Skip to content

Hormone Therapy, Radiation Therapy, and Steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700 in Treating Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Phase III Trial of Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With a GNRH Agonist vs. Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Enhanced ADT With a GNRH Agonist and TAK-700 For Men With High Risk Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01546987
Enrollment
239
Registered
2012-03-07
Start date
2012-05-01
Completion date
2025-09-04
Last updated
2026-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

adenocarcinoma of the prostate, stage I prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer, stage IV prostate cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Drugs, such as steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700, when used with other hormone therapy, may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body. Radiation therapy uses high energy x rays to kill tumor cells. This may be an effective treatment for prostate cancer when combined with hormone therapy. Studying quality-of-life in patients having cancer treatment may help identify the intermediate- and long-term effects of treatment on patients with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying the use of hormone therapy, including TAK-700, together with radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To evaluate the difference in overall survival of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with unfavorable prognostic features between a) standard treatment (androgen-deprivation therapy \[ADT\] + radiotherapy) and b) standard treatment with the addition of 24 months of steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700 (TAK-700). Secondary * To characterize differences between the treatment groups with respect to incidence of unexpected grade ≥ 3 adverse events and/or clinically significant decrement in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) among subjects treated with TAK-700. * To compare rates and cumulative incidence of biochemical control (freedom from PSA failure), local/regional progression, and distant metastases. * To compare rate and cumulative incidence of clinical failure, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \> 25 ng/mL, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of ADT. * To compare prostate cancer-specific survival and other-cause mortality. * To compare the change in severity of fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue short form. * To compare changes in patient-reported QOL as measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). * To assess quality-adjusted survival using the EQ-5D. * To compare nadir and average serum testosterone at 12 and 24 months during treatment. * To compare changes in hemoglobin A1C, fasting glucose, and fasting insulin during 24 months of systemic treatment and during the first three years of follow-up. * To compare changes in fasting lipid levels during 24 months of treatment and during the first three years of follow-up. * To compare changes in body mass index (BMI) during 24 months of treatment and during the first three years of follow-up. * To compare the incidence of adverse events ascertained via CTCAE version 4. * To compare the rate of recovery of testosterone to \> 230 ng/dL (accepted threshold for supplementation) after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. * To compare the median time to recovery of testosterone to \> 230 ng/dL during the first five years of follow-up. * To assess cumulative incidence of relevant clinical survivorship endpoints including new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or osteoporotic fracture. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized study. Patients are stratified according to risk group (see Disease Characteristics) and type of radiation therapy (RT) boost (intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) vs brachytherapy). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGGnRH agonist

LHRH agonists are administered with a variety of techniques. The manufacturer's instructions should be followed. Begins within 6 weeks after registration (if not started prior) at same time as anti-androgen and TAK-700 (if applicable).

Starts at same time as GnRH agonist, ends at end of radiation therapy. Either flutamide (orally 250 mg three times a day) or bicalutamide (orally 50 mg once a day).

300 mg twice daily (BID) (600 mg per day) orally, continuously for 2 years starting with ADT.

RADIATIONRadiation therapy

Starts 8-10 weeks after initiation of ADT. Initially 45 Gy (1.8 Gy / fraction) to prostate and pelvic lymph nodes delivered with 3DCRT/IMRT, then a boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy, or high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

