Skip to content

LIpid Lowering With Highly Potent Statins in Hyperlipidaemia With Type 2 Diabetes patiENts

Study on Effect of Highly Potent Statins on Lipid Lowering Effect and Glucose Metabolism in Hypercholesterolemia Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01544309
Acronym
LISTEN
Enrollment
1049
Registered
2012-03-05
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia With Concomitant Type 2 Diabetes

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on lipid lowering effect and glucose metabolism in hypercholesterolemia patients with diabetes mellitus.

Interventions

DRUGAtorvastatin

Atorvastatin 10 mg (atorvastatin 10 mg tablet x 1 or atorvastatin 5 mg tablet x 2), orally,once daily for 12 months. (When not reach the LDL-C level of target in the Japan Atherosclerosis Society \[JAS\] Guidelines \[GL\] after 3 months, had the atorvastatin \[ATV\] dose of 20 mg.)

DRUGRosuvastatin

Rosuvastatin 5 mg (rosuvastatin 5 mg tablet x1 or rosuvastatin 2.5 mg tablet x 2), orally, once daily for 12 months. (When not reach the LDL-C level of target in JAS GL after 3 months, had the rosuvastatin \[RSV\] dose of 10 mg.)

Sponsors

Listen Trial Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Hypercholesterolemia patients • Patients who have not achieved the target control levels of LDL-C in the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2007 2. Type 2 diabetes patients * Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and receiving diet therapy, exercise therapy, or medication * Patients who received constant therapy for three months before registration and have no plan for therapy change * Patients with kept HbA1c level (Japan Diabetes Society \[JDS\] level) of less than 7.0% (or, National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program \[NGSP\] level of less than 7.4%) within three months before registration * Patients receiving or not receiving medication at present 3. Patients giving voluntary written consent to participate in the study 4. Male or female patients at 20 years or older

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who administered rosuvastatin, atorvastatin or ezetimibe within three month at the registration 2. Patients with severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure \[SBP\] ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\] ≥ 110 mmHg) 3. Patients with type 1 diabetes 4. Patients judged to have familial hypercholesterolemia 5. Patients with a serum triglyceride level of ≥ 400 mg/dL 6. Patients who had the onset of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease within three months 7. Patients with serious heart failure (NYHA classification III - IV) 8. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to statins 9. Patients with a history of drug-induced myopathy 10. Patients with severe complication of diabetes 11. Patients receiving insulin 12. Patients with serious liver or kidney disease 13. Patients with serious concurrent disease such as malignancy, or patients with severely limited lifespan 14. Patients who are or may be pregnant 15. Patients judged by the investigators to be ineligible for participation in the study for any other reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) LevelBaseline, and 12 months after administration
Change in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 12 months after administration

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa
Change in HbA1c LevelBaseline, 3, 6 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Percent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)
Percent Change in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa.
Change From Baseline in Insulin LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa
Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 12 months after administrationDeterioration of diabetic treatment status is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.
Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Up to 12 months
Percent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Percent Change in Non-HDL-C LevelBaseline, 3 and 6 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment
Percent Changes in Lipids and Inflammatory Marker (Hs-CRP) and Their CorrelationBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatmentCorrelation between percent changes in lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TC and FFA) and inflammatory marker (hs-CRP)
Rate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 20073 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatmentPercentage of participants achieving the target LDL-C levels \<100 mg/dL for participants with history of coronary artery diseases (CAD) and \<120 mg/dL for participants without history of CAD are presented.
Change From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa
Frequency of Cardiovascular Events (Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Cerebrovascular Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Disease)From the start of the treatment to the end of study treatment
Number of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administrationDeterioration of diabetic treatment status is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atorvastatin Administration Group
Atorvastatin: Atorvastatin 10 mg (atorvastatin 10 mg tablet x 1 or atorvastatin 5 mg tablet x 2), orally,once daily for 12 months. (When not reach the LDL-C level of target in JAS GL after 3 months, had the ATV dose of 20 mg.)
504
Rosuvastatin Administration Group
Rosuvastatin: Rosuvastatin 5 mg (rosuvastatin 5 mg tablet x1 or rosuvastatin 2.5 mg tablet x 2), orally, once daily for 12 months. (When not reach the LDL-C level of target in JAS GL after 3 months, had the RSV dose of 10 mg.)
514
Total1,018

