Skip to content

Efficacy Of PF-05089771 In Treating Postoperative Dental Pain

A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Study Assessing The Efficacy Of Single Doses Of Pf-05089771 For The Treatment Of Postoperative Dental Pain Using Ibuprofen 400 Mg As Positive Control

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01529346
Enrollment
235
Registered
2012-02-08
Start date
2011-12-12
Completion date
2012-06-25
Last updated
2018-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Dental Pain

Keywords

Postoperative dental pain

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the overall pain relief of a single dose of PF-05089771 against placebo following third molar extraction.

Interventions

A single dose of PF-05089771 1600 mg oral solution administered once to the subject on Day 1 postoperatively

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo tablets for ibuprofen: 2 X 200 mg placebo tablets administered orally once to the subject on Day 1 postoperatively

DRUGIbuprofen

2 X 200 mg tablets of ibuprofen administered orally once to the subject on Day 1 postoperatively

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Oral surgery having removed 2 unilateral third molar teeth. * Pre-dose pain intensity score (100 mm VAS \[VAS\]) of at least 50mm within 5 hours of oral surgery * Pre-dose pain intensity score of moderate or severe within 5 hours of oral surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Presence or known history of any clinically significant hematological, hepatic, renal, endocrine, cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, allergic (including known drug hypersensitivities or allergies, but excluding untreated asymptomatic seasonal allergy) or any metabolic disorder that may increase risk associated with study participation, investigational drug administration or may interfere with interpretation of study results. * Prior use of any type of analgesic or NSAID within 5-half lives of that drug or less before taking the first dose of study medication, except for anesthesia for the procedure. * Active dental infection at the time of surgery. * Recent (within the previous 12 months) history of chronic analgesic or tranquiliser dependency. * Any significant oral surgery complication at the time of surgery or in the immediate postoperative period, or oral surgery that has lasted more than 30 minutes (time from first incision to last suture placement). Subjects who smoke more than 1 pack (20 cigarettes) per day, more than 3 cigars per day or use smokeless tobacco on a daily basis are excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Pain Relief From 0 to 6 Hours (TOTPAR[6])0 to 6 hoursTOTPAR(6) was defined as the total area under pain relief (PR) curve through first 6 hours after dosing, calculated using trapezoidal rule. PR was assumed to be 0 at 0 hour. PR assessed on a 5-point categorical scale: 0(none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete), at different time points during study up to 6 hours. Total score range for TOTPAR(6): 0 (worst) to 24 (best), higher value indicated greater degree of PR. Posterior mean, standard deviation were estimated based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with non-informative priors within outlier robust Bayesian framework.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Relief (PR) Score15, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 hoursPR was assessed on a 5-point categorical scale; 0 (none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete).
Pain Intensity Difference (PID)15, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 hoursPID was calculated as pain intensity at baseline (baseline pain severity score range 2 \[moderate\] to 3 \[severe\]) minus pain intensity at the respective post-baseline visit (pain severity score range 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]). Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best).
Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)0 to 6 hours; 0 to 24 hoursSPID: area under the PID effect curve from 0 to 6 hours (SPID\[6\]) and 0 to 24 hours (SPID\[24\]). AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Total score range: -6 (worst) to 18 (best) for SPID(6), and -24 (worst) to 72 (best) for SPID(24). Higher value of SPID indicated greater degree of pain relief. PID was calculated as pain intensity at baseline minus pain intensity at the respective post-baseline visit. Pain intensity was assessed on a categorical scale ranging from 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe).
Total Pain Relief From 0 to 24 Hours (TOTPAR[24])0 to 24 hoursTOTPAR(24) was defined as the total area under the PR curve through the first 24 hours after dosing, calculated using trapezoidal rule. PR was assumed to be 0 at 0 hour. PR assessed on a 5-point categorical scale: 0 (none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete), at different time points during the study up to 6 hours. Total score range for TOTPAR (24): 0 (worst) to 96 (best), higher value indicated greater degree of PR. The least square mean and standard error are based on ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate
Time to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief0 to 24 hoursParticipants evaluated the time to first perceptible pain relief by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible pain relief' at the moment they first began to experience any relief.
Time to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief0 to 24 hoursParticipants evaluated the time to first meaningful relief by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'meaningful pain relief' at the moment they first began to experience meaningful relief.
Time to First Use of Rescue Medication0 to 24 hoursTime to first use of rescue medication (acetaminophen 500 mg or hydrocodone 5 mg) was calculated by subtracting time of first administration of study medication from the rescue medication administration time.
