Complications: Urgent C Section VS Elective C Section

Comparison of Maternal and Fetal Complications After Urgent Caesarian Section for Prolapsed Cord Versus Elective Caesarian Section.

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01524107

Enrollment

240

Registered

2012-02-01

Start date

2012-01-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2016-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urgent Caesarian Section Secondary to Cord Prolapse

Keywords

Prophylaxis Antibiotics, Maternal Complications, Neonatal Complications, Cord Prolapse, Elective Caesarian Section, Maternal Morbidity, Neonatal Morbidity

Brief summary

The medical literature does not provide sufficient information or recommendation regarding specific antibiotic coverage for urgent Caesarian sections. The goal of this study is to compare maternal and neonatal morbidity of women who have undergone urgent Caesarian Sections for Prolapsed Cord to those who have undergone Elective Caesarian Sections in order to develop a standard treatment protocol. The Medical Record review will include many parameters including complications, type of antibiotic usage etc.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

20 Years to 40 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* women undergoing urgent Caesarian Section for Prolapsed Cord. * women undergoing Elective Caesarian Section.

Exclusion criteria

* preterm birth * multiple gestation

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactDrorith Hochner-Celnikier, MD

hochner@hadassah.org.il00 972 2 5844400

Outcome results