Skip to content

Characterize Patients With Moderately Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Evaluation of the Clinical Characteristics, Real-world Treatment Pathways, and Outcomes of Patients With Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01557322
Enrollment
1754
Registered
2012-03-19
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2013-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

1. To assess the baseline (i.e. RA therapy initiation) characteristics in a real-world setting across two moderate RA cohorts: a Test Group of patients newly exposed to etanercept (Enbrel) therapy and a Control Group of patients with similar disease characteristics newly exposed to other, non-biologic therapies. 2. To assess the change over time (from baseline to the most recent follow-up) in the characteristics described at baseline in 2 British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) cohorts (i.e. moderate RA patients treated with Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) alone versus moderate RA patients treated with Enbrel).

Detailed description

Retrospective database analysis

Interventions

BIOLOGICALetanercept

This is a Non-interventional study. The data is being analyzed retrospectively. The data consists of 2 cohorts; biologic and non-biologic

DRUGmethotrexate (MTX)

This is a Non-interventional study. The data is being analyzed retrospectively. The data consists of 2 cohorts; biologic and non-biologic

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The Test Group will be patients with rheumatoid arthritis, newly starting therapy with etanercept (Enbrel). Inclusion criteria for the exposed cohort subjects are: * Patients aged 18 years and over at the time of diagnosis; * Patients from the BSRBR with moderate RA as defined by a DAS28 (\>3.2 and ≤5.1); * Patients who have given informed consent for long term follow-up and access to all medical records; * Patients initiating (i.e. at leats one treatment) treatment with etanercept (Enbrel) for RA. The Control Group: * Patients aged 18 years and over a the time of diagnosis; * Patients from the BSRBR with moderate RA as defined by a DAS28 (\>3.2 and ≤5.1); * Patients who have given informed consent for long term follow-up and access to all medical records; Patients are receiving at least one traditional DMARD and have never been prescribed a biologic agent;