Number of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)0 to 24 hoursPPR was defined as the highest PR score achieved at any time point during the evaluation period, prior to rescue medication. PR was assessed on a 5-point categorical scale: 0 (none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete).
Number of Participants With Study Medication Satisfaction6, 24 hours, prior to rescue medication (assessed up to 24 hours)Participants provided assessment regarding satisfaction with study medication (SM) for pain relief (PR) and overall performance (OP) on a 5-point categorical scale, 1=very dissatisfied (VD), 2=somewhat dissatisfied (SD), 3=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (NSND), 4=somewhat satisfied (SS) and 5=very satisfied (VS).
Plasma PF-05089771 Concentration0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 hours post-dose
Plasma Ibuprofen Concentration0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 hours post-doseIbuprofen concentration was reported separately for 2 isomers of ibuprofen: (S)-Ibuprofen, and (R)-Ibuprofen, where S implied sinister (clockwise configuration) and R implied rectus (anti-clockwise configuration).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Day 28 (follow-up)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between administration of study drug and up to 28 days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory FindingsBaseline up to Day 7 to 10 (follow-up)Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelets, leukocytes, total neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes), blood chemistry (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, fasting glucose, uric acid, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium, albumin, total protein, creatine kinase), and urinalysis (urine white blood cells, urine red blood cells) were performed.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital SignsBaseline up to Day 7 to 10 (follow-up)Clinically significant vital signs: supine/sitting pulse rate (PR) less than (\<) 40 or more than (\>) 120 beats per minute (bpm), standing PR \<40 or \>140 bpm; systolic blood pressure (BP) \>=30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) change from baseline; absolute systolic BP \<90 mmHg; diastolic BP \>=20 mmHg change from baseline; absolute systolic BP \<50 mmHg.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Day 7 to 10 (follow-up)Clinically significant ECG abnormalities: PR interval \>=300 milliseconds (msec); 25% increase from baseline in PR interval when baseline PR was \>200 msec; an increase from baseline of \>=50% in PR interval when baseline PR was \<=200 msec; QRS interval \>=140 msec; an increase from baseline of \>=50% in QRS interval; corrected QT interval (QTc) \>=500 msec.
Number of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study Medication6, 24 hours, prior to rescue medication (assessed up to 24 hours)Participant rated the study medication at 6 hours, 24 hours and immediately prior to rescue medication intake (only for participants who took rescue medication\[RM\]), on 5-point categorical scale: 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PF-05089771 150 mg
Single oral dose of PF-05089771 150 milligram (mg) -dispersion along with 2 placebo tablets matched to ibuprofen 200 mg tablet orally following unilateral surgical extraction of two-third molars, one of which was a partial or full bony mandibular impaction. Study treatment was administered within 5 hours post-surgery when the pain intensity reached the required moderate to severe level (score of 2 or greater on a 4-point categorical pain severity rating scale and a score of at least 50 millimeter \[mm\] on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\] pain severity rating scale).
55
PF-05089771 450 mg
Single oral dose of PF-05089771 450 mg -dispersion along with 2 placebo tablets matched to ibuprofen 200 mg tablet orally following unilateral surgical extraction of two-third molars, one of which was a partial or full bony mandibular impaction. Study treatment was administered within 5 hours post-surgery when the pain intensity reached the required moderate to severe level (score of 2 or greater on a 4-point categorical pain severity rating scale and a score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS pain severity rating scale).
54
PF-05089771 1600 mg
Single oral dose of PF-05089771 1600 mg -dispersion along with 2 placebo tablets matched to ibuprofen 200 mg tablet orally following unilateral surgical extraction of two-third molars, one of which was a partial or full bony mandibular impaction. Study treatment was administered within 5 hours post-surgery when the pain intensity reached the required moderate to severe level (score of 2 or greater on a 4-point categorical pain severity rating scale and a score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS pain severity rating scale).
54
Ibuprofen
Single oral dose of 2 ibuprofen 200 mg tablets (equivalent to ibuprofen 400 mg) along with placebo matched to PF-05089771-dispersion orally following unilateral surgical extraction of two-third molars, one of which was a partial or full bony mandibular impaction. Study treatment was administered within 5 hours post-surgery when the pain intensity reached the required moderate to severe level (score of 2 or greater on a 4-point categorical pain severity rating scale and a score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS pain severity rating scale).
36
Placebo
Single oral dose of 2 placebo tablets matched to ibuprofen tablets along with placebo matched to PF-05089771-dispersion orally following unilateral surgical extraction of two-third molars, one of which was a partial or full bony mandibular impaction. Study treatment was administered within 5 hours post-surgery when the pain intensity reached the required moderate to severe level (score of 2 or greater on a 4-point categorical pain severity rating scale and a score of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS pain severity rating scale).
36
Total235

