Skip to content

Robotic Assisted Sacral Colpopexy : A Prospective Study Assessing Outcomes With Learning Curves

Robotic Assisted Sacral Colpopexy : A Prospective Study Assessing Subjective and Objective Outcomes With Learning Curves in the Development of a New Pelvic Floor Robotics Program

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01535833
Enrollment
100
Registered
2012-02-20
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2016-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

robotic sacral colpopexy, Learning curve, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Robotic Surgery

Brief summary

The investigators scientific aims are to determine the benefits associated with the use of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy surgery on women with prolapse, to define how the benefits impact the patient, physician and the institution, and to determine the complications associated with the use of the robot. This will be a prospective cohort following 100 patients for a 24 month period.

Detailed description

The investigators scientific aims are to determine the benefits associated with the use of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy surgery on women with prolapse, to define how the benefits impact the patient, physician and the institution, and to determine the complications associated with the use of the robot. This will be a prospective cohort following 100 patients for a 24 month period. The investigators primary outcomes will be: * Surgical time: Key portion of procedure will be assessed along with total time for completion * Learning curve: Will be assessed using surgical times, VAS of camera skills, surgical skills involving tissue handling and movements and overall performance by surgeon, assistant and blind reviewer * Length of hospitalization: measured by days in hopsital The investigators secondary outcomes will be: * Pre-operative and postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) at 6 week, 6, 12, and 24 months. * Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 Questionnaire (PFDI-20) * Mesh erosion, * Estimated blood loss, * Complications (bowel or bladder injury) and, * Wound infection, * Patient Global Impressions of Improvement * Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12).

Interventions

PROCEDUREDevice- Robotic sacral colpopexy

To assess robotic sacral colpopexy for female patients with stage 2 pelvic organ prolapse

Sponsors

Kaiser Permanente
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* \> 18 years old * Females only * Undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without other procedures for pelvic organ prolapse * Willing to return for follow-up visits * Written informed consent obtained from each subject

Exclusion criteria

* Decline to participate * Pregnant or contemplating future pregnancy (within a year) * Unable to participate in the informed consent process

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Learning curve of robotic sacral colpopexy24 monthsTo assess learning curve during implementation of a new pelvic floor robotic program which will assess surgical time (total and specific essential portions), simulator training and surgeon, observational surgeon skills by surgeon, assistant and blinded assessor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective outcomes for robotic sacral colpopexyTwo yearsSubjective outcomes for robotic sacral colpopexy for prolapse and incontinence symptoms and sexual function using validated measures (PFDI-20), (PISQ-12)
Adverse events for robotic sacral colpopexyTwo yearsAdverse events for robotic sacral colpopexy including estimated blood loss, GU and GI injury, wound infection and mesh erosion
Objective outcomes measures associated with robotic sacral colpopexy24 monthsTo assess prolapse outcomes using POP-Q assessment of postoperative support at 12 and 24 months

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactShawn A Menefee, MD
shawn.a.menefee@kp.org6192216398
Backup ContactJohn N Nguyen, MD
john.n.nguyen@kp.org5626572642

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026