Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Continued Access Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in Very High Risk Subjects and High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement

Medtronic CoreValve® Continued Access Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01531374
Enrollment
2777
Registered
2012-02-10
Start date
2012-02-21
Completion date
2019-11-18
Last updated
2022-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Aortic Stenosis

Keywords

Valvular Heart Disease, Critical Aortic Stenosis, Severe Aortic Stenosis, Extreme Risk, High Risk, Aortic Valve Replacement

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects who have a predicted very high risk and high risk for aortic valve surgery.

Interventions

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiovascular
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. High Risk: Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and two cardiac surgeons agree that predicted risk of operative mortality is ≥15% (and predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk of \< 50%) at 30 days. OR Extreme Risk: Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and two cardiac surgeons agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. Specifically, the predicted operative risk of death or serious, irreversible morbidity is ≥ 50% at 30 days. 2. Subject has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with: * Mean gradient \> 40 mmHg, or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/sec by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization (either resting or dobutamine stress), AND * An initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm2 (or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.5 cm2/m2) by resting echocardiogram or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization 3. Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater. 4. The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the trial, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the IRB of the respective clinical site. 5. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Clinical 1. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days before the intended treatment. 2. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the MCS TAVI procedure including bare metal and drug eluting stents. 3. Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC \< 1000mm3), thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy. 4. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization. 5. Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support. 6. Need for emergency surgery for any reason. 7. Severe ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 20% as measured by resting echocardiogram. 8. Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). 9. End stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis or creatinine clearance \< 20 cc/min. 10. Active GI bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation. 11. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following which cannot be adequately pre-medicated: * Aspirin * Heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin * Nitinol (titanium or nickel) * Ticlopidine and clopidogrel * Contrast media 12. Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis. 13. Subject refuses a blood transfusion. 14. Life expectancy \< 12 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions. 15. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of an Investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent. 16. Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits). 17. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device trial. 18. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease. Anatomical 19. High Risk:Native aortic annulus size \< 20 mm or \> 29 mm per the baseline diagnostic imaging (until 23mm valve enrollment completion/closure in the CoreValve® US Pivotal Trial-High Risk Cohort) OR Extreme Risk: Native aortic annulus size \< 18 mm or \> 29 mm per the baseline diagnostic imaging. (High risk and extreme risk upon 23mm valve enrollment completion/closure in the CoreValve® US Pivotal Trial-High Risk Cohort) 20. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve any position. 21. Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation (3-4+)). 22. Moderate to severe (3-4+) or severe (4+) mitral or severe (4+) tricuspid regurgitation. 23. Moderate to severe mitral stenosis. 24. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. 25. Echocardiographic evidence of new or untreated intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation. 26. Severe basal septal hypertrophy with an outflow gradient. 27. Aortic root angulation (angle between plane of aortic valve annulus and horizontal plane/vertebrae) \> 70° (for femoral and left subclavian/axillary access) and \> 30° (for right subclavian/axillary access). 28. Ascending aorta diameter \>43 mm if the aortic annulus diameter is 23-29 mm; ascending aortic diameter \> 40 mm if the aortic annulus diameter is 20-23 mm; or an ascending aorta diameter \> 34 mm if the aortic annulus diameter is 18-20 mm (Extreme Risk only until 23 mm valve enrollment completion/closure in the CoreValve® US Pivotal Trial-High Risk Cohort). 29. Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve verified by echocardiography. 30. Sinus of valsalva anatomy that would prevent adequate coronary perfusion. Vascular 31. Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Extreme Risk: All-cause Death or Major Stroke; High Risk Surgical: All-cause Mortality1 yearAll-cause Death or Major Stroke (Extreme Risk- Medtronic CoreValve® System); All-cause Mortality (High Risk Surgical- Medtronic CoreValve® System vs. Surgical Valve)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.Individual MACCE Components Include: * All Cause Mortality * MI * All stroke * Reintervention (defined as any cardiac surgery or percutaneous reintervention catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces a previously implanted valve)
Major Adverse Events (MAEs)30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.MAEs Include: * MACCE * Acute Kidney Injury * Cardiac Tamponade * Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction * Cardiogenic Shock * Valve Endocarditis * Life-Threatening, Disabling or Major Bleeding * Major Vascular Complication * Cardiac Perforation * Device Migration/Valve Embolism
Conduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.
Change From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 30 days, baseline to 6 months, baseline to 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.Change from baseline (continuous variable). A positive number corresponds to NYHA worsening; a negative number corresponds to NYHA improvement. NYHA Classification: Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Change From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline to 30 days, baseline to 1 yearChange in distance walked during 6MWT from baseline
Ratio of Days Alive Out of Hospital at 365 Days Post Procedure Versus Total Days Alive1 year
Quality of Life (QoL) Change30 day, 6 month, 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.QoL summary score change from baseline using the following measures: * Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): Quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. * 12 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): Measures functional health and well-being. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. * European QoL (EQ-5D): Measures 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that can be converted to utilities using an algorithm. Utilities range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing perfect health, and 0 corresponding to the worst imaginable health state.
Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.Using the following measure: • Effective Orifice Area (EOA) analyzed overall per Extreme Risk or High Risk. Iliofemoral access and non-iliofemoral access are not reported separate because this is a valve performance measurement.
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.MACCE is defined as a composite of: * All-Cause Death * Myocardial Infarction (MI) * All Stroke * Reintervention (defined as any cardiac surgery or percutaneous reintervention catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces a previously implanted valve)
Cardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.
Strokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.Strokes (of any severity) and TIAs
Index Procedure Related MAEsProcedure
Length of Index Procedure Hospital StayNumber of days from admission to discharge
Device SuccessNumber of days from admission to dischargeDefined as: * Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device, and successful retrieval of the delivery system, * Correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location (placement in the annulus with no impedance on device function), * Intended performance of the prosthetic valve (aortic valve area \> 1.2 cm2 for 26, 29 and 31mm valves, ≥ 0.9 cm2 for 23mm valve (by echocardiography using the continuity equation) and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/sec, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation) * Only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location
Procedural SuccessNumber of days from admission to dischargeDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACCE.
Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.PVD was defined according to VARC using the site reported echocardiography assessments including aortic regurgitation (AR) and aortic stenosis (AS) evaluations. Total AR reported as moderate or severe was considered PVD. AS was defined as significant stenosis and considered PVD if one of the following was met: * Peak velocity \>4 m/s * Mean gradient \>35 mmHg * EOA \< 0.8 cm2 * TVIV1 / TVIV2 \< 0.25
Aortic Valve Hospitalizations30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between February 21, 2012 and April 15, 2014, 1658 subjects were enrolled in the Continued Access Extreme Risk Study at 45 centers in the US. Between October 19, 2012 and August 12, 2014, 1119 subjects were enrolled in the High Risk Study at the same 45 US centers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Extreme Risk: Iliofemoral
Extreme Risk Patients: Medtronic CoreValve® System Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI); Iliofemoral Access Medtronic CoreValve® System Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
1,257
Extreme Risk: Non-Iliofemoral
Extreme Risk Patients: Medtronic CoreValve® System Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI); Non-Iliofemoral Access Medtronic CoreValve® System Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
367
High Risk
High Risk Surgical Patients: Medtronic CoreValve® System Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Medtronic CoreValve® System Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
1,108
Total2,732