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20100
Overall StudyOther01100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPF-05089771 150 mgPF-05089771 450 mgPF-05089771 1600 mgIbuprofenPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous23.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
23.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
24.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
22.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
24.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
23.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants18 Participants15 Participants9 Participants13 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants36 Participants39 Participants27 Participants23 Participants166 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 5520 / 5423 / 5410 / 3612 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 550 / 540 / 540 / 360 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Total Pain Relief From 0 to 6 Hours (TOTPAR[6])

TOTPAR(6) was defined as the total area under pain relief (PR) curve through first 6 hours after dosing, calculated using trapezoidal rule. PR was assumed to be 0 at 0 hour. PR assessed on a 5-point categorical scale: 0(none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete), at different time points during study up to 6 hours. Total score range for TOTPAR(6): 0 (worst) to 24 (best), higher value indicated greater degree of PR. Posterior mean, standard deviation were estimated based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with non-informative priors within outlier robust Bayesian framework.

Time frame: 0 to 6 hours

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all randomized participants who received at least (\>=) 1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (more than or equal to \[\>=\] 90 minutes post-dose) PR score. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-05089771 150 mgTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 6 Hours (TOTPAR[6])6.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.898
PF-05089771 450 mgTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 6 Hours (TOTPAR[6])6.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.915
PF-05089771 1600 mgTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 6 Hours (TOTPAR[6])7.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.906
IbuprofenTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 6 Hours (TOTPAR[6])14.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
PlaceboTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 6 Hours (TOTPAR[6])4.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.082
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

Clinically significant ECG abnormalities: PR interval \>=300 milliseconds (msec); 25% increase from baseline in PR interval when baseline PR was \>200 msec; an increase from baseline of \>=50% in PR interval when baseline PR was \<=200 msec; QRS interval \>=140 msec; an increase from baseline of \>=50% in QRS interval; corrected QT interval (QTc) \>=500 msec.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 7 to 10 (follow-up)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Findings

Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelets, leukocytes, total neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes), blood chemistry (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, fasting glucose, uric acid, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium, albumin, total protein, creatine kinase), and urinalysis (urine white blood cells, urine red blood cells) were performed.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 7 to 10 (follow-up)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Findings0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Findings0 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Findings0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Findings0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Findings0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs

Clinically significant vital signs: supine/sitting pulse rate (PR) less than (\<) 40 or more than (\>) 120 beats per minute (bpm), standing PR \<40 or \>140 bpm; systolic blood pressure (BP) \>=30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) change from baseline; absolute systolic BP \<90 mmHg; diastolic BP \>=20 mmHg change from baseline; absolute systolic BP \<50 mmHg.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 7 to 10 (follow-up)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs0 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study Medication

Participant rated the study medication at 6 hours, 24 hours and immediately prior to rescue medication intake (only for participants who took rescue medication\[RM\]), on 5-point categorical scale: 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent.

Time frame: 6, 24 hours, prior to rescue medication (assessed up to 24 hours)

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment, had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) PR score. Participants who received RM prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS. N(number of participants analyzed): participants evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Very Good5 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Excellent2 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Good7 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Fair2 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Poor0 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Fair7 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Very Good0 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Poor2 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Fair6 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Excellent0 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Poor26 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Good11 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Good4 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Excellent3 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Very Good4 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Very Good6 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Good5 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Poor0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Excellent2 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Good9 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Fair3 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Poor0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Fair7 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Very Good5 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Good5 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Poor26 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Excellent1 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Very Good3 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Excellent1 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Fair1 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Poor21 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Fair2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Very Good5 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Excellent0 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Fair3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Good5 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Very Good11 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Excellent3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Poor2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Good2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Excellent9 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Poor3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Fair9 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Good3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Very Good1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Very Good18 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Poor2 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Fair1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Good3 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Good1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Fair0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Fair1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Excellent6 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Very Good6 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Poor6 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Poor0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Excellent6 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Excellent7 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Very Good7 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Good1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Excellent0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Good4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Very Good3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Good5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Excellent0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Fair2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Very Good0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Poor22 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Fair0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Fair6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Poor0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Excellent0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationPrior to RM: Good1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 24: Poor0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Global Evaluation of Study MedicationHour 6: Very Good1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)

PPR was defined as the highest PR score achieved at any time point during the evaluation period, prior to rescue medication. PR was assessed on a 5-point categorical scale: 0 (none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete).

