Skip to content

Trial of Point-of-treatment Xpert MTB/RIF Assay

Multicentre Randomised Control Trial of Point-of-treatment (Clinic-based) Xpert MTB/RIF Assay

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01554384
Acronym
TBNEATXpert
Enrollment
1472
Registered
2012-03-15
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2013-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tuberculosis

Keywords

Tuberculosis, diagnosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, point-of-treatment, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

Xpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel automated molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB. Xpert can detect TB genetic material in sputum samples as well as test for genetic resistance to rifampicin providing results within 2 hours. Xpert received WHO endorsement in December 2010. There is limited data on the impact of Xpert on time-to-treatment and TB-related patient morbidity in primary care clinics. No studies have yet evaluated Xpert performed at the point-of-treatment (POT) i.e. in primary care clinic location. The investigators hypothesize that one sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay performed at the POT will improve time-to-diagnosis, time-to-treatment and TB related patient morbidity for patients with suspected TB presenting to primary level TB clinics in high HIV prevalent settings.

Detailed description

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the world's most important infectious causes of mortality and continues to kill 1.8 million people annually. Despite intensified standard measure of TB control, TB case detection rates are low, posing major hurdles for TB control. It is estimated that approximately 50% of patients with TB are still not diagnosed and treated appropriately. The problem is compounded by the increasing prevalence of multi drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) TB and the close association between TB and HIV infection. Diagnostic tools introduced 100 years ago are still in routine use and increasingly inaccurate if the face of the HIV and TB syndemics. Consequently, many patients with active TB remain undiagnosed and continue to spread the disease within the community. Thus, missed or delayed diagnosis results in ongoing transmission, patient morbidity and mortality, and social and economic consequences. Currently, there is no available point-of-care, or even point-of-treatment test that allows early detection of active tuberculosis at the peripheral health clinic level. Lack of rapid, simple and accurate diagnostic tests at this level is a major hurdle in controlling the global burden of TB. A number of promising new TB diagnostics have shown initial promise but there remains an urgent need to assess their impact when used at the point-of-treatment in primary care level. In 2009, Cepheid released the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay, which is the only system able to deliver answers directly from unprocessed samples by combining on-board preparation of the sample with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in less than 2 hours. Additionally, the Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay allows for simultaneous on-demand molecular testing for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and rifampicin (frontline anti-TB drug) resistance. . The GeneXpert™ system consists of a GeneXpert instrument, personal computer and disposable fluidic cartridges. The system combines cartridge-based sample preparation with amplification and detection in a fully integrated and automated nucleic acid analysis instrument. Xpert has now been shown to be an accurate tool for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in both smear-positive and smear-negative samples in both a multicentre evaluation and demonstration study with a sensitivity of approximately 70% in smear negative culture positive TB. Xpert testing in both these studies was performed at microscopy laboratories. In December 2010, on the basis of these results, Xpert was endorsed for TB diagnosis by the World Health Organisation (WHO) but is yet to be integrated into national tuberculosis control programmes. Limited data is available on the impacts of Xpert on patient important outcomes such as TB-related morbidity. No data is available about the feasibility and robustness of performing Xpert in primary care clinics at the POT using minimally trained nursing staff. The objective of this study will be to examine the feasibility and impact of a single point-of-treatment Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Assay performed by clinic staff compared to standard microscopy-centre based diagnostics. Special focus will be on the patient-related outcomes of time-to-treatment initiation, drop out rates and the mean difference in TB-morbidity scores in patients diagnosed with Xpert. The Xpert POT study will be a multicentre patient-level randomised controlled trial comparing a single sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay performed at point-of-treatment with same-day standard fluorescent smear microscopy for TB diagnosis at the primary level of care. A single liquid MGIT culture performed a regional laboratory will be used as the reference standard.

Interventions

PROCEDUREXpert MTB/RIF assay

Automated nucleic-acid amplification test (fully integrated) test for TB

Smear microscopy involve sputum smear with either ziehl-neelsen or auramine-O staining of slides and light or fluorescence microscopy reading

Sponsors

Biomedical Research and Training Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zimbabwe
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zambia
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical Research Council, South Africa
CollaboratorOTHER
Mbeya medical research program
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
McGill University
CollaboratorOTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cape Town Lung Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cape Town
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able and willing to give informed consent 2. Ambulant patient presenting to TB clinic IF HIV negative requires 2 or more of the following: * Cough ≥ 2 weeks * loss of weight * persistent fever ≥ 2 weeks and/or * a single recorded temp \> 38°C * night sweats * generalized fatigue * hemoptysis or * chest pain OR if HIV positive - any one of the following: * current cough * night sweats * fever * loss of weight 3. Patient 18 years or above

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired) 2. Unable to produce 2 sputa of ≥ 1ml 3. TB treatment within the last 60 days 4. Unable to potentially return for study follow-up at 2 and 6 months (i.e. leaving community) 5. Patient not meeting inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in TB-related Morbidity2 monthsTime-specific (2 month) difference in morbidity between the Xpert MTB/RIF and smear microscopy study arms. Morbidity will be assessed using the TB Score and Karnosky performance scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time-to-diagnosis6 monthsTime from study enrollment to TB diagnosis in each study arm A diagnosis of TB will include: i) Smear microscopy: WHO classification for smear grading considered positive ii) Xpert MTB/RIF positive (mtb detected) iii) MGIT liquid culture positive
Drop-out and lost-to-follow up rates1 yearNumber of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, and then do not return to receive a positive test result, and Number of patients that are enrolled, randomized to a study arm, diagnosed with TB, and then are lost-to-follow up prior to completion of prescribed standard TB treatment
Feasibility of clinic-based performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed by nursing staff without formal research training6 monthsFeasibility indicators for the performance of Xpert at POT will be recorded. These include indeterminate rates, turn-around-time, user appraisal and assessments and performance comparisons between laboratory and clinic-based Xpert MTB/RIF.
Individual patient-level cost analysis, cost-effectiveness evaluation and quality of health indices evaluation1 yearDetailed documentation of patient and health system costs for TB diagnosis and treatment will be done at baseline, 2 month and 6 month time-points as well as quality of life health questionaires.
Time-to-treatment initiation6 monthsThe time-to-treatment initiation for TB culture positive patients in each study arm will be compared Treatment commencement will be considered as the initiation of the first dose of anti-TB treatment at a registered DOTs facility

Countries

South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026