Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This prospective observational study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Data of patients treated with Tarceva in routine clinical practice will be collected for 1 year.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients, \> 65 years of age * Locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (Stage IIIb or IV) * Failure of at least one prior standard platinum-based chemotherapy
Exclusion criteria
* Age \< 65 years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive 1 Year After Start of Treatment | Year 1 | Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall percentage of participants who were alive 1 year after study treatment and those based on the factor of age (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, ≥ 80 years) were reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Median Overall Survival: Age | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. Median survival based on the factor of age (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, ≥80 years) were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Fatigue | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | — |
| Percentage of Participants With Rash | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | — |
| Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | — |
| Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Severity was categorized as Grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Grade 1= mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2= moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5= death related to adverse event. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Severity was categorized as Grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Grade 1= mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2= moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5= death related to adverse event. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Severity was categorized as Grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Grade 1= mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2= moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5= death related to adverse event. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Dose modification included increase or decreased in the dose of the drug and interrupted dose. Reasons for dose modification included progression, participants' wish, intolerance and others. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Reasons for dose withdrawals included progression, participants' wish, intolerance, others and not known. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Severity of cough was categorized as mild, moderate, severe and unknown. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories in the course of time were reported. Participants with no cough were not included. |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Response rate was observed during the treatment period according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). It consisted of CR, PR, SD and progressive disease (PD). Participants with CR, PR and SD were reported. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) and non-TLs, with any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to less than 10 millimeters (mm). PR: at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the baseline (BL) sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. |
| Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Severity of dyspnea was categorized as mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening and unknown. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories in the course of time were reported. Participants with no dyspnea were not included. |
| Percentage of Participants With Remission of CR and PR | Months 3, 6, 9, 12 | Remission was defined as participants with CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all TLs and non-TLs, with any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the BL sum diameters. |
| Median Progression Free Survival: Overall | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression no death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. |
| Median Progression Free Survival: Age | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Median progression-free survival based on the factor of age (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, ≥80 years) were reported. |
| Median Progression Free Survival: Gender | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Median progression-free survival based on the factor of gender (male and female) were reported. |
| Median Progression Free Survival: Smoking Status | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Median progression-free survival based on the factor of smoking status (smoker, non-smoker and ex-smoker) were reported. |
| Median Progression Free Survival: Best Response to Prior Chemotherapy | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. |
| Median Overall Survival: Overall | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. |
| Median Overall Survival: Gender | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. Median survival based on the factor of gender (male and female) were reported. |
| Median Overall Survival: Smoking Status | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. Median survival based on the factor of smoking status (smoker, non-smoker and ex-smoker) were reported. |
| Median Overall Survival: Best Response to Prior Chemotherapy | From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40) | Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. |
| Time to Start of Erlotinib Therapy After End of First Line Therapy | Baseline | — |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants Elderly Participants (≥ 65 years) with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, on erlotinib (Tarceva®) prescribed in accordance with the terms of the marketing authorization, were observed for maximum of 12 months. | 385 |
| Total | 385 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 52 |
| Overall Study | Did not sign informed consent | 1 |
| Overall Study | Discontinued treatment | 25 |
| Overall Study | Disease progression | 230 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 8 |
| Overall Study | No participant record available | 5 |
| Overall Study | No previous chemotherapy | 33 |
| Overall Study | Not treated | 9 |
| Overall Study | NSCLC grade IV histology not confirmed | 20 |
| Overall Study | Other | 19 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 11 |
| Overall Study | Screening failure | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | NSCLC Elderly Participants |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 72.66 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.23 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 127 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 258 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 135 / 385 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 79 / 385 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive 1 Year After Start of Treatment
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall percentage of participants who were alive 1 year after study treatment and those based on the factor of age (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, ≥ 80 years) were reported.