Time frame: 0 to 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Lot4 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)None13 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Complete16 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Little11 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Some10 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Little11 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Some10 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Lot9 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)None13 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Complete11 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Little6 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)None15 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Some11 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Lot6 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Complete15 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)None1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Little4 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Lot11 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Some1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Complete19 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Some9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)None9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Lot4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)Complete4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Peak Pain Relief (PPR)A Little10 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Study Medication Satisfaction

Participants provided assessment regarding satisfaction with study medication (SM) for pain relief (PR) and overall performance (OP) on a 5-point categorical scale, 1=very dissatisfied (VD), 2=somewhat dissatisfied (SD), 3=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (NSND), 4=somewhat satisfied (SS) and 5=very satisfied (VS).

Time frame: 6, 24 hours, prior to rescue medication (assessed up to 24 hours)

Population: FAS: all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment, had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) PR score. Participants who received RM prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS. N(number of participants analyzed): participants evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: NSND4 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: NSND3 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SS9 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: NSND9 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SD3 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VS5 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SD7 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VD16 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SS5 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VS5 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VS0 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SS11 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VD0 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: NSND4 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VD2 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SD2 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SD7 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: NSND4 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SS6 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VS7 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SS4 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: NSND3 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VS7 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SD1 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VD2 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VD0 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VD21 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SD5 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VS0 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SS4 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SD0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SS3 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VD0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SS11 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VS4 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VS5 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: NSND5 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VS4 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VS5 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: NSND2 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SD3 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SD8 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SS5 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VD22 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VD0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SS4 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: NSND4 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VS6 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VD23 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VS3 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SS6 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: NSND1 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SS9 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SD7 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VD0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VD0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: NSND3 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: NSND4 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SD1 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SD0 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: NSND2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SD2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SD1 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: NSND3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VS12 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SS7 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VD2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VS13 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SS3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: NSND1 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VD2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VS1 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SS3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: NSND3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SD7 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VD20 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VS12 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SS7 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: NSND1 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SD3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VD2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VS13 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SS3 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: NSND0 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SD2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VD2 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VS1 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SS1 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SD9 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VD20 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: NSND0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SD0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SD2 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VS10 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SS9 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VS8 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VD1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SD0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SS6 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VS17 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: NSND1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VS9 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VD3 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SS3 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: NSND3 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: NSND0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SD3 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VD0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VD4 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VS7 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SD4 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: NSND2 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SS3 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VS18 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: NSND0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VD1 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SS5 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VD0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SS9 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SD2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SS6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: SD2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: NSND0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VD0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SD0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VD0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VD0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: NSND1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VS0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: SS5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SS6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 24: VS1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: NSND1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SD1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SD9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: SD0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: SS6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: NSND1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 24: VD0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Hour 6: VS0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VS0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: NSND3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SD8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: VD17 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VD17 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: NSND4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Hour 6: VS0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: SS0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM PR, Prior to RM: SS0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Study Medication SatisfactionSM OP, Prior to RM: VS0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between administration of study drug and up to 28 days that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 (follow-up)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Events22 participants
PF-05089771 150 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events0 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Events24 participants
PF-05089771 450 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events0 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Events28 participants
PF-05089771 1600 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events0 participants
IbuprofenNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Events12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Adverse Events16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events0 participants
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference (PID)

PID was calculated as pain intensity at baseline (baseline pain severity score range 2 \[moderate\] to 3 \[severe\]) minus pain intensity at the respective post-baseline visit (pain severity score range 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]). Total possible score range for PID: -1 (worst) to 3 (best).

