Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Bio Mineral Toothpaste in Patients With Mild Periodontitis

Single Blind, Randomized, Active-controlled Comparative Clinical Trial to Evaluate Clinical Efficacy and Safety Following the Application for 4 Weeks of Bio Mineral Toothpaste in Patients With Mild Periodontitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01548469
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-03-08
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2013-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis

Keywords

Mild periodontitis, Bio Mineral toothpaste, Geumjin Thermal Water

Brief summary

The hypothesis of this study is that using Bio Mineral toothpaste for 4 weeks will decrease plaque and gingivitis of mild periodontitis patients compared to patients using Perio Total Care toothpaste. This study is Single blind, Randomized, Active-controlled Comparative clinical trial to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety following the application for 4 weeks of Bio Mineral toothpaste in patients with mild periodontitis.

Detailed description

This study is Single blind, Randomized, Active-controlled Comparative clinical trial to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety following the application for 4 weeks of Bio Mineral toothpaste in patients with mild periodontitis. 30 patients of treatment group and 30 patients of control group, total 60 patients will be enrolled to this study. Every patients will use investigational toothpaste 2 times everyday for 4 weeks and brush their teeth at least 3 minutes each time with 1ml of toothpaste.

Interventions

OTHERBio Mineral toothpaste

Frequency: 2 times everyday/Duration: 4 weeks/Dosage: 1ml at once

OTHERPerio Total Care toothpaste

Frequency: 2 times everyday/Duration: 4 weeks/Dosage: 1ml at once

Sponsors

The Catholic University of Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 63 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. A healthy man or menopausal woman who is at least 18 to maximum 63 years of age. 2. Agreed to participate voluntarily in the study. 3. Must have over 20 maxillary teeth 4. Must have mild periodontal disease which can induce mild plaque. 5. Having no general disease except for dental disease. 6. Must be able to understand and carry out the trial's objective and method.

Exclusion criteria

1. Who has history of using antimicrobials or antibiotics during the past 30 days. 2. Who has history of periodontal treatment during the past 30 days. 3. Who has acute pain or severe suppuration caused by pericoronitis of the wisdom tooth. 4. Who has hypersensitive conditions caused by Gingivitis or periodontitis. 5. Who having restorative dentistry or wearing braces widely. 6. Who using tobacco products (Except for who quit smoking) 7. Who has been participated in other clinical trials during the past 4 weeks. 8. Who judged inappropriate to participate in the study by investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in score of Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index at 4 weeks from baseline.0 to 4 weeksChanges in score of Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index at 4 weeks from baseline.
Changes in score of Modified Gingival Index at 4 weeks from baseline.0 to 4 weeksChanges in score of Modified Gingival Index at 4 weeks from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in score of BOP(Bleeding on probing) at 4 weeks from baseline.0 to 4 weeksChanges in score of BOP(Bleeding on probing) at 4 weeks from baseline.
Compare Satisfaction of treatment group to Control Group at 4 weeks using Satisfaction Questionnaire.4 weeksCompare Satisfaction of treatment group with Control Group at 4 weeks using Satisfaction Questionnaire. Questionnaire Item 1. Elimination of plaque 2. Feeling of refreshment 3. Amount of bubble. 4. Feeling of flow. 5. Taste and Flavor. 6. Level of cleansing teeth 7. Creamy consistency Each subjects will rate score 0(Very dissatisfied) to 10(Very satisfied) using VAS(Visual Analog Scale).

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026