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministered prohibit prior medication10
Overall StudyNot performed pre-dose examination12
Overall StudyPhysician Decision41
Overall StudyProtocol Violation21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject127

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAtorvastatin Administration GroupRosuvastatin Administration Group
1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol (1,5-AG)15.40 μg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.01
15.40 μg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
15.39 μg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Age, Continuous66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Angina pectoris
With events
62 participants31 participants31 participants
Angina pectoris
Without events
956 participants473 participants483 participants
Blood glucose118.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.2
118.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27
119.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.2
Cardiac arrhythmias
With events
57 participants31 participants26 participants
Cardiac arrhythmias
Without events
961 participants473 participants488 participants
Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular events before entry
With events
206 participants103 participants103 participants
Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular events before entry
Without events
812 participants401 participants411 participants
Cerebral haemorrhage
With events
9 participants3 participants6 participants
Cerebral haemorrhage
Without events
1009 participants501 participants508 participants
Cerebral infarction
With events
51 participants21 participants30 participants
Cerebral infarction
Without events
967 participants483 participants484 participants
Complications related to diabetes
With diabetic complications
116 participants49 participants67 participants
Complications related to diabetes
Without diabetic complications
902 participants455 participants447 participants
Diabetic foot
With diabetic foot
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Diabetic foot
Without diabetic foot
1017 participants504 participants513 participants
Diabetic nephropathy
With diabetic nephropathy
34 participants13 participants21 participants
Diabetic nephropathy
Without diabetic nephropathy
984 participants491 participants493 participants
Diabetic neuropathy
With diabetic neuropathy
46 participants23 participants23 participants
Diabetic neuropathy
Without diabetic neuropathy
972 participants481 participants491 participants
Diabetic retinopathy
With diabetic retinopathy
13 participants4 participants9 participants
Diabetic retinopathy
Without diabetic retinopathy
1005 participants500 participants505 participants
Free fatty acids (FFA)0.584 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.298
0.585 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.297
0.584 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.299
HbA1c6.39 % (NGSP value)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
6.38 % (NGSP value)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.59
6.40 % (NGSP value)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.66
HDL-C54.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
55.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
54.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Heart failure
With events
18 participants10 participants8 participants
Heart failure
Without events
1000 participants494 participants506 participants
Hypertension
With hypertension
645 participants307 participants338 participants
Hypertension
Without hypertension
373 participants197 participants176 participants
Insulin11.77 μU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.39
10.95 μU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.66
12.57 μU/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.07
LDL-C/HDL-C ratio2.69 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86
2.66 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81
2.73 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)139.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30
139.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.9
139.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.9
Myocardial infarction
With events
14 participants7 participants7 participants
Myocardial infarction
Without events
1004 participants497 participants507 participants
Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio3.30 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
3.25 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07
3.36 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)168.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.3
169.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.6
168.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.8
Revascularization
With events
12 participants3 participants9 participants
Revascularization
Without events
1006 participants501 participants505 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
1018 participants504 participants514 participants
Statin administration before entry
Administered
241 participants120 participants121 participants
Statin administration before entry
Not administered
777 participants384 participants393 participants
Total cholesterol (TC)223.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34
224.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.8
223.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36
Transient ischaemic attack
With events
9 participants5 participants4 participants
Transient ischaemic attack
Without events
1009 participants499 participants510 participants
Triglyceride (TG)152.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 115.8
149.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 89.1
154.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 137.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
87 / 50688 / 516
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 50619 / 516

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c Level

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months after administration

Population: Participants in FAS except the ones who had no HbA1c data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange in HbA1c Level0.120 Amount of change (%)Standard Deviation 0.65
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange in HbA1c Level0.10 Amount of change (%)Standard Deviation 0.67
Primary

Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) Level

Time frame: Baseline, and 12 months after administration

Population: Participants in full analysis set (FAS) except the ones who had no HDL-C data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) Level-31.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.1
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) Level-32.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 1,5-AG Level