Time frame: 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Analysis excluded influential outliers. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)4 Hours1.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)90 Minutes0.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)45 Minutes0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)30 Minutes0.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)3 Hours0.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)15 Minutes0.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)24 Hours2.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)60 Minutes0.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)8 Hours1.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)6 Hours1.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)2 Hours0.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)15 Minutes0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)90 Minutes0.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)2 Hours0.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)30 Minutes0.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)3 Hours0.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)4 Hours0.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)24 Hours1.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)45 Minutes0.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)6 Hours0.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)60 Minutes0.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)8 Hours1.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)3 Hours0.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)8 Hours1.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)4 Hours1.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)24 Hours2.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)30 Minutes0.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)90 Minutes0.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)45 Minutes0.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)60 Minutes0.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)15 Minutes0.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)2 Hours0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Intensity Difference (PID)6 Hours1.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)3 Hours1.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)15 Minutes0.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)30 Minutes0.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)45 Minutes0.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)60 Minutes1.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)90 Minutes1.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)2 Hours1.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)4 Hours1.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)6 Hours1.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)8 Hours1.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
IbuprofenPain Intensity Difference (PID)24 Hours1.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)15 Minutes0.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)6 Hours0.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)90 Minutes0.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)24 Hours1.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)60 Minutes0.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)8 Hours0.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)45 Minutes0.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)30 Minutes0.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)4 Hours0.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)3 Hours0.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference (PID)2 Hours0.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.19, 0.14]
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.03, 0.37]
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.1, 0.24]
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.16, 0.21]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.06, 0.45]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.19, 0.7]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.04, 0.54]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.32, 0.87]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.16, 0.4]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.12, 0.68]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.05, 0.5]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.4, 1.01]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.19, 0.4]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.1, 0.49]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.16, 0.43]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.41, 1.06]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.01, 0.64]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.01, 0.62]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.08, 0.71]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.92, 1.61]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.04, 0.76]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.03, 0.69]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.05, 0.77]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.92, 1.68]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.16, 0.95]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.17, 0.97]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.24, 1.03]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.97, 1.78]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.08, 0.92]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.03, 0.84]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.09, 0.93]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.75, 1.59]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.27, 0.72]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.37, 0.65]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.23, 0.77]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.33, 1.31]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.24, 0.89]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.25, 0.94]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.31, 0.8]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.08, 1.19]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.07, 0.83]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.36, 0.44]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.07, 0.68]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.32, 0.45]
Secondary

Pain Relief (PR) Score

PR was assessed on a 5-point categorical scale; 0 (none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete).

Time frame: 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Analysis excluded influential outliers. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score45 Minutes0.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score24 Hours3.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score2 Hours1.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score90 Minutes1.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score60 Minutes0.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score6 Hours2.02 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score30 Minutes0.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score8 Hours2.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score4 Hours1.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score3 Hours1.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PF-05089771 150 mgPain Relief (PR) Score15 Minutes0.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score2 Hours1.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score15 Minutes0.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score8 Hours2.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score30 Minutes1.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score45 Minutes1.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score60 Minutes1.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score90 Minutes1.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score3 Hours1.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score4 Hours1.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score6 Hours1.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
PF-05089771 450 mgPain Relief (PR) Score24 Hours3.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score15 Minutes0.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score90 Minutes1.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score45 Minutes0.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score2 Hours1.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score3 Hours1.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score30 Minutes0.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score24 Hours3.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score4 Hours1.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score6 Hours2.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score8 Hours2.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
PF-05089771 1600 mgPain Relief (PR) Score60 Minutes1.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score8 Hours2.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score3 Hours2.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score45 Minutes1.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score4 Hours3.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score24 Hours3.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score60 Minutes2.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score6 Hours2.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score90 Minutes2.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score15 Minutes0.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score2 Hours2.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
IbuprofenPain Relief (PR) Score30 Minutes1.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score60 Minutes0.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score6 Hours2.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score3 Hours0.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score45 Minutes0.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score8 Hours2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score24 Hours2.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score90 Minutes0.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score4 Hours1.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score15 Minutes0.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score2 Hours0.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboPain Relief (PR) Score30 Minutes0.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.38, 0.22]
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.2, 0.39]
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.28, 0.32]
Comparison: 15 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.41, 0.24]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.32, 0.44]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.01, 0.77]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.22, 0.54]
Comparison: 30 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.24, 1.07]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.37, 0.42]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0, 0.78]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.29, 0.5]
Comparison: 45 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.59, 1.45]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.21, 0.62]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.07, 0.76]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.11, 0.72]
Comparison: 60 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.85, 1.75]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.04, 0.81]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.1, 0.75]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.05, 0.81]
Comparison: 90 Minutes: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [1.22, 2.15]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.01, 0.99]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.05, 1.03]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.04, 0.94]
Comparison: 2 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [1.26, 2.31]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.06, 1.11]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.11, 1.17]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.11, 1.15]
Comparison: 3 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [1.33, 2.4]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.07, 1.05]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.24, 0.91]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.13, 0.98]
Comparison: 4 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [1.05, 2.17]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.74, 0.64]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.86, 0.56]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.57, 0.8]
Comparison: 6 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.22, 1.58]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.93, 0.59]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.98, 0.62]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-1.05, 0.45]
Comparison: 8 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.47, 1.02]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [0.15, 1.11]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.27, 0.74]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.03, 0.91]
Comparison: 24 Hours: repeated measures model included baseline pain intensity, treatment, time, the treatment by time interaction and the time by baseline pain intensity interaction as fixed effects. The unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.90% CI: [-0.3, 0.67]
Secondary

