
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0.0 picograms/milliliter
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0.0 picograms/milliliter
Secondary

Number of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Additional intervention was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. The number of participants requiring additional intervention due to hyperglycemia is summarized cumulatively at 26 and 52 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2189265Number of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
LY2189265Number of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events were adjudicated by a committee of physicians with cardiology expertise external to the Sponsor. The nonfatal cardiovascular events subjected to adjudication included myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions (such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), and cerebrovascular events including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Baseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2189265Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
LY2189265Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

Events of pancreatitis (including suspected pancreatitis and severe or serious abdominal pain) were adjudicated by a committee of expert physicians external to the Sponsor. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Baseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2189265Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
LY2189265Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks

A participant was considered to have treatment-emergent LY2189265 ADAs if the participant had at least 1 titer that was treatment-emergent relative to baseline, defined as a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from the baseline measurement.

Time frame: Baseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had LY2189265 evaluable ADA data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2189265Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks (n=279, 68, 133)3 participants
LY2189265Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks (n=279, 68, 134)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks (n=279, 68, 133)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks (n=279, 68, 134)0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks26 weeks (n=279, 68, 133)0 participants
LiraglutideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent LY2189265 Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) at 26 Weeks and 52 Weeks52 weeks (n=279, 68, 134)0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%

The percentage of participants achieving HbA1c level less than 7.0% and less than or equal to 6.5% at Week 26 and Week 52 was analyzed with a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by prestudy therapy (OAM yes/no) and baseline BMI group (\<25 or \>=25 kg/m\^2).

Time frame: Up to 26 and 52 weeks

Population: Participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication with evaluable HbA1c data. Only pre-rescue measurements were used. Missing endpoints were imputed with the last observation carried forward (LOCF), using only postbaseline data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2189265Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <7%, 26 weeks71.4 percentage of participants
LY2189265Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <=6.5%, 52 weeks49.3 percentage of participants
LY2189265Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <=6.5%, 26 weeks50.0 percentage of participants
LY2189265Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <7%, 52 weeks67.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <7%, 52 weeks70.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <=6.5%, 26 weeks1.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <=6.5%, 52 weeks52.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <7%, 26 weeks5.9 percentage of participants
LiraglutidePercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <7%, 52 weeks60.3 percentage of participants
LiraglutidePercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <7%, 26 weeks69.1 percentage of participants
LiraglutidePercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <=6.5%, 26 weeks49.3 percentage of participants
LiraglutidePercentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5% or <7%HbA1c <=6.5%, 52 weeks41.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.608Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.844Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.112Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.103Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes

The percentage of participants with hypoglycemic episodes was calculated by dividing the number of participants with at least one hypoglycemic episode over the 26-week or 52-week treatment period by the total number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100%. All classifications of hypoglycemia (documented symptomatic, asymptomatic, severe, nocturnal, non-nocturnal, probable symptomatic, relative, and unspecified) were included, except for episodes of relative hypoglycemia that were not severe. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Baseline through 26 weeks and Baseline through 52 weeks

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LY2189265Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes26 weeks2.1 percentage of participants
LY2189265Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes52 weeks2.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes26 weeks1.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes52 weeks2.9 percentage of participants
LiraglutidePercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes52 weeks2.9 percentage of participants
LiraglutidePercentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes26 weeks1.5 percentage of participants
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026