Papulopustular Rosacea
Conditions
Keywords
Rosacea
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of azelaic acid (AzA) foam, 15% topically applied twice daily for 12 weeks in subjects with papulopustular rosacea compared to its vehicle.
Detailed description
To determine the efficacy of AzA foam, 15% compared to vehicle topically applied twice daily in papulopustular rosacea evaluated by therapeutic success rate according to Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) and change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to end of treatment. Evaluation of all adverse events will be covered in Adverse Events section.
Interventions
Azelaic acid twice daily topical application
twice daily topical application
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of papulopustular rosacea * Free of any clinically significant disease, which could interfere with the study * Male or female subject aged ≥ 18 years * Willingness of subject to follow all study procedures * Signed written informed consent before any study-related activities are carried out
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects who are known to be non-responders to azelaic acid * Presence of dermatoses that might interfere with rosacea diagnosis * Ocular rosacea; phymatous rosacea; subjects with plaque-type rosacea lesions, papulopustular rosacea that requires systemic treatment * Topical use of any prescription or non-prescription medication to treat rosacea within 6 weeks prior to randomization and throughout the study * Systemic use of any prescription or non-prescription medication to treat rosacea (Retinoids within 6 months, Tetracycline within 2 months, Corticosteroids, erythromycin, azithromycin, and/or metronidazole within 4 weeks) prior to randomization and throughout the study * Facial laser surgery for telangiectasia (or other conditions) within 6 weeks prior to randomization * Known hypersensitivity to any ingredients of the investigational product formulation * Participation in another clinical research in parallel or within the last 4 weeks before randomization in this study * Any condition or therapy that in the investigator's opinion may pose a risk to the subject or that could interfere with any evaluation in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward) | At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | Static evaluation of overall severity of papulopustular rosacea at a given time: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal. |
| Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | The mean (standard deviation) change from baseline in the inflammatory lesion count at the end of treatment is provided. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | Erythema was rated as: clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; or severe. For the assessment of the grouped change in erythema ratings, the baseline examination was used to group into 'improved', 'no change', or 'worsened'. A participant was considered to have an 'improved' erythema rating if the erythema rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each of these categories is presented. |
| Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | The IGA consists of 5 scores: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. The percentage of participants with each score at the end of treatment is provided. |
| Nominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | The mean (standard deviation) lesion count at the end of treatment is provided. |
| Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | The percentage of participants in each rating category of erythema (clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; severe) at the end of treatment is provided. |
| Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | Telangiectasia was rated as: no; mild; moderate; or severe. At the end of study, a participant was considered to have an 'improved' telangiectasia rating if the telangiectasia rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each category is presented. |
| Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | Facial skin color (as compared with skin outside the treatment area) was rated as: normal; barely visible skin lightening; mild skin lightening; moderate skin lightening; severe skin lightening. The percentage of participants in each category of facial skin color at the end of study is presented. |
| Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | At the end of treatment, participants assessed the change of papulopustular rosacea from baseline (how it looked, felt, appeared to others) as excellent improvement, good improvement, fair improvement, no improvement, or worse. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | The mean (standard deviation) percentage change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to end of study is provided. |
| Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on cosmetic acceptability of the investigational product as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented. |
| Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on the practicability of the use of the investigational product in facial areas next to the hairline as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented. |
| Change From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life Score | Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | The Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of rosacea on a participant's quality of life. Each of the 21 items in this questionnaire asks about the frequency with which a particular aspect of living with rosacea affects the participant: possible responses for each item are never (score=1), rarely (score=2), sometimes (score=3), often (score=4), or all the time (score=5). The overall score is the sum of the results from all 21 questions, with possible scores ranging from 21 (best) to 105 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The mean (standard deviation) of the change, defined as end of treatment overall score minus baseline overall score, is presented. |
| Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Score | Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a questionnaire consisting of a set of 10 questions that evaluate the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the past week. Possible responses to each question are: very much (question 7: yes) (score=3), a lot (score=2), a little (score=1), or not at all/not relevant (score=0). The DLQI overall score is the sum of the results from all 10 questions, with possible scores ranging from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The number of participants with score changes (end of treatment - baseline) in DLQI overall score from baseline to end of treatment \<=-5 and \>-5 are presented. |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of Treatment | Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | The EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-VAS asks for a judgment of the overall health status assessed by the participant her/himself. The 20-cm visual analog scale (VAS) has endpoints labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state that are anchored at 100 and 0, respectively. Respondents are asked to indicate how they rate their own health by drawing a line from an anchor box to that point on the EQ-VAS, which best represents their own health on that day; higher scores indicate a better health state. The median (range) of the change, defined as EQ-VAS at end of treatment minus EQ-VAS at baseline, is presented. |
| Change From Baseline in Index Value at End of Treatment | Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | The EuroQol Group Questionnaire-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, it provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. It is used to assess the level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension is evaluated using 5 levels: no problems (level 1), slight problems (level 2), moderate problems (level 3), severe problems (level 4), and extreme problems (level 5). A scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group calculates a single index value from the results from all 5 domains along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (full health). The median (range) change, defined as the index value at end of treatment minus the index value at baseline, is presented. |
| Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks | At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on local tolerability of the investigational product as excellent, good, acceptable despite minor irritation, less acceptable due to continuous irritation, non-acceptable, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented. |
| Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF) | At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks | Participants achieving a clear, minimal, or mild IGA at the end of treatment were considered as 'responder'. Participants with an IGA of moderate or severe at the end of treatment were considered as 'non-responder'. Participants who prematurely withdraw from study treatment because of lack of efficacy were coded as 'non-responders'. The percentage of responders is presented. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) 0.5 g azelaic acid (AzA) foam, 15% applied twice daily (BID) topical and nonocclusive on facial skin for 12 weeks. | 483 |
| Vehicle Foam 0.5 g vehicle foam applied twice daily topical and nonocclusive on facial skin for 12 weeks. | 478 |
| Total | 961 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow up | Adverse Event | 2 | 5 |
| Follow up | Death | 0 | 1 |
| Follow up | Lost to Follow-up | 9 | 10 |
| Follow up | Other reason | 3 | 3 |
| Follow up | Protocol Violation | 2 | 4 |
| Follow up | Withdrawal by Subject | 22 | 22 |
| Treatment | Adverse Event | 6 | 12 |
| Treatment | Lost to Follow-up | 28 | 23 |
| Treatment | Other reason | 2 | 3 |
| Treatment | Protocol Violation | 4 | 5 |
| Treatment | Withdrawal by Subject | 24 | 36 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Vehicle Foam | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 51.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 | 51.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 51.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 |
| Erythema rating Clear or almost clear | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Erythema rating Mild | 43 Participants | 39 Participants | 82 Participants |
| Erythema rating Moderate | 364 Participants | 370 Participants | 734 Participants |
| Erythema rating Severe | 76 Participants | 69 Participants | 145 Participants |
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clear | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Mild | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Minimal | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Moderate | 418 Participants | 416 Participants | 834 Participants |
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Severe | 65 Participants | 62 Participants | 127 Participants |
| Lesion count | 21.7 Inflammatory lesions STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 | 21.2 Inflammatory lesions STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 21.4 Inflammatory lesions STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 354 Participants | 348 Participants | 702 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 129 Participants | 130 Participants | 259 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 148 / 483 | 117 / 478 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 483 | 4 / 478 |
Outcome results
Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)
The mean (standard deviation) change from baseline in the inflammatory lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | -13.2 Inflammatory lesions | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
| Vehicle Foam | Nominal Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion (IL) Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | -10.3 Inflammatory lesions | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward)
Static evaluation of overall severity of papulopustular rosacea at a given time: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. Therapeutic success is defined as an IGA score of clear or minimal.
Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward) | 32.1 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Success at End of Treatment (LOCF: Last Observation Carried Forward) | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of Treatment
The EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The EQ-VAS asks for a judgment of the overall health status assessed by the participant her/himself. The 20-cm visual analog scale (VAS) has endpoints labeled best imaginable health state and worst imaginable health state that are anchored at 100 and 0, respectively. Respondents are asked to indicate how they rate their own health by drawing a line from an anchor box to that point on the EQ-VAS, which best represents their own health on that day; higher scores indicate a better health state. The median (range) of the change, defined as EQ-VAS at end of treatment minus EQ-VAS at baseline, is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Change From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of Treatment | 0 Scores on a scale |
| Vehicle Foam | Change From Baseline in EuroQol Group Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at End of Treatment | 0 Scores on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Index Value at End of Treatment
The EuroQol Group Questionnaire-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, it provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. It is used to assess the level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension is evaluated using 5 levels: no problems (level 1), slight problems (level 2), moderate problems (level 3), severe problems (level 4), and extreme problems (level 5). A scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group calculates a single index value from the results from all 5 domains along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (full health). The median (range) change, defined as the index value at end of treatment minus the index value at baseline, is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Change From Baseline in Index Value at End of Treatment | 0.000 Scores on a scale |
| Vehicle Foam | Change From Baseline in Index Value at End of Treatment | 0.000 Scores on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life Score
The Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of rosacea on a participant's quality of life. Each of the 21 items in this questionnaire asks about the frequency with which a particular aspect of living with rosacea affects the participant: possible responses for each item are never (score=1), rarely (score=2), sometimes (score=3), often (score=4), or all the time (score=5). The overall score is the sum of the results from all 21 questions, with possible scores ranging from 21 (best) to 105 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The mean (standard deviation) of the change, defined as end of treatment overall score minus baseline overall score, is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Change From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life Score | -6.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| Vehicle Foam | Change From Baseline in Rosacea Quality of Life (RosaQoL) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Quality of Life Score | -6.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.1 |
Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)
Erythema was rated as: clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; or severe. For the assessment of the grouped change in erythema ratings, the baseline examination was used to group into 'improved', 'no change', or 'worsened'. A participant was considered to have an 'improved' erythema rating if the erythema rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each of these categories is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Improved | 61.5 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | No change | 36.9 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Worse | 1.7 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Improved | 51.3 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | No change | 46.2 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Worse | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)
Telangiectasia was rated as: no; mild; moderate; or severe. At the end of study, a participant was considered to have an 'improved' telangiectasia rating if the telangiectasia rating was lower compared to the baseline rating, 'no change' if the rating was identical, and 'worsened' if the rating was higher. The percentage of participants in each category is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Improved | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | No change | 65.8 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Worse | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Improved | 22.6 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | No change | 69.7 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Grouped Changes From Baseline in Telangiectasia Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Worse | 7.7 Percentage of participants |
Nominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)
The mean (standard deviation) lesion count at the end of treatment is provided.
Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Nominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | 8.5 Inflammatory lesions | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Vehicle Foam | Nominal Value of Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | 10.8 Inflammatory lesions | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Score
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a questionnaire consisting of a set of 10 questions that evaluate the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the past week. Possible responses to each question are: very much (question 7: yes) (score=3), a lot (score=2), a little (score=1), or not at all/not relevant (score=0). The DLQI overall score is the sum of the results from all 10 questions, with possible scores ranging from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The number of participants with score changes (end of treatment - baseline) in DLQI overall score from baseline to end of treatment \<=-5 and \>-5 are presented.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Score | Score change <=-5 | 107 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Score | Score change >-5 | 328 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Score | Score change <=-5 | 82 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at End of Treatment - Overall Score | Score change >-5 | 349 Participants |
Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment
At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on local tolerability of the investigational product as excellent, good, acceptable despite minor irritation, less acceptable due to continuous irritation, non-acceptable, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Excellent | 167 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Good | 128 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Acceptable despite minor irritation | 112 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Less acceptable due to continuous irritation | 15 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Not acceptable | 6 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | No opinion | 7 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Not acceptable | 7 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Excellent | 165 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Less acceptable due to continuous irritation | 27 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Good | 173 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | No opinion | 11 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Tolerability at End of Treatment | Acceptable despite minor irritation | 49 Participants |
Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment
At the end of treatment, participants assessed the change of papulopustular rosacea from baseline (how it looked, felt, appeared to others) as excellent improvement, good improvement, fair improvement, no improvement, or worse. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Good improvement | 174 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | No improvement | 57 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Fair improvement | 121 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Worse | 8 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Excellent improvement | 75 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Worse | 27 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Excellent improvement | 42 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Good improvement | 151 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | Fair improvement | 128 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Global Assessment of Treatment Response at End of Treatment | No improvement | 84 Participants |
Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment
At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on cosmetic acceptability of the investigational product as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Good | 112 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Poor | 36 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Satisfactory | 95 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | No opinion | 16 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Very good | 176 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | No opinion | 21 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Very good | 124 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Good | 142 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Satisfactory | 99 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Cosmetic Acceptability at End of Treatment | Poor | 46 Participants |
Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment
At the end of treatment, participants provided their opinion on the practicability of the use of the investigational product in facial areas next to the hairline as very good, good, satisfactory, poor, or no opinion. The number of participants in each category of this assessment is presented.
