Skip to content

Vaporized Cannabis and Spinal Cord Injury Pain

The Effect of Vaporized Cannabis on Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01555983
Enrollment
42
Registered
2012-03-16
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Diseases, Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

cannabis, central neuropathic pain, analgesia

Brief summary

This study will demonstrate that vaporized marijuana results in antinociception when compared to placebo in subjects with spinal cord injury. To further evaluate potential benefits and side effects, the effect of different strengths of cannabis on mood, cognition, and psychomotor performance will also be measured.

Detailed description

This study will demonstrate that vaporized cannabis can produce antinociceptive effects compared to placebo in human subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI). A within-subject crossover study of the effects of cannabis versus placebo on spontaneous and evoked pain will be performed. A synopsis of antinociception with mood, cognitive impairment, psychomotor performance, and side effects will be obtained to help evaluate the utility of vaporized marijuana in SCI neuropathic pain. This study will compare the analgesic and side effect profile of low (3.5%) to high dose (7.0%) delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in subjects with spinal cord injury pain. It is hypothesized that a low dose will produce a lesser degree of neuropsychological impairment while maintaining a similar degree of pain relief to the higher dose. The use of two different strengths will help determine tolerable dosing for the treatment of SCI neuropathic pain.

Interventions

DRUGVaporization of Cannabis

Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial of Vaporized Cannabis using different strengths of THC in patients with Central Neuropathic Pain Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 6.7% THC Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 2.9% THC Placebo Comparator: Vaporized Placebo THC

Sponsors

VA Northern California Health Care System
CollaboratorFED
University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Barth Wilsey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age greater than 18 and less than 70 2. Pain intensity ≥ 4/10 3. Neuropathic pain defined as chronic pain in an area of sensory abnormality corresponding to the spinal cord or nerve root lesion, and the pain should have no primary relation to movement, inflammation or other local tissue damage 4. Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs score greater than or equal to 12 5. Spinal cord injury of 3 or more months duration (to avoid spontaneous recovery obfuscating generalizability)

Exclusion criteria

1. Known concomitant cerebral damage/cognitive impairment (TBI, Alzheimer's Disease Vascular dementia, Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy Bodies and Front temporal dementia 2. Clinically significant or unstable medical condition (i.e., cardiac, respiratory, hepatic or renal disease) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise participation in the study 3. Neurologic disorders unrelated to spinal cord injury that may confound the assessment of the central neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury (hereditary neuropathies; diabetic peripheral neuropathy; traumatic neuropathy; and immune-mediated neuropathies) 4. Active substance abuse within past year using The Substance Abuse Module of Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV 5. Pregnancy as ascertained by a self-report and a mandatory commercial pregnancy test 6. Currently on probation or parole. 7. Hx of Schizophrenia, Bipolar Depression with Mania, current suicidal ideation or past history of suicide attempt 8. Severe depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ≥ 15) 9. Current suicidal ideation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Pain Intensity of 30% or Morehourly pain assessments for 8 hoursNumber of participants achieving a reduction of pain intensity of 30% or more, a level believed to be clinically important, was estimated for each treatment dose.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled via recruitment from the UC Davis Medical Center Spinal Cord Injury Clinic, IRB-approved recruitment letters and newspaper advertisements.

Pre-assignment details

Screening for inclusion criteria (e.g., age \> 18 and ≤ 70, pain intensity ≥ 4/10 and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, a pain scale based on analysis of sensory description and bedside examination of sensory dysfunction. A threshold of ≥12 on this instrument was utilized to substantiate neuropathic pain.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
All participants received all interventions
42
Total42

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject100011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 410 / 380 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 410 / 381 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 410 / 380 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Pain Intensity of 30% or More

Number of participants achieving a reduction of pain intensity of 30% or more, a level believed to be clinically important, was estimated for each treatment dose.

Time frame: hourly pain assessments for 8 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo THCNumber of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Pain Intensity of 30% or More18 participants
2.9% THCNumber of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Pain Intensity of 30% or More26 participants
6.7% THCNumber of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Pain Intensity of 30% or More35 participants
Comparison: The number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve 30% pain reduction during the 8-hour period was 4 (95% CI: 2.1-25.3) for the lower dose vs. placebo, and 3 (95% CI: 1.6-4.2) for the higher dose versus placebo.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026