Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder, Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment, Acute Postsurgical Subcutaneous Wound, Impaired Wound Healing, Wound Healing Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
surgical wound, wound healing disorder, Wound healing impairment, post surgical wound healing disorder, abdominal wound healing impairment, Vacuum Assisted Closure, negative pressure wound therapy
Brief summary
This clinical study is performed in several German, Dutch and Belgian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery. Therefore the underlying layer of fibrous tissue that permeates the internal organs must be intact. Main outcome measure is the time until complete wound closure that sustained for a minimum of 14 days. Furthermore the therapy options will be examined regarding several other clinical, safety, patient reported and economic parameters. Patients will be assigned equally and by chance to both treatment groups. Study participants as well as the attending doctors and nurses will be informed about the assignment to the respective treatment arm. The primary outcome measure and some of the secondary parameters like reappearance of the wound and the development of the wound size over time, examined within an active study treatment time of 42 days, will be photographed and analysed under the use of a central computer system. The central analysing personal will not be informed about patient details or therapy allocation. Patients with at first closed belly wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgery without an opening of the underlying layer of fibrous tissue are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure. Study participants will be selected and enrolled within clinical surgical departments which provide the respective personal, structural and scientific background for the conduction of the trial project. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. It is very important to examine the therapy options also in the ambulant care setting thus study participants with good health who are able to continue the specific wound treatment in ambulant should be transferred to the ambulant service as soon as possible.
Detailed description
The Institute for Research in Operative Medicine as part of the Private University of Witten /Herdecke is planning and performing a clinical trial project to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery without fascial dehiscence. The clinical trial project is fully financed by Kinetic Concepts Incorporated (KCI). The V.A.C.® Therapy devices that will be used in this study include the ActiV.A.C.® Therapy System, InfoV.A.C.® Therapy System, and V.A.C. Freedom® Therapy System. All V.A.C.® Therapy devices to be utilized in this study bear the CE mark and will be operated within normal conditions of use and according to manufacturer's specifications. Background of the clinical trial project is the decision of the Joint Federal Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschusses (G-BA)) that Vacuum assisted closure therapy is inadmissible to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany. This decision is based on systematic review & meta-analysis of existing trials performed by Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in the Healthcare System (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)) which showed an insufficient state of evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds. This study project compares Vacuum Assisted Closure® and standard conventional wound therapy in the treatment of acute abdominal wounds after surgery without fascial dehiscence and will be conducted in abdominal surgical hospital departments with the required structural, manpower, and scientific qualifications. Patients will be stratified according to hospital and wound size. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. The study is designed as a multinational, multicentre, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint. The primary objective is to compare the clinical, safety, and economic outcomes of V.A.C.® Therapy and SCWT in postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments without fascial dehiscence. The primary outcome to be observed in this study is time to complete abdominal wound closure where closure is observed at or before day 42 and is confirmed to have been sustained for a period of at least 14 consecutive days. This study design also will allow detailed description of specific covariates to determine their effect on response variables (healing). This study's hypothesis is that the use of the V.A.C.® Therapy System, when compared to SCWT in the management of post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairments with intact fascia, will result in a decrease in the time to achieve complete wound closure with confirmation after subsequent 14 days. Using V.A.C.® Therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for hospitals as well as for outpatient care for treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds with wound healing impairment in the postoperative course. Randomisation to treatment arms will be performed at a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be performed via a centralized system with an Internet-based tool. To address issues of blinding, wound photo documentation will be obtained during the trial and confirmation of wound closure will be assessed via blinded photographic analysis, which will serve as the method of primary endpoint analysis. Primary closed abdominal wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgical intervention without fascial dehiscence are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure. During active recruitment phase, the pre-trial estimates indicate approximately 600 patients will be required to yield the target of 552 evaluable participants. Using an adaptive design study sample-size calculations will be re-estimated upon planed interim analysis of study data of 250 patients. Patients will be enrolled from approximately 25 centres in Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands. The evaluation of the primary Endpoint defined as time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days and secondary endpoints including clinical endpoints like recurrences, safety endpoints, patient reported outcome parameters and economic-based outcome measures will provide data regarding efficacy and efficiency of NPWT therapy for the treatment of acute post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairment in hospital as well as in the ambulant setting. The results of the study will be provided to make a contribution to the final decision of the Joint Federal Committee about NPWT to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany for inpatient and / or outpatient care.
Interventions
Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days. VAC® Therapy Systems used within the trial are ActiV.A.C.®, InfoV.A.C.®, V.A.C. Freedom®, V.A.C. Via® and VAC Ulta®. All used systems are equally eligible for the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds and should be used according to availability and local preferences within the trial site. Systems differ regarding user surface and display and processing of data. For the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds the V.A.C.® Granufoam Dressing (size medium and big) is recommended.
