Skip to content

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Using Blastocyst Biopsy and Array CGH

Comparison of Standard ART Practice vs. Trophectoderm Biopsy, Array CGH Analysis, and Day-6 Replacement of a Single Euploid Embryo

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01546350
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-03-07
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2013-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Keywords

infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, miscarriage

Brief summary

The investigators propose to perform a clinical randomized trial to evaluate the effect of single embryo (blastocyst) transfer (SET) with array CGH for the evaluation of the complete chromosome complement of the blastocyst in comparison to standard ART methods in which one or more embryo are replaced. Patients will be randomized into two groups: * Control group: patients will have up to two embryos replaced on day 5 based on morphological and developmental characteristics, and the other embryos reaching blastocyst stage will be vitrified. If patients in the control group do not have a pregnancy to term from that fresh cycle, they will be offered free PGD either for the frozen embryos of that cycle or for the next cycle (up to the center and patient). Data from that PGD is not part of the study. * Test group: patients will have grade A,B or C blastocysts hatched on day 5, biopsied on day 5, analyzed by array CGH, and a single euploid embryo transferred on day 6. Any morulas developing to grade A,B or C blastocyst on day-6 will be also analyzed but vitrified for use in a future cycle.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized after fertilization, and will be dropped from the study if they produce 3 or less blastocysts on day 5. The Primary efficacy endpoint of comparing the study group with the control will be (I) implantation rates and (II) multiple pregnancies (twin or higher order) comparing the first transfer. The study may be extended to evaluate secondary efficacy endpoints which will be miscarriage rate and take home baby rates comparing the two groups.

Interventions

GENETICPGD

array CGH after blastocyst biopsy

Sponsors

Reprogenetics, Livingston, NJ
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Long Island IVF, Melville, NY
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Reproductive Associates of Illinois, Highland Park, IL
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
McGill University
CollaboratorOTHER
BlueGnome, Cambridge, UK
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Southern California Reproductive Center, CA
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Reprogenetics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
32 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Maternal age 33 to 42 years old (included)

Exclusion criteria

* MESA and TESE patients * At least one partner carrier of a chromosomal or genetic disease * Abnormal ovarian reserve, defined as FSH of \>10 IU/L on day 2-4 of the cycle and AMH \< 1ng /ml (If only one of the two parameters altered then patients is acceptable). * Egg donor cycle (sperm donor is acceptable)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implantation rateFirst month after replacementfetal sacs / embryos replaced

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spontaneous miscarriage rateduring first and second trimester of pregnancypregnancies lost / pregnancies of cycles randomized
ongoing pregnancy ratethird trimester of pregnancypregnancies past second trimester / cycles started
Multiple pregnancy ratefirst month after transferTwin or multiple order pregnancies / total pregnancies

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026