Sponsors

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
NRG Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate within 180 days prior to registration at high risk for recurrence as determined by one of the following combinations: * Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 9, PSA ≤ 150 ng/mL, any T stage * GS ≥ 8, PSA \< 20 ng/mL, T stage ≥ T2 * GS ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20-150 ng/mL, any T stage * GS ≥ 7, PSA ≥ 20-150 ng/mL, any T stage 2. History/physical examination within 60 days prior to registration. 3. Clinically negative lymph nodes as established by imaging \[abdominal and/or pelvic computerized tomography (CT) or abdominal and/or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)\], nodal sampling, or dissection within 90 days prior to registration. •Patients with lymph nodes equivocal or questionable by imaging are eligible if the nodes are \< 2.0 cm. 4. No distant metastases (M0) on bone scan within 90 days prior to registration (18F-Na bone scan is an acceptable substitute). •Equivocal bone scan findings are allowed if plain films are negative for metastasis. 5. Baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value performed with an FDA-approved assay (e.g., Abbott, Hybritech), obtained prior to any luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) or anti-androgen therapy, within 180 days of randomization. 6. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), such as LHRH agonists (e.g., goserelin, leuprolide), anti-androgens (e.g., flutamide, bicalutamide), estrogens (e.g., DES), or surgical castration (orchiectomy), may have been started prior to registration, provided that registration is within 50 days of beginning ADT. Please note: If the patient has started ADT he will not be eligible to participate in the quality of life component of this study. 7. Prior testosterone administration is allowed if last administered at least 90 days prior to registration. 8. Zubrod Performance Status 0-1 within 21 days prior to registration 9. Age ≥ 18 10. Complete blood count (CBC)/differential obtained within 14 days prior to registration on study, with adequate bone marrow function defined as follows: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,800 cells/mm3 * Platelets ≥ 100,000 cells/mm3 * Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dl (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb ≥ 8.0 g/dl is acceptable.) 11. Serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dl and creatinine clearance (can be calculated) \> 40 mL/minute within 21 days prior to registration 12. Bilirubin \< 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \< 2.5x ULN within 21 days prior to registration 13. Serum testosterone within 21 days prior to registration 14. Chemistry (including sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate (carbon dioxide), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), glucose, calcium, magnesium and phosphorous) and liver panels (including albumin and alkaline phosphatase) obtained within 21 days prior to registration 15. Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, lipid panel \[cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)\], and Hemoglobin A1C within 21 days prior to registration 16. Screening calculated ejection fraction of ≥ to institutional lower limit of normal by multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or by echocardiogram (ECHO). 17. Baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) within 180 days prior to registration 18. Patients, even if surgically sterilized (ie, status post vasectomy), who: 1. Agree to practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months (120 days) after the last dose of study drug, or 2. Agree to completely abstain from intercourse. 19. Patient must be able to provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry.

Exclusion criteria

1. PSA \> 150 2. Definite evidence of metastatic disease. 3. Pathologically positive lymph nodes or nodes \> 2.0 cm on imaging. 4. Prior radical prostatectomy, cryosurgery for prostate cancer, or bilateral orchiectomy for any reason. 5. Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) unless disease-free or not requiring systemic therapy for a minimum of 3 years. 6. Prior systemic chemotherapy for prostate cancer (Note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowed). 7. Prior radiotherapy, including brachytherapy, to the region of the prostate that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields. •Any patient undergoing brachytherapy must have transrectal ultrasound confirmation of prostate volume \<60 cc, American Urological Association (AUA) score ≤15 within 60 days of registration, and no history of prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP); prior TURP is permitted for patients who receive external beam radiation therapy \[EBRT\] only). 8. Previous hormonal therapy for \> 50 days. 9. Known hypersensitivity to TAK-700 or related compounds 10. A history of adrenal insufficiency 11. History of myocardial infarction, unstable symptomatic ischemic heart disease, ongoing arrhythmias of Grade \> 2 \[NCI CTCAE, version 4.02\] (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, 2009), thromboembolic events (eg, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or symptomatic cerebrovascular events), or any other cardiac condition (e.g., pericardial effusion restrictive cardiomyopathy) within 6 months prior to registration. Chronic stable atrial fibrillation on stable anticoagulant therapy is allowed. 12. New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure. 13. ECG abnormalities of: 1. Q-wave infarction, unless identified 6 or more months prior to screening 2. QTc interval \> 460 msec 14. Patients who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception; this exclusion is necessary because the treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic. 15. Prior allergic reaction to the drugs involved in this protocol. 16. Study entry PSA obtained during the following time frames: 1. 10-day period following prostate biopsy; 2. following initiation of hormonal therapy. 17. Cushing's syndrome 18. Severe chronic renal disease (serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl and confirmed by creatinine clearance \< 40 mL/minute) 19. Chronic liver disease (bilirubin \> 1.5x ULN, ALT or AST \> 2.5x ULN) 20. Chronic treatment with glucocorticoids within one year 21. Uncontrolled hypertension despite appropriate medical therapy within 21 days prior to registration (blood pressure of greater than 150 mm Hg systolic and 90 mm Hg diastolic at 2 separate measurements no more than 60 minutes apart during Screening visit) 22. Unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol or cooperate fully with the investigator and site personnel. 23. Major surgery within 14 days prior to registration 24. Serious infection within 14 days prior to registration 25. Uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea \[Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3\] despite appropriate medical therapy at the time of registration 26. Known gastrointestinal (GI) disease or GI procedure that could interfere with the oral absorption or tolerance of TAK-700, including difficulty swallowing tablets