Time frame: Year 1
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive 1 Year After Start of Treatment | Overall | 30.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive 1 Year After Start of Treatment | 65-69 years | 26.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive 1 Year After Start of Treatment | 70-74 years | 29.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive 1 Year After Start of Treatment | 75-79 years | 37.2 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive 1 Year After Start of Treatment | ≥ 80 years | 25.6 percentage of participants |
Median Overall Survival: Age
Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. Median survival based on the factor of age (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, ≥80 years) were reported.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Age | 65-69 years | 7.039 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Age | 70-74 years | 6.612 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Age | 75-79 years | 7.928 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Age | ≥ 80 years | 6.020 months |
Median Overall Survival: Best Response to Prior Chemotherapy
Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: Data for best response to prior chemotherapy could not be collected, as it was not recorded in the CRF, hence, the analysis could not be performed.
Median Overall Survival: Gender
Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. Median survival based on the factor of gender (male and female) were reported.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Gender | Male | 6.283 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Gender | Female | 8.125 months |
Median Overall Survival: Overall
Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Overall | 7.1 months |
Median Overall Survival: Smoking Status
Overall Survival was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of death from any cause. If death was not observed during the study, survival time was censored at the last day of observation (latest at the end of study after one year). Overall Survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier Methods. Median survival based on the factor of smoking status (smoker, non-smoker and ex-smoker) were reported.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until death (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Smoking Status | Smoker | 6.612 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Smoking Status | Non-smoker | 11.184 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Overall Survival: Smoking Status | Ex-smoker | 5.855 months |
Median Progression Free Survival: Age
Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Median progression-free survival based on the factor of age (65-69, 70-74, 75-79, ≥80 years) were reported.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Age | 65-69 years | 3.257 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Age | 70-74 years | 3.388 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Age | 75-79 years | 5.033 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Age | ≥ 80 years | 2.928 months |
Median Progression Free Survival: Best Response to Prior Chemotherapy
Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: Data for best response to prior chemotherapy could not be collected, as it was not recorded in the Case Report Form (CRF), hence, the analysis could not be performed.
Median Progression Free Survival: Gender
Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Median progression-free survival based on the factor of gender (male and female) were reported.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Gender | Male | 3.355 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Gender | Female | 4.046 months |
Median Progression Free Survival: Overall
Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression no death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Overall | 3.5 months |
Median Progression Free Survival: Smoking Status
Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from the date of first medication to the date of disease progression or death from any cause. If neither progression nor death was observed during the study, PFS time was censored at the last day of observation. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Median progression-free survival based on the factor of smoking status (smoker, non-smoker and ex-smoker) were reported.
Time frame: From Baseline then every 3 months from Month 3 until disease progression (Maximum follow-up to Month 40)
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Smoking Status | Smoker | 3.454 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Smoking Status | Non-smoker | 5.526 months |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Median Progression Free Survival: Smoking Status | Ex-smoker | 2.993 months |
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD)
Response rate was observed during the treatment period according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). It consisted of CR, PR, SD and progressive disease (PD). Participants with CR, PR and SD were reported. CR: disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) and non-TLs, with any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to less than 10 millimeters (mm). PR: at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the baseline (BL) sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest sum on study (this included the BL sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 3: CR | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 3: PR | 4.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 3: SD | 25.2 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 6: CR | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 6: PR | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 6: SD | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 9: CR | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 9: PR | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 9: PD | 10.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 12: CR | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 12: PR | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) | Month 12: SD | 8.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity
Severity of cough was categorized as mild, moderate, severe and unknown. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories in the course of time were reported. Participants with no cough were not included.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Baseline: Mild | 13.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Baseline: Moderate | 24.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Baseline: Severe | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Baseline: Unknown | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 3: Mild | 15.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 3: Moderate | 14.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 3: Severe | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 3: Unknown | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 6: Mild | 4.4 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 6: Moderate | 3.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 6: Severe | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 6: Unknown | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 9: Mild | 4.7 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 9: Moderate | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 9: Unknown | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 12: Mild | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 12: Moderate | 1.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 12: Severe | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Cough by Severity | Month 12: Unknown | 0.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea | Month 3 | 89.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea | Month 6 | 39.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea | Month 9 | 19.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea | Month 12 | 13.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time
Severity was categorized as Grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Grade 1= mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2= moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5= death related to adverse event. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 1 | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 2 | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 3 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 9: Grade 1 | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 9: Grade 2 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 9: Grade 3 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 12: Grade 1 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 1 | 11.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 2 | 7.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 3 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 4 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason
