Skip to content

Study of the Effectiveness of Administration of Meperidine on the Length of Active Phase of Labor in Women

Is There Any Effect of Meperidine on the Length of Duration of Labor? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01555671
Enrollment
250
Registered
2012-03-15
Start date
2012-01-01
Completion date
2015-07-01
Last updated
2021-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Pain

Keywords

labor,, meperidine,, active phase,, duration of labor

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effect of meperidine on the length of active phase of labor in nulliparous or multiparous women, who will be randomized into two (control and study) groups. Our hypothesis is that the use of meperidine during active labor has no effect on the duration of labor.

Detailed description

* Our aim is to examine the effect of the opioid derivative meperidine used during labor on the duration of labor in singleton pregnancies. * The sample size was calculated using the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) / PASS 2007. Power 80% and significance level (α) 0.05, the mean (mean) ± standard deviation (SD) of the first 20 individuals included in the control group of the study (296.04 ± 170.02) and has minimal clinical significance for the active phase of labor from previous studies. We found that the sample size should be 200 (100/100) considering the duration (30 minutes). * A Simple randomisation using a random-number table was performed by the independent nurse staff, who took no further part in the study.Using the sealed envelope technique, parturients were randomly allocated to two groups: A meperidine group and B normal saline group * Age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), gravida, parity, week of gestation, expected fetal weight (EFW), hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) values and episiotomy requirements were recorded in two groups.Gender, birth weight, 1st and 5th minute Apgar scores and presence of meconium aspiration of the newborns in two groups were recorded. * During labor, oxytocin induction was not performed during the latent phase in accordance with the routine protocol of our hospital. Pregnant women in both groups were given oxytocin (Synpitan® amp) at a concentration of 1% by 10 drops/min by performing amniotomy when Bishop score was 6 or cervix dilation was 4 cm and when 70% effacement was achieved. In the meperidine group, when the cervical opening was 6 cm and 70% washout, 25 mg iv bolus injection of meperidine (2.5 ml) was administered. The same amount (2.5 ml) of physiological saline was administered intravenously to the subjects in the control group. The patients were followed in NST until 10 cm clearance and 100% effacement. This time was recorded as active phase time. The time from the end of the active phase period to the birth of the baby was recorded as the duration of the second phase of birth. * The primary outcome of interest in this study is the duration of active phase of labor .

Interventions

DRUGMeperidine

0.5 ml meperidine injection intravenously injected in randomly selected patients

DRUGSaline

0.5 ml saline solution injection intravenously injected in randomly selected patients

Sponsors

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Both drug provider and patient do not know which drug or placebo was given

Intervention model description

Randomized parallel double blind plasebo controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* gestational age between 38 and 42 weeks * live fetus * cephalic presentation * in active phase of labour

Exclusion criteria

* placenta previa, placental abruption * caesarean section or any uterine scarring * multiple gestation * fetal macrosomia (≥4000 g) * meperidine allergy * use any kind of labour induction or augmentation before on admission for delivery in our hospital

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Duration of Active Phase of Labour24hThe primary outcome is to evaluate whether meperidine is effective in shortening the duration of the active phase of labor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Duration of Labour24hTotal time of delivery of patients who gave birth including the second stage of delivery
Duration of the Second Stage of Labour24hThe period of time until the birth of the baby, since the patient being followed for delivery

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was planned to be carried out between January 2012 and May 2012 in Kanuni Sultan Süleyman training and research hospital(Istanbul-Turkey), gynecology and obstetrics department.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 449 patients were included in the study. 199 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded from the study. The remaining 250 patients were randomized to the groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study Group
0.5 ml meperidine injection intravenously injected in randomly selected patients
125
Plasebo Group
0.5 ml saline solution injection intravenously injected in randomly selected patients
125
Total250

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2025

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlasebo GroupStudy GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
125 Participants125 Participants250 Participants
Age, Continuous26.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
25.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.17
25.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.06
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
125 participants125 participants250 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
125 Participants125 Participants250 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 1054 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1050 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

The Duration of Active Phase of Labour

The primary outcome is to evaluate whether meperidine is effective in shortening the duration of the active phase of labor

Time frame: 24h

Population: women giving birth at term period

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Meperidine Administration GroupThe Duration of Active Phase of Labour249 minutesStandard Deviation 122
Plasebo GroupThe Duration of Active Phase of Labour304 minutesStandard Deviation 167
p-value: 0.029Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Duration of the Second Stage of Labour

The period of time until the birth of the baby, since the patient being followed for delivery

Time frame: 24h

Population: duration of the second stage of labour

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Meperidine Administration GroupDuration of the Second Stage of Labour24 minutesStandard Deviation 15
Plasebo GroupDuration of the Second Stage of Labour27 minutesStandard Deviation 22
Secondary

Total Duration of Labour

Total time of delivery of patients who gave birth including the second stage of delivery

Time frame: 24h

Population: Total time of delivery of patients who gave birth including the second stage of delivery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Meperidine Administration GroupTotal Duration of Labour273 minutesStandard Deviation 129
Plasebo GroupTotal Duration of Labour331 minutesStandard Deviation 177

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026