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Hemoglobin A1cBaseline, 12 months, 24 months
Fasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline, 12 months, 24 months
Fasting Plasma InsulinBaseline, 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline and yearly to five years.Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms (or pounds) divided by the square of height in meters (or feet). Change from baseline = time point value - baseline value.
Serum TestosteroneBaseline,12 months, 24 months
Fasting Total CholesterolBaseline, 12 months, 24 months
Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from primary (original protocol) to secondary. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse EventsFrom randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Time to grade 3 or higher adverse event (event) is defined as time from randomization to the date of first event, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Event rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.
Percentage of Participants With Local ProgressionFrom randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates reported.Local recurrence (failure) is defined as biopsy proven recurrence within the prostate gland. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.
Percentage of Participants With Distant MetastasesFrom randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Distant metastases (failure) is defined as imaging or biopsy demonstrated evidence for systemic recurrence. Biopsy was not required, however it was encouraged in absence of a rising PSA. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. Note, the protocol lists this endpoint as regional or distant metastasis, but regional progression data was not collected.
Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment FailureFrom randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.General clinical treatment failure (GCTF) is defined as: PSA \> 25 ng/ml, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from registration to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.
Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate CancerFrom randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death due to other causes (competing risk). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. If too few events occur for meaningful estimates, then only counts of events will be reported.
Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One YearBaseline, one yearThe PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year.
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearBaseline, one yearThe EPIC-Short Form is a 26-item, validated self-administered tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies consisting of five summary domains (bowel, urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, sexual, and hormonal function). Responses for each item form a Likert scale which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A domain score is the average of the transformed domain item scores, ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Change at one year is defined as one-year value - baseline value. Positive change at one year indicates improved quality of life.
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventFrom registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data
Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 MonthsFrom registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Time to testosterone recovery is defined as time from randomization to the date of testosterone recovery, biochemical, local, or distant failure (competing risk), salvage therapy (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method.
Median Testosterone Recovery TimeFrom randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring for biochemical, local, or distant failure, salvage therapy, death, and otherwise alive without event. Testosterone recovery time is defined as time from randomization to testosterone recovery or censoring.
Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsFrom randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.Clinical survivorship events are defined as the following newly diagnosed non-fatal cardiovascular events or other clinical endpoints relevant to prostate cancer survivorship: type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and osteoporotic fracture.

Countries

Canada, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORM. Dror Michaelson, MD, PhD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ADT + RT
Standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) beginning two months prior to radiation therapy (RT). ADT comprised of anti-androgen continuing for two years and GnRH agonist stopping at end of RT.
115
TAK-700 + ADT + RT
TAK-700 and standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) beginning two months prior to radiation therapy (RT). ADT comprised of anti-androgen continuing for two years and GnRH agonist stopping at end of RT. TAK-700 continues for two years.
116
Total231

