Skip to content

The Effect of the Timing of Postoperative Mobilisation After Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Fractures of the Surgical Neck of the Humerus

The Effect of the Timing of Postoperative Mobilisation After Locking Plate Osteosynthesis of Fractures of the Surgical Neck of the Humerus.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01524965
Enrollment
94
Registered
2012-02-02
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2023-10-21
Last updated
2025-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Humeral Fracture

Keywords

Locking Plate, Physiotherapy

Brief summary

Open reduction and locking plate osteosynthesis is a commonly used and well-accepted treatment for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. The shoulders tend to end stiff despite intensive rehabilitation, limiting the function of the upper extremity and decreasing the quality of life. The accepted postoperative mobilisation protocol includes passive exercises until six weeks postoperatively and active range of motion exercises after that. There is good evidence that conservatively treated fractures of the same site heal better and faster if mobilised immediately. The study compares standard mobilisation versus immmediate mobilisation in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in order to find the optimal time-frame for physiotherapy to produce best possible results. Outcome measures are assessed at specific time points after the operation and comparisons between groups are made to follow the rate of recovery and end results.

Interventions

PROCEDUREImmediate mobilisation after locking-plate osteosynthesis

Immediate passive range of motion exercises are begun postoperatively, after 3 weeks, active unloaded mobilisation begins after three weeks and active, loaded use is allowed 6 weeks postoperatively. Surgical procedure is open reduction of the fracture and internal fixation of the fracture using a locking plate using standard deltopectoral approach and AO principles in fracture management.

PROCEDUREStandard mobilisation after locking plate osteosynthesis

Immediately postoperatively the arm is held in a sling, active mobilisation of healthy joints and pendel exercises are befun. Passive range of motion exercises of the shoulder are begun 3 weeks postoperatively. Active mobilisation begins after six weeks. Surgical procedure is open reduction of the fracture and internal fixation of the fracture using a locking plate using standard deltopectoral approach and AO principles in fracture management.

DEVICEOsteosynthesis with a locking plate (Philos)

Standard open reduction and internal fixation using a deltopectoral approach. Fracture fixation is done using a locking plate (Philos, Synthes) following the AO principles of fracture management.

Sponsors

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Helsinki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older * Surgery can be performed within 10 days of injury * A dislocated (\>1cm or 35 degrees) AO 11-A2, -A3, -B1 or -B2 fracture of the surgical neck of the proximal humerus with a possible fracture of the Tuberculum Majus

Exclusion criteria

* Glenohumeral dislocation * Fracture of the Tuberculum Minus * Open fracture * Additional fractures in the shoulder region * Other injuries requiring surgical treatment * Clinically significant injury of the brachial plexus or vasculature * Pathological fracture associated with cancer * History of a fracture of the clavicle, scapula or humerus, or history of a very significant disease or trauma of the shoulder region (hemiparesis, tumour, osteomyelitis, grave arthrosis etc) * Rheumatoid Arthritis in the shoulder requiring active treatment * Reduced co-operation or incapability for independent living (dementia, mental illness, drug- or alcohol abuse etc) * Unwillingness to accept some of the treatment options.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disablities of Arm, Hand and Shoulder3 weeksValidated patient-reported upper extremity function scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Simple Shoulder Test (SST)3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsanother shoulder score
Pain in rest and motion (2 different values)3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsNumeric rating scale 0-10
Constant Score3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearssubjective and objective shoulder score
Quality of Life3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsUsing the 15D instrument
Complications3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsComplications of surgery and postoperative phase
Subjective satisfaction3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 yearsPatient reported, Numeric Rating Scale 0-10

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026