Skip to content

Effectiveness of Vyvanse Compared to Concerta in Adolescents With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Forced-dose Titration, Safety and Efficacy Study of SPD489 (VYVANSE®) Compared With OROS-MPH (CONCERTA®) With a Placebo Reference Arm, in Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01552902
Enrollment
549
Registered
2012-03-13
Start date
2012-04-03
Completion date
2014-05-22
Last updated
2021-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

ADHD

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine effectiveness of Vyvanse compared to Concerta in adolescents with Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Interventions

DRUGLisdexamfetamine dimesylate

Daily oral dosing in the AM ranging from 30- 70 mg. 4 week forced dose titration, 2 week dose maintenance

DRUGMethylphenidate Hydrochloride

Daily oral dosing in the AM ranging from 18-72 mg. 4 week force dose titration, 2 week dose maintenance

DRUGPlacebo

Daily oral dosing in the AM for 6 weeks

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must be 13-17 years of age, inclusive, at the time of consent. * Subject must weigh more than 79.5lb. * The parent/LAR must be available at approximately 7:00AM (±2 hours) to dispense the dose of investigational product for the study duration. * Subject, who is a female, must have a negative serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test and a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to comply with any applicable contraceptive requirements of the protocol. * Subject has an ADHD-RS-IV total score ≥28. * Subject is able to swallow a capsule. * Subject does not have hypertension and has a resting sitting blood pressure less than or equal to 135/85mmHg.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a current, controlled (with medications prohibited in this study) or uncontrolled, comorbid psychiatric diagnosis with significant symptoms such as any significant comorbid Axis II disorder or significant Axis I disorder (such as post traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, bipolar illness, pervasive developmental disorder, severe obsessive compulsive disorder, depressive or anxiety disorder. * Diagnosis of conduct disorder. Oppositional defiant disorder is not exclusionary. * Subject is considered a suicide risk, has previously made a suicide attempt, or is currently demonstrating active suicidal ideation. Subjects with intermittent passive suicidal ideation are not necessarily excluded. * Subject is underweight or overweight. * Subject has a concurrent chronic or acute illness (such as severe allergic rhinitis or an infectious process requiring antibiotics), disability, or other condition. Mild, stable asthma is not exclusionary. * Subject has a history of seizures (other than infantile febrile seizures), a chronic or current tic disorder, or a current diagnosis and/or a known family history of Tourette's Disorder. * Subject has a known history of symptomatic cardiovascular disease, advanced arteriosclerosis, structural cardiac abnormality, cardiomyopathy, serious heart rhythm abnormalities, coronary artery disease, or other serious cardiac problems that may place him/her at increased vulnerability to the sympathomimetic effects of a stimulant medication. * Subject has a known family history of sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmia. * Subject has any clinically significant ECG or clinically significant laboratory abnormality. * Subject has current abnormal thyroid function, defined as abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroxine (T4). Treatment with a stable dose of thyroid medication for at least 3 months is permitted. * Subject has a documented allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to amphetamine or to any excipients in the investigational product. * Subject has a documented allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to MPH or to any excipients in the reference product. * Subject has failed to fully respond to an adequate course(s) (dose and duration) of MPH or amphetamine therapy. * Subject has a history of suspected substance abuse or dependence disorder (excluding nicotine). Subjects with a lifetime history of amphetamine, cocaine, or other stimulant abuse and/or dependence will be excluded. * Subject has a positive urine drug result. * Subject has previously participated in this study or another clinical study involving SPD489/NRP104. * Subject has glaucoma. * Subject is required to take or anticipates the need to take medications that have CNS effects or affect performance, such as sedating antihistamines and decongestant sympathomimetics, or are monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Stable use of bronchodilator inhalers is not exclusionary. * Subject is female and is pregnant or lactating. * Subject is well controlled on his/her current ADHD medication. * Subject has a pre-existing severe gastrointestinal tract narrowing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 6Baseline, Week 6The ADHD-RS-IV was developed to measure the behaviors of children with ADHD and is commonly used in clinical studies of ADHD. The ADHD-RS-IV consisted of 18 items designed to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (reflecting no symptoms) to 3 (reflecting severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0-54, Higher score = more severe symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6Week 6The Clinical Global Impressions Scale permits a global evaluation of the participant's severity of illness and improvement over time. The scale included a severity of illness item and a global improvement item. The investigator performed the CGI-I to rate the improvement of a participant's ADHD symptoms based on a 7-point scale (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; or 7=very much worse.). Percentage of participants with an improved measurement (response of very much improved and much improved) is reported.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsBaseline up to 3 days after last dose (last dose at Week 6)An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered as a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were events between first dose of double-blind investigational product and up to 3 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6Baseline, Week 6
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 6Baseline, Week 6