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelAt 3 months-0.51 μg/mLStandard Deviation 3.48
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelAt 6 months-1.28 μg/mLStandard Deviation 4.23
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelAt 12 months-0.88 μg/mLStandard Deviation 4.33
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline 1,5-AG level15.40 μg/mLStandard Deviation 7.91
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelBaseline 1,5-AG level15.39 μg/mLStandard Deviation 8.1
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelAt 3 months-0.21 μg/mLStandard Deviation 3.77
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelAt 12 months-1.09 μg/mLStandard Deviation 4.66
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in 1,5-AG LevelAt 6 months-0.94 μg/mLStandard Deviation 4.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Insulin Level

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

Population: Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelAt 3 months-0.10 μU/mLStandard Deviation 20.26
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelAt 6 months0.66 μU/mLStandard Deviation 18.63
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelAt 12 months-1.50 μU/mLStandard Deviation 18.69
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelBaseline Insulin level10.95 μU/mLStandard Deviation 18.66
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelBaseline Insulin level12.57 μU/mLStandard Deviation 20.07
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelAt 3 months-0.54 μU/mLStandard Deviation 18.56
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelAt 12 months-2.91 μU/mLStandard Deviation 19.02
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange From Baseline in Insulin LevelAt 6 months-0.44 μU/mLStandard Deviation 19.86
Secondary

Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 3 months2.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.5
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 6 months6.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 30.2
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 12 months3.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 30.7
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 3 months0.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.2
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 6 months4.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.5
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 12 months1.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35
Secondary

Change in HbA1c Level

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

Population: Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange in HbA1c LevelAt 3 months0.05 Amount of change (%)Standard Deviation 0.42
Atorvastatin Administration GroupChange in HbA1c LevelAt 6 months0.13 Amount of change (%)Standard Deviation 0.57
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange in HbA1c LevelAt 3 months0.00 Amount of change (%)Standard Deviation 0.5
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupChange in HbA1c LevelAt 6 months0.12 Amount of change (%)Standard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Frequency of Cardiovascular Events (Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Cerebrovascular Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Disease)

Time frame: From the start of the treatment to the end of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atorvastatin Administration GroupFrequency of Cardiovascular Events (Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Cerebrovascular Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Disease)5 Number of patients with any events
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupFrequency of Cardiovascular Events (Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Cerebrovascular Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease and Aortic Disease)9 Number of patients with any events
Secondary

Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

Time frame: Up to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Atorvastatin Administration GroupFrequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)14 Number of patients with SAE
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupFrequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)19 Number of patients with SAE
Secondary

Number of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment Status

Deterioration of diabetic treatment status is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration

Population: Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug except the ones who had no HbA1c or non-HDL-C data or a protocol deviation of the administration of study drugs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atorvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification: 6-12 months32 participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusOther: 3-6 months5 participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification: 3-6 months12 participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusOther: 6-12 months8 participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusOther: 0-3 months6 participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusNo deterioration421 participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification: 0-3 months20 participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusNo deterioration453 participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification: 0-3 months14 participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification: 3-6 months8 participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification: 6-12 months23 participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusOther: 0-3 months5 participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusOther: 3-6 months5 participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupNumber of Participants Stratified by Time to the Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusOther: 6-12 months6 participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment Status

Deterioration of diabetic treatment status is defined as addition of new drug, increase in dosage, drug changes (therapy intensification), and deterioration in HbA1c of \> 0.5%.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months after administration

Population: Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug except the ones who had no HbA1c or non-HDL-C data or a protocol deviation of the administration of study drugs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atorvastatin Administration GroupOccurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification64 Participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupOccurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusDeterioration in HbA1c of > 0.5%177 Participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupOccurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusTherapy intensification45 Participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupOccurrence of Deterioration of Diabetic Treatment StatusDeterioration in HbA1c of > 0.5%162 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change in 1,5-AG Level

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in 1,5-AG level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

Population: Participants in FAS except the ones who had no 1,5-AG data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelAt 3 months-1.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 30.8
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelAt 6 months-6.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35.8
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelAt 12 months-3.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35.1
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelAt 3 months5.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 72.6
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelAt 6 months2.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 83.7
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in 1,5-AG LevelAt 12 months3.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 98
Secondary

Percent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment(or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

