Skip to content

Curative Image Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

A Randomised, Two Centre Trial on Daily Cone-beam vs Standard Weekly Orthogonal Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) for Prostate Cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01550237
Acronym
RIC
Enrollment
260
Registered
2012-03-09
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2025-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Keywords

radiotherapy, image-guided, adverse effects, position verification, safety margins

Brief summary

The clinical importance of cone beam computer tomography based image guided radiotherapy (CT- IGRT) has not been established. The primary aim of the present trial is to investigate whether CT- IGRT and consequently reduced safety margins reduces the rectal side effects from curative, high dose radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Any impact of the reduced planning target volume in the CT- IGRT arm on biochemical freedom from disease will be evaluated as secondary outcome. An open randomised phase III trial. The included men will be randomised to receive curative radiotherapy to 78 Gy in 39 fractions with weekly orthogonal position verification and standard safety margins (10-15 mm) or 78 Gy in 39 fractions with daily CT position verification and reduced safety margins (7mm).

Interventions

RADIATIONradiotherapy daily verification reduced safety margins

curative radiotherapy to 78 Gy in 39 fractions with daily CT position verification and reduced safety margins (7mm)

RADIATIONradiotherapy weekly verification standard safety margins

curative radiotherapy to 78 Gy in 39 fractions with weekly orthogonal position verification and standard safety margins (10-15 mm)

Sponsors

Norwegian University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Alesund Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of prostate * No evidence of nodal or distant metastases (N0M0) * Intermediate or high risk based on T stage, PSA level and Gleason score * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment for cancer last 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of skin * Any previous radiotherapy, except KV or electron treatment of skin tumors outside the pelvis * Metallic hip joint replacement * Pre-existing intestinal or genitourinary disease with increased risk of side effects * Any pre-existing condition making the patient unsuitable for radiotherapy * Any pre-existing condition making the patient unsuitable for hormonal therapy * Any pre-existing condition making the patient unsuitable for MRI. * ALAT, GT, ALP, creatinin \> 1.5 x upper normal limit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute rectal side effects10 weeksFWUO94

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalup to 10 years
Cancer specific survivalup to 10 years
Freedom from biochemical failure3 years
Acute genitourinary side effects10 weeks
quality of lifeup to 10 yearsHRQoL
Late genitourinary and rectal side effectsup to 10 years

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026