Skip to content

Study of Mitomycin-C Application in Laryngotracheal Stenosis

A Randomized Study of Mitomycin-C Application in the Endoscopic Surgical Treatment of Patients With Laryngotracheal Stenosis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01523275
Enrollment
15
Registered
2012-02-01
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2019-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngeal Stenosis, Subglottic Stenosis, Tracheal Stenosis

Keywords

mitomycin-C, laryngotracheal stenosis, subglottic stenosis, tracheal stenosis, endoscopic airway surgery

Brief summary

This is a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the use of mitomycin-C topical application as an adjunctive treatment in the endoscopic surgical treatment of patients with laryngotracheal stenosis. We hypothesize that the use of mitomycin-C improves patient outcome in the endoscopic surgical treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis.

Detailed description

Obstruction of the upper airway caused by laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) often results in severe morbidity and even mortality. Treatment of LTS continues to present a challenge and a wide array of surgical techniques have been employed. Despite multiple endoscopic and/or open reconstructive procedures, patients often experience restenosis as a result of the abnormal wound-healing process that initially instigated the airway obstruction. The high rate of stenosis relapse has therefore motivated researchers to find new methods to modulate and control the wound-healing process of the airway. Although other adjuvant treatments such as steroids and antibiotics have been investigated in LTS, much attention in recent years has turned to the use of topical mitomycin-C (MMC). As a topical application, MMC has been shown to inhibit fibroblast proliferation in wound-healing processes. The use of MMC in the treatment of airway stenosis was first reported in 1998 and is now routinely used in the endoscopic management of LTS. However, despite numerous animal and human studies, the benefit of MMC in LTS patients remains questionable. While previously published retrospective data suggest that the addition of MMC improves outcome, there have been no prospective studies to directly address the efficacy of MMC in endoscopic LTS surgery. This study will be the first randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial designed to investigate the efficacy of MMC as an adjunctive therapy to endoscopic surgical treatment in patients with LTS. In addition, the study will investigate the relationship between patient symptoms and objective pulmonary function measurements. Ultimately, the results of this study may influence the treatment and evaluation of patients with laryngotracheal stenosis.

Interventions

Topical mitomycin-C at a dosage of 0.4mg/ml will be applied to cottonoid pledgets and placed into the radial incisions for 3 minutes.

Isotonic saline will be applied to cottonoid pledgets and placed into the patient's radial incisions for 3 minutes as the placebo intervention.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with laryngotracheal stenosis, including subglottic stenosis or tracheal stenosis * Patients with disease amenable to treatment with endoscopic CO2 laser radial incisions and balloon dilation * Age greater than or equal to 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years * Pregnancy * Patients with glottic and supraglottic stenosis * Patients with disease not amenable to treatment with endoscopic CO2 laser radial incisions and balloon dilation * Patients with cartilaginous subglottic or tracheal stenosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Repeat Surgery24 monthsLength of time between surgeries for laryngotracheal stenosis during the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Symptom Improvement24 monthsSymptom improvement was measured using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, a 10-point patient reported symptom score. Duration of symptom improvement was defined as the time from surgery to the time that symptoms to worsened beyond a CCQ score of 1 or the time to the subsequent surgery if CCQ never exceeded 1
Peak Inspiratory Flow Measurement3 monthsChange in maximum inspiratory air flow from preoperative value to highest postoperative value within 3 months of surgery. Calculation details: Highest postoperative value within 3 months of surgery minus preoperative value.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruited from the UCSF Voice and Swallowing Center clinic from August 1, 2012 to February 1, 2018

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Saline
Patients will undergo standard endoscopic surgical treatment for LTS involving CO2 laser radial incisions and balloon dilation, as well as topical application of isotonic saline in the radial incisions. Saline application: Isotonic saline will be applied to cottonoid pledgets and placed into the patient's radial incisions for 3 minutes as the placebo intervention.
9
Mitomycin-C
Patients will undergo standard endoscopic surgical treatment for LTS involving CO2 laser radial incisions and balloon dilation, as well as topical application of MMC in the radial incisions. Mitomycin -C: Topical mitomycin-C at a dosage of 0.4mg/ml will be applied to cottonoid pledgets and placed into the radial incisions for 3 minutes.
6
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSalineTotalMitomycin-C
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Age, Continuous57.1 Years of age
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
53 Years of age
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
48 Years of age
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Age of Onset52.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
49 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
44.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Average prior laryngotracheal stenosis surgeries1.1 Surgeries
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
2 Surgeries
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
4 Surgeries
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Etiology
Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Etiology
Idiopathic
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Etiology
Post-Intubation
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Prior laryngotracheal stenosis surgery
No
5 Participants6 Participants1 Participants
Prior laryngotracheal stenosis surgery
Yes
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Prior treatment with Kenalog
No
7 Participants9 Participants2 Participants
Prior treatment with Kenalog
Yes
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Prior treatment with Mitomycin C
No
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Prior treatment with Mitomycin C
Yes
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants13 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Site
Subglottis
8 Participants13 Participants5 Participants
Site
Subglottis and Trachea
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Site
Trachea
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 90 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Repeat Surgery

Length of time between surgeries for laryngotracheal stenosis during the study

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Patients who did not undergo a subsequent surgery after the initial study surgery were excluded as a surgical interval could not be calculated. There were two patients in each arm that did not have subsequent surgeries

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SalineTime to Repeat Surgery17.9 MonthsStandard Deviation 15.7
Mitomycin-CTime to Repeat Surgery17.4 MonthsStandard Deviation 12.8
p-value: 0.95t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Duration of Symptom Improvement

Symptom improvement was measured using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, a 10-point patient reported symptom score. Duration of symptom improvement was defined as the time from surgery to the time that symptoms to worsened beyond a CCQ score of 1 or the time to the subsequent surgery if CCQ never exceeded 1

Time frame: 24 months

Population: Time to symptom score (CCQ) progression was calculated for each surgery performed during the study with available CCQ data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SalineDuration of Symptom Improvement4.1 MonthsStandard Deviation 6.7
Mitomycin-CDuration of Symptom Improvement6.0 MonthsStandard Deviation 6.4
p-value: 0.52t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Peak Inspiratory Flow Measurement

Change in maximum inspiratory air flow from preoperative value to highest postoperative value within 3 months of surgery. Calculation details: Highest postoperative value within 3 months of surgery minus preoperative value.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Improvement in peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was calculated for each surgery performed during the study with available PIF data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SalinePeak Inspiratory Flow Measurement1.1 Liters per secondStandard Deviation 1.5
Mitomycin-CPeak Inspiratory Flow Measurement1.3 Liters per secondStandard Deviation 0.96
p-value: 0.64t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026