Skip to content

Prontosan Versus Saline in the Cleansing of Chronic Leg Ulcers in Diabetic Patients

A Randomized, Double-Blind Exploratory Pilot Study Comparing Prontosan(TM) Versus Saline in the Cleansing of Chronic Leg Ulcers in Diabetic Patients

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01554644
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-03-15
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2013-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Complications

Keywords

Cleansing, Chronic Leg Ulcers, Diabetic Patients

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled double blinded study involving two (2) investigational sites in the United States. All subjects (n=40) will receive either Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution and Gel treatment or standard of care treatment (0.9% saline) and placebo gel. This is a 12-week study.

Interventions

DEVICEProntosan

Prontosan(TM) Wound Irrigation Solution (PHMB 0.1%, Betaine 0.1%) and Prontosan(TM) Wound Gel (PHMB 0.1%, Betaine 0.1%). Dressings will be changed and the treatment procedure will be repeated daily with 30ml/40 ml wound solution and 30 ml wound gel for a period of 12 weeks.

DEVICESaline

Saline Wound Irrigation Solution and inert Wound Gel. Dressings will be changed and the treatment procedure will be repeated daily with 30ml/40 ml wound solution and 30 ml wound gel for a period of 12 weeks.

Sponsors

B. Braun Medical Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female diabetic (type I or II) patients ≥ 18 years of age. * Diabetic ulcer(s) present for ≥ 4 weeks located below the knee. * A total surface area of ≥ 3 cm2 and ≤ 16 cm2. * Willingness to wear an off-loading device if medically indicated (e.g., DH shoe or Walker).

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women and nursing mothers. * Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by glucose levels \>225 mg/dl. * HbA1c ≥ 12%. * Subjects with a wound infection. * Subjects receiving antibiotic therapy within 14 days of enrollment. * Subject with history of or clinical evidence of: Cardiac insufficiency (NYHA functional classification IV), angina pectoris (CCS functional classification IV), unstable pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine or hematologic disease as determined by the Investigator (serum creatinine of \> 3.0; transaminase or alkaline phosphatase levels equal to or greater than 5 times the upper limit) malnutrition (albumin \< 2.5 g/dL). * Peripheral arterial occlusive disease with a non-palpable pulse on both dorsal pedial and the posterior tibial artery. * Presence of gangrene. * Active rheumatic or collagen vascular disease (including rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, and systemic lupus erythematosus) * Subjects that have been diagnosed with HBV, HVC, AIDS or are HIV positive. * Osteomyelitis diagnosed by x-ray, bone biopsy, or other radiological procedure within 90 days prior to Screening Period. * Active radiation therapy below the hip. * Subject currently receiving, or has received oral or parenteral corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or cytotoxic agents within 30 days prior to Baseline Visit (Visit 1, Week 0) or is anticipated to require such agents during the course of the study. * Current participation or participation in another investigational drug or medical device study within the last 30 days. * Subjects who test positive for alcohol and or illicit drug use. * Subjects who are unable to comprehend or comply with study requirements or ability to sign an informed consent. * Subjects, who in the opinion of the Investigator would not be a suitable candidate for this study (reason for exclusion needs to be documented).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Relative (%) area wound size change versus baseline in respondents to treatment following a 12-week treatment periodBaseline and 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Identification of bacteria present on wound bed at baseline and follow-up12-week treatment period
Relative change in bacterial load during treatment period12-week treatment period
Change in absolute wound area dimensions12-week treatment period
Number of non-responders as measured by wound size change (<50% relative wound size reduction12-week treatment period
Change of clinical wound infection during treatment period12-week treatment period
Change in wound margins determined by color photography12-week treatment period

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026