Exclusion criteria

Per BSRBR registry since data is retropsectively being analyzed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Direct and Indirect Cost of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) TreatmentBaselineDirect costs included: outpatient costs, physician visits, outpatient surgery, emergency room visits, visits to healthcare professionals other than physicians, medications, diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures, medical devices, inpatient costs, admission to acute-care nonsurgical departments, admission to acute-care surgical departments, admission to extended-care facilities, and other direct costs (travel expenses, home care, home remodeling, medical devices, non-physician healthcare professionals, alternative medicine practitioner, participant time). Indirect cost (related to lost productivity through morbidity and death) included: lost productivity in employed participants (disability, sick-leaves), lost opportunities (lost productivity in family members caring for the patient, disability requiring changes to everyday activities), and lost wages.
Time to Disease WorseningBaseline up to Month 60Disease worsening (severe RA diagnosis) was defined as DAS28 score \>5.1.
Time to Therapeutic GoalBaseline up to Month 60Therapeutic goal achievement was based on physician's discretion.
Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 60Baseline, Month 60The pain VAS is a horizontal line; 100 millimeter (mm) in length, self-administered by the participant to rate pain from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 60Month 60ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 60Month 60ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 60Month 60ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Number of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Related VisitsBaselineNumber of RA-related visits to doctor/healthcare professional in previous 3 months was to be reported.
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaBaselineACR criteria: 1) Morning stiffness: in and around joints, lasting at least (\>=) 1 hour; 2) Arthritis/deformity of \>=3 joint areas: presence of soft tissue swelling or fluid (not bony overgrowth alone), 14 possible areas are right/left proximal interphalangeal (PIP), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), wrist, elbow, knee, ankle, metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints; 3) Arthritis of hand joints: \>=1 area swollen in wrist, MCP, PIP joint; 4) Symmetric arthritis: simultaneous involvement of same joint areas (as defined in 2) on both sides of body; 5): Rheumatoid nodules: subcutaneous nodules over bony prominences or extensor surfaces or in juxtaarticular regions; 6): Rheumatoid factor (RF): abnormal amounts of RF by any method for which result has been positive in \<5% of normal control participants; 7) Radiographic changes: typical of RA on posteroanterior hand and wrist radiographs, which must include erosions/unequivocal bony decalcification localized in or most marked adjacent to involved joints.
Number of Participants With Systemic FeaturesBaselineSystemic features included sicca syndrome, serosal involvement (pleurisy/pericarditis), eye involvement, systemic vasculitis, nailfold vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis, and others (other than those specified).
Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryBaselineParticipants who had prior total knee replacement, total hip replacement, total shoulder replacement, total elbow replacement, wrist/hand/ankle/foot surgery, and neck surgery are reported.
Number of Participants With Chest X-Ray Prior to New TherapyBaseline
Number of Participants With ComorbiditiesBaselineComorbidities included: hypertension, moderate or severe heart failure, angina, stroke, epilepsy, asthma, chronic bronchitis/emphysema, peptic ulcer, tuberculosis, pre-existing or recent onset of central nervous system demyelinating disorders, chronic infectious disease such as chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis or sinusitis, active tuberculosis, renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic or cerebral disease, malignancy or history of malignancy, hyperthyroidism, depression and/or anxiety, recent substance abuse (drug or alcohol), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or active hepatitis B/C infection (including associated chronic active hepatitis). Participants suffering from any of the comorbidity are reported.
Body Mass Index (BMI)BaselineBMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2).
Blood Pressure (BP)BaselineBP is the pressure of the blood within the arteries. It is produced primarily by the contraction of the heart muscle. BP measurement is recorded by 2 numbers: systolic BP (SBP, BP when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle) and diastolic BP (DBP, BP when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles).
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60Baseline, Month 60DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, acute phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR, millimeters per hour\] or C-reactive protein \[CRP, milligram per liter\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 \<2.6: remission, DAS28 \<=3.2: low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1: moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1: progression.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60Baseline, Month 60Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60Baseline, Month 60Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60Baseline, Month 60The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultra-sensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is \<10 milligram/liter (mg/L). A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60Baseline, Month 60ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60Baseline, Month 60Participants answered: Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today? Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Duration of Disease (Rheumatoid Arthritis)Baseline
Time Since First Rheumatologist VisitBaseline
Time Since Recalled Symptom OnsetBaselineRA symptoms include joint pain, stiffness, and swelling.
Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)BaselineNumber of participants who previously received DMARDs or were currently on DMARDs at baseline is reported.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60Baseline, Month 60Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Baseline, Month 60The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Total of 3 variables were analyzed (2 composite subscales and vitality score). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Month 60Baseline, Month 60EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With MalignancyMonth 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60Malignancy included lymphoproliferative tumors, Hodgkins lymphoma, myeloma, leukaemia, non-melanoma skin cancer, and solid tumor. Number of participants with each of these malignancies is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.
Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsMonth 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60Number of participants who died or hospitalized due to AEs is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6DAS28 calculated from the SJC and PJC using the 28 joints count, acute phase reactants (ESR, millimeters per hour or CRP, milligram per liter) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 \<2.6: remission, DAS28 \<=3.2: low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1: moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1: progression.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Total of 3 variables were analyzed (2 composite subscales and vitality score). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Number of participants with AEs is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Participants with moderate rheumatoid arthritis (RA), defined as disease activity score based on 28-joints count (DAS28) more than (\>) 3.2 to less than or equal to (\<=) 5.1, who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC), were followed retrospectively using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
211
nbDMARDs
Biological naïve participants with moderate RA, defined as DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1, who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC, were followed retrospectively using the data in BSRBR for 5 years. The doses had been adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
1,543
Total1,754

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanerceptnbDMARDsTotal
Age Continuous55.3 years62.1 years61.2 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
163 Participants1098 Participants1261 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
48 Participants445 Participants493 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
77 / 211534 / 1,543

Outcome results

Primary

Blood Pressure (BP)

BP is the pressure of the blood within the arteries. It is produced primarily by the contraction of the heart muscle. BP measurement is recorded by 2 numbers: systolic BP (SBP, BP when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle) and diastolic BP (DBP, BP when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptBlood Pressure (BP)Systolic Blood Pressure (n= 199, 1477)134.3 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 1.4
EtanerceptBlood Pressure (BP)Diastolic Blood Pressure (n= 199, 1483)79.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 0.8
nbDMARDsBlood Pressure (BP)Systolic Blood Pressure (n= 199, 1477)138.0 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 0.5
nbDMARDsBlood Pressure (BP)Diastolic Blood Pressure (n= 199, 1483)80.2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Error 0.3
Comparison: Systolic Blood Pressure: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.016t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Diastolic Blood Pressure: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.369t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Body Mass Index (BMI)

BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptBody Mass Index (BMI)26.6 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.4
nbDMARDsBody Mass Index (BMI)27.2 kg/m^2Standard Error 0.1
Comparison: P-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.188t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60

The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Total of 3 variables were analyzed (2 composite subscales and vitality score). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Baseline: MCS (n= 171, 1202)49.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Change at Month 60: PCS (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Baseline: PCS (n= 171, 1202)27.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Change at Month 60: MCS (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Change at Month 60: Vitality Score (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Baseline: Vitality Score (n= 186, 1272)49.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Change at Month 60: Vitality Score (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Baseline: PCS (n= 171, 1202)29.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Baseline: MCS (n= 171, 1202)49.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Baseline: Vitality Score (n= 186, 1272)49.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Change at Month 60: PCS (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 60Change at Month 60: MCS (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
Comparison: Baseline PCS: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Baseline MCS: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.886t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Baseline Vitality Score: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.68t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultra-sensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is \<10 milligram/liter (mg/L). A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60Baseline (n= 80, 431)28.3 mg/LStandard Error 3.4
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 15, 0)NA mg/L
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60Baseline (n= 80, 431)23.1 mg/LStandard Error 1.4
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 15, 0)NA mg/L
Comparison: Baseline: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.154t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60

DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, acute phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR, millimeters per hour\] or C-reactive protein \[CRP, milligram per liter\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 \<2.6: remission, DAS28 \<=3.2: low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1: moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1: progression.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60Baseline (n= 211, 1543)4.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 57, 131)-1.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60Baseline (n= 211, 1543)4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.01
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 57, 131)-1.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Comparison: Baseline: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Change at Month 60: p-value was calculated using multivariate linear regression with baseline DAS28 score and other baseline variables (socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and initial treatment profile) as covariates.p-value: 0.3746Regression, Linear
Primary

Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60

ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60Baseline (n= 200, 1344)24.0 mm/hourStandard Error 1.3
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 53, 7)NA mm/hour
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60Baseline (n= 200, 1344)26.3 mm/hourStandard Error 0.5
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 53, 7)NA mm/hour
Comparison: Baseline: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.108t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Month 60

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60

Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60Baseline (n= 195, 1294)1.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60Baseline (n= 195, 1294)1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 0, 0)NA units on a scale
Comparison: Baseline: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 60

The pain VAS is a horizontal line; 100 millimeter (mm) in length, self-administered by the participant to rate pain from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.

Primary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60

Participants answered: Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today? Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60Baseline (n= 205, 1525)49.0 mmStandard Error 1.7
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 53, 2)NA mm
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60Baseline (n= 205, 1525)46.7 mmStandard Error 0.5
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 53, 2)NA mm
Comparison: Baseline: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: 0.199t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60

Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60Baseline (n= 206, 1526)6.0 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.4
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 55, 2)NA swollen joints
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60Baseline (n= 206, 1526)3.8 swollen jointsStandard Error 0.1
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 55, 2)NA swollen joints
Comparison: Baseline: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60

Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 55, 2)NA tender joints
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60Baseline (n= 207, 1526)6.1 tender jointsStandard Error 0.3
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60Baseline (n= 207, 1526)4.8 tender jointsStandard Error 0.1
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Month 60Change at Month 60 (n= 55, 2)NA tender joints
Comparison: Baseline: p-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Direct and Indirect Cost of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Treatment

Direct costs included: outpatient costs, physician visits, outpatient surgery, emergency room visits, visits to healthcare professionals other than physicians, medications, diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures, medical devices, inpatient costs, admission to acute-care nonsurgical departments, admission to acute-care surgical departments, admission to extended-care facilities, and other direct costs (travel expenses, home care, home remodeling, medical devices, non-physician healthcare professionals, alternative medicine practitioner, participant time). Indirect cost (related to lost productivity through morbidity and death) included: lost productivity in employed participants (disability, sick-leaves), lost opportunities (lost productivity in family members caring for the patient, disability requiring changes to everyday activities), and lost wages.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Results not reported as this outcome was not evaluated due to lack of availability of information on the outcome in BSRBR used for analysis.

Primary

Duration of Disease (Rheumatoid Arthritis)

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptDuration of Disease (Rheumatoid Arthritis)14.1 yearsStandard Error 0.7
nbDMARDsDuration of Disease (Rheumatoid Arthritis)10.2 yearsStandard Error 0.3
Comparison: P-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 60

ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

Time frame: Month 60

Population: Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 60

ACR50 response: \>= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame: Month 60

Population: Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 60

ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

Time frame: Month 60

Population: Result not reported as no participants were evaluable at this time-point.

