Skip to content

Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of Early Introduction of Everolimus, Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitors and Early Steroid Elimination Compared to Standard CNI, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroid Regimen in Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients

A 12-month, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of Early Introduction of Everolimus, Reduced CNI, and Early Steroid Elimination Compared to Standard CNI, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroid Regimen in Paediatric Renal Transplant Recipients With a 24-month Additional Safety Follow-up.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01544491
Enrollment
106
Registered
2012-03-06
Start date
2012-08-17
Completion date
2018-09-24
Last updated
2019-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prevention of Acute Rejection in Paediatric Recipients of a Renal Transplant

Keywords

Paediatric kidney transplantation, Early MMF to everolimus conversion, Composite efficacy (biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss or death), Renal function

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if everolimus combined with reduced exposure CNI (TAC) is efficacious and safe and will support corticosteroid elimination compared to a standard exposure CNI (TAC) + MMF + steroid regimen after paediatric kidney transplantation. An additional purpose of the study is to assess the effect of the combination of EVR and reduced exposure CNI (TAC) on renal function. This study is part of the requirements of the Paediatric Investigational Plan approved by Paediatric Committee at the European Medicines Agency (PDCO/EMA) on September 10, 2010, and is intended to support the indication of everolimus in the prevention of acute rejection in paediatric recipients of a renal transplant.

Interventions

DRUGRAD001

Everolimus (C0 trough level of 3-8 ng/mL) in combination with reduced dose tacrolimus and steroids withdrawal at 6 months after transplant

DRUGMMF

MMF (Cellcept®): 600mg/m2/dose twice daily (1200 mg/m2/day) in combination with tacrolimus (Prograf) and standard dose steroids

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria at baseline: 1. Written informed consent/assent must be obtained from the parent(s) or legal guardian before any assessment is performed. 2. Primary or secondary paediatric kidney transplant recipient aged greater than or equal to 1 year and younger than 18 years receiving a deceased donor or non-HLA identical living donor (related or unrelated) renal transplant. Inclusion criteria at randomization: 1. Patients on TAC + MMF + steroids. 2. Renal function with eGFR \> 40 ml/min/1.73 m2 (Schwartz formula - abbreviated).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection12 months, 36 monthsTo estimate the rate of the composite efficacy endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death at 12 months post transplantation in primary paediatric kidney transplant recipients converted at 4-6 weeks post-transplantation from MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids, to everolimus + reduced dose TAC regimen and steroid withdrawal at 6 months, versus continuation of MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids.
To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 3612 months and 36 months post-transplantationTo evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (abbreviated) (Schwartz, 2009).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Evaluate the Time to Event of BPAR36 monthsTime to incidence of Event, given in terms of number of participants with an Event according to time interval up to 36 months
Incidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.at 12 and 36 months post-transplantationTo evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: biopsy proven antibody mediated rejection/Steroid resistant BPAR and BPAR treated with T cell depleting therapy.
Chronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophyat 12 and 36 months post-transplantation.To evaluate the proportion of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, IF/TA) by histopathology and its progression.The term chronic allograft nephropathy was used inappropriately in the protocol and therefore, replaced by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy
Composite Efficacy Endpointat 12 and 36 months post-transplantationTo evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death. The efficacy events will be descriptively summarized by treatment group.
Growth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From Baselinemonth 12 , month 36 post transplantation.Evaluation of the potential effects upon the bone growth. The Z-score is a statistical tool which helps to assess data (here child growth parameters) relative to a reference or standard population. The Z-score describes the distance and direction of an observation away from the population median (or mean, however, here the median was used). A negative Z-score shows that data are lower than the median of the standard population, a positive Z-score shows that data are higher than the median of the standard population, and a Z-score of zero shows that the data are equal to the median of the standard population. The more the Z-score is distant from 0, the more expressed is for example underweight or overweight.
Evaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timebaseline, 6 months, 12 months , 24 months, 36 monthsresults given as eGFR values by time interval
To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Extended), at Month 1212 months post-transplantationTo evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (extended) (Schwartz, 2009). Results given as change from randomization
Proteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)at 12 and 36 months post-transplantationThe urinary protein/creatinine ratio will be descriptively summarized by treatment group at each visit. The incidence rate of patients with proteinuria will be categorized in \<0.2 g/mg/mg, 0.2\<2.0 mg/mg and ≥ 2.0 mg/mg and summarized by treatment groups at each visit.
To Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12, month 36T-cell mediated rejection severity : Type IA - Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Type IB - Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Type IIA - Mild to moderate intimal arteritis Type IIB - Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area Type III - Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Full Analysis set (FAS) 106 enrolled and randomized patients except misrandomized Per Protocol set (PPS) 90 patients in the FAS without major protocol deviations Safety set (SAF) 106 randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EVR+rTAC
Investigational arm : Conversion from MMF to everolimus plus reduced dose tacrolimus and steroids withdrawal at 6 months after transplant
52
MMF+sTAC
Control arm : MMF continuation (in combination with tacrolimus and standard dose steroids)
54
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyadministrative problems20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEVR+rTACMMF+sTACTotal
Age, Customized
11 <= 18 years
26 Participants27 Participants53 Participants
Age, Customized
1 to <11 years
26 Participants27 Participants53 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
42 Participants47 Participants89 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
23 Participants23 Participants46 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
29 Participants31 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 520 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 5248 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 520 / 54

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection

To estimate the rate of the composite efficacy endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death at 12 months post transplantation in primary paediatric kidney transplant recipients converted at 4-6 weeks post-transplantation from MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids, to everolimus + reduced dose TAC regimen and steroid withdrawal at 6 months, versus continuation of MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids.

