Skip to content

Use of PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Use of PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01526382
Acronym
PiCCO
Enrollment
350
Registered
2012-02-03
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2015-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Septic Shock

Keywords

septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, transpulmonary thermodilution technique, mortality

Brief summary

PiCCO has been widely used in critical care settings for several decades. Together with pulmonary artery catheter, it is regarded as the important tool for guiding fluid management in patients with shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, its effects on patients' outcome remain untested. The investigators study is a pilot study that is designed to test whether the use of PiCCO will improve patients' outcome, as compared to those without PiCCO monitoring.

Detailed description

PiCCO comprises techniques of pulse contour analysis and transpulmonary thermodilution, and can provide important information on hemodynamics and pulmonary functions. It has been widely used in critical care settings for several decades. Together with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), it is regarded as the important tool for guiding fluid management in patients with shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome. During last two decades, many well designed clinical trials have been conducted to see whether the use of PAC would benefit patient outcome. The result consistently showed that PAC added no benefit in terms of mortality, ICU length of stay, organ failure free survival days, and the length of mechanical ventilation. Since PiCCO is relatively new to PAC, and its effects on patients' outcome remain untested. The investigators study is a pilot study that is designed to test whether the use of PiCCO will improve patients' outcome, as compared to those without PiCCO monitoring.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcentral venous catheter

patients in this arm can receive central venous catheter

DEVICEPiCCO monitoring (PULSION)

Patients are monitored with PiCCO system.

Sponsors

Jinhua Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients were included if they were diagnosed with Shock, Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or both. Shock was defined by the presence 4 criteria: * Heart rate of at least 90/min; * A respiratory rate of at least 20/min or a PaCO2 of 32mmHg or lower or the use of mechanical ventilation; * The use of vasopressors to maintain a systolic blood pressure of at least 90mmHg despite fluid resuscitation, low dose of dopamine (≤ 5 μg/kg per minute), or dobutamine; * at least 1 of 3 signs of hypoperfusion (urine output \< 0.5mL/kg of body weight per hour for 1 hour or more; neurologic dysfunction defined by confusion, psychosis, or a Glasgow coma scale score of ≤ 6; plasma lactate higher than the upper limit of the normal value). Acute respiratory distress syndrome: * the presence of acute decrease in PaO2/FIO2 to 200mmHg or lower, * bilateral pulmonary infiltrates or a chest radiograph consistent with edema; * no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension; and requirement for positive pressure ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients were moribund. * signed do-not-resuscitation odor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30 day mortality30 daysdeath from any cause before day 30

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
14 day mortality14 dayspatients were followed up for 14 days
days on mechanical ventilationup to 30 daysdays during which the patients are on mechnical ventilation: The criteria for termination of mechanical ventilation: a cooperative patient, recovery from primary disease, hemodynamically stable, adequate and strong cough reflex, positive end-expiratory pressure \<5 cmH2O, pressure support \<10 cmH2O and the spontaneous breathing trial is successfully passed.
ICU length of stayup to 30 daysthe time from ICU admission to ICU discharge or death
ICU free survival days during 30-day period30 daysICU free survival days during 30-day period
mechanical ventilation free survival days during 30-day period28 daysmechanical ventilation free survival days during 30-day period
days of vasoactive agents supportup to 30 daysdays during which vasoactive agents are used: The sum of the number of days with one or more vasoactive agents to maintain a mean arterial pressure \>60 mmHg

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026