Skip to content

Preliminary Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Nepadutant in Infant With Feeding Intolerance

A Multicenter, Open Label, Ascending 7 Day-Repeated Dose Study to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Nepadutant In Infants With Feeding Intolerance

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01532518
Enrollment
27
Registered
2012-02-14
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colic

Keywords

Feeding intolerance, Infant, tachykinin antagonist, Infant colic, Nepadutant

Brief summary

The present pilot study is aimed to obtain preliminary data on the effect of three ascending oral dose levels of nepadutant on the relief of symptoms associated with feeding intolerance. In addition, the assessment of drug exposure (PK assessment) will provide additional information on the dose-effect relationship, thus supporting the dose selection and dosing schedule in the future studies.

Detailed description

Feeding intolerance is a transient neuro-developmental phenomenon affecting 25% to 40% of infant and toddler, with a peak at 6 weeks of age. Feeding problems include mainly vomiting, slow feeding, refusal to eat and colic. Current non pharmacological interventions (e.g. message, restriction in maternal diet in breast-feeding infants) and pharmacological treatments (simethicone, antimuscarinic drugs and antiacids) are largely unsatisfactory. Nepadutant is postulated to have a therapeutic effect in infant colic since it reverts exaggerated intestinal motility and sensitivity induced by different stimuli through the activation of neurokinin-2 receptors, without interferring on the on physiological gastrointestinal transit. This phase IIa study is designed to test in each participant infant two out of three oral doses of nepadutant in order to measure its blood levels, safety and efficacy with each dose level to be given for 7 concecutive days. The experimental clinical phase encompasses the following periods: * Screening period (no study medication), lasting approximately 7 days prior to randomization * Treatment period, lasting fourteen days (7 days fore each dose)with once daily administration * A safety follow-up visit, approximately four weeks after start of treatment.

Interventions

Nepadutant oral solution

Sponsors

Menarini Group
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 6 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infants with a clinical diagnosis of feeding intolerance. * Age ≤ 6 months at the enrolment. * Normal growth. * Infants who can refrain from use of erythromycin, metoclopramide, antihistaminic drug, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antacids, antimuscarinic drugs, simethicone and dimethicone from 1 week prior randomization until end of study.

Exclusion criteria

* Any clinically relevant event (excluding those relevant to the condition under study) which has occurred within one week prior to randomization. * Any pharmacological treatment starting within one week prior to randomization. * Infants for whom a change in the diet (i.e. weaning) has been performed within one week prior to randomization or is planned during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).V3 (end of 1st week of treatment) and V4 (end of 2nd week of treatment)The results obtained at V3 are used as baseline for the second week treatment period (V4). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).Baseline (V2) and end of 1st week of treatment(V3)Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs baseline (Visit 2) by first dose level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).end of first week of treatment (V3) and end of second week of treatment (V4)Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs Visit 3 by second dose level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).Baseline (V2) and end of first week of treatment (V3)Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for the assessment of effects at V3 (i.e. end of first week of treatment). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).Baseline (V2) and follow up 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5)Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for follow-up assessment 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5) Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-040.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated DoseThe population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Clearance estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.
Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Levelup to 4 weeksThe analysis is by treatment - Each infant was treated with two out of three ascending dose (0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg), therefore counted in more than one dose level.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 3
Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days Nepadutant: Nepadutant oral solution
6
Cohort 2
Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days Nepadutant: Nepadutant oral solution
15
Cohort 1
Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for additional 7 days Nepadutant: Nepadutant oral solution
6
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 3Cohort 2Cohort 1Total
Age, Continuous12.52 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.281
13.62 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.468
14.27 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.559
13.52 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.89
I-GERQ-R total score24.8 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
19 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.32
21.8 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.91
20.8 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.22
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 particpants4 particpants1 particpants8 particpants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 particpants3 particpants0 particpants3 particpants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
3 particpants8 particpants5 particpants16 particpants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants15 participants6 participants27 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants8 Participants2 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants7 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Weight5.323 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9085
5.623 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1045
5.708 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.764
5.576 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1975

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 212 / 218 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 210 / 211 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).

Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs baseline (Visit 2) by first dose level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Time frame: Baseline (V2) and end of 1st week of treatment(V3)

Population: Subjects with feeding intolerance who received at least 1 dose of nepadutant (first dose level 0.1mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg).~One subject in the 3rd cohort didn't report I-GERQ-R score at V2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 3I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).-6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.31
Cohort 2I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).-7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Primary

I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).

Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs Visit 3 by second dose level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Time frame: end of first week of treatment (V3) and end of second week of treatment (V4)

Population: Subjects with feeding intolerance who received at least 1 dose of nepadutant (second dose level 0.5mg/kg and 1 mg/kg)~1 subject in the first cohort early terminated after V2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 3I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).-1.4 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 0.89
Cohort 2I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).-4.9 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 4.41
Primary

The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).

Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for the assessment of effects at V3 (i.e. end of first week of treatment). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Time frame: Baseline (V2) and end of first week of treatment (V3)

Population: Infants with feeding intolerance who received at least 1 dose of nepadutant. In the 3rd cohort 1 subject didn't report I-GERQ-R score at randomization. In the 1rst cohort 1 patient early terminated after V2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 3The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).-6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.55
Cohort 2The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).-7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Cohort 1The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).-6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.81
Primary

The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).

