Skip to content

Randomized Clinical Trial of Ceramic Bearing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Five-Year Outcome of Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing Versus Ceramic on Crossfire® Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01522014
Enrollment
92
Registered
2012-01-31
Start date
1997-11-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2021-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Hip Replacement

Keywords

Joint Replacement, Health Related Quality of Life, Functional Outcomes, Revision Rate

Brief summary

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been a very successful surgical intervention in the geriatric population. Numerous studies have reported good mid and long term results of THA in patients over the age of 60 years. With the reported high success rate of this surgical intervention, the THA surgery is being performed in younger patients who have significant joint disease. A clinical trial, using a randomized blinded design, was undertaken to compare the functional outcome of 1) alumina heads/alumina liners, and 2) alumina head/Crossfire polyethylene liners in patients 60 years of age or younger with non-inflammatory arthritis of the hip. Subjects were assessed preoperatively and at one and five years postoperatively. Ten-year follow-up is currently underway. The primary outcome measure is the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Secondary measures were the RAND-12, as well as measurement of complication and revision rates. The patient's demand on the implant as calculated by the patient's age, weight, health status and activity level was also measured.

Interventions

DEVICESecure-Fit™ arc-deposited Hydroxylapatite (HA) shell - surface ceramic and an Alumina Bearing Couple (ABC) ceramic insert and Ceramic C-taper head
DEVICESecure-Fit™ arc-deposited hydroxylapatite shell, a Crossfire® insert and a Ceramic C-taper head

Sponsors

Stryker Canada LP
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females scheduled for primary THA to treat non-inflammatory arthritis * Less than 61 years old at time of surgery * Able to speak and read the English language or have an available translator * Dorr Index A or B bone quality on preoperative radiographs * Willing and able to return for follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Have femoral or acetabular bone deficiency requiring augmentation * Ongoing corticosteroid use * Dorr Index C bone quality on the preoperative radiograph * Required a prosthesis neck length of greater than five millimeters

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain ScoreFive YearsThis is a disease-specific, patient reported outcome measure of pain.
WOMAC Function ScoreFive yearsThis is a disease-specific patient reported outcome measure of function
WOMAC Stiffness ScoreFive YearsThis is a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure of stiffness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RAND 12-Item Health Survey (RAND-12)Five YearsThis is a generic patient-reported outcome measure of health status.
RAND-12One yearsThis is a generic patient-reported outcome measure of health status.
ComplicationsFive YearsThis measured the postoperative complications.
WOMAC Pain ScoreOne YearThis is a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure of pain.
WOMAC Function Scores10 years
Revision Rate10 years
RevisionsFive YearsThis measured the number of revisions in five years
WOMAC Function ScoreOne YearThis is a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure of function.
WOMAC Stiffness ScoreOne YearThis is a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure of stiffness.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026