Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Azelaic Acid Foam, 15 % in Papulopustular Rosacea

A Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% Topically Applied Twice Daily for 12 Weeks in Subjects With Papulopustular Rosacea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01555463
Enrollment
961
Registered
2012-03-15
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2023-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Papulopustular Rosacea

Keywords

Rosacea

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of azelaic acid (AzA) foam, 15% topically applied twice daily for 12 weeks in subjects with papulopustular rosacea compared to its vehicle.

Detailed description

To determine the efficacy of AzA foam, 15% compared to vehicle topically applied twice daily in papulopustular rosacea evaluated by therapeutic success rate according to Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) and change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to end of treatment. Evaluation of all adverse events will be covered in Adverse Events section.

Interventions

DRUGAzelaic acid foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)

Azelaic acid twice daily topical application

DRUGVehicle foam

twice daily topical application

Sponsors

Bayer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
LEO Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of papulopustular rosacea * Free of any clinically significant disease, which could interfere with the study * Male or female subject aged ≥ 18 years * Willingness of subject to follow all study procedures * Signed written informed consent before any study-related activities are carried out

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who are known to be non-responders to azelaic acid * Presence of dermatoses that might interfere with rosacea diagnosis * Ocular rosacea; phymatous rosacea; subjects with plaque-type rosacea lesions, papulopustular rosacea that requires systemic treatment * Topical use of any prescription or non-prescription medication to treat rosacea within 6 weeks prior to randomization and throughout the study * Systemic use of any prescription or non-prescription medication to treat rosacea (Retinoids within 6 months, Tetracycline within 2 months, Corticosteroids, erythromycin, azithromycin, and/or metronidazole within 4 weeks) prior to randomization and throughout the study * Facial laser surgery for telangiectasia (or other conditions) within 6 weeks prior to randomization * Known hypersensitivity to any ingredients of the investigational product formulation * Participation in another clinical research in parallel or within the last 4 weeks before randomization in this study * Any condition or therapy that in the investigator's opinion may pose a risk to the subject or that could interfere with any evaluation in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksStatic evaluation of overall severity of papulopustular rosacea at a given time: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal.
Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe mean (standard deviation) change from baseline in the inflammatory lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksErythema was rated as: clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; or severe. For the assessment of the grouped change in erythema ratings, the baseline examination was used to group into 'improved', 'no change', or 'worsened'. A participant was considered to have an 'improved' erythema rating if the erythema rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each of these categories is presented.
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe IGA consists of 5 scores: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. The percentage of participants with each score at the end of treatment is provided.
Nominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe mean (standard deviation) lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.
Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe percentage of participants in each rating category of erythema (clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; severe) at the end of treatment is provided.
Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksTelangiectasia was rated as: no; mild; moderate; or severe. At the end of study, a participant was considered to have an 'improved' telangiectasia rating if the telangiectasia rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each category is presented.
Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksFacial skin color (as compared with skin outside the treatment area) was rated as: normal; barely visible skin lightening; mild skin lightening; moderate skin lightening; severe skin lightening. The percentage of participants in each category of facial skin color at the end of study is presented.
Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentAt end of treatment, up to 12 weeksAt the end of treatment, participants assessed the change of papulopustular rosacea from baseline (how it looked, felt, appeared to others) as excellent improvement, good improvement, fair improvement, no improvement, or worse. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksThe mean (standard deviation) percentage change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to end of study is provided.
Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentAt end of treatment, up to 12 weeksAt the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on cosmetic acceptability of the investigational product as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentAt end of treatment, up to 12 weeksAt the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on the practicability of the use of the investigational product in facial areas next to the hairline as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Change From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life ScoreBaseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeksThe Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of rosacea on a participant's quality of life. Each of the 21 items in this questionnaire asks about the frequency with which a particular aspect of living with rosacea affects the participant: possible responses for each item are never (score=1), rarely (score=2), sometimes (score=3), often (score=4), or all the time (score=5). The overall score is the sum of the results from all 21 questions, with possible scores ranging from 21 (best) to 105 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The mean (standard deviation) of the change, defined as end of treatment overall score minus baseline overall score, is presented.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall ScoreBaseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeksThe Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a questionnaire consisting of a set of 10 questions that evaluate the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the past week. Possible responses to each question are: very much (question 7: yes) (score=3), a lot (score=2), a little (score=1), or not at all/not relevant (score=0). The DLQI overall score is the sum of the results from all 10 questions, with possible scores ranging from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The number of participants with score changes (end of treatment - baseline) in DLQI overall score from baseline to end of treatment \<=-5 and \>-5 are presented.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of TreatmentBaseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeksThe EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-VAS asks for a judgment of the overall health status assessed by the participant her/himself. The 20-cm visual analog scale (VAS) has endpoints labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state that are anchored at 100 and 0, respectively. Respondents are asked to indicate how they rate their own health by drawing a line from an anchor box to that point on the EQ-VAS, which best represents their own health on that day; higher scores indicate a better health state. The median (range) of the change, defined as EQ-VAS at end of treatment minus EQ-VAS at baseline, is presented.
Change From Baseline in Index Value at End of TreatmentBaseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeksThe EuroQol Group Questionnaire-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, it provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. It is used to assess the level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension is evaluated using 5 levels: no problems (level 1), slight problems (level 2), moderate problems (level 3), severe problems (level 4), and extreme problems (level 5). A scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group calculates a single index value from the results from all 5 domains along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (full health). The median (range) change, defined as the index value at end of treatment minus the index value at baseline, is presented.
Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentAt end of treatment, up to 12 weeksAt the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on local tolerability of the investigational product as excellent, good, acceptable despite minor irritation, less acceptable due to continuous irritation, non-acceptable, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeksParticipants achieving a clear, minimal, or mild IGA at the end of treatment were considered as 'responder'. Participants with an IGA of moderate or severe at the end of treatment were considered as 'non-responder'. Participants who prematurely withdraw from study treatment because of lack of efficacy were coded as 'non-responders'. The percentage of responders is presented.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)
0.5 g azelaic acid (AzA) foam, 15% applied twice daily (BID) topical and nonocclusive on facial skin for 12 weeks.
483
Vehicle Foam
0.5 g vehicle foam applied twice daily topical and nonocclusive on facial skin for 12 weeks.
478
Total961