Countries

Canada, Germany, Hungary, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 77 sites in the United States, Canada, and Europe.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 778 screened participants, 229 were screen failures and 549 were randomized to treatment. A total of 547 participants were treated and the reasons for 2 'randomized but not treated' participants included withdrawal by 1 participant in the Methylphenidate group and 1 participant with a protocol violation in the Lisdexamfetamine group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
2 placebo over encapsulated capsules once daily orally for 6 weeks.
110
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX, Vyvanse®, SPD489) 30 to 70 mg over encapsulated capsule once daily orally along with placebo over encapsulated capsule for 4 weeks (forced dose titration), followed by LDX 70 mg over encapsulated capsule once daily orally along with placebo over encapsulated capsule for 2 weeks (dose maintenance).
218
Methylphenidate
Methylphenidate (Concerta, OROS-MPH) 18 to 72 mg over encapsulated capsule once daily orally along with placebo over encapsulated capsule (no placebo administered when methylphenidate 72 mg \[2\*36 mg capsules\] was administered) for 4 weeks (forced dose titration), followed by methylphenidate 72 mg (2\*36 mg capsules) over encapsulated capsule once daily orally for 2 weeks (dose maintenance).
219
Total547

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event11514
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy431
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up136
Overall StudyOther343
Overall StudyProtocol Violation333
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject196

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboLisdexamfetamine DimesylateMethylphenidateTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
110 Participants218 Participants219 Participants547 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous14.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37
14.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38
14.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.42
14.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subtype
Combined Subtype
68 Participants146 Participants144 Participants358 Participants
Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subtype
Predominantly Hyperactive/Impulsive
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Subtype
Predominantly Inattentive
40 Participants70 Participants71 Participants181 Participants
Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score36.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.91
37.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.46
36.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.42
36.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.34
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Borderline mentally ill
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Markedly ill
41 Participants106 Participants90 Participants237 Participants
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Mildly ill
2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Moderately ill
60 Participants93 Participants115 Participants268 Participants
Clinical Global Impressions - Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Severely ill
6 Participants15 Participants13 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants83 Participants69 Participants186 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
76 Participants135 Participants150 Participants361 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 110113 / 21899 / 219
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1101 / 2181 / 219

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 6

The ADHD-RS-IV was developed to measure the behaviors of children with ADHD and is commonly used in clinical studies of ADHD. The ADHD-RS-IV consisted of 18 items designed to reflect current symptomatology of ADHD based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition-Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (reflecting no symptoms) to 3 (reflecting severe symptoms) with total scores ranging from 0-54, Higher score = more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) was defined as all participants in the Safety set who had at least 1 post-baseline measurement of the ADHD-RS-IV. Not all FAS participants were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 6-17 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.03
Lisdexamfetamine DimesylateChange From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 6-25.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Fourth Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) Total Score at Week 6-22.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Comparison: The least squares mean (LSM), the difference in LSM and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and the p-value were from a mixed effects model for repeated measures that included treatment group, visit, interaction of the treatment group with the visit as factors, baseline score as a covariate, and an adjustment for the interaction of the baseline score with the visit. The model was based on Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method of estimation and utilized an unstructured covariance.p-value: =0.001395% CI: [-5.4, -1.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The LSM, the difference in LSM and its 95% CI, and the p-value were from a mixed effects model for repeated measures that included treatment group, visit, interaction of the treatment group with the visit as factors, baseline score as a covariate, and an adjustment for the interaction of the baseline score with the visit. The model was based on REML method of estimation and utilized an unstructured covariance.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-11, -6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The LSM, the difference in LSM and its 95% CI, and the p-value were from a mixed effects model for repeated measures that includes treatment group, visit, interaction of the treatment group with the visit as factors, baseline score as a covariate, and an adjustment for the interaction of the baseline score with the visit. The model was based on REML method of estimation and utilized an unstructured covariance.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-7.6, -2.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6

The Clinical Global Impressions Scale permits a global evaluation of the participant's severity of illness and improvement over time. The scale included a severity of illness item and a global improvement item. The investigator performed the CGI-I to rate the improvement of a participant's ADHD symptoms based on a 7-point scale (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; or 7=very much worse.). Percentage of participants with an improved measurement (response of very much improved and much improved) is reported.

Time frame: Week 6

Population: FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With an Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 650 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine DimesylatePercentage of Participants With an Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 681.4 percentage of participants
MethylphenidatePercentage of Participants With an Improvement on Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 671.3 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: Safety set. Not all Safety set participants were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6Systolic blood pressure-1 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6Diastolic blood pressure-0.1 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8.1
Lisdexamfetamine DimesylateChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6Systolic blood pressure1.5 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.56
Lisdexamfetamine DimesylateChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6Diastolic blood pressure3.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8.15
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6Systolic blood pressure2.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.97
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure at Week 6Diastolic blood pressure3.5 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 8.59
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 6

Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

Population: Safety set. Not all Safety set participants were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 62.4 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 10.81
Lisdexamfetamine DimesylateChange From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 66.7 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 12.46
MethylphenidateChange From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week 68.2 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 12.7
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered as a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were events between first dose of double-blind investigational product and up to 3 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: Baseline up to 3 days after last dose (last dose at Week 6)

Population: Safety set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs49 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with serious TEAEs1 participants
Lisdexamfetamine DimesylateNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs145 participants
Lisdexamfetamine DimesylateNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with serious TEAEs1 participants
MethylphenidateNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs129 participants
MethylphenidateNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with serious TEAEs1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026