Primary

Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria

ACR criteria: 1) Morning stiffness: in and around joints, lasting at least (\>=) 1 hour; 2) Arthritis/deformity of \>=3 joint areas: presence of soft tissue swelling or fluid (not bony overgrowth alone), 14 possible areas are right/left proximal interphalangeal (PIP), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), wrist, elbow, knee, ankle, metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints; 3) Arthritis of hand joints: \>=1 area swollen in wrist, MCP, PIP joint; 4) Symmetric arthritis: simultaneous involvement of same joint areas (as defined in 2) on both sides of body; 5): Rheumatoid nodules: subcutaneous nodules over bony prominences or extensor surfaces or in juxtaarticular regions; 6): Rheumatoid factor (RF): abnormal amounts of RF by any method for which result has been positive in \<5% of normal control participants; 7) Radiographic changes: typical of RA on posteroanterior hand and wrist radiographs, which must include erosions/unequivocal bony decalcification localized in or most marked adjacent to involved joints.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaMorning Stiffness >1 Hour194 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaNodules91 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaArthritis/Deformity of >=3 Joint Areas179 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaRheumatoid Factor Positive123 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaSymmetry175 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaErosions on Hand or Feet X-Ray116 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaArthritis/Deformity of Hand/Joint160 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaErosions on Hand or Feet X-Ray730 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaMorning Stiffness >1 Hour1316 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaArthritis/Deformity of >=3 Joint Areas1133 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaArthritis/Deformity of Hand/Joint1123 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaSymmetry978 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaNodules470 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) CriteriaRheumatoid Factor Positive927 participants
Comparison: Morning Stiffness \> 1 Hour: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.01Chi-squared
Comparison: Arthritis or Deformity of 3 or More Joint Areas: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Arthritis/Deformity of Hand/Joint: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.363Chi-squared
Comparison: Symmetry: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Nodules: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Rheumatoid Factor Positive: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.605Chi-squared
Comparison: Erosions on Hand or Feet X-Ray: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.038Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Chest X-Ray Prior to New Therapy

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Chest X-Ray Prior to New Therapy183 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Chest X-Ray Prior to New Therapy742 participants
Comparison: P-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Comorbidities

Comorbidities included: hypertension, moderate or severe heart failure, angina, stroke, epilepsy, asthma, chronic bronchitis/emphysema, peptic ulcer, tuberculosis, pre-existing or recent onset of central nervous system demyelinating disorders, chronic infectious disease such as chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis or sinusitis, active tuberculosis, renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic or cerebral disease, malignancy or history of malignancy, hyperthyroidism, depression and/or anxiety, recent substance abuse (drug or alcohol), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or active hepatitis B/C infection (including associated chronic active hepatitis). Participants suffering from any of the comorbidity are reported.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesHigh Blood Pressure (n= 208, 1532)60 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesLiver Disease (n= 211, 1539)11 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesEpilepsy (n= 211, 1541)2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesRenal Disease (n= 211, 1540)8 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesHeart Attack (n= 210, 1535)6 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesTuberculosis (n= 207, 1538)5 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesAsthma (n= 211, 1539)24 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesDemyelination (n= 210, 1536)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesAngina (n= 211, 1536)5 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesDiabetes (n= 211, 1539)16 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesChronic Bronchitis/Emphysema (n= 211, 1537)8 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesHyperthyroidism (n= 211, 1535)3 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesStroke (n= 211, 1538)3 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesDepression (n= 211, 1539)40 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesPeptic Ulcer (n= 208, 1537)11 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesCancer (n= 210, 1540)6 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesPeptic Ulcer (n= 208, 1537)97 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesHigh Blood Pressure (n= 208, 1532)488 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesAngina (n= 211, 1536)115 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesHeart Attack (n= 210, 1535)73 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesStroke (n= 211, 1538)53 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesEpilepsy (n= 211, 1541)19 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesAsthma (n= 211, 1539)198 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesChronic Bronchitis/Emphysema (n= 211, 1537)124 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesCancer (n= 210, 1540)102 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesLiver Disease (n= 211, 1539)26 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesRenal Disease (n= 211, 1540)46 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesTuberculosis (n= 207, 1538)34 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesDemyelination (n= 210, 1536)7 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesDiabetes (n= 211, 1539)93 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesHyperthyroidism (n= 211, 1535)65 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With ComorbiditiesDepression (n= 211, 1539)249 participants
Comparison: High Blood Pressure: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.381Chi-squared
Comparison: Angina: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.006Chi-squared
Comparison: Heart Attack: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.215Chi-squared
Comparison: Stroke: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.117Chi-squared
Comparison: Epilepsy: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 1Chi-squared
Comparison: Asthma: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.542Chi-squared
Comparison: Chronic Bronchitis/Emphysema: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.027Chi-squared
Comparison: Peptic Ulcer: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.566Chi-squared
Comparison: Liver Disease: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.003Chi-squared
Comparison: Renal Disease: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.526Chi-squared
Comparison: Tuberculosis: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.802Chi-squared
Comparison: Demyelination: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 1Chi-squared
Comparison: Diabetes: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.385Chi-squared
Comparison: Hyperthyroidism: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.048Chi-squared
Comparison: Depression: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.308Chi-squared
Comparison: Cancer: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.033Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)

