Skip to content

A Sleep Laboratory Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of the Rotigotine Skin Patch in Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome and End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Hemodialysis

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Polysomnography Study to Investigate Safety and Efficacy of the Rotigotine Transdermal Patch in Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome and End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Hemodialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01537042
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-02-22
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2014-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-Stage Renal Disease, Restless Legs Syndrome

Keywords

Rotigotine, Neupro, Restless Legs Syndrome, RLS, End-Stage Renal Disease

Brief summary

This is a sleep laboratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rotigotine in subjects with Restless Legs Syndrome and End-Stage Renal Disease requiring hemodialysis. The objectives are to demonstrate superiority of Rotigotine against Placebo as well as to investigate the effect of Rotigotine on quality of life and sleep.

Interventions

DRUGRotigotine

Transdermal patch; Dose: 1 mg/24 h, 2 mg/24 h or 3 mg/24 h once daily depending on optimal dose; maximal dose is 3 mg/24 h. Subjects start with a Rotigotine dose of 1 mg/24 h for 1 week. The dose can be increased weekly during Up-Titration Period until either the optimal or the maximal dose of 3 mg/24 h has been reached. Subjects will maintain the optimal/maximal dose during the 2-week Maintenance Period. Following the Maintenance Period, subjects will be de-escalated from their optimal dose by decreasing the dose by 1 mg/24 h every other day during Taper Period until complete withdrawal.

DRUGPlacebo

Transdermal patch; Patches matching to active treatment patches in size and appearance. Up to 3 weeks of Titration, 2 weeks of Maintenance, Up to 4 days of Taper Period.

Sponsors

UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis and regular dialysis schedule * Fulfillment of pre-defined criteria of hematology parameters * Diagnosis of Restless Legs (RLS) based on the 4 cardinal diagnostic clinical features according to the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group * Initial response to previous dopaminergic treatment for RLS, or has had no previous dopaminergic treatment (ie, de novo) * Score of ≥ 15 points on the IRLS (indicating moderate to severe RLS) at Baseline * Score of ≥ 11 points on the RLS-DI (Diagnostic Index) at Baseline * Score of ≥ 4 points on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 assessment (indicating moderately ill) at Baseline * Scores ≥ 15 Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs) per hour on the Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI) based on Polysomnography (PSG) (recorded during the second night) as assessed by the investigator at Baseline

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically relevant Polyneuropathy or Varicosis which cannot be clearly differentiated from RLS symptoms in the opinion of the investigator * Clinically relevant concomitant diseases, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Painful Legs, and Moving Toes * Other central nervous system diseases * Evidence of an impulse control disorder according to the modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview (mMIDI) * Lifetime history of suicide attempt (including an active attempt, interrupted attempt, or aborted attempt), or has suicidal ideation in the past 6 months as indicated by a positive response ('yes') to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the Columbia-Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2) * Prior history of psychotic episodes * History of symptomatic (not asymptomatic) Orthostatic Hypotension * Clinically relevant Cardiovascular Disease * Clinically relevant Venous or Arterial Peripheral Vascular Disease * Malignant Neoplastic Disease requiring therapy within 12 months prior to Screening (Visit 1) * Treatment with any of the following drug classes: neuroleptics, norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (bupropion), gabapentin, budipine, dopamine antagonist antiemetics (except domperidone), opioids, monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors, or psychostimulants (eg, amphetamines) * Subject is pregnant, nursing, or is a woman of childbearing potential who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or does not consistently use 2 combined effective methods of contraception (including at least 1 barrier method), unless sexually abstinent * Previous treatment with dopamine agonists within a period of 14 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2), or L-dopa within 7 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2) * Medical history indicating intolerability to dopaminergic therapy (if pretreated) or has experienced Augmentation (Garcia-Borreguero and Williams, 2010) when previously treated with any dopaminergic agent * Subject has received previous treatment with Rotigotine * Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the study medication, such as a history of significant Skin Hypersensitivity to adhesives, known Hypersensitivity to other transdermal medications, or unresolved Contact Dermatitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ratio From Baseline to the End of the 2-week Maintenance Period in Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe PLMI is defined as Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs)/ total time in bed in hours. PLMs are measured by Polysomnography (PSG). The reduction of the PLMI is reflected in terms of the ratio from Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period and was calculated as \[PLMI at end of Maintenance Period (MP)\] / \[PLMI at Baseline\]. A PLMI Ratio \<1 indicates an improvement from Baseline to the end of the 2-week MP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Sum Score to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe IRLS is a subject based scale that consists of 10 items to evaluate the severity of major RLS symptoms and the impact of the disease on subjects' functioning in daytime activities. Each of the 10 items is measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). A sum score between 0 (no RLS symptoms present at all) and 40 (maximum severity in all symptoms) across all 10 items will be calculated. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline in IRLS.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreVisit 2 (Baseline); Visit 6 (End of Maintence Period)The CGI Item 1 score measures the severity of illness on a scale that ranges from 0 (Not assessed) to 7 (Among the most extremely ill).
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 1 to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 1 measures satisfaction with sleep during the last seven nights on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (completely satisfied) to 10 (completely dissatisfied). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 2 to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 2 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last 7 nights in the situation of falling asleep. This is measured on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 3 to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 3 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last seven nights on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 4 to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 4 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last seven days at rest on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movements Index (PLMI) to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe PLMI is defined as Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs)/ total time in bed in hours. PLMs are measured by Polysomnography (PSG). A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period.
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 6 to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 6 measures the severity of daytime tiredness/ sleepiness on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (not at all) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movement During Sleep Arousal Index (PLMSAI) to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe Periodic Limb Movement during Sleep Arousal Index (PLMSAI) reflects the influence of the PLM on subject's sleep. Arousal is defined as sudden change in the Electroencephalogram (EEG) activity and the index illustrates to what degree the PLMs contribute to arousal from sleep. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodSleep stages and time spent in each sleep stage are determined from Electroencephalogram (EEG) readings. Sleep stage data will be used to calculate sleep efficiency. Sleep efficiency will be presented as percentages. Sleep efficiency is the percentage of time in bed spent asleep. A postive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) Total Score to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe RLS-QoL is a disease-specific questionnaire to evaluate quality of life. It consists of 12 items. A total score will be calculated from all of the 12 items. The overall sum score can be from 0 (highest QoL) to 60 (lowest QoL). A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MCS) to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe SF-36 is a 36 item generic human research quality of life instrument that uses a recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains as follows: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items), and a further unscaled single item (question 2) for perceived stability or change in health (Health Transition) during the last year. The norm based scores (based on the US general population) were used for analysis. For the MCS, the lowest and highest possible scores are -9 and 82 (rounded). The SF-36 domains (subscores) are scored so that a higher score indicates a better health state.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe SF-36 is a 36 item generic human research quality of life instrument that uses a recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains as follows: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items), and a further unscaled single item (question 2) for perceived stability or change in health (Health Transition) during the last year. The norm-based scores (based on the US general population) were used for analysis. For the PCS, the lowest and highest possible scores are 1 and 81 (rounded). The SF-36 domains (subscores) are scored so that a higher score indicates a better health state.
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 5 to the End of the Maintenance PeriodFrom Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance PeriodThe RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 5 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last seven days engaged in activities on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Countries

Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment for the SP0934 study began in April 2012. It concluded in October 2013. This was a multicenter study with subjects enrolled by 9 sites across Europe and 6 sites across the United States.

Pre-assignment details

The participant flow consists of the Randomized Set (RS), which is all subjects randomized into SP0934.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Transdermal patch matched according to patch size and appearance. Placebo: Transdermal patch; Patches matching to active treatment patches in size and appearance.
10
Rotigotine
Rotigotine Transdermal Patch 1 mg/24 h, 2 mg/24 h or 3 mg/24 h once daily depending on optimal dose; maximal dose is 3 mg/24 h.
20
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event02
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyOther01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboRotigotineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants15 Participants23 Participants
Age, Continuous50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
BMI28.850 kg/ m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.182
30.405 kg/ m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.262
29.887 kg/ m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.931
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants16 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Height171.77 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.59
171.50 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.99
171.59 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.82
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants13 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
4 participants8 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants12 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants13 Participants20 Participants
Weight85.38 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.99
89.42 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.34
88.07 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.17

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 1012 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 103 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Ratio From Baseline to the End of the 2-week Maintenance Period in Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)

The PLMI is defined as Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs)/ total time in bed in hours. PLMs are measured by Polysomnography (PSG). The reduction of the PLMI is reflected in terms of the ratio from Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period and was calculated as \[PLMI at end of Maintenance Period (MP)\] / \[PLMI at Baseline\]. A PLMI Ratio \<1 indicates an improvement from Baseline to the end of the 2-week MP.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboRatio From Baseline to the End of the 2-week Maintenance Period in Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)1.16 ratio
RotigotineRatio From Baseline to the End of the 2-week Maintenance Period in Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)0.51 ratio
p-value: 0.023295% CI: [0.22, 0.88]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 Score

The CGI Item 1 score measures the severity of illness on a scale that ranges from 0 (Not assessed) to 7 (Among the most extremely ill).

Time frame: Visit 2 (Baseline); Visit 6 (End of Maintence Period)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNormal, not ill at all0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreBorderline ill0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMarkedly ill5 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreModerately ill3 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreAmong the most extremely ill subjects0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMildly ill0 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreSeverely ill2 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNot assessed0 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreAmong the most extremely ill subjects1 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreModerately ill3 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMarkedly ill9 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNormal, not ill at all0 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNot assessed0 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreBorderline ill0 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreSeverely ill2 participants
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMildly ill0 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMarkedly ill0 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreSeverely ill0 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNormal, not ill at all1 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreAmong the most extremely ill subjects0 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreBorderline ill1 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNot assessed0 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMildly ill3 participants
Placebo (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreModerately ill5 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMildly ill3 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNot assessed0 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreNormal, not ill at all5 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreBorderline ill4 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreAmong the most extremely ill subjects0 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreModerately ill1 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreMarkedly ill2 participants
Rotigotine (Visit 6)Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 ScoreSeverely ill0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency to the End of the Maintenance Period