Standard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) according to institutional clinical standards within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Written informed consent * Post-surgical subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment * Minimum wound size eligible for the application of the randomized treatment- Inclusion, randomization, adequate wound pre-treatment (Debridement) and start of therapy within 48 hours after reopening of the wound, diagnosis for nonclosable wound or in case of spontaneous wound dehiscence
Exclusion criteria
* Age \< 18 * Noncompliance with study procedures, visit schedule and follow up * Pregnancy * Present or nonclosable defect of the abdominal fascia * Any pre-existing or ongoing organ system failure, that cannot be stabilized or solved by appropriate medical treatment * Necrotic tissue with eschar present * Non-enteric and unexplored fistulas * Malignancy of the wound * Use of any other device based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy on the study wound within ≤ 8 days prior to screening * Competing therapies or procedures * Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Complete Wound Closure | 42 days | Time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days (14 days -0 / + 3) Complete wound closure is defined as: 100% epithelialization No drainage from the wound No need for adjuvant therapy or dressing No presence of sutures |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure | 42 days | Incidence of confirmed and verified wound closure achieved after a maximum study observation / treatment period of 42 days (+ 14 days to observe sustained closure) |
| Recurrence | 132 days | Recurrence of wound opening after confirmed wound closure |
Countries
Belgium, Germany
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Patients were enrolled betweenAugust 2, 2011, and January 31, 2018 in 34 abdominal surgical departments of hospitals in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| NPWT Negative Pressure Wound Therapy | 256 |
| SCWT Standard Conventional Wound Treatment | 251 |
| Total | 507 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow Up | No data available | 46 | 44 |
| Primary Endpoint Assessment ITT | Death | 2 | 2 |
| Primary Endpoint Assessment ITT | No or deliquent informed consent | 3 | 3 |
| Primary Endpoint Assessment ITT | No post baseline documentation | 2 | 2 |
| Primary Endpoint Assessment ITT | Physician Decision | 2 | 1 |
| Primary Endpoint Assessment ITT | Withdrawal by Subject | 8 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | NPWT | Total | SCWT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 64 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 | 64 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 | 64 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 |
| Alcohol use | 111 Participants | 225 Participants | 114 Participants |
| BMI | 28.71 kg/m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58 | 29.4 kg/m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 29.5 kg/m² STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 |
| Clinical signs of infection during screening No | 122 Participants | 238 Participants | 116 Participants |
| Clinical signs of infection during screening Not assesable | 29 Participants | 53 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Clinical signs of infection during screening Yes | 105 Participants | 215 Participants | 110 Participants |
| Clinical signs of local infection at randomization, No | 133 Participants | 263 Participants | 130 Participants |
| Clinical signs of local infection at randomization, Not assessable | 39 Participants | 75 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Clinical signs of local infection at randomization, Yes | 75 Participants | 154 Participants | 79 Participants |
| Coagulation: International Normalized Ratio (INR) | 1.1 ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 | 1.1 ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 | 1.1 ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 |
| Coagulation: Partial Thromboplastin Time (pTT) | 33.9 seconds (s) STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 | 33.2 seconds (s) STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 32.5 seconds (s) STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 |
| Coagulation: Prothrombin Time (PT) | 88.3 percentage (%) STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 | 88.3 percentage (%) STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 | 88.3 percentage (%) STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8 |
| Diagnosis of abdominal wound healing disorder Active reopening | 198 Participants | 391 Participants | 193 Participants |
| Diagnosis of abdominal wound healing disorder Spontaneous dehiscence | 57 Participants | 109 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Diagnosis of abdominal wound healing disorder Wound left open after surgery | 2 Participants | 11 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Drug use | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Height | 172 Centimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 171 Centimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 169 Centimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 |
| Level of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Randomization Deep incisional | 28 Participants | 62 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Level of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Randomization Organ or space infection | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Level of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Randomization Superficial incisional | 43 Participants | 86 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Leven of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Screening Deep incisional | 37 Participants | 76 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Leven of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Screening Organ or space infection | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Leven of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Screening Superficial incisional | 65 Participants | 132 Participants | 67 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Anal surgery | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Appendix surgery | 14 Participants | 27 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Closure of abdominal hernias | 18 Participants | 31 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Esophagus surgery | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Extended gastric resection and other gastric surge | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Gall bladder and bile ducts surgery | 23 Participants | 40 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Gastric incision, excision, and resection | 6 Participants | 10 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Incision, excision, resection and anastomose of th | 94 Participants | 187 Participants | 93 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Liver surgery | 8 Participants | 16 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Operations on other abdominal regions | 15 Participants | 42 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Other | 4 Participants | 14 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Other operations on the small and large intestine | 35 Participants | 65 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Pancreatic surgery | 13 Participants | 24 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment Rectal surgery | 22 Participants | 42 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Nutritional status Moderately or suspected of being malnourished | 18 Participants | 44 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Nutritional status Severely malnourished | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Nutritional status Well nourished | 235 Participants | 457 Participants | 222 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 7 participants | 16 participants | 9 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 245 participants | 486 participants | 241 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 2 participants | 3 participants | 1 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 101 Participants | 220 Participants | 119 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 155 Participants | 287 Participants | 132 Participants |
| Smoking | 65 Participants | 120 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Weight | 86 Kilogram STANDARD_DEVIATION 19 | 85 Kilogram STANDARD_DEVIATION 20 | 84 Kilogram STANDARD_DEVIATION 21 |
| Wound volume <=60 cm*3 | 149 Participants | 291 Participants | 142 Participants |
| Wound volume >60 cm*3 | 107 Participants | 214 Participants | 107 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 24 / 256 | 15 / 251 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 41 / 234 | 22 / 201 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 22 / 234 | 12 / 201 |
Outcome results
Time to Complete Wound Closure
Time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days (14 days -0 / + 3) Complete wound closure is defined as: 100% epithelialization No drainage from the wound No need for adjuvant therapy or dressing No presence of sutures
Time frame: 42 days
Population: Intention To Treat Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| NPWT | Time to Complete Wound Closure | 36.1 Days |
| SCWT | Time to Complete Wound Closure | 39.1 Days |
Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure
Incidence of confirmed and verified wound closure achieved after a maximum study observation / treatment period of 42 days (+ 14 days to observe sustained closure)
Time frame: 42 days
Population: Intention To Treat Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| NPWT | Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure | 92 Participants |
| SCWT | Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure | 54 Participants |
Recurrence
Recurrence of wound opening after confirmed wound closure
Time frame: 132 days
Population: Intention To Treat Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| NPWT | Recurrence | 0 Participants |
| SCWT | Recurrence | 0 Participants |