Skip to content

A Two-Step Approach to Bone Marrow Transplant Using Cells From Two Partially-Matched Relatives

A Two Step Approach to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies Using Two Related Donors

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01532635
Enrollment
4
Registered
2012-02-14
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2025-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematologic Malignancy, Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, ALL, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, AML, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, CLL, Lymphoma, Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Non-hodgkin's Lymphoma, Myeloma

Keywords

hematologic malignancy, leukemia, Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ALL, Acute myelogenous leukemia, AML, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL, lymphoma, hodgkin's lymphoma, non-hodgkin's lymphoma, myeloma, allogeneic stem cell transplant, TJU 2-step, Hematopoietic stem cell transplant, HSCT, bone marrow transplant, Cyclophosphamide, MMF, Mycophenolate Mofetil

Brief summary

This phase II clinical trial studies how well two donors stem cell transplant work in treating patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. After receiving radiation to help further treat the disease, patients receive a dose of donors' T cells. T cells can fight infection and react against cancer cells. Two days after donors' T cells are given, patients receive cyclophosphamide (CY) to help destroy the most active T cells that may cause tissue damage (called graft versus host disease or GVHD). Some of the less reactive T cells are not destroyed by CY and they remain in the patient to help fight infection. A few days after the CY is given, patients receive donors' stem cells to help their blood counts recover. Using two donors' stem cell transplant instead of one donor may be more effective in treating patients with high-risk disease and may prevent the disease from coming back.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess 1 year relapse free survival in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) using the Thomas Jefferson University (TJU) 2 step approach using 2 donors. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the consistency and pace of engraftment. II. To assess the pace of T cell and B cell immune recovery in patients in each arm. III. To assess regimen related toxicity, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence and severity, and overall survival. IV. To assess the tolerance of the period of fever, diarrhea, and rash after the introduction of second donor and qualitatively compare it to prior patient groups or concurrent patient groups. V. To assess chimerism to ascertain whether one donor is emerging as dominant at regular intervals beginning at the time of engraftment. VI. If dominance is observed, to compare the donors with regard to degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, killer Ig-like receptor (KIR) types, cluster of differentiation (CD)34+ cell doses, infusion order, donor age, and donor alloreactivity points in an effort to identify potential biologic factors that predict for dominance. To determine if trends toward dominance occur in T cell, natural killer (NK) cell, or other cellular subsets prior to emerging in the graft as a whole. VII. To assess if establishment of a dominant donor versus persistent chimerism of both donors is associated with a lower relapse rate. VIII. To collect leukemia samples prior to transplant and after relapse whenever possible. To assess the overall degree of HLA-class I and class II expression on these paired samples. To test for loss of one or both HLA haplotypes in the relapsed tumor specimens. When observed, to correlate loss of one HLA haplotype with: a) receipt of a transplant capable of targeting only that haplotype; b) establishment of dominance in a 2 haplotype transplant such that the lost haplotype would be the primary target of the dominant donor; c) being the target of the donor predicted to be more alloreactive in a 2 haplotype transplant. OUTLINE: CONDITIONING: Patients undergo total-body irradiation (TBI) twice daily (BID) on days -9 to -6, undergo donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) on day -6, and receive cyclophosphamide intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days -3 and -2. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo CD34+ selected allogeneic HSCT on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV or orally (PO) beginning on day -1 with taper beginning on day 42 and mycophenolate mofetil IV or PO BID on days -1 to 28. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 1 year, and then periodically thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGTacrolimus

Tacrolimus is started the day before the transplant and stops a few months after transplant.

DRUGMycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)

MMF is started the day before transplant and stops a few weeks after transplant.

RADIATIONTotal Body Irradiation (TBI)

TBI twice daily for 4 days and occurs 6 to 9 days prior to the transplant. Total radiation dose is 12 Gy.

DLI given 6 days prior to transplant (HSCT).

Cyclophosphamide given once daily at 60 mg/kg on days 2 and 3 prior to transplant (HSCT).

BIOLOGICALHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)

CD34+ selected Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) is performed using donor cells from two related donors. The CliniMACS® Plus Instrument will be used for the selection of human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells.