Number of participants who previously received DMARDs or were currently on DMARDs at baseline is reported.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Cyclosporine0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Methotrexate198 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Cyclophosphamide0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Azathioprine61 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Leflunomide14 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Cyclophosphamide10 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Azathioprine7 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Cyclosporine40 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Sulphasalazine20 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Leflunomide111 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Methotrexate65 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Leflunomide209 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Methotrexate963 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Azathioprine32 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Cyclophosphamide2 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Cyclosporine27 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Leflunomide158 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Current DMARDs: Sulphasalazine370 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Methotrexate1158 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Azathioprine118 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Cyclophosphamide7 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Previous and Current Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)Previous DMARDs: Cyclosporine70 participants
Comparison: Current DMARDs, Methotrexate: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Current DMARDs, Azathioprine: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.313Chi-squared
Comparison: Current DMARDs, Cyclophosphamide: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 1Chi-squared
Comparison: Current DMARDs, Cyclosporine: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.066Chi-squared
Comparison: Current DMARDs, Leflunomide: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.099Chi-squared
Comparison: Current DMARDs, Sulphasalazine: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Previous DMARDs, Methotrexate: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Previous DMARDs, Azathioprine: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Previous DMARDs, Cyclophosphamide: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Previous DMARDs, Cyclosporine: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Previous DMARDs, Leflunomide: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or Surgery

Participants who had prior total knee replacement, total hip replacement, total shoulder replacement, total elbow replacement, wrist/hand/ankle/foot surgery, and neck surgery are reported.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Shoulder Replacement21 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryWrist/Hand/Ankle/Foot Surgery56 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Elbow Replacement14 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Hip Replacement29 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryNeck Surgery9 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Knee Replacement31 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryNeck Surgery9 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryWrist/Hand/Ankle/Foot Surgery262 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Knee Replacement141 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Hip Replacement99 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Shoulder Replacement24 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Prior Joint Replacement or SurgeryTotal Elbow Replacement31 participants
Comparison: Total Knee Replacement: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Total Hip Replacement: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Total Shoulder Replacement: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Total Elbow Replacement: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Wrist/Hand/Ankle/Foot Surgery: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Neck Surgery: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Participants With Systemic Features

Systemic features included sicca syndrome, serosal involvement (pleurisy/pericarditis), eye involvement, systemic vasculitis, nailfold vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis, and others (other than those specified).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesSerosal Involvement (n= 211, 1540)7 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesSystemic Vasculitis (n= 211, 1540)6 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesSicca Syndrome (n= 211, 1540)45 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesNailfold Vasculitis (n= 211, 1540)3 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesEye Involvement (n= 211, 1540)17 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesPulmonary Fibrosis (n= 211, 1540)2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesOther (n= 211, 1537)6 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesPulmonary Fibrosis (n= 211, 1540)37 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesOther (n= 211, 1537)34 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesSicca Syndrome (n= 211, 1540)166 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesSerosal Involvement (n= 211, 1540)18 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesEye Involvement (n= 211, 1540)93 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesSystemic Vasculitis (n= 211, 1540)14 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Systemic FeaturesNailfold Vasculitis (n= 211, 1540)17 participants
Comparison: Sicca Syndrome: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Comparison: Serosal Involvement: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.024Chi-squared
Comparison: Eye Involvement: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.257Chi-squared
Comparison: Systemic Vasculitis: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.026Chi-squared
Comparison: Nailfold Vasculitis: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.725Chi-squared
Comparison: Pulmonary Fibrosis: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.22Chi-squared
Comparison: Other: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.62Chi-squared
Primary

Number of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Related Visits

Number of RA-related visits to doctor/healthcare professional in previous 3 months was to be reported.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Results not reported as this outcome was not evaluated due to lack of availability of information on the outcome in BSRBR used for analysis.

