Skip to content

Cystic Fibrosis Related Bone Disease: the Role of CFTR

Cystic Fibrosis Related Bone Disease: the Role of CFTR

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01549314
Enrollment
79
Registered
2012-03-09
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2020-02-29
Last updated
2020-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis Related Bone Disease

Keywords

Cystic fibrosis related bone disease, Cystic fibrosis, Ivacaftor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ivacaftor, a recently FDA-approved CFTR potentiator, improves bone micro-architecture and strength in patients with cystic fibrosis with at least one G551D CFTR mutation.

Detailed description

Ivacaftor, a CFTR potentiator, has recently been FDA approved for the treatment of cystic fibrosis in patients with at least one G551D CFTR mutation. Given the possible role of CFTR in bone, we hypothesize that this medication may also improve bone health in CF patients. The purpose of this study is to test this hypothesis using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, a research tool that measures bone micro-architecture and volumetric bone density and has the ability to detect small changes in bone that might otherwise be missed with standard bone imaging techniques such as bone density testing.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

COHORT 1 Inclusion Criteria: * Age 6 to 75 years old * Established diagnosis of CF with at least one abnormal G551D-CFTR allele * Eligibility for and intent to start treatment with ivacaftor or started treatment with ivacaftor within previous 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Psychiatric or mental incapacity that would preclude subject from assenting to study participation * Current pregnancy * History of organ transplantation * History of Burkholderia dolosa infection COHORT 2: Subjects will be grouped by gender, age and race to match subjects in Cohort 1 within two years. Pubertal subjects will be matched by Tanner stage. Inclusion Criteria: * Age 6 to 75 years old * Established diagnosis of CF

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Microarchitecture and Strength Measures of the Radius and TibiaBaseline and 24 monthsChange in cortical volumetric bone mineral density at the radius

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Areal Bone Mineral Density as Measured by DXABaseline and 24 monthsChange in PA spine bone mineral density
Bone Turnover MarkersBaseline and 24 monthsChange in osteocalcin

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

27 subjects with CF taking ivacaftor were enrolled; however, 1 subject dropped out immediately after signing the consent form prior to any study procedures. No baseline data were obtained in this subject. Therefore, 26 subjects with CF taking ivacaftor were followed prospectively and were matched to the other 2 cohorts.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects With CF Taking Ivacaftor
Subjects with CF ages 6 to 75 years old who will be or have started taking ivacaftor within the previous 6 months
26
Subjects With CF Not Taking Ivacaftor
Subjects with CF ages 6 to 75 years old who will not be taking ivacaftor, matched for age, race, and gender with cohort 1
26
Healthy Subjects
Healthy subjects with no medical conditions known to affect bone between the ages of 6 to 75 years old, matched for age, race, and gender with cohort 2.
26
Total78

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSubjects With CF Taking IvacaftorSubjects With CF Not Taking IvacaftorHealthy SubjectsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
11 Participants11 Participants11 Participants33 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants15 Participants15 Participants45 Participants
Age, Continuous23.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
22.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
23.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
23.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants78 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants78 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants26 participants26 participants78 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants15 Participants15 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants11 Participants11 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 260 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 261 / 260 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 260 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Bone Microarchitecture and Strength Measures of the Radius and Tibia

Change in cortical volumetric bone mineral density at the radius

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Subjects who were lost to follow up prior to the 24 month visit were not included in the analyses

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects With CF Taking IvacaftorBone Microarchitecture and Strength Measures of the Radius and Tibia44.6 mgHA/cm3Standard Deviation 53.9
Subjects With CF Not Taking IvacaftorBone Microarchitecture and Strength Measures of the Radius and Tibia40.1 mgHA/cm3Standard Deviation 44
Healthy SubjectsBone Microarchitecture and Strength Measures of the Radius and Tibia43.7 mgHA/cm3Standard Deviation 53.8
Comparison: Change from baseline to 24 months in cortical volumentric bone mineral density was determined and compared between subjects with CF taking ivacaftor and subjects with CF not taking ivacaftor.p-value: 0.77t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Change from baseline to 24 months in cortical volumentric bone mineral density was determined and compared between subjects with CF not taking ivacaftor and healthy subjects.p-value: 0.82t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Areal Bone Mineral Density as Measured by DXA

Change in PA spine bone mineral density

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Subjects who were lost to follow up prior to the 24 month visit were not included in the analyses

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects With CF Taking IvacaftorAreal Bone Mineral Density as Measured by DXA0.032 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.058
Subjects With CF Not Taking IvacaftorAreal Bone Mineral Density as Measured by DXA0.024 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.043
Healthy SubjectsAreal Bone Mineral Density as Measured by DXA0.029 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.043
Comparison: Change from baseline to 24 months in DXA PA spine bone mineral density was determined and compared between subjects with CF taking ivacaftor and subjects with CF not taking ivacaftor.p-value: 0.64t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Change from baseline to 24 months in DXA PA spine bone mineral density was determined and compared between subjects with CF not taking ivacaftor and healthy subjects.p-value: 0.78t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Bone Turnover Markers

Change in osteocalcin

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Subjects who were lost to follow up prior to the 24 month visit were not included in the analyses

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects With CF Taking IvacaftorBone Turnover Markers-5.36 ng/mlStandard Deviation 12.89
Subjects With CF Not Taking IvacaftorBone Turnover Markers-4.51 ng/mlStandard Deviation 16.27
Healthy SubjectsBone Turnover Markers-4.5 ng/mlStandard Deviation 14.55
Comparison: Change from baseline to 24 months in osteocalcin was determined and compared between subjects with CF taking ivacaftor and subjects with CF not taking ivacaftor.p-value: 0.86t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Change from baseline to 24 months in osteocalcin was determined and compared between subjects with CF not taking ivacaftor and healthy subjects.p-value: 0.99t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026