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicADT + RTTotalTAK-700 + ADT + RT
ADT Started Prior to Registration
No
31 Participants56 Participants25 Participants
ADT Started Prior to Registration
Yes
11 Participants31 Participants20 Participants
Age, Customized
≤ 49 years
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
50 - 59 years
16 Participants38 Participants22 Participants
Age, Customized
60 - 69 years
44 Participants85 Participants41 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 70 years
53 Participants105 Participants52 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
111 Participants220 Participants109 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Gleason Score
7
16 Participants34 Participants18 Participants
Gleason Score
8
37 Participants67 Participants30 Participants
Gleason Score
≥9
62 Participants130 Participants68 Participants
M-Stage M0115 Participants231 Participants116 Participants
N-Stage N0115 Participants231 Participants116 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants24 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
93 Participants194 Participants101 Participants
Risk Factors
Gleason 7, PSA ≥20-150, any T-stage
14 Participants32 Participants18 Participants
Risk Factors
Gleason 8, PSA ≥20-150, any T-stage
13 Participants23 Participants10 Participants
Risk Factors
Gleason 8, PSA <20, and ≥T2
23 Participants44 Participants21 Participants
Risk Factors
Gleason ≥ 9, PSA ≤150, any T-stage
65 Participants132 Participants67 Participants
RT Boost Modality
High dose rate (HDR) implant
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
RT Boost Modality
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
103 Participants208 Participants105 Participants
RT Boost Modality
Low dose rate (LDR) permanent prostate implant (PPI)
12 Participants22 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
115 Participants231 Participants116 Participants
Study Entry PSA
20.0-150.0 ng/ml
40 Participants81 Participants41 Participants
Study Entry PSA
< 20.0 ng/ml
75 Participants150 Participants75 Participants
T-Stage
T1a-T1c
22 Participants45 Participants23 Participants
T-Stage
T2-T2c
66 Participants124 Participants58 Participants
T-Stage
T3-T3b
24 Participants57 Participants33 Participants
T-Stage
T4
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Zubrod Performance Status
0
99 Participants203 Participants104 Participants
Zubrod Performance Status
1
16 Participants28 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
24 / 11519 / 116
other
Total, other adverse events
108 / 112112 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 11238 / 115

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)17.3 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)12.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Revised protocol due to early accrual closure (September 2014) computes that seventy events with five years of additional follow-up after early accrual closure provides 70% power (at one-sided alpha = 0.05) to detect a 40% reduction in the assumed rate control arm rate of is 0.08/year.p-value: 0.5595% CI: [0.47, 1.48]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms (or pounds) divided by the square of height in meters (or feet). Change from baseline = time point value - baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and yearly to five years.

Population: Eligible participants data at baseline and data at any of the post-baseline timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)2 years0.67 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 3.76
ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)4 years-0.02 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 6.95
ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)3 years0.75 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 3.9
ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)5 years-0.52 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 3.01
ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)1 year0.64 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.19
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)5 years0.15 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.71
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)1 year-0.84 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 4.28
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)2 years-0.34 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.55
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)3 years0.25 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.32
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)4 years0.46 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year.

Time frame: Baseline, one year

Population: Eligible participants who consented to quality of life component and had baseline and one-year data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTChange in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year2.78 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.21
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year3.16 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.24
Comparison: One hundred thirty evaluable participants (arms combined), provides 81% power to detect a moderate effect size of 0.5 using a two-sample test of the difference in means with a two-sided type I error of 0.05.p-value: 0.76t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year

The EPIC-Short Form is a 26-item, validated self-administered tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies consisting of five summary domains (bowel, urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, sexual, and hormonal function). Responses for each item form a Likert scale which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A domain score is the average of the transformed domain item scores, ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Change at one year is defined as one-year value - baseline value. Positive change at one year indicates improved quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, one year

