Skip to content

Comparison of Perennial and Preseasonal Subcutaneous Immunotherapy

A Randomised Double-blind Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Perennial in Comparison to Preseasonal Grass/Rye Pollen Immunotherapy in Patients Suffering From Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01555736
Enrollment
120
Registered
2012-03-15
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
2006-09-30
Last updated
2012-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

allergic rhinitis, perennial immunotherapy, preseasonal immunotherapy

Brief summary

Specific immunotherapy, which involves the administration of allergic extracts to patients with symptoms of allergic disorder, is the leading therapeutical tool of modern allergology. According to the latest studies immunotherapy not only reduces symptoms' severity but also may modify the course of allergic disease by reducing the risk of new sensitisations and development of more advanced stages of the disease.It has been hypothesized basing on clinical observation that perennial immunotherapy is more effective and safer in comparison to preseasonal immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of perennial and preseasonal immunotherapy on rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and safety of both treatments.

Interventions

DRUGgrass (80%) and rye (20%) pollens allergoids

comparison of two schemes of immunotherapy - preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy.

Sponsors

Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medical University of Lodz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. IgE-mediated seasonal allergic rhinitis with symptoms during the grass and rye pollens season (May, June, July); 2. Symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis requiring medication during the last season 3. Positive skin prick test to grass and rye pollens only with wheal at least as large as histamine control reaction and diameter \> 5mm; 4. For female patients effective contraception and negative pregnancy test results were necessary.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous course of immunotherapy with grass and rye pollens extracts or allergens which are unknown during the last 5 years 2. FEV1 \< 80% of predicted 3. Uncontrolled bronchial asthma according to GINA 4. Non-allergic rhinoconjunctivitis 5. Severe acute or chronic diseases, severe inflammatory diseases 6. Autoimmune diseases, immunosuppression, neoplastic diseases 7. Severe psychiatric and psychological disorders including alcohol or drug abuse 8. Contraindication for application of adrenaline; 9. Treatment with beta-blockers 10. Pregnancy or lactation period 11. Females patients seeking to become pregnant 12. Low compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
difference between preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy in area under curve of combined symptom medication score during 1st year of immunotherapyup to 3 monthscombined symptom medication score was calculated as a sum of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medications during pollen season
difference between preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy in area under curve of combined symptom medication score during 2nd year of immunotherapyup to 3 monthscombined symptom medication score was calculated as a sum of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medications during pollen season
difference between preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy in area under curve of combined symptom medication score during 3rd year of immunotherapyup to 3 monthscombined symptom medication score was calculated as a sum of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medications during pollen season

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the differences between study groups in mean daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms scoreup to 3 months/4 years
the differences from baseline in combined symptom medication scoreup to 3 months/4 years
frequency of adverse reactions during immunotherapyup to 3 years of immunotherapy
the differences between study groups in combined symptom medication scoreup to 3 months/4 years
the differences between study groups in serum level of sIgG4up to 3 months/4 years
the differences from baseline a in serum level of sIgG4the peak of each pollen season (June) during 4 years of study
type of adverse reactionsup to 3 years of immunotherapy
the differences from baseline in mean daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms scoreup to 3 months/4 years

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026