Primary

Time Since First Rheumatologist Visit

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptTime Since First Rheumatologist Visit13.1 yearsStandard Error 0.7
nbDMARDsTime Since First Rheumatologist Visit9.7 yearsStandard Error 0.3
Comparison: P-value was calculated using 2-sided t-test.p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Time Since Recalled Symptom Onset

RA symptoms include joint pain, stiffness, and swelling.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Results not reported as this outcome was not evaluated due to lack availability of information on the outcome in BSRBR used for analysis.

Primary

Time to Disease Worsening

Disease worsening (severe RA diagnosis) was defined as DAS28 score \>5.1.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 60

Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.

Primary

Time to Therapeutic Goal

Therapeutic goal achievement was based on physician's discretion.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 60

Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.

Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6

The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). Total of 3 variables were analyzed (2 composite subscales and vitality score). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable at each time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6PCS (n= 87, 633)0.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6MCS (n= 87, 633)-0.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6Vitality Score (n= 104, 711)1.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6PCS (n= 87, 633)-0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6MCS (n= 87, 633)-1.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.35
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 6Vitality Score (n= 104, 711)1.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.33
Comparison: PCS: p-value was calculated using multivariate linear regression with baseline PCS and other baseline variables (socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and initial treatment profile) as covariates.p-value: 0.2558Regression, Linear
Comparison: MCS: p-value was calculated using multivariate linear regression with baseline MCS and other baseline variables (socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and initial treatment profile) as covariates.p-value: 0.4908Regression, Linear
Comparison: Vitality Score: p-value was calculated using multivariate linear regression with baseline vitality score and other baseline variables (socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and initial treatment profile) as covariates.p-value: 0.8379Regression, Linear
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 6

DAS28 calculated from the SJC and PJC using the 28 joints count, acute phase reactants (ESR, millimeters per hour or CRP, milligram per liter) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 \<2.6: remission, DAS28 \<=3.2: low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to \<=5.1: moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1: progression.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 6-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) at Month 60.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Comparison: P-value was calculated using multivariate linear regression with baseline DAS28 score and other baseline variables (socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and initial treatment profile) as covariates.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Linear
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Month 6

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Data not analyzed due to low number of participants available for this measure in BSRBR used for analysis.

Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 6

Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0 = no difficulty; 1 = some difficulty; 2 = much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 6-0.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
nbDMARDsChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 60.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: P-value was calculated using multivariate linear regression with baseline HAQ-DI score and other baseline variables (socio-demographics, disease characteristics, and initial treatment profile) as covariates.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Linear
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse Events

Number of participants who died or hospitalized due to AEs is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 6 (n=22, 101)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 6 (n= 18, 85)16 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 30 (n=12, 80)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 12 (n= 8, 81)6 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 18 (n=12, 111)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 18 (n= 11, 77)10 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 36 (n=6, 91)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 24 (n= 5, 70)5 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 12 (n=10, 100)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 48 (n=3, 63)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 36 (n= 4, 69)4 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 24 (n=10, 102)2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 48 (n= 1, 38)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 60 (n=7, 44)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 60 (n= 4, 24)4 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 30 (n= 8, 64)6 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 60 (n= 4, 24)22 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 6 (n=22, 101)8 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 12 (n=10, 100)3 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 18 (n=12, 111)3 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 24 (n=10, 102)2 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 30 (n=12, 80)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 36 (n=6, 91)2 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 48 (n=3, 63)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsDeath Due to AE: Month 60 (n=7, 44)6 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 6 (n= 18, 85)73 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 12 (n= 8, 81)70 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 18 (n= 11, 77)63 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 24 (n= 5, 70)62 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 30 (n= 8, 64)59 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 36 (n= 4, 69)59 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants Who Died or Hospitalized Due to Adverse EventsHospitalization Due to AE: Month 48 (n= 1, 38)31 participants
Comparison: Death Due to AE, Month 6: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5817Chi-squared
Comparison: Death Due to AE, Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.2595Chi-squared
Comparison: Death Due to AE, Month 18: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5642Chi-squared
Comparison: Death Due to AE, Month 24: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0034Chi-squared
Comparison: Death Due to AE, Month 36: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.7137Chi-squared
Comparison: Death Due to AE, Month 60: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.963Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 6: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.7353Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.3829Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 18: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4532Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 24: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4238Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 30: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.1218Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 36: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4124Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 48: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.6356Chi-squared
Comparison: Hospitalization Due to AE, Month 60: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5491Chi-squared
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Number of participants with AEs is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 483 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 2410 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 1210 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 3012 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 622 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 366 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 607 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 1812 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 6044 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 4863 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 6101 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 12100 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 18111 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 24102 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 3080 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Month 3691 participants
Comparison: Month 6: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0233Chi-squared
Comparison: Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5103Chi-squared
Comparison: Month 18: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.999Chi-squared
Comparison: Month 24: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.6495Chi-squared
Comparison: Month 30: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.3829Chi-squared
Comparison: Month 36: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.1085Chi-squared
Comparison: Month 48: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0472Chi-squared
Comparison: Month 60: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4804Chi-squared
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Malignancy

