Skip to content

A Study of Ustekinumab to Evaluate a Subject-tailored Maintenance Dosing Approach in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate a Subject-tailored Maintenance Dosing Approach in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01550744
Acronym
PSTELLAR
Enrollment
478
Registered
2012-03-12
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2017-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Keywords

Psoriasis, Ustekinumab, STELARA, Skin disease, Monoclonal

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the effect of extending maintenance dosing intervals beyond 12 weeks on the clinical efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Detailed description

In this study, a proportion of subjects will receive study agent at its recommended dose and interval (45mg for subjects less than or equal to 100kg, or 90mg for subjects greater than 100kg; every 12 weeks after 2 starter doses at Weeks 0 and 4). The majority of subjects will have the opportunity to receive study agent less frequently during the randomization period depending on the subject's response. The study consists of a 4-week screening period; a 28-week open-label run-in period; a double-blind treatment period from Week 28 to Week 104; a 12 week post-treatment period; and a 20-week safety follow-up. Participants will be randomized for the double blind period into one of two study groups. Group 1 participants will receive an injection of the study medication at a 12 week dosing interval. Group 2 participants will undergo a placebo withdrawal and may receive study agents at an extended interval greater than 12 weeks. During the double-blind treatment period, subjects in Groups 1 and 2 will receive placebo as necessary to maintain the blind.

Interventions

Form = Injection, route = subcutaneous

Form = Injection, route = subcutaneous

DRUGPlacebo

Form = Injection, route = subcutaneous

Sponsors

Janssen Biotech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Eligibility Criteria * Male or female * Have had a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis at least 6 months prior to the first administration of study agent (subjects with concurrent psoriatic arthritis may be enrolled). * Have plaque-type psoriasis covering at least 10% of their total BSA at screening and at the time of the first administration of study agent. * Have a PGA score of ≥ 3 at screening and at the time of the first administration of study agent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1)Up to 24 weeks (Week 88 up to Week 112 [total 7 visits])Clinical responses for week (wk)28 sPGA responders randomized to every 12 weeks (q12wk) fixed-interval dosing (Group 1) vs. patient-tailored fixed-interval dosing (Group 2) were assessed using the static PGA (sPGA) measure. Investigators graded psoriasis lesions for induration (0=no plaque elevation to 5=severe plaque elevation), erythema (0=no evidence of erythema to 5=dusky to deep red coloration), and scaling (0=no evidence of scaling to 5=severe scaling). The sum of the 3 scales is divided by 3 and rounded to obtain a final sPGA score, defined as 0=cleared (except for residual discoloration), 1=minimal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked or 5=severe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 100, 104, 108, 112Clinical responses for week (wk) 28 sPGA responders randomized to every 12 weeks (q12wk) fixed-interval dosing (Group 1) vs. patient-tailored fixed-interval dosing (Group 2) were assessed using the static PGA (sPGA) measure. Investigators graded psoriasis lesions for induration (0=no plaque elevation to 5=severe plaque elevation), erythema (0=no evidence of erythema to 5=dusky to deep red coloration), and scaling (0=no evidence of scaling to 5=severe scaling). The sum of the 3 scales is divided by 3 and rounded to obtain a final sPGA score, defined as 0=cleared (except for residual discoloration), 1=minimal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked or 5=severe.
The Number of Visits for Which Participants Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 ResponseUp to 24 weeks (Week 88 up to Week 112 [total 7 visits])The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A PASI 75 response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 75 percent (%) improvement in PASI score from baseline.
The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 100, 104, 108, 112The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A PASI 75 response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 75 percent (%) improvement in PASI score from baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

During this study, two subjects were transferred between sites and counted twice. Hence, a total of 478 subjects were enrolled in this trial.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ustekinumab 45 mg/Ustekinumab 90 mg
Open-label period (Week 0-28) - ustekinumab subcutaneous (SC) injections of 45 milligram (mg) at Week 0, 4 and 16 for participants with weight less than or equal to (\<=) 100 kilograms (kg) at Week 0 or 90 mg at Week 0, 4, and 16 for participants with weight greater than (\>) 100 kg at Week 0.
478
Total478

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double-BlindAdverse Event0415
Double-BlindDeath010
Double-BlindLack of Efficacy028
Double-BlindLost to Follow-up0612
Double-BlindOther0210
Double-BlindPregnancy003
Double-BlindProtocol Violation004
Double-BlindWithdrawal by Subject0215
Open-LabelAdverse Event1100
Open-LabelLack of Efficacy400
Open-LabelLost to Follow-up700
Open-LabelNot all 3 study drug injections received200
Open-LabelOther100
Open-LabelProtocol Violation400
Open-LabelStatic PGA-cleared/minimal not achieved5800
Open-LabelWithdrawal by Subject1300

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUstekinumab 45 mg/Ustekinumab 90 mg
Age, Continuous45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.19
Gender
Female
177 Participants
Gender
Male
301 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
478 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
73 / 47839 / 76131 / 302
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 4787 / 7621 / 302

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1)

Clinical responses for week (wk)28 sPGA responders randomized to every 12 weeks (q12wk) fixed-interval dosing (Group 1) vs. patient-tailored fixed-interval dosing (Group 2) were assessed using the static PGA (sPGA) measure. Investigators graded psoriasis lesions for induration (0=no plaque elevation to 5=severe plaque elevation), erythema (0=no evidence of erythema to 5=dusky to deep red coloration), and scaling (0=no evidence of scaling to 5=severe scaling). The sum of the 3 scales is divided by 3 and rounded to obtain a final sPGA score, defined as 0=cleared (except for residual discoloration), 1=minimal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked or 5=severe.

