Skip to content

Decreasing the Use of Unmodified Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in an Indian Hospital

Decreasing the Use of Unmodified ECT in an Indian Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01526395
Enrollment
99
Registered
2012-02-03
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2013-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia

Keywords

electroconvulsive therapy, ECT, unmodified, anesthesia, propofol

Brief summary

In developing countries, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is typically delivered without the use of an anesthetic prior to the treatment, known as unmodified ECT. This interventional study aims to decrease the practice of unmodified ECT at Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, U.P. & G.M. & Associated Hospitals (C.S.M) by administering a low dose anesthetic (propofol) prior to ECT delivery. In so doing, the investigators hope to facilitate the transition from unmodified to modified ECT without incurring excessive costs to the center. It is hypothesized that ECT patients will opt for modified treatment, that adverse effects will be minimal, and that costs will not rise prohibitively.

Detailed description

Patients that are currently receiving unmodified ECT at C.S.M Hospital will be eligible for the first phase of the study in which only data is collected. Three months after study start, patients who are to receive ECT for a psychiatric disorder will be eligible to participate in the intervention (introduction of propofol at a low dose prior to ECT). Data collection will include information such as demographics, ratings scales, seizure length, anxiety level, adverse events, and number of treatments.

Interventions

DRUGPropofol

The major intervention proposed in this study is the introduction of low dose IV propofol for sedation prior to ECT treatment at C.S.M Medical University. The investigators will use a dose of 0.25 to 0.50 mg/kg of IV propofol. The maximum dose of 0.50 mg/kg is not sufficient for anesthesia (i.e., to make unconscious), but should provide a light level of sedation and be amnestic, meaning the patient should have memory loss for the period of time around the ECT procedure itself. The propofol dose will be titrated upwards (from an initial dose of 0.25 mg/kg) with successive treatments in increments of 0.05mg/kg, until it is just sufficient to be lightly sedating. ECT will be administered 30 to 60 seconds after propofol is injected. ECT may be given up to three times per week.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects are any psychiatric patients at C.S.M. for whom ECT is recommended by their doctor, whether or not they actually receive ECT. * Subjects must also have an American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA) rating score of 1 (completely healthy) or 2 (mild systemic disease) with stable symptoms and laboratory values. * Subjects must be between the ages of 18 to 65 years old and be able to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who speak neither English nor Hindi. * History of or anatomical evidence for a difficult airway being a short mandible, micrognathia, large tongue or large goiter, arthritis of the jaw or neck, or enlarged tonsils. For this reason we will also exclude patients with a BMI \> 28. * Respiratory tract disease including asthma, respiratory infection, chest wall disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, or other disorder which might compromise the airway. Patients who smoke 15 or more cigarettes per day will be excluded unless abstinent for at least 10 days, to reduce the risk of respiratory complications. * Patients who receive modified ECT during the first phase of the study. * Pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding. * Hypersensitivity to propofol or any of its components. * Patients who are hemodynamically unstable or who have impaired cardiac function. * BMI \< 18. * Patients with a history of epilepsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of patients receiving ECT who agree to the modified form of treatment after it is offered.6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rate at which ECT is offered and refused.6 months
Change in patient anxiety measured by the state portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.Baseline and completion of ECT treatments or up to 6 months, whichever comes first
Inpatient length of stay calculated from onset of ECT administration.6 months
Number of ECTs required to complete a course of treatment6 months
Cognitive changes, monitored by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)Baseline and completion of ECT treatments or up to 6 months, whichever comes first
Monitoring of adverse effects such the occurence of emergent delirium, headaches, muscle aches, nausea and vomiting, and fractures and dislocations.Baseline and completion of ECT treatments or up to 6 months, whichever comes first
Monitoring of delirium using the test with the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU).Baseline and completion of ECT treatments or up to 6 months, whichever comes first
Changes in scales used to assess severity of symptoms. The investigators will record changes in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Severity scale.Baseline and completion of ECT treatments or up to 6 months, whichever comes first

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026