Skip to content

Treatment Study of Vacuum Assisted Closure for Postsurgical Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairments

Treatment of Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment After Surgery Without Fascial Dehiscence by Vacuum Assisted Closure™(SAWHI-V.A.C.® Study) Versus Standard Conventional Wound Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01528033
Acronym
SAWHI
Enrollment
539
Registered
2012-02-07
Start date
2011-08-02
Completion date
2018-06-11
Last updated
2020-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder, Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment, Acute Postsurgical Subcutaneous Wound, Impaired Wound Healing, Wound Healing Disorder

Keywords

surgical wound, wound healing disorder, Wound healing impairment, post surgical wound healing disorder, abdominal wound healing impairment, Vacuum Assisted Closure, negative pressure wound therapy

Brief summary

This clinical study is performed in several German, Dutch and Belgian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery. Therefore the underlying layer of fibrous tissue that permeates the internal organs must be intact. Main outcome measure is the time until complete wound closure that sustained for a minimum of 14 days. Furthermore the therapy options will be examined regarding several other clinical, safety, patient reported and economic parameters. Patients will be assigned equally and by chance to both treatment groups. Study participants as well as the attending doctors and nurses will be informed about the assignment to the respective treatment arm. The primary outcome measure and some of the secondary parameters like reappearance of the wound and the development of the wound size over time, examined within an active study treatment time of 42 days, will be photographed and analysed under the use of a central computer system. The central analysing personal will not be informed about patient details or therapy allocation. Patients with at first closed belly wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgery without an opening of the underlying layer of fibrous tissue are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure. Study participants will be selected and enrolled within clinical surgical departments which provide the respective personal, structural and scientific background for the conduction of the trial project. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. It is very important to examine the therapy options also in the ambulant care setting thus study participants with good health who are able to continue the specific wound treatment in ambulant should be transferred to the ambulant service as soon as possible.

Detailed description

The Institute for Research in Operative Medicine as part of the Private University of Witten /Herdecke is planning and performing a clinical trial project to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery without fascial dehiscence. The clinical trial project is fully financed by Kinetic Concepts Incorporated (KCI). The V.A.C.® Therapy devices that will be used in this study include the ActiV.A.C.® Therapy System, InfoV.A.C.® Therapy System, and V.A.C. Freedom® Therapy System. All V.A.C.® Therapy devices to be utilized in this study bear the CE mark and will be operated within normal conditions of use and according to manufacturer's specifications. Background of the clinical trial project is the decision of the Joint Federal Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschusses (G-BA)) that Vacuum assisted closure therapy is inadmissible to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany. This decision is based on systematic review & meta-analysis of existing trials performed by Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in the Healthcare System (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)) which showed an insufficient state of evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds. This study project compares Vacuum Assisted Closure® and standard conventional wound therapy in the treatment of acute abdominal wounds after surgery without fascial dehiscence and will be conducted in abdominal surgical hospital departments with the required structural, manpower, and scientific qualifications. Patients will be stratified according to hospital and wound size. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. The study is designed as a multinational, multicentre, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint. The primary objective is to compare the clinical, safety, and economic outcomes of V.A.C.® Therapy and SCWT in postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments without fascial dehiscence. The primary outcome to be observed in this study is time to complete abdominal wound closure where closure is observed at or before day 42 and is confirmed to have been sustained for a period of at least 14 consecutive days. This study design also will allow detailed description of specific covariates to determine their effect on response variables (healing). This study's hypothesis is that the use of the V.A.C.® Therapy System, when compared to SCWT in the management of post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairments with intact fascia, will result in a decrease in the time to achieve complete wound closure with confirmation after subsequent 14 days. Using V.A.C.® Therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for hospitals as well as for outpatient care for treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds with wound healing impairment in the postoperative course. Randomisation to treatment arms will be performed at a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be performed via a centralized system with an Internet-based tool. To address issues of blinding, wound photo documentation will be obtained during the trial and confirmation of wound closure will be assessed via blinded photographic analysis, which will serve as the method of primary endpoint analysis. Primary closed abdominal wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgical intervention without fascial dehiscence are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure. During active recruitment phase, the pre-trial estimates indicate approximately 600 patients will be required to yield the target of 552 evaluable participants. Using an adaptive design study sample-size calculations will be re-estimated upon planed interim analysis of study data of 250 patients. Patients will be enrolled from approximately 25 centres in Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands. The evaluation of the primary Endpoint defined as time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days and secondary endpoints including clinical endpoints like recurrences, safety endpoints, patient reported outcome parameters and economic-based outcome measures will provide data regarding efficacy and efficiency of NPWT therapy for the treatment of acute post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairment in hospital as well as in the ambulant setting. The results of the study will be provided to make a contribution to the final decision of the Joint Federal Committee about NPWT to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany for inpatient and / or outpatient care.

Interventions

DEVICEVacuum Assisted Closure®

Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days. VAC® Therapy Systems used within the trial are ActiV.A.C.®, InfoV.A.C.®, V.A.C. Freedom®, V.A.C. Via® and VAC Ulta®. All used systems are equally eligible for the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds and should be used according to availability and local preferences within the trial site. Systems differ regarding user surface and display and processing of data. For the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds the V.A.C.® Granufoam Dressing (size medium and big) is recommended.

