Skip to content

KatGuide Method Versus Conventional Method at Insertion of Chest Tube

KatGuide-trial. KatGuide Method Versus Conventional Method at Insertion of Chest Tube. A Randomized, Parallel Group, Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01522885
Acronym
KatGuide
Enrollment
109
Registered
2012-02-01
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2014-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chylothorax, Empyema, Hemothorax, Hydrothorax, Pneumothorax

Keywords

Chest tube, placement, mal positioning

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether if KatGuide (a new developed medical device) improves the placing of a large bore chest tube in the pleural cavity compared to the conventional method.

Interventions

DEVICEKatGuide versus conventional method (forceps)

According to randomization Chest tubes are placed in the pleural cavity by using the KatGuide device.

The chest tube is placed in the pleural cavity by using a forceps (conventional method) or KatGuide

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
CollaboratorOTHER
Niels Katballe
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with pneumothorax in the upper pleural space or fluid in the lower pleural space. * Indication for upper or lower placement of a single chest tube in the pleural cavity * 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

* Fertile women * Patients who can not give written or verbal consent to participate * If there is no time or possibility to inform the patient * Patients who already has a large bore chest tube * Patients with long lasting (\>14 days) or chronic chest tube * Patients with both fluid and air in the pleural cavity * Patients where the safe area (front axillary fold, IC 4-5) can not be used for chest tube insertion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chest tube placement3 hoursX-ray examination of the chest is performed within 3 hours after the chest tube insertion, to evaluate if the placement of the chest tube is acceptable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of hospital stay5 daysThe hospital stay depends on how long time it takes to solve the chest tube related problem. In a few patients it takes only one day, but in severe cases it may take weeks before the patient can be discharged. We predict, that the patient will be in hospital for a mean time of 5 days.
Time with chest tube3 days (mean time)A few patients can have the chest tube removed in only one day, but some patients must have a chest tube for weeks. We predict that the patients will have a chest tube in a mean time of 3 days.
Infection in wound4 weeks4 weeks after the chest tube insertion, the patient is contacted and the patient is asked whether there are problems with infection of the wound.
Number of chest tubes7 days (mean time)It is observed whether the patient has multiple chest tubes inserted in the pleural cavity at the same side. It is predicted, that these patients are hospitalized longer than patients with only one chest tube. We predict, that these patients are hospitalized for a mean time of 7 days.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026