Time frame: 12 months, 36 months

Population: Full Analysis set (12 months and 36 months) Results given as number of participants with composite efficacy failures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EVR+rTACNumber of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection12 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACNumber of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection36 months5 Participants
MMF+sTACNumber of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection12 months3 Participants
MMF+sTACNumber of Participants Having Reached the Composite Efficacy Endpoint of Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection36 months5 Participants
Comparison: at 12 monthsp-value: 0.971280% CI: [-6.6, 6.8]Log Rank
Comparison: 36 monthsp-value: 0.963480% CI: [-7.3, 7.7]Log Rank
Primary

To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 36

To evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (abbreviated) (Schwartz, 2009).

Time frame: 12 months and 36 months post-transplantation

Population: Full Analysis set 12 months and 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 3612 months76.7 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.66
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 3636 months68.1 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.45
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 3612 months71.7 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.56
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Abbreviated), at Month 12 and 3636 months67.3 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 3.54
Comparison: at 12 monthsp-value: 0.345580% CI: [-1.8, 11.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: 36 monthsp-value: 0.864280% CI: [-5.5, 7.2]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Chronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy

To evaluate the proportion of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, IF/TA) by histopathology and its progression.The term chronic allograft nephropathy was used inappropriately in the protocol and therefore, replaced by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy

Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EVR+rTACChronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy12 months3 Participants
EVR+rTACChronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy36 months11 Participants
MMF+sTACChronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy12 months3 Participants
MMF+sTACChronic Allograft Nephropathy / Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy36 months7 Participants
Secondary

Composite Efficacy Endpoint

To evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death. The efficacy events will be descriptively summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation

Population: full Analysis set 36 month analysis Results given as number of participants with composite efficacy failures

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointacute rejection 12 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy EndpointBiopsy proven acute rejection 12 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointmonth 36 composite efficacy endpoint5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointtreated Biopsy proven acute rejection 12 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointdeath 12 months0 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointgraft loss 36 months1 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointtreated Biopsy proven acute rejection 36 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointdeath 36 months0 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy EndpointBiopsy proven acute rejection 36 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointacute rejection 36 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointgraft loss 12 months0 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointtreated acute rejection 12 months5 Participants
EVR+rTACComposite Efficacy Endpointmonth 12 composite efficacy endpoint5 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointtreated Biopsy proven acute rejection 36 months5 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointmonth 12 composite efficacy endpoint3 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointgraft loss 12 months0 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointdeath 12 months0 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointmonth 36 composite efficacy endpoint5 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointacute rejection 12 months4 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointtreated acute rejection 12 months4 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy EndpointBiopsy proven acute rejection 12 months3 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointtreated Biopsy proven acute rejection 12 months3 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointgraft loss 36 months2 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointdeath 36 months0 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy Endpointacute rejection 36 months7 Participants
MMF+sTACComposite Efficacy EndpointBiopsy proven acute rejection 36 months5 Participants
Secondary

Evaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Time

results given as eGFR values by time interval

Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months , 24 months, 36 months

Population: full Analysis set 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EVR+rTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timebaseline14.2 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 11.38
EVR+rTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 2472.9 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 28.43
EVR+rTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 676.6 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 28.29
EVR+rTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 1276.9 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 21.61
EVR+rTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 3668.2 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 21.6
MMF+sTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 3669.6 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 20.01
MMF+sTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timebaseline13.1 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 15.62
MMF+sTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 1267.8 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 23.57
MMF+sTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 2468.6 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 23.26
MMF+sTACEvaluation of Evolution of Renal Allograft Function Over Timemonth 668.3 ml/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 21.02
Secondary

Growth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From Baseline

Evaluation of the potential effects upon the bone growth. The Z-score is a statistical tool which helps to assess data (here child growth parameters) relative to a reference or standard population. The Z-score describes the distance and direction of an observation away from the population median (or mean, however, here the median was used). A negative Z-score shows that data are lower than the median of the standard population, a positive Z-score shows that data are higher than the median of the standard population, and a Z-score of zero shows that the data are equal to the median of the standard population. The more the Z-score is distant from 0, the more expressed is for example underweight or overweight.

Time frame: month 12 , month 36 post transplantation.