Sleep stages and time spent in each sleep stage are determined from Electroencephalogram (EEG) readings. Sleep stage data will be used to calculate sleep efficiency. Sleep efficiency will be presented as percentages. Sleep efficiency is the percentage of time in bed spent asleep. A postive value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency to the End of the Maintenance Period-2.850 sleep time/ total time in bedStandard Deviation 10.347
RotigotineChange From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency to the End of the Maintenance Period7.668 sleep time/ total time in bedStandard Deviation 12.317
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Sum Score to the End of the Maintenance Period

The IRLS is a subject based scale that consists of 10 items to evaluate the severity of major RLS symptoms and the impact of the disease on subjects' functioning in daytime activities. Each of the 10 items is measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). A sum score between 0 (no RLS symptoms present at all) and 40 (maximum severity in all symptoms) across all 10 items will be calculated. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline in IRLS.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Sum Score to the End of the Maintenance Period-8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Sum Score to the End of the Maintenance Period-15.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movement During Sleep Arousal Index (PLMSAI) to the End of the Maintenance Period

The Periodic Limb Movement during Sleep Arousal Index (PLMSAI) reflects the influence of the PLM on subject's sleep. Arousal is defined as sudden change in the Electroencephalogram (EEG) activity and the index illustrates to what degree the PLMs contribute to arousal from sleep. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movement During Sleep Arousal Index (PLMSAI) to the End of the Maintenance Period4.634 movement per hourStandard Deviation 7.162
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movement During Sleep Arousal Index (PLMSAI) to the End of the Maintenance Period-1.609 movement per hourStandard Deviation 14.412
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movements Index (PLMI) to the End of the Maintenance Period

The PLMI is defined as Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs)/ total time in bed in hours. PLMs are measured by Polysomnography (PSG). A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to the end of the Maintenance Period.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movements Index (PLMI) to the End of the Maintenance Period10.3 movement/ hourStandard Deviation 21
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movements Index (PLMI) to the End of the Maintenance Period-23.7 movement/ hourStandard Deviation 38.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 1 to the End of the Maintenance Period

The RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 1 measures satisfaction with sleep during the last seven nights on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (completely satisfied) to 10 (completely dissatisfied). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 1 to the End of the Maintenance Period-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 1 to the End of the Maintenance Period-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 2 to the End of the Maintenance Period

The RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 2 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last 7 nights in the situation of falling asleep. This is measured on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 2 to the End of the Maintenance Period-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 2 to the End of the Maintenance Period-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 3 to the End of the Maintenance Period

The RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 3 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last seven nights on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 3 to the End of the Maintenance Period-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 3 to the End of the Maintenance Period-4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 4 to the End of the Maintenance Period

The RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 4 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last seven days at rest on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 4 to the End of the Maintenance Period-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 4 to the End of the Maintenance Period-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 5 to the End of the Maintenance Period

The RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 5 measures the severity of RLS symptoms during the last seven days engaged in activities on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 5 to the End of the Maintenance Period-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 5 to the End of the Maintenance Period-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 6 to the End of the Maintenance Period

The RLS-6 consists of six scales of which four scales are designed to assess severity of RLS and two scales cover sleep and daytime tiredness. Scale 6 measures the severity of daytime tiredness/ sleepiness on an 11-point scale that ranges between 0 (not at all) to 10 (very severe). The ratings are given by the subjects. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 6 to the End of the Maintenance Period-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 6 to the End of the Maintenance Period-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) Total Score to the End of the Maintenance Period

The RLS-QoL is a disease-specific questionnaire to evaluate quality of life. It consists of 12 items. A total score will be calculated from all of the 12 items. The overall sum score can be from 0 (highest QoL) to 60 (lowest QoL). A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) Total Score to the End of the Maintenance Period-10.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs-Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) Total Score to the End of the Maintenance Period-10.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period

The SF-36 is a 36 item generic human research quality of life instrument that uses a recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains as follows: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items), and a further unscaled single item (question 2) for perceived stability or change in health (Health Transition) during the last year. The norm based scores (based on the US general population) were used for analysis. For the MCS, the lowest and highest possible scores are -9 and 82 (rounded). The SF-36 domains (subscores) are scored so that a higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period

The SF-36 is a 36 item generic human research quality of life instrument that uses a recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains as follows: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items), and a further unscaled single item (question 2) for perceived stability or change in health (Health Transition) during the last year. The norm-based scores (based on the US general population) were used for analysis. For the PCS, the lowest and highest possible scores are 1 and 81 (rounded). The SF-36 domains (subscores) are scored so that a higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: From Baseline over the Up-Titration Period (up to 3 Weeks) to the end of the 2-Week Maintenance Period

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), which included all randomized subjects with at least 1 patch applied during the Treatment Period, and had evaluable PSG data at Baseline and at the end of the 2-week Maintenance Period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
RotigotineChange From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026