Skip to content

Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs. Abdominal Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer

A Randomized Open Controlled Trial Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in a Fast Track Program

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01526655
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-02-06
Start date
2012-01-25
Completion date
2016-07-27
Last updated
2024-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

Endometrial cancer, Robot assisted laparoscopy, Abdominal hysterectomy, Fast track program

Brief summary

The purpose of the trial is to determine whether robot assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in a fast track program gives a faster recovery postoperatively, causes less tissue damage and less effects on the immunological system, and is health economically cost-effective.

Detailed description

If detailed description is requested, please contact sponsor.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAbdominal total hysterectomy

Abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision

Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy

Sponsors

University Hospital, Linkoeping
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Over 18 years of age. * Scheduled to total hysterectomy + bilateral salpingooophorectomy (BSAE) and peritoneal lavage because of endometrial carcinoma, International federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) stage 1, grade 1 and 2, with diploid DNA profile (i.e. low risk profile). * WHO (World Health Organisation) performance status ≤ 2. * Proficiency in Swedish * Accept to participate in the study and has signed written informed consent document. * The operation should be considered possible to be perform laparoscopically and by laparotomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision.

Exclusion criteria

* The operation is anticipated to comprise more than the hysterectomy + BSAE. * A midline incision is planned for the laparotomy. * Contraindications towards spinal anesthesia with intrathecally applied morphine. * Physically disabled women who cannot be expected to be mobilized in accordance to the fast track program in a way similar to what is expected from not-physically disabled women. * Mentally disabled women who cannot fill in the questionnaires or understand the consequences of participating in a trial. * Severe psychiatric disease or on medication for psychiatric disease so that the physician consider participation in the trial inappropriate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42Quality of life measured by means of the EuroQol form (EQ-5D). The EQ-5D form was completed daily during the first eight days after surgery, then once weekly for additional six weeks. The health state index has a possible range from 0 to 1 with a higher score meaning a better quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.
Health Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)From the day of surgery until six weeks after surgery.Total costs (direct and indirect) for hospital stay and recovery period until six weeks postoperatively.
Health Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)From the day of surgery until six weeks after surgery.Total costs (direct and indirect) for hospital stay and recovery period until six weeks postoperatively.
Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Countries

Sweden

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

One patient withdrew consent prior to surgery in the control group (abdominal hysterectomy) and received the standard treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Robotic Hysterectomy
Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy Robot assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: Robot assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy
25
Abdominal Hysterectomy
Standard extrafascial abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision Abdominal total hysterectomy: Abdominal total hysterectomy through a low transverse abdominal wall incision
25
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAbdominal HysterectomyTotalRobotic Hysterectomy
Age, Continuous67 years67 years68 years
ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system)
Class I
11 Participants20 Participants9 Participants
ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system)
Class II
13 Participants28 Participants15 Participants
ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system)
Class III
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Body mass index
BMI <25
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Body mass index
BMI 25-29.9
10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Body mass index
BMI 30-35
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Body mass index
BMI > 35
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Body mass index28.0 kg/m^228.1 kg/m^228.2 kg/m^2
Comorbidity
Cardiovascular disease
11 Participants21 Participants10 Participants
Comorbidity
Diabetes mellitus
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Comorbidity
Previous breast cancer
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Comorbidity
Pulmonary disease
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Current medication
Analgesics
2 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Current medication
Antidepressant/sedative
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
EQ-5D health index preoperatively (EuroQol Group form five dimensions)0.82 score on a scale0.81 score on a scale0.81 score on a scale
HADS Anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Mild-moderate anxiety
6 Participants15 Participants9 Participants
HADS Anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
No anxiety
15 Participants28 Participants13 Participants
HADS Anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Severe anxiety
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
HADS Depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Mild-moderate depression
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
HADS Depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
No depression
21 Participants42 Participants21 Participants
Parity2 births2 births2 births
Previous laparotomy8 Participants21 Participants13 Participants
PSQ score (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire score)
PSQ minor score (range 0-10)
2.3 score on a scale (0-10)2.3 score on a scale (0-10)2.1 score on a scale (0-10)
PSQ score (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire score)
PSQ moderate score(range 0-10)
4.4 score on a scale (0-10)4.4 score on a scale (0-10)4.4 score on a scale (0-10)
PSQ score (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire score)
PSQ total score (range 0-10)
3.3 score on a scale (0-10)3.1 score on a scale (0-10)2.9 score on a scale (0-10)
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
25 Participants50 Participants25 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
25 Participants50 Participants25 Participants
Smokers0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 2515 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 252 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

Quality of life measured by means of the EuroQol form (EQ-5D). The EQ-5D form was completed daily during the first eight days after surgery, then once weekly for additional six weeks. The health state index has a possible range from 0 to 1 with a higher score meaning a better quality of life.