Population: safety set, 36 months analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EVR+rTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineHeight month 120.37 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.625
EVR+rTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineHeight month 360.72 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.131
EVR+rTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineWeight month 120.30 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.732
EVR+rTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineWeight month 360.61 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.987
EVR+rTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineBMI month 120.00 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.716
EVR+rTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineBMI month 360.02 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.86
MMF+sTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineBMI month 120.24 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.98
MMF+sTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineHeight month 120.20 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.537
MMF+sTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineWeight month 360.82 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.268
MMF+sTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineHeight month 360.39 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.776
MMF+sTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineBMI month 360.47 z scoreStandard Deviation 1.231
MMF+sTACGrowth/Development : Weight, Height, BMI : Change From BaselineWeight month 120.42 z scoreStandard Deviation 0.747
Secondary

Incidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.

To evaluate the proportion of patients with the following efficacy events: biopsy proven antibody mediated rejection/Steroid resistant BPAR and BPAR treated with T cell depleting therapy.

Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation

Population: Full Analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EVR+rTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.patients with BPAR at 12 months7 Participants
EVR+rTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR Steroid resistant,12 months1 Participants
EVR+rTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR, T Cell depleting therapy 12 months1 Participants
EVR+rTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.patients with BPAR at 36 months6 Participants
EVR+rTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR Steroid resistant,36 months1 Participants
EVR+rTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR, T Cell depleting therapy 36 months2 Participants
MMF+sTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR Steroid resistant,36 months2 Participants
MMF+sTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.patients with BPAR at 12 months8 Participants
MMF+sTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.patients with BPAR at 36 months12 Participants
MMF+sTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR Steroid resistant,12 months0 Participants
MMF+sTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR, T Cell depleting therapy 36 months1 Participants
MMF+sTACIncidence of Biopsy Proven Antibody Mediated Rejection.BPAR, T Cell depleting therapy 12 months1 Participants
Secondary

Proteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)

The urinary protein/creatinine ratio will be descriptively summarized by treatment group at each visit. The incidence rate of patients with proteinuria will be categorized in \<0.2 g/mg/mg, 0.2\<2.0 mg/mg and ≥ 2.0 mg/mg and summarized by treatment groups at each visit.

Time frame: at 12 and 36 months post-transplantation

Population: full analysis set 36 months analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Baseline < 200mg/g1 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 12 200 - < 2000 mg/g13 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Baseline >= 2000 mg/g14 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 12 >= 2000 mg/g0 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 36 < 200mg/g23 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Baseline 200 - < 2000 mg/g12 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 36 200 - < 2000 mg/g10 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 36 >= 2000 mg/g1 Participants
EVR+rTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 12 < 200mg/g19 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 36 >= 2000 mg/g0 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 36 200 - < 2000 mg/g11 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Baseline < 200mg/g2 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Baseline 200 - < 2000 mg/g12 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Baseline >= 2000 mg/g15 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 12 < 200mg/g28 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 12 200 - < 2000 mg/g11 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 36 < 200mg/g23 Participants
MMF+sTACProteinuria (Urinary Protein/Creatinine Ratio)Month 12 >= 2000 mg/g0 Participants
Secondary

To Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Extended), at Month 12

To evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (extended) (Schwartz, 2009). Results given as change from randomization

Time frame: 12 months post-transplantation

Population: Full Analysis set 12 months months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Extended), at Month 124.6 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 11.94
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate Renal Function, Assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) and Estimated by the Schwartz Formula (Extended), at Month 12-0.0 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Deviation 23.92
Secondary

To Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)

T-cell mediated rejection severity : Type IA - Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Type IB - Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Type IIA - Mild to moderate intimal arteritis Type IIB - Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area Type III - Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation)

Time frame: month 12, month 36

Population: full Analysis set 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IIB0 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IA3 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IB1 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IIA0 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade III0 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IA3 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IB2 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IIA0 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IIB0 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade III0 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IIA1 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IA1 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IA1 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade III1 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IB0 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IB0 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IIA2 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade IIB0 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 36 grade IIB1 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Severity of BPAR (Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection Only) (Banff 2009)month 12 grade III0 Participants
Secondary

To Evaluate the Time to Event of BPAR

Time to incidence of Event, given in terms of number of participants with an Event according to time interval up to 36 months

Time frame: 36 months

Population: full Analysis set, 36 month analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARafter day 10500 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 8-140 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 1-70 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 15-281 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 29-560 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 57-840 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 85-1502 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 151- 2400 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 241-3301 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 331- 5100 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 511-6901 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 691-8700 Participants
EVR+rTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 871-10500 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 511-6900 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 8-140 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 1-70 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 151- 2400 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 871-10500 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 241-3302 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 15-280 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 691-8700 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 29-560 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 331- 5101 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 57-840 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARafter day 10500 Participants
MMF+sTACTo Evaluate the Time to Event of BPARday 85-1502 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026