Skip to content

Comparison of Storz C-MAC and D-MAC Orotracheal Intubation Systems in Morbidly Obese Patients

Comparison of Storz C-MAC and D-MAC Orotracheal Intubation Systems in Morbidly Obese Patients - A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01556061
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-03-16
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Laryngoscopy, Airway Management, Intubation

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that the D-MAC (Dblade with C-MAC system) may be a suitable alternative device for difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. The D-MAC will enable superior view of the glottic structures as well as easier endotracheal intubations than the C-MAC blade. This is the first study to investigate the individual and comparative performances of C-MAC and D-MAC in this patient cohort.

Detailed description

Since the introduction of laryngoscopy, blades have undergone design innovations with the goal of improving laryngeal visualization and successful tracheal intubation because difficult intubation may be encountered even in patients with favorable anatomy. Failed intubation shows occurrence in 0.05% of surgical patients and in 0.13% to 0.35% of obstetric and obese patients and the incidence of unsuspected difficult intubation is estimated to be higher at approximately 3%, with poor airway visualization being a major contributing factor. Moreover airway management in the obese patient population requires special consideration. An increased BMI is associated with reduced posterior airway space and improper mask ventilation, both of which may lead to rapid development of hypoxemia and possible desaturation immediately after anesthetic induction. As the prevalence of obesity has increased from 23% in 1992 to 33.8% in 2008 and an estimated 140,000 surgical bariatric cases are performed in the U.S., anesthesiologists face challenges of airway management in this population. The main advantage of video intubation is provision of superior views compared to traditional laryngoscopy. This study is designed to determine preliminarily the efficacy of the the D-BLADE \[D-MAC\] intubation systems compared to C-MAC in the bariatric population. The hypothesis is that D-MAC will enable superior view of the glottic structures as well as easier endotracheal intubations than the C-MAC blade. A. General Study Design- The study will include a total of 50 morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 40kg/m2) scheduled for elective surgery (bariatric, gynecological, urological, general abdominal and otorhinolaryngology) at Memorial Hermann Hospital. All patients will be intubated using conventional endotracheal tubes and preferably without any alternative aid to intubation. Patient will be followed for the time they will spend in the operating block (from the airway assessment time to the time of PACU discharge). In the operating room, ASA standard monitoring devices will be applied: a pulse oximeter, a 3 lead ECG, and a blood pressure cuff (or invasive blood pressure depending on the patients' conditions). Pre-induction baseline measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, percent oxygen saturation and end tidal CO2 will be made. Patients will be positioned in a head elevated position (RAMP or TROOP pillow) and pre-oxygenated for 5 minutes. One set of pre-insertion vital signs (after induction) will be obtained. From the time anesthetic induction is begun until five minutes after the patient has been successfully intubated, five sets of vital signs will be recorded at one minute intervals. General anesthesia will be induced by bolus administration of propofol (2-3 mg/kg), fentanyl (2 mcg/kg), and succinylcholine (1mg/kg) per ideal body weight (assuming an ideal BMI of 32 kg/m2 up to a BMI of 50 kg/m2 and an ideal BMI 35 kg/m2 over 50 kg/m2. A rapid sequence induction (RSI) will be performed. RSI will be achieved with suxamethonium.The lungs will be mechanically ventilated with a semi-closed circle system to maintain an end-tidal CO2 near 35 mmHg. Patients' lungs will be ventilated via face-mask for 3 minutes with 100% oxygen until the patient is completely relaxed. A ll investigators (residents and attending) will be trained based on manufacturer recommendations, and each resident will perform at least 3 intubations with the C-MAC and D-MAC video laryngoscope prior to enlisting any patients for the study. Intubations will be performed by 2nd and 3rd year (CA-2 and CA-3) residents. Size 3 blades of CMAC will be utilized in all cases (a size 4 will be available if necessary). A computer-generated list will randomize the order of C-MAC and D-MAC to prevent bias. The resident will use either the C-MAC first followed by the D-MAC, or viceversa, and will declare the Cormack-Lehane Scale score for each method. Intubation will be attempted after the second laryngoscopy technique being used. External neck pressure may be applied by an assistant to improve laryngeal exposure. Any external manipulation will be recorded, and the optimal view obtained and the time required to obtain it for each method will be recorded. The resident will have only one attempt each for C-MAC and D-MAC laryngoscopy. If the first attempt is unsuccessful, the attending anesthesiologist will take one more attempt for that particular method, C-MAC or D-MAC. The number of attempts (maximum 4 total as defined by reinsertion of either the blade or endotracheal tube), time required to obtain optimum view, CL score of view, and time required to intubate will all be recorded. Intubation time is defined by time from which the anesthesiologist has ETT in hand to when the ETT cuff passes distally through vocal cords. If unsuccessful, the direct laryngoscopy/flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy will be performed to intubate the trachea. If more than 4 attempts are needed, or if the anesthesiologist discontinues use of the video laryngoscope, the case will be considered a failure. The resident's subjective opinion on laryngoscopy and intubation difficulty level (from 1 = Extremely Easy, to 5 = Extremely Difficult) will also be recorded. In order to maintain patient safety all intubation attempts will be performed within the safety apnea time or time for oxygen blood saturation to drop to 92%. B. Measurements Pre-operatively, morphometric characteristics of all patients will be recorded: Mallampati score, adequacy of neck mobility, neck circumference, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, and interincisor gap distance. Degree of irritation: Following intubation in either group, the appearance of oropharynx, pharynx, epiglottis, and arytenoids will be checked. The presence of abrasions, bleeding, redness, perforation or other signs of tissue or dental injury will be recorded. Also, the patient's subjective report of soreness, hoarseness, or dysphagia post-operatively will be recorded as well. DATA ANALYSIS: This investigation will serve as preliminary study to determine if there is an improved rate of airway view during C-MAC or D-MAC video laryngoscopy. The study will have a time frame of 12 months. Data will be summarized using mean ± SD, median and interquantile, and frequency (%) for discrete variables by each group. Appropriate tests like t-test, ANOVA, chi-squared, and Fischer tests will be used to compare the mean primary outcome variable, duration of desaturation, between two groups after adjusting the effects of risk factors. For the secondary outcome variables, appropriate tests like t-test, ANOVA, or the chi-squared tests will be performed to compare the continuous variables between two groups to compare the percentage of discrete outcome variables between two groups. Statistical analyses will be conducted using STATA 10.0 College Station, TX and a p-value \< 0.05 will be considered as statistical significant.