OTHERStandard conventional wound therapy

Standard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) according to institutional clinical standards within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days

Sponsors

KCI Europe Holding B.V.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Witten/Herdecke
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Post-surgical subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment * Minimum wound size eligible for the application of the randomized treatment- Inclusion, randomization, adequate wound pre-treatment (Debridement) and start of therapy within 48 hours after reopening of the wound, diagnosis for nonclosable wound or in case of spontaneous wound dehiscence

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 * Noncompliance with study procedures, visit schedule and follow up * Pregnancy * Present or nonclosable defect of the abdominal fascia * Any pre-existing or ongoing organ system failure, that cannot be stabilized or solved by appropriate medical treatment * Necrotic tissue with eschar present * Non-enteric and unexplored fistulas * Malignancy of the wound * Use of any other device based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy on the study wound within ≤ 8 days prior to screening * Competing therapies or procedures * Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Complete Wound Closure42 daysTime (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days (14 days -0 / + 3) Complete wound closure is defined as: 100% epithelialization No drainage from the wound No need for adjuvant therapy or dressing No presence of sutures

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure42 daysIncidence of confirmed and verified wound closure achieved after a maximum study observation / treatment period of 42 days (+ 14 days to observe sustained closure)
Recurrence132 daysRecurrence of wound opening after confirmed wound closure

Countries

Belgium, Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled betweenAugust 2, 2011, and January 31, 2018 in 34 abdominal surgical departments of hospitals in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NPWT
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
256
SCWT
Standard Conventional Wound Treatment
251
Total507

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow UpNo data available4644
Primary Endpoint Assessment ITTDeath22
Primary Endpoint Assessment ITTNo or deliquent informed consent33
Primary Endpoint Assessment ITTNo post baseline documentation22
Primary Endpoint Assessment ITTPhysician Decision21
Primary Endpoint Assessment ITTWithdrawal by Subject87

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNPWTTotalSCWT
Age, Continuous64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Alcohol use111 Participants225 Participants114 Participants
BMI28.71 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58
29.4 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
29.5 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Clinical signs of infection during screening
No
122 Participants238 Participants116 Participants
Clinical signs of infection during screening
Not assesable
29 Participants53 Participants24 Participants
Clinical signs of infection during screening
Yes
105 Participants215 Participants110 Participants
Clinical signs of local infection at randomization,
No
133 Participants263 Participants130 Participants
Clinical signs of local infection at randomization,
Not assessable
39 Participants75 Participants36 Participants
Clinical signs of local infection at randomization,
Yes
75 Participants154 Participants79 Participants
Coagulation: International Normalized Ratio (INR)1.1 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
1.1 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
1.1 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Coagulation: Partial Thromboplastin Time (pTT)33.9 seconds (s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
33.2 seconds (s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
32.5 seconds (s)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Coagulation: Prothrombin Time (PT)88.3 percentage (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
88.3 percentage (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
88.3 percentage (%)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
Diagnosis of abdominal wound healing disorder
Active reopening
198 Participants391 Participants193 Participants
Diagnosis of abdominal wound healing disorder
Spontaneous dehiscence
57 Participants109 Participants52 Participants
Diagnosis of abdominal wound healing disorder
Wound left open after surgery
2 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Drug use3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Height172 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
171 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
169 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Level of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Randomization
Deep incisional
28 Participants62 Participants34 Participants
Level of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Randomization
Organ or space infection
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Level of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Randomization
Superficial incisional
43 Participants86 Participants43 Participants
Leven of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Screening
Deep incisional
37 Participants76 Participants39 Participants
Leven of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Screening
Organ or space infection
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Leven of surgical site infection according to CDC classification at Screening
Superficial incisional
65 Participants132 Participants67 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Anal surgery
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Appendix surgery
14 Participants27 Participants13 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Closure of abdominal hernias
18 Participants31 Participants13 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Esophagus surgery
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Extended gastric resection and other gastric surge
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Gall bladder and bile ducts surgery
23 Participants40 Participants17 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Gastric incision, excision, and resection
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Incision, excision, resection and anastomose of th
94 Participants187 Participants93 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Liver surgery
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Operations on other abdominal regions
15 Participants42 Participants27 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Other
4 Participants14 Participants10 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Other operations on the small and large intestine
35 Participants65 Participants30 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Pancreatic surgery
13 Participants24 Participants11 Participants
Main procedure that caused the abdominal wound healing impairment
Rectal surgery
22 Participants42 Participants20 Participants
Nutritional status
Moderately or suspected of being malnourished
18 Participants44 Participants26 Participants
Nutritional status
Severely malnourished
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Nutritional status
Well nourished
235 Participants457 Participants222 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
7 participants16 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
245 participants486 participants241 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants220 Participants119 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
155 Participants287 Participants132 Participants
Smoking65 Participants120 Participants55 Participants
Weight86 Kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
85 Kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
84 Kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
Wound volume
<=60 cm*3
149 Participants291 Participants142 Participants
Wound volume
>60 cm*3
107 Participants214 Participants107 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
24 / 25615 / 251
other
Total, other adverse events
41 / 23422 / 201
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 23412 / 201

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Complete Wound Closure

Time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days (14 days -0 / + 3) Complete wound closure is defined as: 100% epithelialization No drainage from the wound No need for adjuvant therapy or dressing No presence of sutures

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Intention To Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
NPWTTime to Complete Wound Closure36.1 Days
SCWTTime to Complete Wound Closure39.1 Days
Secondary

Incidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure

Incidence of confirmed and verified wound closure achieved after a maximum study observation / treatment period of 42 days (+ 14 days to observe sustained closure)

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Intention To Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NPWTIncidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure92 Participants
SCWTIncidence of Confirmed and Verified Wound Closure54 Participants
Secondary

Recurrence

Recurrence of wound opening after confirmed wound closure

Time frame: 132 days

Population: Intention To Treat Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NPWTRecurrence0 Participants
SCWTRecurrence0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026