Skip to content

A Study of Flexibly Dosed Paliperidone Extended Release Tablets in Participants With Schizophrenia

An Open-label Prospective Trial to Explore the Tolerability, Safety and Efficacy of Flexibly Dosed Paliperidone ER in Non Acute Episode Subjects With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01541371
Enrollment
405
Registered
2012-02-29
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2013-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Schizophrenia, Paliperidone extended-release tablets

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of paliperidone extended-release (ER; designed to slowly release a drug in the body over an extended period of time) tablets in participants with schizophrenia (psychiatric disorder with symptoms of emotional instability, detachment from reality, often with delusions \[a false belief held in the face of strong differing evidence, especially as a symptom of psychiatric disorder\] and hallucinations \[imagining things\], and withdrawal into the self) who were not satisfied with other prior antipsychotics (agents that control agitated psychotic behavior, alleviate acute psychotic states, reduce psychotic symptoms, and exert a quieting effect; olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone) they had been taking. The safety and tolerability of paliperidone ER tablets will also be assessed.

Detailed description

This is an open label (all people know the identity of the intervention), prospective (study following participants forward in time), non-randomized (the study drug is not assigned by chance, participants may choose which group they want to be in, or they may be assigned to the groups by the researchers), single-arm (getting one dose of medicine) and multi-center (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) study designed to determine the efficacy, tolerability and safety of flexible dosage of paliperidone ER tablets in treatment of participants with schizophrenia not satisfied with other prior antipsychotics. The duration of the study will be 12 weeks. All participants will be given paliperidone ER 3 milligram (mg) or 6 mg or 9 mg or 12 mg oral (by mouth) tablets depending on Investigator's discretion once daily for 12 weeks; initial dose for paliperidone ER will be 6 mg/day. The primary objective will be to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with paliperidone ER using Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) total scores. Participants safety and tolerability will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGPaliperidone ER

Paliperidone Extended Release (ER) 3 milligram (mg) or 6 mg or 9 mg or 12 mg oral (by mouth) tablets depending on Investigator's discretion once daily for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) diagnosis criteria of schizophrenia * Participant receiving full course of treatment (6-8 weeks) at correct dose (dose range recommended by the instruction) of Risperdal, Zyprexa or Seroquel before enrollment, was poorly controlled and had to change medication because of unsatisfying efficacy, tolerability or safety issues, or other reason * Participant in the non-acute phase during screening received treatment with any of above three antipsychotics within 4 weeks before enrollment and state of illness was relatively stable * 7\. Female participants must be postmenopausal for at least 1 year, surgically sterile, abstinent, or, if sexually active, agree to practice an effective method of birth control before entry and throughout the study. Effective methods of birth control include prescription hormonal contraceptives, contraceptive injections, intrauterine devices, double barrier method, contraceptive patch and male partner sterilization. Female participants must also have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening * Participant willing to and who could complete questionnaire by himself

Exclusion criteria

* Participant receiving treatment with clozapine or risperidone microspheres for injection (Hengde) within 3 months before screening * Participant having history of seizure except febrile convulsion (seizures that occur during a febrile episode \[fever\]) * Participant having refractory schizophrenia (previous treatment with unsatisfied efficacy of 2 or more than 2 kinds of antipsychotics with different chemical structure after adequate dose and duration) * Participant receiving electric shock treatment within 1 month before screening * Participant having serious, unstable physical diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12PANSS is a medical scale that assesses various symptoms of schizophrenia (psychiatric disorder with symptoms of emotional instability, detachment from reality, often with delusions \[a false belief held in the face of strong differing evidence, especially as a symptom of psychiatric disorder\] and hallucinations \[imagining things\], and withdrawal into the self). The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items, with a range of 30 (absent) to 210 (extreme ill).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The PANSS is a 30-item scale to assess the neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). Positive symptoms subscale consists of 8 items with total score range of 8-56; negative symptoms subscale and disorganized thoughts subscale, each consists of 7 items with total score range of 7-49, uncontrolled hostility/excitement subscale and anxiety/depression subscale, each consists of 4 items with total score range of 4-28. Higher change score indicates greater severity.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total ScoreWeek 12PANSS is a medical scale that assesses various symptoms of schizophrenia. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items, with a range of 30 (absent) to 210 (extreme ill). Percentage of participants with at least 20 percent improvement of PANSS total score was measured.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The CGI-S rating scale is a 7 point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 is equivalent to normal, not at all ill and a rating of 7 is equivalent to among the most extremely ill participants. Higher change scores indicate worsening.
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12Baseline and Week 12PANSS is a medical scale that assesses various symptoms of schizophrenia. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items, with a range of 30 (absent) to 210 (extreme ill). Positive syndrome subscale ranges from 7 to 49, higher change scores indicate worsening. Negative syndrome subscale ranges from 7 to 49, higher change scores indicate worsening. General Psychopathology subscale ranges from 16 to112, higher change scores indicate worsening.
Number of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline and Week 12Participants assessed their satisfaction with paliperidone ER on a 5-point scale: 1 (very good), 2 (good), 3 (moderate), 4 (poor) and 5 (very poor).
Change From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12The self-administered sleep VAS scale (0-100 milimeter \[mm\]) rates quality of sleep (QoS) and daytime drowsiness (DD). Participants indicate mark on the scale to represent how well they have slept in the previous 7 days, score ranges from 0 mm (very badly) to 100 mm (very well); and how often they have felt drowsy within the previous 7 days, from 0 mm (not at all) to 100 mm (all the time).
Change From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12PSP assesses the degree of a participant's dysfunction within 4 domains of behavior: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behavior. The score ranges from 1 to 100, divided into 10 equal intervals to rate the degree of difficulty (1, absent to 6, very severe) in each of the 4 domains. Based on the four domains there will be one total score. Participants with a score of 71 to 100 have a mild degree of difficulty; from 31 to 70, varying degrees of disability; =\<30, functioning so poorly as to require intensive supervision.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from 19 study centers between 30 July 2008 and 23 September 2009.