Population: Eligible participants with data for any of the four domains.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearBowel domain-5.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearSexual domain-24.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.64
ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearHormonal domain-17.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.36
ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearUrinary domain-1.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearHormonal domain-17.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.59
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearBowel domain-7.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearUrinary domain-5.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.46
TAK-700 + ADT + RTChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One YearSexual domain-27.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.98
Comparison: \[Bowel domain\] One hundred thirty evaluable participants (arms combined), provides 81% power to detect a moderate effect size of 0.5 using a two-sample test of the difference in means with a two-sided type I error of 0.05.p-value: 0.44t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: \[Urinary domain\] One hundred thirty evaluable participants (arms combined), provides 81% power to detect a moderate effect size of 0.5 using a two-sample test of the difference in means with a two-sided type I error of 0.05.p-value: 0.13t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: \[Sexual domain\] One hundred thirty evaluable participants (arms combined), provides 81% power to detect a moderate effect size of 0.5 using a two-sample test of the difference in means with a two-sided type I error of 0.05.p-value: 0.5t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: \[Hormonal domain\] One hundred thirty evaluable participants (arms combined), provides 81% power to detect a moderate effect size of 0.5 using a two-sample test of the difference in means with a two-sided type I error of 0.05.p-value: 0.96t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Fasting Plasma Glucose

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Population: Eligible participants with data at any of the timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTFasting Plasma Glucose12 months102.27 mg/dLStandard Deviation 53.06
ADT + RTFasting Plasma Glucose24 months104.24 mg/dLStandard Deviation 67.43
ADT + RTFasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline98.99 mg/dLStandard Deviation 51.87
TAK-700 + ADT + RTFasting Plasma Glucose24 months105.51 mg/dLStandard Deviation 40.53
TAK-700 + ADT + RTFasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline100.52 mg/dLStandard Deviation 45.54
TAK-700 + ADT + RTFasting Plasma Glucose12 months117.39 mg/dLStandard Deviation 118.4
Secondary

Fasting Plasma Insulin

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Population: This data was not collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue
UnknownFasting Plasma InsulinBaseline
UnknownFasting Plasma Insulin12 months
UnknownFasting Plasma Insulin24 months
Secondary

Fasting Total Cholesterol

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Population: Eligible participants with data at any of the timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTFasting Total CholesterolBaseline149.71 mg/dLStandard Deviation 68.2
ADT + RTFasting Total Cholesterol12 months160.27 mg/dLStandard Deviation 73.22
ADT + RTFasting Total Cholesterol24 months163.20 mg/dLStandard Deviation 168.63
TAK-700 + ADT + RTFasting Total CholesterolBaseline154.20 mg/dLStandard Deviation 71.05
TAK-700 + ADT + RTFasting Total Cholesterol12 months154.74 mg/dLStandard Deviation 70.85
TAK-700 + ADT + RTFasting Total Cholesterol24 months160.61 mg/dLStandard Deviation 77.55
Secondary

Hemoglobin A1c

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Population: Eligible participants with data at any of the timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTHemoglobin A1cBaseline6.12 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.05
ADT + RTHemoglobin A1c12 months6.33 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.18
ADT + RTHemoglobin A1c24 months6.30 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.59
TAK-700 + ADT + RTHemoglobin A1cBaseline6.01 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.05
TAK-700 + ADT + RTHemoglobin A1c12 months5.95 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.73
TAK-700 + ADT + RTHemoglobin A1c24 months6.04 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.76
Secondary

Median Testosterone Recovery Time

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring for biochemical, local, or distant failure, salvage therapy, death, and otherwise alive without event. Testosterone recovery time is defined as time from randomization to testosterone recovery or censoring.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants with testosterone data

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ADT + RTMedian Testosterone Recovery TimeNA years
TAK-700 + ADT + RTMedian Testosterone Recovery TimeNA years
p-value: 0.010495% CI: [0.29, 0.89]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data

Time frame: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants who started protocol treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 254 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGarde 44 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 117 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 53 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 331 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 51 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 12 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 245 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGrade 355 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse EventGarde 49 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events

Clinical survivorship events are defined as the following newly diagnosed non-fatal cardiovascular events or other clinical endpoints relevant to prostate cancer survivorship: type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and osteoporotic fracture.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsMyocardial infarction6 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsPulmonary embolism10 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsCoronary artery disease16 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsDeep vein thrombosis8 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsStroke5 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsOsteoporotic fracture6 Participants
ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsType 2 diabetes30 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsOsteoporotic fracture1 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsType 2 diabetes18 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsCoronary artery disease14 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsMyocardial infarction8 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsStroke6 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsPulmonary embolism5 Participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship EventsDeep vein thrombosis7 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer

Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death due to other causes (competing risk). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. If too few events occur for meaningful estimates, then only counts of events will be reported.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer7.7 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer4.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases

Distant metastases (failure) is defined as imaging or biopsy demonstrated evidence for systemic recurrence. Biopsy was not required, however it was encouraged in absence of a rising PSA. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. Note, the protocol lists this endpoint as regional or distant metastasis, but regional progression data was not collected.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Distant Metastases6.8 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Distant Metastases2.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Revised protocol due to early accrual closure (September 2014) computes that 5-year survival of 78% and annual hazard rate of 0.02 for ADT + RT arm, with five years of additional follow-up after early accrual closure provides 32% power (at two-sided alpha = 0.05) to detect a 50% reduction in failure rate.p-value: 0.4895% CI: [0.29, 1.75]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure

General clinical treatment failure (GCTF) is defined as: PSA \> 25 ng/ml, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from registration to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure12.5 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure6.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.6595% CI: [0.45, 1.63]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Time to grade 3 or higher adverse event (event) is defined as time from randomization to the date of first event, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Event rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events34.9 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events58.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.54, 3.4]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Local Progression

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as biopsy proven recurrence within the prostate gland. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates reported.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Local Progression2.9 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTPercentage of Participants With Local Progression0.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.9995% CI: [0.33, 3.13]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from primary (original protocol) to secondary. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided.

Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Population: Eligible participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTPercentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)89.4 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTPercentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)88.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: Revised protocol due to early accrual closure (September 2014) computes that 5-year survival of 78% and annual hazard rate of 0.055 for ADT + RT arm, with five years of additional follow-up after early accrual closure provides 28% power (at two-sided alpha = 0.05) to detect a 33% reduction in failure rate.p-value: 0.2795% CI: [0.38, 1.31]Log Rank
Secondary

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Population: Eligible participants with data at any of the timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)Baseline40.91 mg/dLStandard Deviation 20.96
ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)12 months44.94 mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.21
ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)24 months42.16 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.77
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)Baseline41.32 mg/dLStandard Deviation 20.93
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)12 months44.50 mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.21
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)24 months44.85 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.36
Secondary

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Population: Eligible participants with data at any of the timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)Baseline88.78 mg/dLStandard Deviation 45.64
ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)12 months86.18 mg/dLStandard Deviation 47.11
ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)24 months81.35 mg/dLStandard Deviation 47.73
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)Baseline87.85 mg/dLStandard Deviation 47.33
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)12 months83.73 mg/dLStandard Deviation 46.86
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)24 months95.34 mg/dLStandard Deviation 59.22
Secondary

Serum Testosterone

Time frame: Baseline,12 months, 24 months

Population: Eligible participants with data at any of the timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADT + RTSerum TestosteroneBaseline355.75 ng/dLStandard Deviation 225.65
ADT + RTSerum Testosterone12 months35.68 ng/dLStandard Deviation 68.39
ADT + RTSerum Testosterone24 months86.47 ng/dLStandard Deviation 182.4
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum TestosteroneBaseline357.73 ng/dLStandard Deviation 217.26
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum Testosterone12 months25.22 ng/dLStandard Deviation 67.49
TAK-700 + ADT + RTSerum Testosterone24 months17.36 ng/dLStandard Deviation 32.71
Secondary

Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Time to testosterone recovery is defined as time from randomization to the date of testosterone recovery, biochemical, local, or distant failure (competing risk), salvage therapy (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method.

Time frame: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.

Population: Eligible participants with testosterone data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ADT + RTTestosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months12 months19.4 percentage of participants
ADT + RTTestosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months24 months32.9 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTTestosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months12 months12.5 percentage of participants
TAK-700 + ADT + RTTestosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months24 months17.4 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026