Plasma Ibuprofen Concentration

Ibuprofen concentration was reported separately for 2 isomers of ibuprofen: (S)-Ibuprofen, and (R)-Ibuprofen, where S implied sinister (clockwise configuration) and R implied rectus (anti-clockwise configuration).

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 hours post-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all randomized participants who received study treatment and had a pharmacokinetic sample analyzed within the treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 8 hours3.597 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 2.4122
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 10 hours1.955 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 1.6135
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 24 hours0.1041 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.4332
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 0 hour0.0054 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0325
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 0.5 hour5.510 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 6.3603
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 1 hour7.049 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 6.8608
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 2 hours9.042 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 6.3054
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 4 hours6.522 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 4.7188
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 6 hours2.574 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 2.3774
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 8 hours1.081 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 1.4523
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 10 hours0.4424 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.5976
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(R)-Ibuprofen 24 hours0.0768 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.4028
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 0 hourNA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 0.5 hour4.343 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 5.0224
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 1 hour5.623 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 5.478
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 2 hours7.356 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 4.9376
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 4 hours9.638 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 4.1646
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma Ibuprofen Concentration(S)-Ibuprofen 6 hours6.039 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 3.1734
Secondary

Plasma PF-05089771 Concentration

Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 hours post-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all randomized participants who received study treatment and had a pharmacokinetic sample analyzed within the treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration2 hours5647 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4144.6
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration24 hours498.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 344.82
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration6 hours3826 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2261.7
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration4 hours4831 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2436.8
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration0 hourNA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration10 hours2007 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1195.5
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration1 hour3283 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2614.7
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration0.5 hour1383 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1148.6
PF-05089771 150 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration8 hours2874 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1574.3
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration4 hours14110 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7966.7
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration0 hourNA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration0.5 hour3497 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 3111.2
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration1 hour7770 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5928.5
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration2 hours14470 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 10612
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration6 hours11410 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 6389.5
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration8 hours9818 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5280.2
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration10 hours7916 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4018.3
PF-05089771 450 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration24 hours2115 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1394.6
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration1 hour17890 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13217
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration0 hourNA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration8 hours29830 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 16355
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration0.5 hour6718 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5774.4
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration24 hours8521 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5388.1
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration4 hours33760 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 18706
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration2 hours31260 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 17354
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration10 hours24010 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13993
PF-05089771 1600 mgPlasma PF-05089771 Concentration6 hours31390 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 16894
Secondary

Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)

SPID: area under the PID effect curve from 0 to 6 hours (SPID\[6\]) and 0 to 24 hours (SPID\[24\]). AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Total score range: -6 (worst) to 18 (best) for SPID(6), and -24 (worst) to 72 (best) for SPID(24). Higher value of SPID indicated greater degree of pain relief. PID was calculated as pain intensity at baseline minus pain intensity at the respective post-baseline visit. Pain intensity was assessed on a categorical scale ranging from 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe).