Pre-assignment details

405 participants were enrolled, out of which 403 participants were recruited in Safety Analysis Set (randomized and took at least 1 dose of study drug) and 394 subjects were included in full analysis set (had at least 1 efficacy evaluation).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Paliperidone Extended Release (ER)
Paliperidone ER 3 milligram (mg) or 6 mg or 9 mg or 12 mg oral tablets depending on Investigator's discretion once daily for 12 weeks.
394
Total394

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event15
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy12
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyOther6
Overall StudyProtocol Violation6
Overall StudyStudy medication non-compliance3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPaliperidone Extended Release (ER)
Age Continuous30.88 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.39
Sex: Female, Male
Female
199 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
195 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
227 / 403
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 403

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12

PANSS is a medical scale that assesses various symptoms of schizophrenia (psychiatric disorder with symptoms of emotional instability, detachment from reality, often with delusions \[a false belief held in the face of strong differing evidence, especially as a symptom of psychiatric disorder\] and hallucinations \[imagining things\], and withdrawal into the self). The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items, with a range of 30 (absent) to 210 (extreme ill).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12Baseline77.18 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12Change at Week 12-26.29 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.77
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12Baseline58.46 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.31
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12Change at Week 12-13.99 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.74
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12Baseline63.33 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.08
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 12Change at Week 12-20.90 unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12

The CGI-S rating scale is a 7 point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 is equivalent to normal, not at all ill and a rating of 7 is equivalent to among the most extremely ill participants. Higher change scores indicate worsening.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement. Here N (Number of Participants Analyzed): number of participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n': number of participants who were evaluable at given time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12Baseline (n=237,115,41)4.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=208,103,40)-1.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12Baseline (n=237,115,41)3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=208,103,40)-1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12Baseline (n=237,115,41)3.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=208,103,40)-1.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12

The PANSS is a 30-item scale to assess the neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). Positive symptoms subscale consists of 8 items with total score range of 8-56; negative symptoms subscale and disorganized thoughts subscale, each consists of 7 items with total score range of 7-49, uncontrolled hostility/excitement subscale and anxiety/depression subscale, each consists of 4 items with total score range of 4-28. Higher change score indicates greater severity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Positive symptoms: Baseline21.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.15
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Positive symptoms: Change at Week 12-8.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Negative symptoms: Baseline19.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Negative symptoms: Change at Week 12-6.53 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Disorganized thoughts: Baseline14.13 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Disorganized thoughts: Change at Week 12-4.13 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.28
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Uncontrolled hostility/excitement: Baseline7.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.83
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Uncontrolled hostility/excitement:Change at Week12-2.74 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.63
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Anxiety/depression: Baseline7.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Marder Subscale Scores at Week 12Anxiety/depression: Change at Week 12-2.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12

PANSS is a medical scale that assesses various symptoms of schizophrenia. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items, with a range of 30 (absent) to 210 (extreme ill). Positive syndrome subscale ranges from 7 to 49, higher change scores indicate worsening. Negative syndrome subscale ranges from 7 to 49, higher change scores indicate worsening. General Psychopathology subscale ranges from 16 to112, higher change scores indicate worsening.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12Positive: Change at Week 12-6.59 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12Negative: Baseline18.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.66
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12Negative: Change at Week 12-6.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.99
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12General psychopathology: Baseline34.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12General psychopathology: Change at Week 12-10.84 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Subscale Scores at Week 12Positive: Baseline17.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12