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow upAdverse Event25
Follow upDeath01
Follow upLost to Follow-up910
Follow upOther reason33
Follow upProtocol Violation24
Follow upWithdrawal by Subject2222
TreatmentAdverse Event612
TreatmentLost to Follow-up2823
TreatmentOther reason23
TreatmentProtocol Violation45
TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject2436

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAzelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Vehicle FoamTotal
Age, Continuous51.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
51.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
51.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Erythema rating
Clear or almost clear
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Erythema rating
Mild
43 Participants39 Participants82 Participants
Erythema rating
Moderate
364 Participants370 Participants734 Participants
Erythema rating
Severe
76 Participants69 Participants145 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Clear
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Mild
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Minimal
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Moderate
418 Participants416 Participants834 Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Severe
65 Participants62 Participants127 Participants
Lesion count21.7 Inflammatory lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
21.2 Inflammatory lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
21.4 Inflammatory lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
354 Participants348 Participants702 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
129 Participants130 Participants259 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
148 / 483117 / 478
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 4834 / 478

Outcome results

Primary

Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)

The mean (standard deviation) change from baseline in the inflammatory lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)-13.2 Inflammatory lesionsStandard Deviation 9.5
Vehicle FoamNominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)-10.3 Inflammatory lesionsStandard Deviation 9.8
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)

Static evaluation of overall severity of papulopustular rosacea at a given time: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal.

Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)32.1 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)23.4 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of Treatment

The EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-VAS asks for a judgment of the overall health status assessed by the participant her/himself. The 20-cm visual analog scale (VAS) has endpoints labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state that are anchored at 100 and 0, respectively. Respondents are asked to indicate how they rate their own health by drawing a line from an anchor box to that point on the EQ-VAS, which best represents their own health on that day; higher scores indicate a better health state. The median (range) of the change, defined as EQ-VAS at end of treatment minus EQ-VAS at baseline, is presented.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Change From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of Treatment0 Scores on a scale
Vehicle FoamChange From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of Treatment0 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Index Value at End of Treatment

The EuroQol Group Questionnaire-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, it provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. It is used to assess the level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension is evaluated using 5 levels: no problems (level 1), slight problems (level 2), moderate problems (level 3), severe problems (level 4), and extreme problems (level 5). A scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group calculates a single index value from the results from all 5 domains along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (full health). The median (range) change, defined as the index value at end of treatment minus the index value at baseline, is presented.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Change From Baseline in Index Value at End of Treatment0.000 Scores on a scale
Vehicle FoamChange From Baseline in Index Value at End of Treatment0.000 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life Score

The Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of rosacea on a participant's quality of life. Each of the 21 items in this questionnaire asks about the frequency with which a particular aspect of living with rosacea affects the participant: possible responses for each item are never (score=1), rarely (score=2), sometimes (score=3), often (score=4), or all the time (score=5). The overall score is the sum of the results from all 21 questions, with possible scores ranging from 21 (best) to 105 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The mean (standard deviation) of the change, defined as end of treatment overall score minus baseline overall score, is presented.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Change From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life Score-6.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Vehicle FoamChange From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life Score-6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)

Erythema was rated as: clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; or severe. For the assessment of the grouped change in erythema ratings, the baseline examination was used to group into 'improved', 'no change', or 'worsened'. A participant was considered to have an 'improved' erythema rating if the erythema rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each of these categories is presented.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Improved61.5 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)No change36.9 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Worse1.7 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamGrouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Improved51.3 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamGrouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)No change46.2 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamGrouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Worse2.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)

Telangiectasia was rated as: no; mild; moderate; or severe. At the end of study, a participant was considered to have an 'improved' telangiectasia rating if the telangiectasia rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each category is presented.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Improved27.3 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)No change65.8 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Worse6.8 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamGrouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Improved22.6 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamGrouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)No change69.7 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamGrouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Worse7.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Nominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)

The mean (standard deviation) lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.

Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Nominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)8.5 Inflammatory lesionsStandard Deviation 8.9
Vehicle FoamNominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)10.8 Inflammatory lesionsStandard Deviation 11.3
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Score

The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a questionnaire consisting of a set of 10 questions that evaluate the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the past week. Possible responses to each question are: very much (question 7: yes) (score=3), a lot (score=2), a little (score=1), or not at all/not relevant (score=0). The DLQI overall score is the sum of the results from all 10 questions, with possible scores ranging from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The number of participants with score changes (end of treatment - baseline) in DLQI overall score from baseline to end of treatment \<=-5 and \>-5 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall ScoreScore change <=-5107 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall ScoreScore change >-5328 Participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall ScoreScore change <=-582 Participants
Vehicle FoamNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall ScoreScore change >-5349 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment

At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on local tolerability of the investigational product as excellent, good, acceptable despite minor irritation, less acceptable due to continuous irritation, non-acceptable, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.

Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentExcellent167 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentGood128 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentAcceptable despite minor irritation112 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentLess acceptable due to continuous irritation15 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentNot acceptable6 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentNo opinion7 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentNot acceptable7 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentExcellent165 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentLess acceptable due to continuous irritation27 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentGood173 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentNo opinion11 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of TreatmentAcceptable despite minor irritation49 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment

At the end of treatment, participants assessed the change of papulopustular rosacea from baseline (how it looked, felt, appeared to others) as excellent improvement, good improvement, fair improvement, no improvement, or worse. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.

Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentGood improvement174 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentNo improvement57 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentFair improvement121 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentWorse8 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentExcellent improvement75 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentWorse27 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentExcellent improvement42 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentGood improvement151 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentFair improvement128 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of TreatmentNo improvement84 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment

At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on cosmetic acceptability of the investigational product as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.

Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentGood112 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentPoor36 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentSatisfactory95 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentNo opinion16 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentVery good176 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentNo opinion21 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentVery good124 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentGood142 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentSatisfactory99 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of TreatmentPoor46 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment

At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on the practicability of the use of the investigational product in facial areas next to the hairline as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.

Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentGood143 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentPoor14 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentSatisfactory67 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentNo opinion25 Participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentVery good186 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentNo opinion24 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentVery good155 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentGood151 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentSatisfactory75 Participants
Vehicle FoamParticipants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of TreatmentPoor27 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)

The percentage of participants in each rating category of erythema (clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; severe) at the end of treatment is provided.

Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Clear or almost clear9.3 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Mild51.8 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Moderate34.2 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Severe4.8 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Severe6.7 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Clear or almost clear8.4 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Moderate43.1 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)Mild41.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)

Facial skin color (as compared with skin outside the treatment area) was rated as: normal; barely visible skin lightening; mild skin lightening; moderate skin lightening; severe skin lightening. The percentage of participants in each category of facial skin color at the end of study is presented.

Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Barely visible skin-lightening8.7 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Moderate skin lightening2.7 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Mild skin lightening8.3 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Severe skin lightening0.2 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Normal skin color80.1 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Severe skin lightening0 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Normal skin color78.7 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Barely visible skin-lightening10.5 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Mild skin lightening7.7 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)Moderate skin lightening3.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)

Participants achieving a clear, minimal, or mild IGA at the end of treatment were considered as 'responder'. Participants with an IGA of moderate or severe at the end of treatment were considered as 'non-responder'. Participants who prematurely withdraw from study treatment because of lack of efficacy were coded as 'non-responders'. The percentage of responders is presented.

Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)66.3 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)54.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)

The IGA consists of 5 scores: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. The percentage of participants with each score at the end of treatment is provided.

Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Minimal27.5 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Moderate30.2 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Mild34.2 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Severe3.5 Percentage of participants
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Clear4.6 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Severe6.9 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Clear4.4 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Minimal19.0 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Mild31.0 Percentage of participants
Vehicle FoamPercentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)Moderate38.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)

The mean (standard deviation) percentage change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to end of study is provided.

Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks

Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251)Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)-61.6 Percent change of inflammatory lesionsStandard Deviation 33.5
Vehicle FoamPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)-50.8 Percent change of inflammatory lesionsStandard Deviation 40

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026