The results obtained at V3 are used as baseline for the second week treatment period (V4). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Time frame: V3 (end of 1st week of treatment) and V4 (end of 2nd week of treatment)

Population: Infants with feeding intolerance who received at least 1 dose of nepadutant. In the 3rd cohort 1 subject didn't report I-GERQ-R score at randomization. In the 1rst cohort 1 patient early terminated after V2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 3The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).-15.2 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 5.54
Cohort 2The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).-11.9 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 6.8
Cohort 1The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).-8.6 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 6.66
Primary

The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).

Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for follow-up assessment 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5) Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis \>15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4. The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.

Time frame: Baseline (V2) and follow up 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5)

Population: Infants with feeding intolerance who received at least 1 dose of nepadutant. In the 3rd cohort 1 subject didn't report I-GERQ-R score at randomization. In the 1rst cohort 1 patient early terminated after V2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 3The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).-7.8 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 7.6
Cohort 2The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).-11.1 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 6.78
Cohort 1The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).-9.8 Score as sum of unitsStandard Deviation 7.4
Secondary

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. The PopPK parameter fraction of the dose absorbed (F1) is estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.The results are presented fraction of the absorbed dose with 95% CI of the parameter estimate value

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

Population: At visit 2, samples from 6 subjects in Cohort 1 at 0.1mg/kg; 6 subjects in Cohort 3 at 0,1 mg/kg; 15 subjects in Cohort 2 at 0.5 mg/kg.~At visit 3\*, 4\*: samples from 5 subjects in Cohort 1 (0.1 - 0.5 mg/kg), 15 subjects in Cohort 2 (0.5 - 1 mg/kg) and 6 subjects in Cohort 3 (0.1 - 1 mg/kg).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohort 3A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-040.0275 fraction of dose absorbed
Cohort 2A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-040.0342 fraction of dose absorbed
Cohort 1A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-040.0346 fraction of dose absorbed
Secondary

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Clearance estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

Population: At visit 2, samples from 12 subjects in 0.1 mg/kg and from 15 subjects in 0.5 mg/kg.~At visit 3\*, 4\*: samples from 15 subjects in 0.1 - 0.5 mg/kg cohort, from 5 in 0.5 - 1 mg/kg cohort and from 6 in 0.1 - 1 mg/kg cohort.~\*N=26 instead of 27 as one patient early terminated the study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohort 3A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-041.24 L/h
Cohort 2A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-041.31 L/h
Cohort 1A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-041.64 L/h
Secondary

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

PopPK Volume estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

Population: At visit 2, samples from 6 subjects in Cohort 1 at 0.1mg/kg; 6 subjects in Cohort 3 at 0,1 mg/kg; 15 subjects in Cohort 2 at 0.5 mg/kg.~At visit 3\*, 4\*: samples from 5 subjects in Cohort 1 (0.1 - 0.5 mg/kg), 15 subjects in Cohort 2 (0.5 - 1 mg/kg) and 6 subjects in Cohort 3 (0.1 - 1 mg/kg).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohort 3A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-0422.5 L
Secondary

A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04

The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Ka estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.

Time frame: 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose

Population: At visit 2, samples from 6 subjects in Cohort 1 at 0.1mg/kg; 6 subjects in Cohort 3 at 0,1 mg/kg; 15 subjects in Cohort 2 at 0.5 mg/kg.~At visit 3\*, 4\*: samples from 5 subjects in Cohort 1 (0.1 - 0.5 mg/kg), 15 subjects in Cohort 2 (0.5 - 1 mg/kg) and 6 subjects in Cohort 3 (0.1 - 1 mg/kg).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohort 3A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04206 1/h
Secondary

Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Level

The analysis is by treatment - Each infant was treated with two out of three ascending dose (0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg), therefore counted in more than one dose level.

Time frame: up to 4 weeks

Population: All subjects who received at least one administration of study treatment including dose tolerability test (safety population)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 3Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelGeneral disorders and administration site conditio1 Number of events
Cohort 3Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelPsychiatric disorders0 Number of events
Cohort 3Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1 Number of events
Cohort 3Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Levelgastrointestinal disorder6 Number of events
Cohort 3Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3 Number of events
Cohort 3Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelRespiratory, thoracic and medistinal disorders3 Number of events
Cohort 3Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelInfections and infestations7 Number of events
Cohort 2Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1 Number of events
Cohort 2Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Levelgastrointestinal disorder4 Number of events
Cohort 2Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelGeneral disorders and administration site conditio0 Number of events
Cohort 2Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelInfections and infestations2 Number of events
Cohort 2Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelPsychiatric disorders0 Number of events
Cohort 2Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelRespiratory, thoracic and medistinal disorders1 Number of events
Cohort 2Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1 Number of events
Cohort 1Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelPsychiatric disorders1 Number of events
Cohort 1Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelGeneral disorders and administration site conditio0 Number of events
Cohort 1Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3 Number of events
Cohort 1Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelRespiratory, thoracic and medistinal disorders1 Number of events
Cohort 1Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0 Number of events
Cohort 1Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose LevelInfections and infestations1 Number of events
Cohort 1Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Levelgastrointestinal disorder3 Number of events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026