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExtreme Risk: IliofemoralExtreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralHigh RiskTotal
Age, Continuous83.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
81.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
83.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
83.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Body Surface Area1.9 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
1.8 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
1.9 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
1.9 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
37 Participants4 Participants38 Participants79 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1206 Participants360 Participants1056 Participants2622 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
14 Participants3 Participants14 Participants31 Participants
Logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE)24.2 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
24.2 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1
20.3 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
22.6 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
NYHA Classification I
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
NYHA Classification II
159 participants45 participants180 participants384 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
NYHA Classification III
881 participants248 participants811 participants1940 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
NYHA Classification IV
217 participants74 participants117 participants408 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
568 Participants185 Participants456 Participants1209 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
689 Participants182 Participants652 Participants1523 Participants
Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Risk Score9.1 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
10.2 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
7.7 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
8.7 Percent of predicted mortality
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1,097 / 1,257327 / 3671,001 / 1,108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1,117 / 1,257359 / 3671,004 / 1,108

Outcome results

Primary

Extreme Risk: All-cause Death or Major Stroke; High Risk Surgical: All-cause Mortality

All-cause Death or Major Stroke (Extreme Risk- Medtronic CoreValve® System); All-cause Mortality (High Risk Surgical- Medtronic CoreValve® System vs. Surgical Valve)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralExtreme Risk: All-cause Death or Major Stroke; High Risk Surgical: All-cause Mortality22.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralExtreme Risk: All-cause Death or Major Stroke; High Risk Surgical: All-cause Mortality30.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskExtreme Risk: All-cause Death or Major Stroke; High Risk Surgical: All-cause Mortality17.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Aortic Valve Hospitalizations