Population: Participants in FAS except the ones who had no blood glucose level data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 3 months3.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.3
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 6 months7.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 24.1
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 12 months4.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 24.3
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 3 months2.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 6 months5.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.7
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Blood Glucose Level (Fasting)At 12 months3.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 26.1
Secondary

Percent Change in Insulin Level

An inverse relationship exists between mean change in insulin level and the mean rate of change when the degree of standard deviation is large, wherein the mean change is negative although the mean rate of change is positive or vice versa.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration and the end of study treatment (or at the occurrence of deterioration of diabetic treatment status)

Population: Full analysis set - All participants who received at least 1 dose of open-label study drug

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Insulin LevelAt 3 months40.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 211.2
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Insulin LevelAt 6 months45.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 193.9
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Insulin LevelAt 12 months17.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 132.9
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Insulin LevelAt 3 months31.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 166.4
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Insulin LevelAt 6 months35.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 142.8
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Insulin LevelAt 12 months13.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 148.1
Secondary

Percent Change in Non-HDL-C Level

Time frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment

Population: Participants in FAS except the ones who had no non-HDL-C level data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Non-HDL-C LevelAt 3 months-33.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 17.6
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Non-HDL-C LevelAt 6 months-33.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 16.6
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Non-HDL-C LevelAt 3 months-35.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.4
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Change in Non-HDL-C LevelAt 6 months-33.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.8
Secondary

Percent Changes in Lipids and Inflammatory Marker (Hs-CRP) and Their Correlation

Correlation between percent changes in lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, TC and FFA) and inflammatory marker (hs-CRP)

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment

Secondary

Percent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment

Population: Participants in FAS except the ones who had no lipids level data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)LDL-C: at 3 months-36.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.2
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)LDL-C: at 6 months-35.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.4
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)LDL-C: at 12 months-33.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 21.5
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)HDL-C: at 3 months4.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.3
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)HDL-C: at 6 months7.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 15.1
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)HDL-C: at 12 months4.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.7
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TC: at 3 months-24.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 13.3
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TC: at 6 months-23.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 13
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TC: at 12 months-22.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.3
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TG at 3 months-12.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 38
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TG: at 6 months-12.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 45.9
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TG: at 12 months-12.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 62.2
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio: at 3 months-34.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 22.6
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio: at 6 months-36.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.4
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio: at 12 months-33.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 22.7
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)FFA: at 3 months19.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 87.8
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)FFA: at 6 months13.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 80.5
Atorvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)FFA: at 12 months37.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 125.3
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio: at 6 months-37.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 20.8
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)LDL-C: at 3 months-39.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 21.3
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TG at 3 months-11.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 42.2
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)LDL-C: at 6 months-36.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 21.8
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)FFA: at 12 months34.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 111
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)LDL-C: at 12 months-34.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 21
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TG: at 6 months-11.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 38
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)HDL-C: at 3 months5.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 13.9
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio: at 12 months-36.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 20.7
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)HDL-C: at 6 months8.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 15.2
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TG: at 12 months-15.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35.4
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)HDL-C: at 12 months7.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 15.9
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)FFA: at 6 months15.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 88.9
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TC: at 3 months-25.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.3
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio: at 3 months-37.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 20.2
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TC: at 6 months-23.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.9
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)FFA: at 3 months25.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 111.3
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupPercent Changes in Lipids (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio, and FFA)TC: at 12 months-23.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14
Secondary

Rate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 2007

Percentage of participants achieving the target LDL-C levels \<100 mg/dL for participants with history of coronary artery diseases (CAD) and \<120 mg/dL for participants without history of CAD are presented.

Time frame: 3 months after administration, the end of starting dose and the end of study treatment

Population: Full analysis set except participants who have reached the target LDL-C level specified at the treatment start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Atorvastatin Administration GroupRate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 2007At 3 months89.0 Percentage of participants
Atorvastatin Administration GroupRate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 2007At the end of study treatment86.3 Percentage of participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupRate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 2007At 3 months89.9 Percentage of participants
Rosuvastatin Administration GroupRate of Patients Who Have Reached the Target LDL-C Level Specified in Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines (JASGL) 2007At the end of study treatment87.5 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026