Skip to content

Needle Nerve Contact in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Block

Incidence of Intraneural Needle Insertion in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Block: Out of Plane Versus in Plane Approach

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01554722
Enrollment
44
Registered
2012-03-15
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Nerve Injury

Keywords

Ultrasound guidance, Femoral nerve block, Needle placement, Intraneural needle insertion

Brief summary

Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block is a common regional anesthesia technique. The optimal method of needle guidance (in-plane versus out-of-plane) with regards to the block efficacy and avoidance of needle-nerve contact has not been established. In this study the investigators tests the hypothesis that the incidence of needle-nerve contact is higher with the needle insertion in an out-of-plane than with the in-plane approach.

Detailed description

Fourty-four patients with hip fracture (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3) are being randomized to receive the femoral block with an out-of-plane (needle inserted at a 45°-60° angle 1 cm caudal to the midpoint of the ultrasound probe just above the femoral nerve) or an in-plane technique (needle inserted 0.5 cm from the side of the probe lateral to the femoral nerve). The data collected includes the depth of needle insertion at the endpoint before injection, response to nerve stimulation, distribution of the injected volume in relation to the nerve (anterior vs posterior, the latter indicating impalement), block efficacy at 20 minutes and 24 hours, and any signs of nerve injury).

Interventions

PROCEDURENeedle placement

In plane versus out of plane needle placement techniques

Sponsors

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status 1-3 patients * Diagnosis of trochanteric or cervical hip fracture * Hip replacement under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under the age of 65 years or over the age of 90 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of intraneural needle insertion in ultrasound-guided femoral block: out-of-plane versus in-plane approach4 monthsThe incidence of needle-nerve contact is higher with the out-of-plane approach (inserting the needle into the fascia at the midpoint over the femoral nerve)needle-nerve contact than with the in-plane approach (inserting the needle lateral to the femoral nerve).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with femoral block success in ultrasound-guided femoral block: out-of-plane versus in-plane approach.4 monthsThe efficacy of the out-of-plane approach (inserting the needle into the fascia at the midpoint over the femoral nerve)needle-nerve contact and the in-plane approach (inserting the needle lateral to the femoral nerve).

Countries

Spain, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAna Ruiz, MD
anaruiz@clinic.ub.es0034932275558
Backup ContactXavier Sala-Blanch, MD
Xavier Sala-Blanch <xavi.sala.blanch@gmail.com>0034932275558

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026