The self-administered sleep VAS scale (0-100 milimeter \[mm\]) rates quality of sleep (QoS) and daytime drowsiness (DD). Participants indicate mark on the scale to represent how well they have slept in the previous 7 days, score ranges from 0 mm (very badly) to 100 mm (very well); and how often they have felt drowsy within the previous 7 days, from 0 mm (not at all) to 100 mm (all the time).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement. Here N (Number of Participants Analyzed): number of participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n': number of participants who were evaluable at given time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Daytime drowsiness:Change at Week 12(n=202,106,40)-15.76 mmStandard Deviation 27.52
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Daytime drowsiness score: Baseline (n=233,115,41)38.16 mmStandard Deviation 23.7
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Quality of sleep score: Baseline (n=233,115,41)60.76 mmStandard Deviation 26.7
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Quality of sleep: Change at Week 12 (n=202,106,40)15.76 mmStandard Deviation 29.46
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Quality of sleep score: Baseline (n=233,115,41)75.89 mmStandard Deviation 20.24
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Quality of sleep: Change at Week 12 (n=202,106,40)2.90 mmStandard Deviation 27.41
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Daytime drowsiness score: Baseline (n=233,115,41)44.77 mmStandard Deviation 25.29
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Daytime drowsiness:Change at Week 12(n=202,106,40)-21.66 mmStandard Deviation 27.88
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Quality of sleep score: Baseline (n=233,115,41)70.31 mmStandard Deviation 22.4
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Quality of sleep: Change at Week 12 (n=202,106,40)13.60 mmStandard Deviation 26.94
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Daytime drowsiness score: Baseline (n=233,115,41)34.26 mmStandard Deviation 23.64
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Sleep and Daytime Drowsiness Evaluation Score at Week 12Daytime drowsiness:Change at Week 12(n=202,106,40)-18.10 mmStandard Deviation 26.87
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12

PSP assesses the degree of a participant's dysfunction within 4 domains of behavior: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behavior. The score ranges from 1 to 100, divided into 10 equal intervals to rate the degree of difficulty (1, absent to 6, very severe) in each of the 4 domains. Based on the four domains there will be one total score. Participants with a score of 71 to 100 have a mild degree of difficulty; from 31 to 70, varying degrees of disability; =\<30, functioning so poorly as to require intensive supervision.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement. Here 'n': number of participants who were evaluable at given time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12Baseline (n=238,115,41)53.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.79
Lack of Efficacy GroupChange From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=205,106,40)18.57 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.87
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12Baseline (n=238,115,41)66.95 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.89
Lack of Tolerability GroupChange From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=205,106,40)10.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.75
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12Change at Week 12 (n=205,106,40)12.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.33
Other GroupChange From Baseline in Total Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Score at Week 12Baseline (n=238,115,41)66.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.21
Secondary

Number of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study Treatment

Participants assessed their satisfaction with paliperidone ER on a 5-point scale: 1 (very good), 2 (good), 3 (moderate), 4 (poor) and 5 (very poor).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement. Here N (Number of Participants Analyzed): number of participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n': number of participants who were evaluable at given time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Very satisfied (n=230,113,41)1 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Generally satisfied (n=230,113,41)84 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Very dissatisfied (n=230,113,41)6 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Satisfied (n=230,113,41)15 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Dissatisfied (n=230,113,41)124 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Very satisfied (n=208,105,40)30 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Satisfied (n=208,105,40)93 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Generally satisfied (n=208,105,40)62 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Dissatisfied (n=208,105,40)23 Participants
Lack of Efficacy GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Very dissatisfied (n=208,105,40)0 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Dissatisfied (n=208,105,40)6 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Very satisfied (n=230,113,41)3 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Very satisfied (n=208,105,40)23 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Generally satisfied (n=230,113,41)58 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Generally satisfied (n=208,105,40)24 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Very dissatisfied (n=230,113,41)1 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Very dissatisfied (n=208,105,40)1 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Dissatisfied (n=230,113,41)21 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Satisfied (n=230,113,41)30 Participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Satisfied (n=208,105,40)51 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Satisfied (n=230,113,41)15 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Dissatisfied (n=230,113,41)1 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Very dissatisfied (n=230,113,41)0 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Very satisfied (n=208,105,40)10 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Dissatisfied (n=208,105,40)2 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Satisfied (n=208,105,40)18 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Very dissatisfied (n=208,105,40)0 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Very satisfied (n=230,113,41)0 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentWeek 12, Generally satisfied (n=208,105,40)10 Participants
Other GroupNumber of Participants With Satisfaction With the Study TreatmentBaseline, Generally satisfied (n=230,113,41)25 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response to Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a medical scale that assesses various symptoms of schizophrenia. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items, with a range of 30 (absent) to 210 (extreme ill). Percentage of participants with at least 20 percent improvement of PANSS total score was measured.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lack of Efficacy GroupPercentage of Participants With Response to Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score65.97 Percentage of participants
Lack of Tolerability GroupPercentage of Participants With Response to Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score51.72 Percentage of participants
Other GroupPercentage of Participants With Response to Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score61.90 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026