Skip to content

Training Improves Balance Control

Improving Balance Control and Self-Reported Lower Extremity Function in Community Dwelling Older Adults - A Randomized Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01547988
Enrollment
66
Registered
2012-03-08
Start date
2001-10-01
Completion date
2003-08-01
Last updated
2026-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accidental Falls

Keywords

Aging, Falls, Balance Control, Voluntary Step Execution Test, Dual-Task, Self-reported function

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a group-based functional and specific balance training program on balance function in healthy older adults. It is commonly considered difficult to improve balance function in healthy older adults. The program included dual-task exercises; physical training exercises and a cognitive task (e.g. reading or reciting a story) performed simultaneously, as well as perturbation exercises, where balance is challenged in unexpected ways. The investigators hypothesized that following the proposed training, older adults would improve their speed of taking a step in both single and dual task conditions, refine their ability to control balance when standing still and improve their self-reported physical function.

Interventions

OTHERBalance Training Intervention

The intervention group participated in a total of 24 one-hour training sessions over a period of 12 weeks. The training program utilized different size balls as a general tool in a series of progressively more difficult exercises targeting sitting, standing, and gait-related balance control. The program included exercises at five different levels of progressively more challenging balance exercises. Levels 1-4 focused on voluntarily controlled balance exercises, whereas level 5 also included perturbation exercises to trigger automatic compensatory stepping responses. All levels included attention-demanding dual task exercises that required subjects to simultaneously perform motor and cognitive activities.

Sponsors

Boston University Charles River Campus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 65 years or older * Independently ambulatory (cane acceptable; not walker) * Score better than 45 on the Berg Balance Scale * Higher than 24 Mini-Mental Score

Exclusion criteria

* Severe focal muscle weakness or visual impairment * Known neurological disorders (including stroke, Parkinson disease) * Metastatic cancer * Use of medication that impairs balance or strength

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reaction time of dual task step execution12 weeksSubjects stand on a force platform and are asked to execute a step as rapidly as possible following a tactile stimulus on their heel while performing a cognitive attention demanding task (Stroop task - call out colors of words that are names of colors, e.g. the word "BLUE" is presented in yellow letters).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late Life Functional Disability Index - LLFDI12 weeksSelf-reported measure of function

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLars IE Oddsson, PhD

NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026