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralAortic Valve Hospitalizations6 month12.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralAortic Valve Hospitalizations30 day6.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralAortic Valve Hospitalizations1 year17.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralAortic Valve Hospitalizations6 month12.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralAortic Valve Hospitalizations30 day5.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralAortic Valve Hospitalizations1 year16.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskAortic Valve Hospitalizations30 day5.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskAortic Valve Hospitalizations1 year15.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskAortic Valve Hospitalizations6 month11.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Cardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths30 day Cardiovascular Deaths4.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths30 day Valve Related Deaths1.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths6 month Cardiovascular Deaths11.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths6 month Valve Related Deaths3.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths1 year Cardiovascular Deaths16.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths1 year Valve Related Deaths5.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths1 year Valve Related Deaths6.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths30 day Cardiovascular Deaths9.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths6 month Valve Related Deaths5.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths1 year Cardiovascular Deaths22.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths30 day Valve Related Deaths4.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths6 month Cardiovascular Deaths16.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths30 day Valve Related Deaths2.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths6 month Cardiovascular Deaths9.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths1 year Valve Related Deaths4.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths6 month Valve Related Deaths3.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths30 day Cardiovascular Deaths4.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskCardiovascular Deaths and Valve-Related Deaths1 year Cardiovascular Deaths13.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

Change in distance walked during 6MWT from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to 30 days, baseline to 1 year

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralChange From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline to 30 day46.3 metersStandard Deviation 116.4
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralChange From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline to 1 year58.8 metersStandard Deviation 121.2
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralChange From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline to 30 day4.0 metersStandard Deviation 110.4
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralChange From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline to 1 year28.5 metersStandard Deviation 137.4
High RiskChange From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline to 30 day38.1 metersStandard Deviation 100
High RiskChange From Baseline in Distance Walked During 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline to 1 year55.5 metersStandard Deviation 117.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NYHA Class

Change from baseline (continuous variable). A positive number corresponds to NYHA worsening; a negative number corresponds to NYHA improvement. NYHA Classification: Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.

Time frame: Baseline to 30 days, baseline to 6 months, baseline to 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 6 month-1.4 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.8
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 30 days-1.2 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.8
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 1 year-1.4 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.8
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 6 month-1.4 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.8
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 30 days-1.1 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.9
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 1 year-1.4 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.9
High RiskChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 30 days-1.2 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.8
High RiskChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 1 year-1.4 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.8
High RiskChange From Baseline in NYHA ClassBaseline to 6 month-1.4 average classification level changeStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Conduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation6 month29.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation30 day27.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation1 year31.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation6 month24.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation1 year25.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation30 day23.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation30 day28.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation1 year32.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskConduction Disturbance Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation6 month30.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Device Success

Defined as: * Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the device, and successful retrieval of the delivery system, * Correct position of the device in the proper anatomical location (placement in the annulus with no impedance on device function), * Intended performance of the prosthetic valve (aortic valve area \> 1.2 cm2 for 26, 29 and 31mm valves, ≥ 0.9 cm2 for 23mm valve (by echocardiography using the continuity equation) and mean aortic valve gradient \< 20 mmHg or peak velocity \< 3 m/sec, without moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation) * Only one valve implanted in the proper anatomical location

Time frame: Number of days from admission to discharge

Population: Participant Population= Consisted of all subjects with a TAVR index procedure who were evaluable for device success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralDevice Success84.9 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralDevice Success88.1 percentage of participants
High RiskDevice Success87.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance

Using the following measure: • Transvalvular Mean Gradient analyzed overall per Extreme Risk or High Risk. Iliofemoral access and non-iliofemoral access are not reported separate because this is a valve performance measurement.

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population= Consisted of all subjects with a valve implanted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day8.20 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.26
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month7.98 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.63
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year7.72 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.4
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day8.02 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.53
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month7.97 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.48
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year8.12 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.93
Secondary

Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance

Using the following measure: • Effective Orifice Area (EOA) analyzed overall per Extreme Risk or High Risk. Iliofemoral access and non-iliofemoral access are not reported separate because this is a valve performance measurement.

