Skip to content

Heat Versus Ice in the Acute Management of Neck and Back Strain Injuries

Heat Versus Ice in the Acute Management of Neck and Back Strain Injuries

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01535365
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-02-17
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2012-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Strain, Neck Strain

Keywords

muscular sprain, acute back pain, acute neck pain, heat treatment, cold treatment

Brief summary

Muscle sprains of the back and neck are very common. In addition to pain and antiinflammatory medications the use of either cold or hot packs has been recommended. In the current study we will compare ice packs and heat packs to see which is more effective at relieving pain from back and neck sprains while in the Emergency Department.

Detailed description

as above

Interventions

OTHERHeat

Application of heat pack to the back or neck sprain.

OTHERCold

Application of ice pack to the back or neck sprain.

Sponsors

Stony Brook University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult Patients with acute neck or back pain who are able to consent and are in pain on arrival to Emergency Department.

Exclusion criteria

* Those unable or unwilling to consent, those with suspected fractures or neurologic deficits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Score After Treatment30 minutesPain measured with validated 100 mm VAS with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing most severe pain imaginable

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Request for Rescue Analgesia30 minutesNumber of participants requesting a rescue analgesic be given

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Heat
Application of Heat to site of muscle sprain.
31
Cold
Application of cold to muscle sprain.
29
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalHeatCold
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0.0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0.0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
60.0 Participants31 Participants29 Participants
Age Continuous37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
36.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
60.0 participants31 participants29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31.0 Participants16 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29.0 Participants15 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 310 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Score After Treatment

Pain measured with validated 100 mm VAS with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing most severe pain imaginable

Time frame: 30 minutes

Population: this sample size gives 80% power to detect a size effect of one SD

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Heat PackPain Score After Treatment66 mm95% Confidence Interval 16
Ice PackPain Score After Treatment64 mm95% Confidence Interval 10
Secondary

Request for Rescue Analgesia

Number of participants requesting a rescue analgesic be given

Time frame: 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Heat PackRequest for Rescue Analgesia18 Participants
Ice PackRequest for Rescue Analgesia12 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026