Malignancy included lymphoproliferative tumors, Hodgkins lymphoma, myeloma, leukaemia, non-melanoma skin cancer, and solid tumor. Number of participants with each of these malignancies is reported by each follow-up time point up to Month 60.

Time frame: Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60

Population: Analysis population included all enrolled participants with moderate RA at baseline. Here N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and n signifies participants evaluable for specified category for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 48 (n=114, 815)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 48 (n=114, 815)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 48 (n=114, 815)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)1 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 48 (n=114, 815)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 48 (n=114, 815)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)0 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 48 (n=114, 815)2 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)9 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)1 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)7 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)1 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)4 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)3 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)9 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)1 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 48 (n=114, 815)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)3 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLymphoproliferative Tumors: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)1 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)4 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 48 (n=114, 815)6 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)2 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 60 (n=108, 516)3 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)1 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 48 (n=114, 815)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 48 (n=114, 815)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyHodgkins Lymphoma: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyLeukaemia: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)5 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)1 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)5 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 6 (n=191, 1457)9 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 24 (n=141, 1245)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)6 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 30 (n=127, 1097)1 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 48 (n=114, 815)5 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 36 (n=128, 1027)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Month 18 (n=146, 1350)4 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 48 (n=114, 815)0 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancySolid Tumor: Month 12 (n=172, 1394)4 participants
nbDMARDsNumber of Participants With MalignancyMyeloma: Month 60 (n=108, 516)0 participants
Comparison: Lymphoproliferative Tumors, Month 6: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0895Chi-squared
Comparison: Lymphoproliferative Tumors, Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0774Chi-squared
Comparison: Lymphoproliferative Tumors, Month 18: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0024Chi-squared
Comparison: Lymphoproliferative Tumors, Month 30: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5552Chi-squared
Comparison: Lymphoproliferative Tumors, Month 36: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0793Chi-squared
Comparison: Lymphoproliferative Tumors, Month 48: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0075Chi-squared
Comparison: Hodgkins Lymphoma, Month 6: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0895Chi-squared
Comparison: Hodgkins Lymphoma, Month 18: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0024Chi-squared
Comparison: Hodgkins Lymphoma, Month 30: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.6301Chi-squared
Comparison: Hodgkins Lymphoma, Month 36: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0793Chi-squared
Comparison: Hodgkins Lymphoma, Month 48: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0075Chi-squared
Comparison: Myeloma, Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.7253Chi-squared
Comparison: Myeloma, Month 30: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.7336Chi-squared
Comparison: Leukaemia, Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.0044Chi-squared
Comparison: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer, Month 6: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4175Chi-squared
Comparison: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer, Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.3886Chi-squared
Comparison: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer, Month 18: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5102Chi-squared
Comparison: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer, Month 24: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.9855Chi-squared
Comparison: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer, Month 30: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4955Chi-squared
Comparison: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer, Month 36: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5404Chi-squared
Comparison: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer, Month 48: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.3581Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 6: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4932Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 12: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.4818Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 18: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.3224Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 24: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.5003Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 30: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.1134Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 36: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.3488Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 48: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.187Chi-squared
Comparison: Solid Tumor, Month 60: p-value was calculated using chi-square test.p-value: 0.427Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026