Time frame: Days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 20.74 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 70.83 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 40.77 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 140.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.11
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 10.66 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 210.91 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 50.83 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 280.92 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 30.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 350.93 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 60.84 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 420.95 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 00.34 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 420.86 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 00.30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 10.48 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 20.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 30.59 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 40.63 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 50.64 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 60.67 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 70.66 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 140.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 210.71 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 280.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)EQ-5D Day 350.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
p-value: 0.011ANOVA
Secondary

Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Time frame: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 2489.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 137
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 4392.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 201
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 5358.1 nmol/LStandard Deviation 128
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 1273.4 nmol/LStandard Deviation 75
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 6309.1 nmol/LStandard Deviation 98
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 7307.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 129
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 3301.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 267
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 7331.1 nmol/LStandard Deviation 125.4
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 6331.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 76
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 1266.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 123.2
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 2510.1 nmol/LStandard Deviation 131.2
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 3533.2 nmol/LStandard Deviation 249
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 5379.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 125.4
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Cortisol)Cortisol time 4383.0 nmol/LStandard Deviation 178.1
p-value: 0.06ANOVA
Secondary

Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Time frame: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 546.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 49.8
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 429.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 29.4
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 22.7 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.6
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 610.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.6
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 12.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 72.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.6
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 32.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 71.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 1.5
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 16.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 17
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 24.7 mg/LStandard Deviation 11.4
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 33.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 6.7
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 575.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 43.7
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 69.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.6
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))hsCRP time 452.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 27
p-value: 0.03ANOVA
Secondary

Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Time frame: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 21.9 µkat/LStandard Deviation 1.1
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 53.0 µkat/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 31.5 µkat/LStandard Deviation 0.9
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 61.0 µkat/LStandard Deviation 0.6
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 11.8 µkat/LStandard Deviation 1.1
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 71.6 µkat/LStandard Deviation 1.1
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 43.3 µkat/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 71.3 µkat/LStandard Deviation 0.8
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 21.6 µkat/LStandard Deviation 1
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 32.5 µkat/LStandard Deviation 1
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 46.2 µkat/LStandard Deviation 4.9
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 54.5 µkat/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 60.9 µkat/LStandard Deviation 0.6
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Creatin Kinase (CK))CK time 11.6 µkat/LStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.03ANOVA
Secondary

Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Time frame: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 215.7 pg/mlStandard Deviation 29
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 428.0 pg/mlStandard Deviation 31
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 115.0 pg/mlStandard Deviation 29.8
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 515.3 pg/mlStandard Deviation 21.8
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 321.0 pg/mlStandard Deviation 28.7
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 713.1 pg/mlStandard Deviation 25.7
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 618.4 pg/mlStandard Deviation 31.2
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 712.2 pg/mlStandard Deviation 28.8
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 610.0 pg/mlStandard Deviation 12.1
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 110.9 pg/mlStandard Deviation 19
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 29.6 pg/mlStandard Deviation 13.8
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 347.6 pg/mlStandard Deviation 24.5
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 437.9 pg/mlStandard Deviation 19
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (Interleukin 6 (IL-6))IL-6 time 517.3 pg/mlStandard Deviation 9.4
p-value: 0.03ANOVA
Secondary

Changes in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))

The biomarker was measured on seven occasions. Time 1: one week before surgery. Time 2: just before surgery. Time 3: two hours postoperatively. Time 4: 24 hours postoperatively. Time 5: 48 hours postoperatively. Time 6: one week after surgery. Time 7: six weeks after surgery.

Time frame: One week and just before surgery. Two, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. One and six weeks after surgery.

Population: Women with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery at the University Hospital in Linköping between February 2012 and may 2016 were asked to participate int the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 26.2 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 49.4 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 3.3
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 67.2 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 57.2 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.3
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 36.8 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 3
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 76.5 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.5
Robotic HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 16.7 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 76.8 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.6
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 17.7 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.1
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 67.6 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 26.6 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.7
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 311.4 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 3.7
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 410.1 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.8
Abdominal HysterectomyChanges in Biomarkers for Tissue Damage (White Blood Cells (WBC))WBC time 59.2 x10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.3
p-value: <0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Health Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)

Total costs (direct and indirect) for hospital stay and recovery period until six weeks postoperatively.

Time frame: From the day of surgery until six weeks after surgery.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)Direct costs per procedure65,728 Swedish crowns per procedure
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)Indirect costs per procedure12,451 Swedish crowns per procedure
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)Total costs (direct + indirect) per procedure78,179 Swedish crowns per procedure
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)Direct costs per procedure46,776 Swedish crowns per procedure
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)Indirect costs per procedure18,318 Swedish crowns per procedure
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 300 Robotic Procedures Annually)Total costs (direct + indirect) per procedure65,094 Swedish crowns per procedure
p-value: 0.06t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Health Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)

Total costs (direct and indirect) for hospital stay and recovery period until six weeks postoperatively.

Time frame: From the day of surgery until six weeks after surgery.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)Direct costs per procedure61,862 Swedish crowns per procedure
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)Indirect costs per procedure12,451 Swedish crowns per procedure
Robotic HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)Total costs (direct + indirect) per procedure74,313 Swedish crowns per procedure
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)Direct costs per procedure46,769 Swedish crowns per procedure
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)Indirect costs per procedure18,318 Swedish crowns per procedure
Abdominal HysterectomyHealth Economics (With 500 Robotic Procedures Annually)Total costs (direct + indirect) per procedure65,087 Swedish crowns per procedure
p-value: 0.04t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026