Skip to content

Prediction of Response to Intra-articular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis

Prediction of Response to Intra-articular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01557868
Enrollment
198
Registered
2012-03-20
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2014-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the investigators can develop a computer algorithm to predict which individual patients will respond to injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) products for knee osteoarthritis.

Detailed description

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a debilitating condition that affects an estimated 21 million Americans. This number is expected to rise steadily as the population ages. The medical expenditures associated with arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States have increased from $50 billion in 1997 to $86 billion in 2003. In 2003, almost 420,000 total knee replacements were performed, primarily for arthritis. Injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) have been shown to provide symptom relief for many OA patients who have failed to respond to conservative interventions. Many other patients, however, experience only slight or no improvement. The results from this study will allow physicians to identify whether a patient is likely or not likely to respond well to HA therapy leading to improved treatment success rates. Goals This study has two related goals: 1) to identify patient and treatment factors that predict response to intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis using multivariable analysis and 2) develop mathematical and statistical models that will predict individual patient response to HA for knee OA. It is anticipated that the investigators will develop computer software in this study that can support clinical decision making related to viscosupplementation in the treatment of knee OA. If this project yields successful patient predictive models, physicians who are considering a trial of HA for a patient will have some empirical basis for treatment selection. Eventually a physician would be able to assess a relatively small number of variables for a patient and then be provided with predictions regarding treatment response. \*\*Please note that the study site at the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, Virginia can only enroll patients who are eligible to be treated at a military facility.

Interventions

Three 2 cc injections at weekly intervals

DEVICE1% sodium hyaluronate

Three 2 cc injections at weekly intervals

Sponsors

United States Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth
CollaboratorFED
American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis presenting to physician's office * Radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis * Age 18 years or older * Failed minimum of 3 months of non-operative treatment, including, but not limited to, Tylenol, anti-inflammatory medication, cortisone injection, physical therapy, bracing, and/or heel wedge * Symptoms for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Associated ligamentous instability * History of deep knee infection * Candidate for total knee arthroplasty or arthroscopy * Peripheral neuropathy. * X-rays that are completely negative and only MRI evidence or arthroscopic evidence (from previous arthroscopy) of OA. * Prior HA injections at any point in the past * Chondrocalcinosis * Patients with precautions or contraindications for viscosupplementation use * Cortisone injection within past 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain ScaleBaseline and at 6 month follow-upThe KOOS is 42-item patient-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms and problems associated with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It yields scores for five scales including Pain, Other Symptoms, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport/Recreation, and Knee-Related Quality of Life. We used only the Pain scale which has a range of 0 to 100 where 100 represents the best score, i.e., no pain. We reported differences in baseline Pain scale score from Pain scale score at 6 months so these scores could theoretically range from -100 (moving from no pain to maximum pain) to 100 (moving from maximum pain to no pain). Positive change scores represent improvement from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 MonthsAssessments were at baseline to 6 month follow-upThe VAS is a patient-reported assessment of knee pain. Patients mark on a line (0-100mm) their current level of knee pain while moving where 0 represent no pain and 100 represents maximum pain. We report changes in VAS pain rating between baseline and 6 month follow-up. Therefore scores can theoretically range from -100 (moving from maximum pain to no pain) to 100 (moving from no pain to maximum pain). Negative change scores represent decreases in perceived pain or improvement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Synvisc (Hylan G-F 20)
hylan G-F 20: Three 2 cc injections at weekly intervals
103
Euflexxa (1% Sodium Hyaluronate)
1% sodium hyaluronate: Three 2 cc injections at weekly intervals
95
Total198

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEuflexxa (1% Sodium Hyaluronate)TotalSynvisc (Hylan G-F 20)
Age, Continuous43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
46.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 participants6 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
21 participants54 participants33 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
6 participants11 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants3 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
62 participants124 participants62 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
95 participants198 participants103 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants78 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants120 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1030 / 95
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 1031 / 95

Outcome results

Primary

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Scale

The KOOS is 42-item patient-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms and problems associated with knee injury and osteoarthritis. It yields scores for five scales including Pain, Other Symptoms, Function in Daily Living, Function in Sport/Recreation, and Knee-Related Quality of Life. We used only the Pain scale which has a range of 0 to 100 where 100 represents the best score, i.e., no pain. We reported differences in baseline Pain scale score from Pain scale score at 6 months so these scores could theoretically range from -100 (moving from no pain to maximum pain) to 100 (moving from maximum pain to no pain). Positive change scores represent improvement from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Synvisc (Hylan G-F 20)Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Scale12.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.9
Euflexxa (1% Sodium Hyaluronate)Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Scale9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 Months

The VAS is a patient-reported assessment of knee pain. Patients mark on a line (0-100mm) their current level of knee pain while moving where 0 represent no pain and 100 represents maximum pain. We report changes in VAS pain rating between baseline and 6 month follow-up. Therefore scores can theoretically range from -100 (moving from maximum pain to no pain) to 100 (moving from no pain to maximum pain). Negative change scores represent decreases in perceived pain or improvement.

Time frame: Assessments were at baseline to 6 month follow-up

Population: The discrepancy between the number of subjects included in this analysis (140) and the number of subjects reported completing the study (141) is due to a missing values for one subject for this variable.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Synvisc (Hylan G-F 20)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 Months-13.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.4
Euflexxa (1% Sodium Hyaluronate)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 Months-10.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026