Time frame: 0 to 6 hours; 0 to 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Analysis excluded influential outliers. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS. Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PF-05089771 150 mgSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(6)2.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
PF-05089771 150 mgSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(24)12.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.01
PF-05089771 450 mgSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(6)2.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
PF-05089771 450 mgSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(24)5.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 3
PF-05089771 1600 mgSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(6)2.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
PF-05089771 1600 mgSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(24)13.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.03
IbuprofenSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(24)24.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.68
IbuprofenSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(6)7.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
PlaceboSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(6)0.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
PlaceboSummed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID)SIPD(24)2.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.67
Comparison: SPID(6): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% confidence interval (CI) were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [0.43, 3.71]
Comparison: SPID(6): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [0.05, 3.33]
Comparison: SPID(6): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [0.69, 3.99]
Comparison: SPID(6): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [5.19, 8.79]
Comparison: SPID(24): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [1.97, 17.63]
Comparison: SPID(24): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [-4.28, 11.37]
Comparison: SPID(24): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [2.97, 18.68]
Comparison: SPID(24): LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model included treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [13.82, 30.97]
Secondary

Time to First Use of Rescue Medication

Time to first use of rescue medication (acetaminophen 500 mg or hydrocodone 5 mg) was calculated by subtracting time of first administration of study medication from the rescue medication administration time.

Time frame: 0 to 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PF-05089771 150 mgTime to First Use of Rescue Medication4.0 hours
PF-05089771 450 mgTime to First Use of Rescue Medication2.5 hours
PF-05089771 1600 mgTime to First Use of Rescue Medication5.5 hours
IbuprofenTime to First Use of Rescue Medication12.1 hours
PlaceboTime to First Use of Rescue Medication2.3 hours
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [0.4, 1]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [0.5, 1.2]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [0.3, 0.8]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [0.2, 0.6]
Secondary

Time to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief

Participants evaluated the time to first perceptible pain relief by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'first perceptible pain relief' at the moment they first began to experience any relief.

Time frame: 0 to 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PF-05089771 150 mgTime to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief0.6 hours
PF-05089771 450 mgTime to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief0.3 hours
PF-05089771 1600 mgTime to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief0.4 hours
IbuprofenTime to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief0.5 hours
PlaceboTime to Onset of First Perceptible Pain Relief0.7 hours
Comparison: Hazard Ratio (HR) estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [0.6, 1.5]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [0.9, 1.9]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [0.7, 1.6]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [1, 2.4]
Secondary

Time to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief

Participants evaluated the time to first meaningful relief by stopping a stopwatch labeled 'meaningful pain relief' at the moment they first began to experience meaningful relief.

Time frame: 0 to 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PF-05089771 150 mgTime to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief3.3 hours
PF-05089771 450 mgTime to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief2.7 hours
PF-05089771 1600 mgTime to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief3.7 hours
IbuprofenTime to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief1.3 hours
PlaceboTime to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief4.6 hours
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [1.1, 3.8]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [1.4, 4.9]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [1.1, 4.1]
Comparison: HR estimates of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on Cox proportional hazards model including treatment and baseline pain intensity as fixed effects.90% CI: [2.8, 9.9]
Secondary

Total Pain Relief From 0 to 24 Hours (TOTPAR[24])

TOTPAR(24) was defined as the total area under the PR curve through the first 24 hours after dosing, calculated using trapezoidal rule. PR was assumed to be 0 at 0 hour. PR assessed on a 5-point categorical scale: 0 (none), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a lot) and 4 (complete), at different time points during the study up to 6 hours. Total score range for TOTPAR (24): 0 (worst) to 96 (best), higher value indicated greater degree of PR. The least square mean and standard error are based on ANCOVA model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate

Time frame: 0 to 24 hours

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received \>=1 dose of study treatment and had \>=1 evaluable (\>=90 minutes post-dose) pain relief score. Analysis excluded influential outliers. Participants who received rescue medication prior to 90 minutes were not included in FAS. Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PF-05089771 150 mgTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 24 Hours (TOTPAR[24])30.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.23
PF-05089771 450 mgTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 24 Hours (TOTPAR[24])22.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.22
PF-05089771 1600 mgTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 24 Hours (TOTPAR[24])31.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.26
IbuprofenTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 24 Hours (TOTPAR[24])51.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.17
PlaceboTotal Pain Relief From 0 to 24 Hours (TOTPAR[24])18.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.16
Comparison: LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model including treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [1.26, 23.27]
Comparison: LS mean estimate of the treatment difference along with 90% CI were based on an ANCOVA model including treatment as a fixed effect and baseline pain intensity as a covariate.90% CI: [-6.82, 15.18]
90% CI: [1.52, 23.61]
90% CI: [20.51, 44.61]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026