Skip to content

Sensory Stimulation Effect on Movement Speed in Patients With Parkinson Disease

Aponeurotic Stimulation Effect on Parkinson Bradykinesia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01544738
Enrollment
11
Registered
2012-03-06
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Parkinson Disease, sensory stimulation, Bradykinesia

Brief summary

Movement slowness (bradykinesia) is one of the main motor symptoms in Parkinson Disease (PD). Several studies have shown that patients with PD exhibit slowness because they are unable to modulate, in an optimal way, the velocity of voluntary motor acts not induced by external stimulation. Indeed, these patients have difficulties to integrate multi-sensorial information, mainly proprioception. The investigators investigated changes in shoulder velocity during pointing movements by patients with PD after stimulation of soft tissues (aponeurosis) of upper limb muscles. The stimulation consisted of manipulating, with a hook (the diacutaneous fibrolysis method), the aponeurotic tissues enrobing the heads of the upper limb muscles. This technique has previously been shown to decrease passive tension and the tendon reflex response of the manipulated muscle group. The investigators hypothesis is that aponeurotic manipulation of shoulder muscles therefore creates a modification in the proprioceptive information, which in return temporarily decreases the bradykinesia of shoulder movements.

Interventions

OTHERAponeurotic stimulation (the diacutaneous fibrolysis method)

Treatment consisted of manipulating, with a hook, the aponeurotic tissues enrobing the heads of the upper-limb muscles. The manipulation consisted of back and forth mobilization, applied perpendicularly to the axis of the muscular fibers. The mobilization is performed with both hands; the therapist's non-dominant hand performs a manual mobilization whereas the dominant hand follows the movement with the hook. The hook allows the therapist to be very precise about the location of the tissues that are stretched. This stretch is realized at the level of the aponeurotic fibers presenting the greatest resistance to perpendicular movement. The shape of the hook is chosen to avoid discomfort or pain during manipulation. To spread the pressure exerted by the spatula on a very local point, it is important to fill completely the curved part of the hook with the adjacent soft tissues. We manipulated muscle from the proximal insertion towards the distal, giving special attention to the tendons.

Placebo stimulation (PS) consisted of manipulating the skin along the same paths over the trunk, shoulder and arm muscles that were the targets for treatment in the AS group

Sponsors

Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique
CollaboratorOTHER
Belgium: Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson Disease

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a limitation in the shoulder range of motion necessary to perform pointing movements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
3D kinematic movement parameters and upper limb muscles electromyographic activationParticipants will be followed for the duration of the clinical test (2 weeks)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)Participants will be followed for the duration of the clinical test (2 weeks)

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026