Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of IM Injections of PLX-PAD for the Regeneration of Injured Gluteal Musculature After Total Hip Arthroplasty

A Phase I/II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Intramuscular Injections of Allogeneic PLX-PAD Cells for the Regeneration of Injured Gluteal Musculature After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01525667
Enrollment
20
Registered
2012-02-03
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2015-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Injury, Total Hip Arthroplasty

Keywords

THA, Muscle injury

Brief summary

Local administration of PLX-PAD single dose, intra-muscular injection for the regeneration of injured gluteal musculature after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).

Detailed description

One of the main problems when performing THA via the standard transgluteal approach is the necessary injury of the gluteus medius muscle. The consecutive decrease of contractile muscle substance and the substitution by scar tissue leads to functional deficits of the pelvic-stabilizing musculature with an insufficiency limp in a large number of patients. In the long run the lack of musculature leads to a decrease in bone substance at the insertion sites of the gluteal muscles of the proximal femur. The present study has the aim of establishing a new therapy for iatrogenic gluteal muscle damage. The hypothesis of the present proposal is that intra-muscular (IM) injection of PLX-PAD into the iatrogenically injured gluteus medius muscle after THA results in an improved regeneration of the skeletal muscle tissue and consecutively in an improved functional outcome. Subjects will be assigned to receive one of the two targeted doses of PLX-PAD or placebo. On the treatment day, after suturing the gluteus medius muscle PLX-PAD or placebo will be applied directly to the site of laceration. Patients will be followed up for efficacy assessment up to week 26 and for safety assessment (Adverse events, vital signs, ECG, routinf lab and immunological testing) up to week 52 after THA. Patients will be phoned at week 104 in order to inquire about the occurence of new cancer.

Interventions

BIOLOGICAL150M PLX-PAD

Single course, multiple IM injections

BIOLOGICAL300M PLX-PAD

Single course, multiple IM injections

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Single course, multiple IM injections

Sponsors

Pluristem Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female subjects between 50 to 75 years of age 2. Scheduled THA 3. ASA Score ≤ 3 4. Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Muscle diseases 2. Severe neurological diseases 3. Opioid long term medication 4. Pain chronification \> stadium II of Gerbershagen 5. Immunosuppression due to illness or medication 6. Ankylosing spondylitis 7. History of ectopic bone formation of any localisation 8.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) Moment of the Injured Side to Assess Gluteus Medius Strength.Day 0 to Week 26Change from Visit 2 (Day 0) to Week 26 in the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) moment of the injured side as measured by isometric dynamometry to assess Gluteus Medius force strength.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in Muscle Volume.Day 0 to Week 26Change from Visit 2 (Day 0) to Week 26 in Muscle Volume as Measured by MRI.
Change From Day 1 to Week 12 in Mean Fiber Diameter.Day 1 to Week 12Change from Visit 3 (Day 1) to Week 12 in Mean Fiber Diameter as Measured by Muscle Biopsy.
Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Ratio of Injured to Contralateral Pelvic Shift .Day 0 to Week 26Change from Visit 2 (Day 0) to Week 26 in the Ratio of Injured to Contralateral Pelvic Shift as Measured by Gait Analysis
Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score.Day 0 to Week 26Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score ranges from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worse possible pain)

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PLX-PAD Low Dose
PLX-PAD low dose: Single treatment, multiple injections
7
PLX-PAD High Dose
PLX-PAD high dose: Single treatment, multiple injections
6
Placebo
Placebo: Single treatment, multiple injections
7
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPLX-PAD High DosePlaceboPLX-PAD Low DoseTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants3 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants4 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Age, Continuous64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Region of Enrollment
Germany
6 participants7 participants7 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants6 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 76 / 67 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 70 / 61 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) Moment of the Injured Side to Assess Gluteus Medius Strength.

Change from Visit 2 (Day 0) to Week 26 in the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) moment of the injured side as measured by isometric dynamometry to assess Gluteus Medius force strength.

Time frame: Day 0 to Week 26

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PLX-PAD Low DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) Moment of the Injured Side to Assess Gluteus Medius Strength.31.17 NewtonsStandard Error 6.97
PLX-PAD High DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) Moment of the Injured Side to Assess Gluteus Medius Strength.20.36 NewtonsStandard Error 7.61
PlaceboChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) Moment of the Injured Side to Assess Gluteus Medius Strength.5.43 NewtonsStandard Error 6.46
p-value: 0.006795% CI: [7.61, 43.86]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1895% CI: [-7.12, 36.99]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in Muscle Volume.

Change from Visit 2 (Day 0) to Week 26 in Muscle Volume as Measured by MRI.

Time frame: Day 0 to Week 26

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PLX-PAD Low DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in Muscle Volume.24.42 mm3Standard Error 4.18
PLX-PAD High DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in Muscle Volume.15.62 mm3Standard Error 4.91
PlaceboChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in Muscle Volume.6.39 mm3Standard Error 4.35
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [6.03, 30.02]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1995% CI: [-4.72, 23.17]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Ratio of Injured to Contralateral Pelvic Shift .

Change from Visit 2 (Day 0) to Week 26 in the Ratio of Injured to Contralateral Pelvic Shift as Measured by Gait Analysis

Time frame: Day 0 to Week 26

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PLX-PAD Low DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Ratio of Injured to Contralateral Pelvic Shift .0.43 RatioStandard Error 0.13
PLX-PAD High DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Ratio of Injured to Contralateral Pelvic Shift .0.28 RatioStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Ratio of Injured to Contralateral Pelvic Shift .0.27 RatioStandard Error 0.13
p-value: 0.495% CI: [-0.21, 0.53]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.96Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score ranges from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worse possible pain)

Time frame: Day 0 to Week 26

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PLX-PAD Low DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score.-31.76 mmStandard Error 5.9
PLX-PAD High DoseChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score.-37.87 mmStandard Error 6.53
PlaceboChange From Day 0 to Week 26 in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score.-48.57 mmStandard Error 5.97
p-value: 0.0595% CI: [0.16, 33.47]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.2495% CI: [-7.26, 28.65]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Day 1 to Week 12 in Mean Fiber Diameter.

Change from Visit 3 (Day 1) to Week 12 in Mean Fiber Diameter as Measured by Muscle Biopsy.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PLX-PAD Low DoseChange From Day 1 to Week 12 in Mean Fiber Diameter.1.25 micronsStandard Error 3.27
PLX-PAD High DoseChange From Day 1 to Week 12 in Mean Fiber Diameter.0.28 micronsStandard Error 3.23
PlaceboChange From Day 1 to Week 12 in Mean Fiber Diameter.-5.21 micronsStandard Error 3.24
p-value: 0.1995% CI: [-3.5, 16.41]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.2595% CI: [-4.29, 15.26]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026