Skip to content

Accuracy of Curvature and Wavefront Aberrations of Posterior Corneal Surface, in Keratoconic and Post-CXL Corneas

Repeatability, Reliability and Reproducibility of Pentacam-derived Curvature and Wavefront Aberrations of Posterior Corneal Surface, in Keratoconic and Cross-linked Corneas

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01527708
Enrollment
129
Registered
2012-02-07
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2012-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Brief summary

Primary objective of this study was to assess the intrasession, intersession and interobserver variability of the Pentacam-derived curvature and zernike coefficients in back surface of normal, keratoconic and crosslinked corneas.

Detailed description

The Pentacam Classic (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, software version 1.14r04) was used for the sake of the study.Three study groups were formed: 1) Normal 2) Keratoconus group (KC) included patients with progressive keratoconus and 3) Collagen-Cross-linking group (CXL) included keratoconus patients that had been treated with uneventful CXL at least on year prior to their enrollment in the study. Three consecutive scans were obtained by two experienced operators. The same procedure was repeated within two weeks for the assessment of intersession variability. In all cases acceptable maps had at least 10.0mm of corneal coverage. Keratometry (K), asphericity (Q), best-fit toric ellipsoid radius (Rs), eccentricity (ecc) and aberrometry (6.0mm pupil diameter), were analyzed. Furthermore we calculated and studied CRMS and CLRMS in order to better appreciate the visual significance of HOAs. Precision (Pre), repeatability (COR) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), were calculated for evaluating intrasession and intersession repeatability. Bland-Altman analysis was used for assessing interobserver repeatability.

Interventions

Instillation of proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% drops for topical anaesthesia, application of a sponge saturated with 10% alcohol to the central cornea for 20-30 seconds and subsequent de-epithelialization by means of a hockey knife. Following de-epithelialization, a mixture of 0.1% riboflavin in 20% Dextran solution was instilled to the cornea for 30 minutes (2 drops every 2 minutes) prior to the irradiation. In details, an 8.0mm diameter of central cornea was irradiated for 30 minutes by UVA light with a wavelength of 370nm and an irradiance of 3mW/cm2.The UVA radiation source that was used is the UV-XTM (IROC AG, Zurich, Switzerland). Instillation of riboflavin drops (1 drop every 2 minutes) was continued during irradiation, as well.

Sponsors

Democritus University of Thrace
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ideal refractive surgery candidate (Normal Group) * Progressive keratoconus (Keratoconus group) * Corneal collagen cross linking (CxL) treatment at least one year prior to enrollment (CxL group)

Exclusion criteria

(Normal Group) * No indications of corneal pathology in slit-lamp biomicroscopy and Placido disk-based videokeratography * Uneventful ophthalmologic history All groups: * Glaucoma * Suspicion of glaucoma * history of herpetic keratitis * corneal scarring * severe eye dryness * pregnancy or nursing * current corneal infection * underlying autoimmune disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Variability of posterior corneal surface curvature and aberrometric measurements within and between sessions and within and between observers.2 weeksThe Pentacam Classic (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, software version 1.14r04) was used for the sake of the study. Three consecutive scans were obtained by two experienced operators for the assessment of intrasession and interobserver variability. The same procedure was repeated within two weeks for the assessment of intersession variability.Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement between the 2 operators. The reliability of all measurements was evaluated by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC).

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026