Skip to content

An Electronic Decision Support Tool to Improve Outpatient Asthma Care

EHR Decision Support to Improve Outpatient Asthma Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01522144
Enrollment
1030
Registered
2012-01-31
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2012-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Brief summary

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's ambulatory network uses an electronic health record (EHR) to document clinical information. Using the EHR, a clinical decision support tool will be designed to help the primary care physician's in caring for children with asthma. The goal will be to improve the primary care physician's use of the national Institutes of Health guidelines for the best care for asthma. To study this EHR decision support tool, it will be introduced into 5 practices while 5 other practices will have the existing asthma care information. It will be determined whether the physicians in the practices with the decision support tool are better at following the asthma guidelines. If the decision support tool works...then it will be offered to others to use with their EHR systems.

Detailed description

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines (NAEPP) exist, but are under used in Primary Care. In addition, implementation of the guidelines has been shown to be vary according to the location of practice and other contextual factors. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Pediatric Research Consortium (PeRC), a practice-based research network will determine whether an innovative clinical decision support system embedded in an existing electronic health record (EHR) will improve provider adherence to the existing NAEPP guidelines. After receiving a standardized education module based on NAEPP guidelines, 10 primary care pediatric practices (both urban and suburban) will be randomized to receive either a passive EHR (control sites) or an interactive decision support sytem (intervention sites). The primary outcome of interest will be the proportion of patient son appropriate asthma controller medication compared over time. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of asthma patients with: 1) an updated asthma action plan 2) documentation of spirometry performed (6 to 17years) and 3) an updated problem list reflecting current asthma severity. After hours calls to providers and types of office visits related to to asthma will be tracked. Contextual factors at the clinic and patient level will be examined to assess their association with the outcomes of interest. In addition, measurement of asthma-related quality of life and missed school and work in a sample of 200 subjects from each group will be performed If shown to be successful, this type of clinical decision support, embedded within the EHR, has the potential to be a powerful tool to improve the implementation of asthma guidelines and clinical practice guidelines for other conditions and illnesses.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALComputerized Decision support

Using a clustered randomized method, computerized decision support, embedded in the electronic health record, was offered to selected primary care practices and outcomes of asthma care were compared to those practices without the computerized decision support.

Sponsors

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
CollaboratorOTHER
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children with the diagnosis of asthma * Children enrolled in one of 10 selected primary care practices in the PeRC practice-based research network

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion of patients on appropriate asthma controller medication at the end of the trialassessed at each visiteach patient who is classified as having persistant asthma should be on at least one appropriate controller medication for asthma.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1) an updated asthma action planupdated at least once per yearEach patient should have an asthma care plan updated once per year
2)documentation of spirometry(6 to 18 yrs)in those with asthmaspirometry should be done once per yearEach patient should have had spirometry at least once per year.
3) an updated problem list that reflects an assessment of asthma severitytthe asthma severity should be on the problem listeach patient should have their asthma severity classification on the thier chart

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026