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with a valve implanted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day1.77 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.53
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month1.75 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.54
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year1.78 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.54
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day1.77 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.51
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month1.78 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.49
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year1.77 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.51
Secondary

Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance

Using the following measure: \- Degree of Aortic Valve Regurgitation (Transvalvular and Paravalvular) analyzed overall per Extreme Risk or High Risk. Iliofemoral access and non-iliofemoral access are not reported separate because this is a valve performance measurement.

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with a valve implanted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- Severe0.2 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- None35.1 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- Mild66.3 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- Moderate6.1 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- Mild58.5 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- Severe0.2 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- Moderate6.9 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- None39.8 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- None26.5 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- Mild54.9 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- Severe0.3 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- Moderate5.1 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- Severe0.3 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- Moderate3.8 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- Severe0.3 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- None28.7 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- Mild65.2 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance30 day Total Aortic Regurgitation- Moderate5.8 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- None37.8 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- Mild58.1 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- Moderate4.0 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance6 month Total Aortic Regurgitation- Severe0.1 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- None39.9 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralEchocardiographic Assessment of Valve Performance1 year Total Aortic Regurgitation- Mild56.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Index Procedure Related MAEs

Time frame: Procedure

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralIndex Procedure Related MAEs46.4 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralIndex Procedure Related MAEs66.6 percentage of participants
High RiskIndex Procedure Related MAEs48.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Length of Index Procedure Hospital Stay

Time frame: Number of days from admission to discharge

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralLength of Index Procedure Hospital Stay7.6 daysStandard Deviation 6.9
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralLength of Index Procedure Hospital Stay10.7 daysStandard Deviation 8.7
High RiskLength of Index Procedure Hospital Stay7.6 daysStandard Deviation 5.9
Secondary

Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)

MACCE is defined as a composite of: * All-Cause Death * Myocardial Infarction (MI) * All Stroke * Reintervention (defined as any cardiac surgery or percutaneous reintervention catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces a previously implanted valve)

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)30 day9.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)6 month19.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)1 year26.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)6 month28.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)30 day16.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)1 year36.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)6 month17.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)1 year24.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskMajor Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)30 day8.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Major Adverse Events (MAEs)

MAEs Include: * MACCE * Acute Kidney Injury * Cardiac Tamponade * Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction * Cardiogenic Shock * Valve Endocarditis * Life-Threatening, Disabling or Major Bleeding * Major Vascular Complication * Cardiac Perforation * Device Migration/Valve Embolism

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)6 month53.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)30 day46.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)1 year57.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)6 month73.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)30 day67.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)1 year76.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)30 day48.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)1 year59.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskMajor Adverse Events (MAEs)6 month54.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Procedural Success

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACCE.

Time frame: Number of days from admission to discharge

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an index procedure who were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralProcedural Success79.7 percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralProcedural Success76.8 percentage of participants
High RiskProcedural Success82.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)

PVD was defined according to VARC using the site reported echocardiography assessments including aortic regurgitation (AR) and aortic stenosis (AS) evaluations. Total AR reported as moderate or severe was considered PVD. AS was defined as significant stenosis and considered PVD if one of the following was met: * Peak velocity \>4 m/s * Mean gradient \>35 mmHg * EOA \< 0.8 cm2 * TVIV1 / TVIV2 \< 0.25

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with a valve implanted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)30 day Aortic Stenosis1.0 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)30 day Aortic Regurgitation3.0 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)6 month Aortic Stenosis2.2 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)6 month Aortic Regurgitation5.0 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)1 year Aortic Stenosis2.8 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)1 year Aortic Regurgitation5.8 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)1 year Aortic Regurgitation3.8 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)30 day Aortic Stenosis0.8 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)6 month Aortic Regurgitation3.3 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)1 year Aortic Stenosis1.6 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)30 day Aortic Regurgitation1.9 Percentage of participants
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)6 month Aortic Stenosis0.8 Percentage of participants
High RiskProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)30 day Aortic Regurgitation2.0 Percentage of participants
High RiskProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)6 month Aortic Stenosis2.0 Percentage of participants
High RiskProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)1 year Aortic Regurgitation4.5 Percentage of participants
High RiskProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)6 month Aortic Regurgitation3.1 Percentage of participants
High RiskProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)30 day Aortic Stenosis0.9 Percentage of participants
High RiskProsthetic Valve Dysfunction (PVD)1 year Aortic Stenosis2.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Quality of Life (QoL) Change

QoL summary score change from baseline using the following measures: * Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): Quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. * 12 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): Measures functional health and well-being. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. * European QoL (EQ-5D): Measures 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that can be converted to utilities using an algorithm. Utilities range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing perfect health, and 0 corresponding to the worst imaginable health state.

