Skip to content

Retrospective Record Review of Adults and Children Advised for Allergen Immunotherapy (MK-7243-022)

Evaluation of Patient Initiation and Persistence With Advised Allergen Immunotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01549340
Enrollment
8790
Registered
2012-03-09
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2017-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perennial Allergic Rhinitis, Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Rhinitis, Allergen immunotherapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of participants that initiate allergen immunotherapy (AIT) upon the recommendation of their physician and the proportion of participants that persist with their AIT throughout the recommended course.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

ALK-Abelló A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of AR with or without allergic conjunctivitis (AC) * Documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option

Exclusion criteria

* Participants receiving AIT as an AR treatment without documented provider-to-patient or parent discussion of AIT as a treatment option * Participants receiving immunotherapy for insect sensitivities only * AIT started before 2005

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) DropsUp to 5 yearsThe percentage of participants who were advised by their physician to start AIT and elected to initiate AIT was calculated. AIT initiation was broken down by type of AIT initiated (SCIT or SLIT).
Percentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of TreatmentAt 5 yearsThe percentage of participants who initiated SCIT or SLIT and completed 5 years of treatment was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled. If extract refills continued past the recommended time for therapy (e.g. 5 years from the start of therapy), the participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course. If the extract refills stopped prior to the end of the recommended time for therapy, but the last refill occurred within 6 months of the recommended time for therapy, this participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course.
Duration of Treatment With SCIT or SLITUp to 5 yearsThe mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR who initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.
Reason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseUp to 5 yearsThe reason for discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT treatment more than 6 months before completion of the recommended course of therapy was recorded. The percentage of participants whose records were reveiwed and who discontinued SCIT or SLIT due to different reasons was calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLITUp to 5 yearsThe percentage of participants who had AR and asthma and initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated.
Duration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR AloneUp to 5 yearsThe mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR and asthma and for all participants with AR only was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT treatment was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study involved a retrospective record review of patients in a private allergy and asthma practice who were recommended to receive allergen immunotherapy (AIT) to treat their allergic rhinitis (AR) by their physician between January 2005 and June 2011.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With AR
Participants with AR whose records were retrospectively reviewed
8,790
Total8,790

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With AR
Age, Continuous26.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Gender
Female
4439 Participants
Gender
Male
4351 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Duration of Treatment With SCIT or SLIT

The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR who initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: The analysis population consisted of those participants with AR who were advised by their physician to receive AIT to treat their AR and who initiated AIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With ARDuration of Treatment With SCIT or SLITSCIT2.4 yearsStandard Deviation 1.8
Participants With ARDuration of Treatment With SCIT or SLITSLIT1.9 yearsStandard Deviation 1.4
Primary

Percentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Drops

The percentage of participants who were advised by their physician to start AIT and elected to initiate AIT was calculated. AIT initiation was broken down by type of AIT initiated (SCIT or SLIT).

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: The analysis population consisted of those participants with AR who were advised by their physician to receive AIT to treat their AR.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With ARPercentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) DropsElected SCIT28.2 percentage of participants
Participants With ARPercentage of Participants Advised to Start AIT Who Elected Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) Shots or Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) DropsElected SLIT8.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of Treatment

The percentage of participants who initiated SCIT or SLIT and completed 5 years of treatment was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled. If extract refills continued past the recommended time for therapy (e.g. 5 years from the start of therapy), the participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course. If the extract refills stopped prior to the end of the recommended time for therapy, but the last refill occurred within 6 months of the recommended time for therapy, this participant was deemed successful in completing the recommended course.

Time frame: At 5 years

Population: The analysis population consisted of those participants with AR who were advised by their physician to receive AIT to treat their AR and who initiated AIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With ARPercentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of TreatmentCompleted 5 years of SCIT (n=2481)10.8 percentage of participants
Participants With ARPercentage of Participants Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT and Completed 5 Years of TreatmentCompleted 5 years of SLIT (n=701)2.6 percentage of participants
Primary

Reason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended Course

The reason for discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT treatment more than 6 months before completion of the recommended course of therapy was recorded. The percentage of participants whose records were reveiwed and who discontinued SCIT or SLIT due to different reasons was calculated.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: The analysis population consisted of those participants with AR who were advised by their physician to receive AIT to treat their AR, who initiated and subsequently discontinued AIT, and had their charts reviewed for the reason for discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With ARReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseAdverse event7 percentage of participants
Participants With ARReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseFinancial4 percentage of participants
Participants With ARReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseLack of efficacy1 percentage of participants
Participants With ARReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseOther reason21 percentage of participants
Participants With ARReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseNo reason documented67 percentage of participants
Participants With AR Who Discontinued SLITReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseOther reason20 percentage of participants
Participants With AR Who Discontinued SLITReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseNo reason documented69 percentage of participants
Participants With AR Who Discontinued SLITReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseAdverse event4 percentage of participants
Participants With AR Who Discontinued SLITReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseLack of efficacy3 percentage of participants
Participants With AR Who Discontinued SLITReason for Discontinuation of SCIT or SLIT More Than 6 Months Before Completion of the Recommended CourseFinancial4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR Alone

The mean duration in years of SCIT or SLIT treatment for all participants with AR and asthma and for all participants with AR only was calculated. Duration of SCIT or SLIT treatment was based on dates when allergy extract prescriptions were refilled.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: The analysis population consisted of those participants with AR and asthma or AR alone who were advised by their physician to receive AIT to treat their AR and who initiated AIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With ARDuration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR AloneSCIT2.4 yearsStandard Deviation 1.77
Participants With ARDuration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR AloneSLIT2.1 yearsStandard Deviation 1.5
Participants With AR Who Discontinued SLITDuration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR AloneSCIT2.4 yearsStandard Deviation 1.82
Participants With AR Who Discontinued SLITDuration of SCIT or SLIT Treatment for Participants With AR and Asthma or AR AloneSLIT1.8 yearsStandard Deviation 1.37
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLIT

The percentage of participants who had AR and asthma and initiated SCIT or SLIT was calculated.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: The analysis population consisted of those participants with AR and asthma who were advised by their physician to receive AIT to treat their AR and who initiated SCIT or SLIT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With ARPercentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLITInitiated SCIT25.2 percentage of participants
Participants With ARPercentage of Participants With a Co-morbidity of Asthma Who Initiated SCIT or SLITInitiated SLIT8.7 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026