Dose modification included increase or decreased in the dose of the drug and interrupted dose. Reasons for dose modification included progression, participants' wish, intolerance and others. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 3: Increased (other) | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 6: Increased (other) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 9: Increased (other) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 12: Increased (participants' wish) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 12: Increased (other) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 3: Decreased (participants' wish) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 3: Decreased (intolerance) | 7.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 3: Decreased (other) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 6: Decreased (participants' wish) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 6: Decreased (intolerance) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 6: Decreased (other) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 9: Decreased (intolerance) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 9: Decreased (other) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 12: Decreased (intolerance) | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 3: Interruption (progression) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 3: Interruption (intolerance) | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 3: Interruption (other) | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 6: Interruption (progression) | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 6: Interruption (other) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 9: Interruption (progression) | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 9: Interruption (other) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications by Reason | Month 12: Interruption (other) | 0.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason
Reasons for dose withdrawals included progression, participants' wish, intolerance, others and not known. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 9: Other | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 3: Progression | 34.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 3: Participants' wish | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 3: Intolerance | 3.4 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 3: Other | 8.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 3: Not known | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 6: Progression | 12.7 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 6: Participants' wish | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 6: Intolerance | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 6: Other | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 6: Not known | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 9: Progression | 4.7 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 9: Participants' wish | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 9: Intolerance | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dose Withdrawals by Reason | Month 12: Progression | 2.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity
Severity of dyspnea was categorized as mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening and unknown. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories in the course of time were reported. Participants with no dyspnea were not included.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Baseline: Mild | 16.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Baseline: Moderate | 20.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Baseline: Severe | 8.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Baseline: Unknown | 1.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 3: Mild | 10.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 3: Moderate | 17.4 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 3: Severe | 4.4 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 3: Life-threatening | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 3: Unknown | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 6: Mild | 4.7 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 6: Moderate | 3.4 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 6: Severe | 2.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 6: Unknown | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 9: Mild | 3.4 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 9: Moderate | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 9: Severe | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 9: Unknown | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 12: Mild | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 12: Moderate | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 12: Severe | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Dyspnea by Severity | Month 12: Unknown | 0.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Fatigue
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue | Month 3 | 89.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue | Month 6 | 38.7 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue | Month 9 | 19.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue | Month 12 | 13.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time
Severity was categorized as Grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Grade 1= mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2= moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5= death related to adverse event. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 1 | 6.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 2 | 8.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 3 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 1 | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 2 | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 3 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 9: Grade 1 | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 9: Grade 2 | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 12: Grade 1 | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Fatigue Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 12: Grade 2 | 0.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Rash
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash | Month 3 | 90.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash | Month 6 | 37.9 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash | Month 9 | 19.5 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash | Month 12 | 13.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time
Severity was categorized as Grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Grade 1= mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2= moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5= death related to adverse event. Only participants that were included in any of the specified categories were reported.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 1 | 19.2 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 2 | 23.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 3: Grade 3 | 4.4 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 1 | 8.1 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 2 | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 6: Grade 3 | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 9: Grade 1 | 3.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 9: Grade 2 | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 12: Grade 1 | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Rash Based on Severity During the Course of Time | Month 12: Grade 2 | 1.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Remission of CR and PR
Remission was defined as participants with CR or PR. CR: disappearance of all TLs and non-TLs, with any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the BL sum diameters.
Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Remission of CR and PR | Month 3 | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Remission of CR and PR | Month 6 | 3.6 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Remission of CR and PR | Month 9 | 1.8 percentage of participants |
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Percentage of Participants With Remission of CR and PR | Month 12 | 2.1 percentage of participants |
Time to Start of Erlotinib Therapy After End of First Line Therapy
Time frame: Baseline
Population: SAF with number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| NSCLC Elderly Participants | Time to Start of Erlotinib Therapy After End of First Line Therapy | 2.30 months |