Time frame: Up to 24 weeks (Week 88 up to Week 112 [total 7 visits])

Population: The subjects randomized at Week 28 data set was defined as the population of enrolled participants who were randomized to either Group 1 or Group 2 at Week 28.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1)4.5 number of visits95% Confidence Interval 3.07
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1)4.1 number of visits95% Confidence Interval 2.93
Secondary

The Number of Visits for Which Participants Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A PASI 75 response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 75 percent (%) improvement in PASI score from baseline.

Time frame: Up to 24 weeks (Week 88 up to Week 112 [total 7 visits])

Population: The subjects randomized at Week 28 data set was defined as the population of enrolled participants who were randomized to either Group 1 or Group 2 at Week 28.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Number of Visits for Which Participants Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response5.8 number of visitsStandard Deviation 2.31
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Number of Visits for Which Participants Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 Response5.4 number of visitsStandard Deviation 2.61
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over Time

The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A PASI 75 response is defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 75 percent (%) improvement in PASI score from baseline.

Time frame: Week 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 100, 104, 108, 112

Population: The Analysis population was subjects randomized at Week 28 data set. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable at each specific timepoint, for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 52 (n=69, 274)82.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 36 (n=74, 288)93.2 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 80 (n=65, 258)81.5 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 56 (n=68, 271)85.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 84 (n=63, 258)84.1 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 44 (n=71, 278)90.1 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 88 (n=64, 257)81.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 60 (n=68, 268)91.2 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 92 (n=64, 254)84.4 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 32 (n=75, 297)92.0 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 96 (n=62, 254)82.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 64 (n=69, 268)79.7 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 104 (n=65, 250)81.5 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 48 (n=69, 269)89.9 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 108 (n=63, 244)82.5 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 68 (n=69, 264)85.5 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 112 (n=58, 242)74.1 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 40 (n=73, 280)86.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 72 (n=66, 262)83.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 76 (n=66, 264)77.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 100 (n=64, 250)76.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 28 (n=76, 302)96.1 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 100 (n=64, 250)75.6 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 32 (n=75, 297)81.1 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 36 (n=74, 288)78.8 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 40 (n=73, 280)77.5 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 44 (n=71, 278)83.5 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 48 (n=69, 269)82.9 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 52 (n=69, 274)84.7 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 56 (n=68, 271)83.8 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 60 (n=68, 268)82.8 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 64 (n=69, 268)83.2 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 68 (n=69, 264)79.9 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 72 (n=66, 262)83.6 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 76 (n=66, 264)79.9 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 80 (n=65, 258)76.4 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 84 (n=63, 258)74.8 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 88 (n=64, 257)78.2 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 92 (n=64, 254)77.2 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 96 (n=62, 254)79.1 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 104 (n=65, 250)79.2 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 108 (n=63, 244)79.9 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 112 (n=58, 242)77.7 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a PASI 75 Response Over TimeWeek 28 (n=76, 302)95.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over Time

Clinical responses for week (wk) 28 sPGA responders randomized to every 12 weeks (q12wk) fixed-interval dosing (Group 1) vs. patient-tailored fixed-interval dosing (Group 2) were assessed using the static PGA (sPGA) measure. Investigators graded psoriasis lesions for induration (0=no plaque elevation to 5=severe plaque elevation), erythema (0=no evidence of erythema to 5=dusky to deep red coloration), and scaling (0=no evidence of scaling to 5=severe scaling). The sum of the 3 scales is divided by 3 and rounded to obtain a final sPGA score, defined as 0=cleared (except for residual discoloration), 1=minimal, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked or 5=severe.

Time frame: Week 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 100, 104, 108, 112

Population: The Analysis population was subjects randomized at Week 28 data set. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluable at each specific timepoint, for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 28 (n=76, 302)100 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 32 (n=75, 297)78.7 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 36 (n=74, 288)75.7 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 40 (n=73, 280)67.1 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 44 (n=71, 278)74.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 48 (n=69, 269)69.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 52 (n=69, 274)71.0 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 56 (n=68, 271)73.5 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 60 (n=68, 268)70.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 64 (n=69, 268)59.4 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 68 (n=69, 264)75.4 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 72 (n=66, 262)74.2 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 76 (n=66, 264)60.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 80 (n=65, 258)67.7 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 84 (n=63, 258)68.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 88 (n=64, 257)57.8 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 92 (n=64, 254)65.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 96 (n=62, 254)58.1 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 100 (n=64, 250)59.4 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 104 (n=65, 250)64.6 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 108 (n=63, 244)60.3 percentage of participants
Group 1: Ustekinumab q12w Maintenance Regimen (MR)The Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 112 (n=58, 242)53.4 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 72 (n=66, 262)63.7 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 96 (n=62, 254)56.3 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 32 (n=75, 297)71.0 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 76 (n=66, 264)58.7 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 36 (n=74, 288)59.0 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 108 (n=63, 244)58.6 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 40 (n=73, 280)56.4 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 80 (n=65, 258)53.5 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 44 (n=71, 278)68.3 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 100 (n=64, 250)50.8 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 48 (n=69, 269)69.9 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 84 (n=63, 258)55.0 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 52 (n=69, 274)66.4 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 28 (n=76, 302)100 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 56 (n=68, 271)61.3 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 88 (n=64, 257)60.7 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 60 (n=68, 268)67.9 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 104 (n=65, 250)56.4 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 64 (n=69, 268)65.7 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 92 (n=64, 254)57.9 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 68 (n=69, 264)57.2 percentage of participants
Group 2: Ustekinumab Subject-tailored Fixed-interval MRThe Percentage of Participants With a Static PGA Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) Over TimeWeek 112 (n=58, 242)55.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026