Time frame: 30 day, 6 month, 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year KCCQ- Clinical23.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day KCCQ- Overall26.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day SF-12-Physical7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day SF-12-Mental6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day EQ-5D0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month KCCQ- Overall31.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month KCCQ- Clinical25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month SF-12-Physical7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month SF-12-Mental6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month EQ-5D0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year KCCQ- Overall30.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.5
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day KCCQ- Clinical21.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year SF-12-Physical6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year SF-12-Mental6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year EQ-5D0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day SF-12-Mental4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day EQ-5D0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year KCCQ- Clinical21.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.2
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month KCCQ- Overall29.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.5
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month KCCQ- Clinical23.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.5
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year SF-12-Physical6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month SF-12-Physical6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year EQ-5D0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month EQ-5D0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month SF-12-Mental7.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year SF-12-Mental6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day KCCQ- Overall19.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.8
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day KCCQ- Clinical16.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.2
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year KCCQ- Overall28.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.5
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day SF-12-Physical5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day KCCQ- Overall19.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year SF-12-Mental4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day SF-12-Mental3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day EQ-5D0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year KCCQ- Overall27.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month EQ-5D0.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month KCCQ- Overall26.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year EQ-5D0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year KCCQ- Clinical21.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month KCCQ- Clinical20.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day KCCQ- Clinical16.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month SF-12-Physical7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change1 year SF-12-Physical6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change6 month SF-12-Mental4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
High RiskQuality of Life (QoL) Change30 day SF-12-Physical5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Ratio of Days Alive Out of Hospital at 365 Days Post Procedure Versus Total Days Alive

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Participant Population= Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralRatio of Days Alive Out of Hospital at 365 Days Post Procedure Versus Total Days Alive0.8 ratio of days alive and out of hospitalStandard Deviation 0.3
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralRatio of Days Alive Out of Hospital at 365 Days Post Procedure Versus Total Days Alive0.7 ratio of days alive and out of hospitalStandard Deviation 0.4
High RiskRatio of Days Alive Out of Hospital at 365 Days Post Procedure Versus Total Days Alive0.8 ratio of days alive and out of hospitalStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Strokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)

Strokes (of any severity) and TIAs

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)30 day Stroke4.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)6 month TIA1.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)6 month Stroke6.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)1 year TIA2.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)1 year Stroke7.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)30 day TIA0.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)6 month Stroke8.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)30 day Stroke5.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)30 day TIA0.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)6 month TIA0.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)1 year Stroke9.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)1 year TIA0.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)30 day Stroke4.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)1 year TIA2.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)1 year Stroke8.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)30 day TIA0.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)6 month Stroke6.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskStrokes and Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs)6 month TIA2.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

The Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components

Individual MACCE Components Include: * All Cause Mortality * MI * All stroke * Reintervention (defined as any cardiac surgery or percutaneous reintervention catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces a previously implanted valve)

Time frame: 30 day, 6 months, and 1 year. The 2-5 year outcome data will be reported once data set is complete.

Population: Participant Population = Consisted of all subjects with an attempted implant procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year All Cause Mortality21.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day Stroke4.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day MI1.1 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month All Cause Mortality13.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day Reintervention0.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year Stroke7.3 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year MI2.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month Reintervention0.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month MI1.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day All Cause Mortality4.5 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year Reintervention1.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month Stroke6.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day All Cause Mortality9.6 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day MI1.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year All Cause Mortality29.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year Reintervention1.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year MI3.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year Stroke9.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month Stroke8.2 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day Stroke5.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day Reintervention0.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month All Cause Mortality20.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month MI2.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
Extreme Risk: Non-IliofemoralThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month Reintervention0.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day Reintervention0.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day MI0.4 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month Reintervention0.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year Reintervention0.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day Stroke4.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components30 day All Cause Mortality4.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month All Cause Mortality12.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month MI1.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components6 month Stroke7.0 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year All Cause Mortality17.8 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year MI1.9 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier
High RiskThe Occurrence of Individual MACCE Components1 year Stroke8.7 percentage of participants, Kaplan-Meier

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026