Interventions

DEVICEDMAC

The D blade will constitute the experimental treatment and in a cross over fashion will be tested against CMAC blade

DEVICECMAC

The CMAC Blade will constitute the active comparator treatment and in a cross over fashion will be tested against D-blade

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-65 years * ASA I-III * BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Necessary awake intubation * Mallampati IV * \< 2 finger breath or 4 cm mouth opening * Previous history of difficult intubation * ASA IV-V * Unstable cervical, thoracic and/or lumbar fracture * Known history of congestive heart failure or a severe disease that alters pulmonary mechanics (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restrictive lung diseases)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time for Intubation90 secondsTime taken for successful placement of endotracheal tube after a successful laryngoscopy. Typically a successful laryngoscopy will range from few seconds to no more than 90 seconds. A successful intubation will not range more than 90 seconds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Laryngoscopy30 secondsPatients underwent laryngoscopy first with their assigned randomized laryngoscope. Time measured was from the time from the moment the anesthesiologist had the laryngoscope in hand to time to optimal visualization of vocal cords.
Second Laryngoscopy30 secondsA second laryngoscopy will be performed in patients with the video laryngoscope from the other group. Patients will be intubated after second laryngoscopy with with this same video laryngoscope.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The dates of the recruitment period were 6/1/11 -12/12/11. Patients were recruited in the Preoperative Day Surgery area and preoperative Holding Unit.

Pre-assignment details

No enrolled patients were excluded from the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
C-MAC First, Then DMAC Video Laryngoscopy
C-MAC video laryngoscope (Intubation) : Patients assigned to this arm will have a first laryngoscopy with C-MAC video laryngoscope then a second laryngoscopy with the D-MAC video laryngoscope. Patients will be intubated after second laryngoscopy with D-MAC laryngoscope.
25
D-MAC First, Then C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy
D-MAC video laryngoscope (Intubation) : Patients assigned to this arm will have a first laryngoscopy with D-MAC video laryngoscope then a second laryngoscopy with the C-MAC video laryngoscope. Patients will be intubated after second laryngoscopy with C-MAC laryngoscope.
25
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicD-MAC First, Then C-MAC Video LaryngoscopyC-MAC First, Then DMAC Video LaryngoscopyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Age, Continuous46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
42.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants21 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Time for Intubation

Time taken for successful placement of endotracheal tube after a successful laryngoscopy. Typically a successful laryngoscopy will range from few seconds to no more than 90 seconds. A successful intubation will not range more than 90 seconds.

Time frame: 90 seconds

Population: The unit of measure of time in seconds from D-MAC larynogoscopy to intubation in the (C-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then DMAC Video Laryngoscopy) group and from C-MAC laryngoscopy to intubation in the (D-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy) group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then DMAC Video LaryngoscopyTime for Intubation9 seconds
D-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then C-MAC Video LaryngoscopyTime for Intubation7.3 seconds
Secondary

First Laryngoscopy

Patients underwent laryngoscopy first with their assigned randomized laryngoscope. Time measured was from the time from the moment the anesthesiologist had the laryngoscope in hand to time to optimal visualization of vocal cords.

Time frame: 30 seconds

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then DMAC Video LaryngoscopyFirst Laryngoscopy6.7 seconds
D-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then C-MAC Video LaryngoscopyFirst Laryngoscopy7.2 seconds
Secondary

Second Laryngoscopy

A second laryngoscopy will be performed in patients with the video laryngoscope from the other group. Patients will be intubated after second laryngoscopy with with this same video laryngoscope.

Time frame: 30 seconds

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
C-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then DMAC Video LaryngoscopySecond Laryngoscopy6.7 seconds
D-MAC Laryngoscopy First, Then C-MAC Video LaryngoscopySecond Laryngoscopy5.5 seconds

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026