Skip to content

A Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Ulthera System

Retrospective Evaluation of the Ulthera System for Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01519934
Enrollment
48
Registered
2012-01-27
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2017-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Laxity, Wrinkles

Keywords

Ulthera® System, Ultherapy™ Treatment, Ulthera, Inc., Ultrasound treatment for skin tightening

Brief summary

Up to 120 subjects within the study site's practice who have already had an Ultherapy™ treatment to the face and neck will be enrolled to monitor treatment effectiveness. Follow-up visits will occur at 90 and 180 days post-treatment. Study images will be obtained at each follow-up visit.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective, single-center clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of the Ulthera System for non-invasive treatment of skin texture and laxity six months after treatment. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, patient satisfaction questionnaires, and quality of life questionnaires will be obtained.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Ulthera, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, age 25-85 years. * Subject in good health. * Received Ultherapy™ treatment prior to or on October 1, 2011, and must have had pre-treatment baseline photographs taken. * Willingness and ability to comply with protocol requirements, including returning for follow-up visits. * Absence of physical or psychological conditions unacceptable to the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease that may affect wound healing. * Significant scarring in areas treated. * Open wounds or lesions in the areas treated. * Severe or cystic acne on the areas treated. * Inability to understand the protocol or to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of the SkinBaseline to 180 days post-treatmentDetermined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 180 days post treatment compared to pre-treatment baseline photographs. A panel of three blinded assessors reviewed pre-treatment and post-treatment photos. Each blinded assessor was provided an identical set of pre-treatment and Day 180 post-treatment photos to assess. The pre/post treatment photos were consistent in lighting, subject positioning and focus. The visit interval of each photo, i.e. pre and post treatment, was NOT marked. Each blinded assessor conducted their assessment independently with no input from another blinded assessor, comparing each set of photos. Each assessor indicated those subjects assessed as improved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Aesthetic ImprovementBaseline to 180 days post-treatmentOverall aesthetic improvement was assessed based on a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores; PGAIS completed by a clinician assessor, SGAIS completed by the study subject. The GAIS is 5-point scale (1-5) describing an overall assessment as follows: 1. = Very Much Improved 2. = Much Improved 3. = Improved 4. = No Change 5. = Worse
Subject Perception of AgeBaseline to 180 days post-treatmentPercentage of subjects rated as looking younger as measured using a Subject Perception of Age questionnaire.
Patient Satisfaction180 days post-treatmentPercentage of subjects reporting satisfaction as measured using a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects who had received an Ulthera treatment to the face and upper neck at two treatment depths at one study site were recruited for study participation.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ulthera-treated Subjects
All enrolled subjects will have received an Ulthera treatment prior to enrollment.
48
Total48

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUlthera-treated Subjects
Age, Continuous58 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
42 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of the Skin

Determined by a masked, qualitative assessment of photographs at 180 days post treatment compared to pre-treatment baseline photographs. A panel of three blinded assessors reviewed pre-treatment and post-treatment photos. Each blinded assessor was provided an identical set of pre-treatment and Day 180 post-treatment photos to assess. The pre/post treatment photos were consistent in lighting, subject positioning and focus. The visit interval of each photo, i.e. pre and post treatment, was NOT marked. Each blinded assessor conducted their assessment independently with no input from another blinded assessor, comparing each set of photos. Each assessor indicated those subjects assessed as improved.

Time frame: Baseline to 180 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ulthera-treated SubjectsImprovement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of the Skin67 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Aesthetic Improvement

Overall aesthetic improvement was assessed based on a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores; PGAIS completed by a clinician assessor, SGAIS completed by the study subject. The GAIS is 5-point scale (1-5) describing an overall assessment as follows: 1. = Very Much Improved 2. = Much Improved 3. = Improved 4. = No Change 5. = Worse

Time frame: Baseline to 180 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ulthera-treated SubjectsOverall Aesthetic ImprovementInvestigator GAIS78 percentage of participants
Ulthera-treated SubjectsOverall Aesthetic ImprovementSubject GAIS78 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

Percentage of subjects reporting satisfaction as measured using a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Time frame: 180 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ulthera-treated SubjectsPatient Satisfaction60 percentage of participants
Secondary

Subject Perception of Age

Percentage of subjects rated as looking younger as measured using a Subject Perception of Age questionnaire.

Time frame: Baseline to 180 days post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ulthera-treated SubjectsSubject Perception of Age60 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026