Skip to content

Efficacy of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF) In Patients With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Efficacy of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF) In Patients With Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01538862
Enrollment
7
Registered
2012-02-24
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2017-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Brief summary

This is a feasibility study to see if Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF) is effective as a treatment of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). Patients will receive one course of treatment with the study drug. The course will be 7 days in length. After receiving GCSF, patients will be followed at 7 and 30 days following the discontinuation of the drug. Thirty day follow up can be done via telephone communication with the patient or family.

Detailed description

Each patient will be given 10 micrograms per kilogram per day of G-CSF subcutaneously for 6 consecutive days. On day 7 each patient will be seen and evaluated in the same manner as on day 0. Patients or their parents (if children are too young to reliably respond themselves) will also be asked to rate the following via a visual analog scale of 1-9- oral pain, pruritus, oral pain, swallowing, and overall sense of well-being. A telephone follow-up will be conducted on all patients 28 days after G-CSF so as to evaluate if the effect noted on day 7 was sustained.

Interventions

G-CSF 10mcg/kg/d SQ for 7 days

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Each patient must have the diagnosis of severe generalized recessive dystrophic EB (formerly known as Hallopeau-Siemens RDEB) confirmed by clinical criteria and either of the following: 1. transmission electron microscopy 2. immunofluorescence antigenic mapping and type VII collagen monoclonal antibody staining 3. COL7A1 mutational analysis

Exclusion criteria

* The patient must not have a history of squamous cell carcinoma or any internal malignancy. * Female patients who are pregnant. * Patients with active signs and symptoms of infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change of Active Blisters and in Total Blister/Erosion Counts7 daysPercent change of active blisters and in total blister/erosion counts from baseline to 7 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surface Area of Nonhealing Erosions7 daysChange in surface area of one or two nonhealing erosions
Overall Improved Symptomatology28 daysOverall clinical improvement in symptomatology and/or findings, as assessed by either the patient or parent. This would include decrease in the number and size of blister and erosions, decreased pain, improved comfort of the patient.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF)
GCSF 10mcg/kg/d SQ for 7 days Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF): G-CSF 10mcg/kg/d SQ for 7 days
7
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGranulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
6 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change of Active Blisters and in Total Blister/Erosion Counts

Percent change of active blisters and in total blister/erosion counts from baseline to 7 days

Time frame: 7 days

Population: Time frame was originally entered as 30 days. This was not consistent with the protocol which listed a 7 day time frame for this Outcome

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF)Percent Change of Active Blisters and in Total Blister/Erosion Counts-29.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.3
p-value: 0.82Regression, Linear
Secondary

Overall Improved Symptomatology

Overall clinical improvement in symptomatology and/or findings, as assessed by either the patient or parent. This would include decrease in the number and size of blister and erosions, decreased pain, improved comfort of the patient.

Time frame: 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF)Overall Improved Symptomatology6 Participants
Secondary

Surface Area of Nonhealing Erosions

Change in surface area of one or two nonhealing erosions

Time frame: 7 days

Population: Time frame was originally entered as 30 days. This was not consistent with the protocol which listed a 7 day time frame for this Outcome

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (GCSF)Surface Area of Nonhealing Erosions-35.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 100.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026