Time frame: At end of treatment, up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized, were dispensed any study medication and had a non-missing observation at end of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Good | 143 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Poor | 14 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Satisfactory | 67 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | No opinion | 25 Participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Very good | 186 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | No opinion | 24 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Very good | 155 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Good | 151 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Satisfactory | 75 Participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Participants' Opinion on Practicability of Product Use in Facial Areas Next to the Hairline at End of Treatment | Poor | 27 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF)
The percentage of participants in each rating category of erythema (clear or almost clear; mild; moderate; severe) at the end of treatment is provided.
Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Clear or almost clear | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Mild | 51.8 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Moderate | 34.2 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Severe | 4.8 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Severe | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Clear or almost clear | 8.4 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Moderate | 43.1 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Erythema Intensity Score at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Mild | 41.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF)
Facial skin color (as compared with skin outside the treatment area) was rated as: normal; barely visible skin lightening; mild skin lightening; moderate skin lightening; severe skin lightening. The percentage of participants in each category of facial skin color at the end of study is presented.
Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Barely visible skin-lightening | 8.7 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Moderate skin lightening | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Mild skin lightening | 8.3 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Severe skin lightening | 0.2 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Normal skin color | 80.1 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Severe skin lightening | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Normal skin color | 78.7 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Barely visible skin-lightening | 10.5 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Mild skin lightening | 7.7 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Facial Skin Color Rating at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Moderate skin lightening | 3.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF)
Participants achieving a clear, minimal, or mild IGA at the end of treatment were considered as 'responder'. Participants with an IGA of moderate or severe at the end of treatment were considered as 'non-responder'. Participants who prematurely withdraw from study treatment because of lack of efficacy were coded as 'non-responders'. The percentage of responders is presented.
Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF) | 66.3 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Based Therapeutic Response at End of Treatment (LOCF) | 54.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF)
The IGA consists of 5 scores: 1) Clear: no papules and/or pustules; no erythema; 2) Minimal: rare papules and/or pustules; faint up to but not including mild erythema; 3) Mild: few papules and/or pustules; mild erythema; 4) Moderate: pronounced number of papules and/or pustules (but less than numerous papules and/or pustules); moderate erythema; 5) Severe: numerous papules and/or pustules, occasionally with confluent areas of inflamed lesions; moderate to severe erythema. The percentage of participants with each score at the end of treatment is provided.
Time frame: At end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Minimal | 27.5 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Moderate | 30.2 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Mild | 34.2 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Severe | 3.5 Percentage of participants |
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Clear | 4.6 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Severe | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Clear | 4.4 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Minimal | 19.0 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Mild | 31.0 Percentage of participants |
| Vehicle Foam | Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scores at End of Treatment (LOCF) | Moderate | 38.7 Percentage of participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF)
The mean (standard deviation) percentage change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline to end of study is provided.
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (LOCF), up to 12 weeks
Population: All subjects who were randomized and who were dispensed any study medication. For subjects with missing end of treatment observation the last non-missing observation was carried forward, including baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azelaic Acid Foam, 15% (BAY39-6251) | Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | -61.6 Percent change of inflammatory lesions | Standard Deviation 33.5 |
| Vehicle Foam | Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at End of Treatment (LOCF) | -50.8 Percent change of inflammatory lesions | Standard Deviation 40 |