Sponsors

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Any patient with a hematologic malignancy with residual disease (morphological, cytogenetic, molecular, or radiographic) after treatment with 1 or more chemotherapy regimens in whom achievement of remission with additional chemoradiotherapy is felt to be unlikely or who is in 3rd or greater CR. Patients with marrow based diseases in which the marrow biopsy does not meet criteria for active disease (i.e. \<5% blasts in acute leukemia) but who does not have full count recovery will be eligible for treatment on this high risk trial. 2. Patients must have two related donors that meet an acceptable scenario as described above. 3. Patients must adequate organ function: * LVEF of \>= 50% * DLCO (adjusted for hemoglobin) \>= 50% of predicted * Adequate liver function as defined by a serum bilirubin =\< 1.8, AST or ALT \< 2.5X upper limit of normal * Creatinine clearance of \>= 60 ml/min 4. Karnofsky Performance Status of \> 80 % on the modified KPS tool (see Appendix A). 5. Patients must be willing to use contraception if they have childbearing potential. 6. Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Modified KPS of \< 80% 2. \>= 5 Comorbidity Points on the HCT-CI Index (See Appendix B) 3. Class I or II antibodies against donor HLA antigens 4. HIV positive 5. Active involvement of the central nervous system with malignancy 6. Psychiatric disorder that would preclude patients from signing an informed consent 7. Pregnancy, or unwillingness to use contraception if they have child bearing potential 8. Patients with life expectancy of =\< 6 months for reasons other than their underlying hematologic/oncologic disorder 9. Alemtuzumab treatment within 8 weeks of HSCT admission. 10. ATG level of \>= 2 ugm/ml 11. Patients with active inflammatory processes (such as flair of an autoimmune disease) including T max \> 101, or active tissue inflammation are excluded. 12. Inability to tolerate cyclophosphamide or undergo total body irradiation at the doses specified in the treatment plan.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
One Year Relapse-Free Survival1 yearTo assess one year relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients undergoing HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) using the TJU 2 step-approach with two donors. Survival will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. All estimates of rates will be presented with corresponding confidence intervals. For 1 year RFS rates, the method of Atkinson and Brown will be used to allow for the two-stage design; otherwise the method of Conover.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Dominance1 yearIf dominance is observed, to compare the 2 donors with regard to degree of HLA mismatch, KIR types, CD 34+ cell doses, infusion order, donor age, and donor alloreactivity points in an effort to identify potential biologic factors that predict for dominance. To determine if trends toward dominance occur in T cell, NK cell, or other cellular subsets prior to emerging in the graft as a whole.
Relapse Rates1 yearTo assess if establishment of a dominant donor versus persistent chimerism of both donors is associated with a lower relapse rate.
Engraftment1 yearTo assess the consistency and pace of engraftment of both donors.
Chimerism Assessment1 yearTo assess chimerism to ascertain whether one donor is emerging as dominant at regular intervals beginning at the time of engraftment.
Non-relapse Morbidity and Mortality1 yearAssessment of regimen related toxicity, GVHD incidence and severity, and overall survival.
Tolerance of DLI2-6 days prior to transplantAssessment of the tolerance of the period of fever, diarrhea, and rash after the introduction of second donor and qualitatively compare it to prior patient groups or concurrent patient groups
Assessment for Tumor Escape Mechanisms1 year post transplantTo test for loss of one or both HLA haplotypes in patients who relapse post-transplant and examine the relapse in the context of the characteristics of the 2 donors
Immune Reconstitution1 yearAssess T and B cell Reconstitution

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Allogeneic HSCT Using Two Related Donors
CONDITIONING: Patients undergo TBI BID on days -9 to -6, undergo DLI on day -6, and receive cyclophosphamide IV over 2 hours on days -3 and -2. TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo CD34+ selected allogeneic HSCT on day 0. GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive tacrolimus IV or PO beginning on day -1 with taper beginning on day 42 and mycophenolate mofetil IV or PO BID on days -1 to 28.
4
Total4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAllogeneic HSCT Using Two Related Donors
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Age, Continuous50.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.64
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

One Year Relapse-Free Survival

To assess one year relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients undergoing HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) using the TJU 2 step-approach with two donors. Survival will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. All estimates of rates will be presented with corresponding confidence intervals. For 1 year RFS rates, the method of Atkinson and Brown will be used to allow for the two-stage design; otherwise the method of Conover.

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Assessment for Tumor Escape Mechanisms

To test for loss of one or both HLA haplotypes in patients who relapse post-transplant and examine the relapse in the context of the characteristics of the 2 donors

Time frame: 1 year post transplant

Secondary

Assessment of Dominance

If dominance is observed, to compare the 2 donors with regard to degree of HLA mismatch, KIR types, CD 34+ cell doses, infusion order, donor age, and donor alloreactivity points in an effort to identify potential biologic factors that predict for dominance. To determine if trends toward dominance occur in T cell, NK cell, or other cellular subsets prior to emerging in the graft as a whole.

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Chimerism Assessment

To assess chimerism to ascertain whether one donor is emerging as dominant at regular intervals beginning at the time of engraftment.

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Engraftment

To assess the consistency and pace of engraftment of both donors.

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Immune Reconstitution

Assess T and B cell Reconstitution

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Non-relapse Morbidity and Mortality

Assessment of regimen related toxicity, GVHD incidence and severity, and overall survival.

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Relapse Rates

To assess if establishment of a dominant donor versus persistent chimerism of both donors is associated with a lower relapse rate.

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Tolerance of DLI

Assessment of the tolerance of the period of fever, diarrhea, and rash after the introduction of second donor and qualitatively compare it to prior patient groups or concurrent patient groups

Time frame: 2-6 days prior to transplant

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026