Blood Pressure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Conditions
Brief summary
Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) measurements at home (HBP) in the morning offer stronger predictive power for micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes than casual/clinic blood pressure measurements (CBP) (Kamoi K et al, 2002-2003). Further, a prospective, longitudinal study for 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes also demonstrated that control of wakening-up HBP provides the stronger predictive power for the outcomes than that of CBP did (Kamoi et al, 2010). However, it is not clear to show which of BP measurement provides the stronger predictive power for outcomes by comparing cumulative events over a longer time than 6 years. Therefore, the investigators examined which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for outcomes in addition of renal anemia reported previously over 10 years in the patients with type 2 diabetes.
Interventions
PROCEDUREBlood pressure measurement based on HBP or CBP
To clarify which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger prediction power for the outcomes.
Sponsors
Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* After a detailed baseline examination, 400 Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes reported previously are followed up for all-cause mortality and morbidity.
Exclusion criteria
* Other than the above, patients judged inappropriate as the subjects of this study by the investigator
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Death | Average time is 10 years | Number of participats not alive |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Microvascular complications including renal anemia | Average time is 10 years |
| Macrovascular complications | Average time is 10 years |
Countries
Japan
Outcome results
None listed