Skip to content

Performance Evaluation of AirWay Medix Closed Suction System Compared With a Standard Closed Suction System

Performance Evaluation of AirWay Medix Closed Suction System Compared With a Standard Closed Suction System

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01547507
Enrollment
26
Registered
2012-03-08
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endotracheal Tube, Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

hemodynamics, respiratory

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the performance, safety, and ease of use (usability) between two closed suction systems, the AirWay Medix Closed Suction System and Kimberly KimVent while intubated with an endotracheal in hospitals and ICU. 26 adults with an endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilation will be randomized into 2 groups to receive one of the following closed suction systems endotracheal tubes: 1. AirWay Medix Closed Suction System 2. KimVent Turbo-Cleaning Closed Suction System Kimberly clarK The groups will be compared regarding the safety, performance and ease of use (usability).

Interventions

AirWay Medix Closed Suction System

Sponsors

Biovo Technologies Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged greater than 18 years 2. Mechanically ventilated for more than 6 hours 3. Endotracheal intubation anticipated to be routine (not difficult) based upon preoperative airway assessment 4. Signed informed consent 5. Sexually active female subjects of childbearing potential must be practicing adequate contraception during the treatment period -

Exclusion criteria

1. Gross / massive hemoptysis 2. Received lung transplantation in the past 3. Admitted from other hospital already mechanically ventilated 4. Previously received mechanical ventilation 5. Active bronchial bleeding 6. Pregnant women, women who plan to become pregnant and breastfeeding women. 7. Substance or alcohol abuse 8. Participation in concurrent trials 9. Any reasons making the patient a poor candidate in the opinion of the investigator -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
hemodynamic and respiratory dataPatients will be followed until extubation

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactNimrod Adi, MD
Nimrodad@clalit.org.il

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026